pushed ahead were branding it as the lisbon treaty three years later which contained many of the changes the constitution had attempted to introduce but this time the majority of the public didn't have a say because parliament simply ratified it island the only e.u. member which stuck with the referendum rejected this bill treaty but that was so didn't go down well with brussels but i believe we should not rush to conclusions believe the truth is a lie and we should now try to find a solution and despite a clear fifty three percent no vote the irish will back at the polls just sixteen months later for what must of felt like day finally the e.u. got the answer it was looking for yes. suppose to jump for joy what about greece the mediterranean country drowning in a sea of its own that its voters decisively rejected the terms of an international

bailout in two thousand and fifteen silly business i would like to say that the greek people made a historic and brave choice their response will alter the existing dialogue in europe but democracy worked in an unexpected way despite the greeks say no to a sturdy government a venture did agree to a painful bailout plan but what about the dutch who rejected plans by the e.u. to sign an association agreement with ukraine back in two thousand and sixteen. the court cannot just be ratified we have to take into account this no vote. well despite that the vote in brussels went ahead and did it only way so while many in the may vote to against the blocs hirings it seems that the e.u. prefer to have its own way with god less the elite made

a decision and now it's sixty to seventy years ago that in one nine hundred fifty four you know this started the whole thing was the european union and there is snuff then you can do against it is a european union is it's gotten it's got nothing to do with democracy it's not it's not decided by the people there's no european people european union words as a cartel of the governments of the u. governments you know they get together they make the solutions and i don't think there's even a. democratic spirit behind it you know it's just this is what we decide to leave eliezer it's not we the people. in the u.k. brics its supporters are now claiming there's a secret plot to keep the country in the european union after a demotion the government has set aside money for next year's eve you parliamentary election officials say the money is only there in case of an emergency. it's a precautionary measure so that we have the necessary funds to deliver our

functions as a european parliamentary election in the likely event that the do go ahead elections for the european parliament will take place next may two months after the u.k. is supposed to have left the e.u. and yet the u.k. has put aside some eight hundred thousand pounds for those elections well it's been almost two years since british voters narrowly chose to leave the e.u. since then the negotiations between london and brussels have encountered numerous stumbling blocks including over the irish border and while there's still no solution that satisfies all sides the e.u. says it wants more clear proposals from the british prime minister. we want to members just partnership with the united kingdom but for that we need realistic proposals from the u.k. a negotiation cannot be a game of hide and seek a downing street spokesperson said the reason is simply trying to get the best possible deal that would satisfy both sides and while you keep m.e.p.

mago parker believes british people are growing frustrated at how long it is taking the government to find a solution the british people if voted for this referendum have full expectancy to leave we're frustrated with our government being so slow in their negotiations you know we we find it very annoying very upsetting that they seem to be so slow every time i think they come to brussels brussels perhaps asks for something more and i'm afraid our government appear to be full of capitulation and they appear not not to be putting the british people first think this is a load of nonsense and i think if you were to put this back two years and say that would be this position people would say no. so they need to sort themselves out but i do think the british public are getting very very fed up with this lack of moving. israel's parliament is now discussing

a new law which would ban the filming of soldiers those behind the bill say that video of the i.d.f. sacked tiffany's can be used to damage the israeli army's reputation or the i.d.f. is frequently accused of using excessive force it's something though denied by the chiefs. these amateur videos i think should lay an aspects of the conflict that might otherwise not get brought up in the public debate here in israel and it's very important that we have that debate on the conflict the building clude some tough measures for example for photographing i.d.f.

soldiers with the intention of undermining spirit you can get jailed for five years but if the intention is to harm state security the maximum sentence is ten years we discussed the proposed law with several experts who say it goes against freedom of speech this is an absurd piece of populist legislation just meant to limit you constrain the freedom of speech and freedom of protest in israel something that contradicts the founding principles of this country and by the way this is very hypocritical as well because members of the right whenever settlers are evacuated they also filmed i.d.f. soldiers this is a time honored tradition in this country in this legislation goes against that. so. there cannot. you can never take them to call the figure is there and they think this is. this is. i'm against this.

law for this legislation because you know when you don't allow people to take pictures of solar jewels it starts it was thought to be your stock before the mall for a speech then you're moved. and or whatever this is the end of the markets that are coming up in just a moment here on this channel donald trump is accused of separating seven hundred mexican children from their families on the u.s. border is that accurate we're trying to shed some light in a moment. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy. let it be an arms race. spearing dramatic developments only i'm going to resist i

don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical time time to sit down and talk. with this manufacture consent to stick to the public well. when the ruling classes protect themselves. with the fines merry go round be the one percent. we can all middle of the room sit. in the real news is really. good to have you with us to. seven hundred mexican children have been taken from

their parents at the u.s. border with mexico since october so according to a new office of refugee resettlement report the issue has sparked public concern with people now accusing donald trump and his administration of violence accusations come after the u.s. attorney general said the policy would help to minimize child trafficking the policy was reportedly implemented more rigorously after this remark by the official also a call for the use of tough immigration measures as a deterrent meanwhile donald trump says that the policy of the democrats is to blame saying it all started long before he became president. put pressure on the democrats to end the horrible law that separates children from their parents once they cross the border into the u.s. catch and release lottery and change must also go with it and we must continue building the wall democrats are protecting emmas thirteen thugs trump came out and said the other day that bye bye once again disinter mation in chaotic tar that this

that this president is so adapted to and it seems to work in there in our media that he can say well it's the democrats' problem the fact the matter is that it was trump who destroyed dark it was trump who took away the ability of children that were born lived there most of their lives almost all of their lives here make them undocumented in the face of. this illegal government action of denying dr members membership to these people so really what's happening is that trump administration is now doing something it's against international law by taking away the rights of parents to be with their kids and blaming it on someone else which is the active that's what he does all of her own fortunately president obama has been the president has the forty most people from the united states and that is. very shameful fact along with the secretary of state hillary clinton at the time pillory

clinton the then secretary of state we always say as hundred one hundred community here in the united states that she has a lot of blood in her hands for promoting the violence the political mess that the levy their victory in the poverty that are the root causes of this massive migration however many now say that there is some truth in trump's words on the democrats and some of the evidence used to prove his administration's involvement turns out to have no connection whatsoever to the republicans for example this image of small children in a cage and sleeping on the floor caused shock waves and went viral it was assumed it showed the harsh consequences of trump's policies towards mexicans however in reality it has nothing to do at all with the dates back to twenty fourteen under barack obama's administration.

this picture of immigrant children sleeping on the floor of a cage have to be forcefully ripped away from their parents should be the defining image of trump's rage is trump's vision of making america great again a concentration camp spoiled with children torn from their parents' border it's time for parents remembering children. doesn't care about his own kids and so these kids matter even less to him. this is happening right now and the only tiebreak that matters is how we force old government to get these kids back to. families described as humanly possible.

millions of children in the u.k. and are living in poverty with teachers reporting they have to feed and clothe their pupils instead of teaching them red fish has released the first part of its report on the worst hit areas and you can watch the full video on red fisher's website or on you tube or facebook once upon a time the british government pledged to make child poverty history. is written in two thousand and eighteen place where millions of pounds of public money has just been spent on a lavish royal wedding but while inside this bubble fifty thousand pounds spent on a royal wedding cake outside of it the number of food banks to feed hungry kids is growing britain is also

a place where the dream of ending child poverty has been shattered london and birmingham are the areas hardest hit by child poverty here in the child poverty rate is fifty two percent twice the national average mr ali is in a wheelchair and lives on the tenth floor of the council estates. this is his fifteen year old son has. learning disabilities yet in the absence of proper care workers he's his father's main care. willing. school came to this country. the.

father of five martin moved to the u.k. along with his family in search of a better life but they have found themselves living in poverty and in overcrowded accommodation thanks to the stigma attached to living in poverty martin and his wife rachel tell their relatives they are doing fine at their request we have changed their names and blurred their faces. is very difficult but a family with five children. the most important. is this house problem. the housing charity shelter more than one million children in england live in bad or overcrowded housing the charity also estimates that one hundred forty families become homeless every day at the same time more than two hundred thousand homes lie empty at a combined worth of forty three billion pounds kids like joseph dream of

a better future. and for. full moon this christmas. because they might be facing. west thinks that white house problems so. it's the right thing to do. to give to to give room to live and. to have the right to have a good life. and live comfortably. nearly a year since the start of the saudi led blockade of cut out the wealthy gulf nation is hitting back the government in doha banned all imports from saudi arabia and other countries that have severed ties with qatar however many goods are still finding their way into qatar through other countries like kuwait and checks have

been announced to make sure shops are complying with the bat now the blockade of qatar was imposed last june by saudi arabia egypt bahrain and the united arab emirates they accuse cut out of funding terrorist groups diplomatic ties were severed and transport links with the country were closed but economist jack russell has told us qatar has managed to adapt to the sanctions. could tarp probably feels that the u.s. military bases near our are important enough that it can take reciprocal action but the outcome we're going to sit down and negotiate now from equal strength they have a lot of exports energy products and a lot of people will want to buy them so i don't think it'll have a long term target and the united states really doesn't want to come down on one side or the other given its policies now towards iran could turn of

a lot to offer other countries that don't really care about the feud with saudi arabia start. financial center that plugs that into the broader world and i'm i'm sure that saudi arabia is a little bit jealous about their access you know their connections and that's another source of saudi concern this is the international and a busy day for your worldwide headlines and your program will return at the top of the hour. survival guide thanks to. the start. get a. good repatriations look

at the rest of seven years. bill of the century kaiser report. fifty years ago breaking in with into a concert gun as a sleeping pill and dusty so don't leave because i like to just said this thought the scientific sweat terrible but not on the road as shown in dutch one troubled love more to hear not the war then boom boom up across europe victims are starting legal battles demanding at least some compensation in south in two ways first will the physical damage itself as well that the constant mind that the people who actually perpetrated this crime has never been able to justice and there has been a couple. who join me every first week on the alex simon chill and i'll be speaking to guests of the world of politics sports business i'm

showbusiness i'll see if that. well. this is the pat on the land. five years ago it was all grass. like that over there now and this is pumper going day in day out we didn't have any choice really we could have put it over that way or ways i mean we could have moved it a little bit. but we have to let the people who own the mineral rights get to those minorities and they compensated us for what they took here but the company built it and we have it now for own next forty years i'm guessing i don't own. my

house up there and there we have we used to have a beautiful view. now we have this to look at brings in a little bit of money very little if they took us out of here and get back all the money i made off of it's. going to happen. someday. you know on oil is all pumped out of the ground they will come back here

and level it all out and turn it back into farmland but that's you know like i said it's going to be out of most of our lifetimes be out of mind for sure. i have nothing to say about where. i should say i have nothing to say you can suggest but they don't have to listen to you don't mean you have no legal say in it put it that way so yeah they can put a wherever they want they don't need any your permission foreign oil industry follows a proper practices i don't think will have a problem but there's always that if me if they don't then we could have an issue in the biggest issue would be to do ground water as i see it when we live are in rural areas most of us depend on wells for our our drinking water and all the water we use in our old so if that would happen it would be a very bad thing. as

all that fraction job that's where they pump the sand the fluid inhale the chemicals they use as it is one they use a chemical called bio bio it kills all biological elements so so when they pumped out that off in a ground any kind of bacteria is going to kill any kind of living organism of any cat it kills it because of one of our guy has he. he has some of it on his hands and light and i disturb just won't his hand will bit because that's what my old bio bio kills biological. anything. i'm pretty sure is it's is run in the water. for history it is as is there nobody drinks the water out of oz or from north dakota i think everybody drank so bottled water you know it just is just like you ever. drop water on the out of the faucet night isn't this it is is

pretty nasty where fracking no oil org. this is allowed to be spilled on the ground if you make an a mistake and you drop one cup you have to clean it up and take it away with you it's not polluting north to cool the air is clean the water is clean. this is privately own land this is not government land i mean less the environmental protection agency fines scientific proof that there is real pollution going on they won't be able to shut this down. and so far there is no proof. there's just. propaganda. is it possible to respect safety measures tracking. down how to pin is advocating this notion and it attempt to avoid all risk of polluting groundwater it seems to

success is very unlikely. the question is me raised to express the intention of anti-fashion groups. one thing is certain the practice if i try the tracking to be as large quantities of drinking water. ten young is the owner of eclipse services a company that facilitates the shipping of water for fracking through pipelines and provides water storage and its huge tanks as well. these things for the youth to hold water for the fracking whole thirty five thousand barrels and so they'll pump water from one to the other until eventually it's over to the frac and down the hole. it's fresh water all that water thrown in here is coming out of the city water line so it's all clean water. so that's been millions of dollars on water for one frac is one of the biggest expenses one of these wells the frac. of

the water after the frac they just log back out of the ground and they all went off to a disposal still. right here this is called a flare natural gas comes up with the oil and so they have to get rid of it so they just burn it off right here the oil comes out of the pump jacks goes underground to the treaters and there it separates the oil the water in the guess this site your produce is more water than what they can pipeline out of here so i have to come in with a truck intricate out take it to disposal facilities. keep their lives sixty miles out of the list and on fort berthold reservation for black gold flows freely and accounts for one quarter north dakota's production. this oil

field isn't all that good for everybody we have secured land and we have virgin land here and now there's oil role with oil fields. at night some of these trucks to drive along gravel roads and they don't poison. fracking water it's all water and all these things into the ditch. because they're too lazy to drive to the dump station and that is going into our river going into our cricks it's going into our stock pond. this is not in the water but it is you know they're not telling the truth. i have twenty nine grandchildren i want them to enjoy this river where i didn't want them to walk in the water one can to catch a fish you can eat you know want to grow a garden and to do would have to worry about poison in the plant i want to have plants with better medicine that's not before and now because of the things that

are in the water. oil workers are best suited to judge the eventual pollution. this caused by fracking. unfortunately this problem is not a priority they are in survival mode first and foremost they are in need of work. during the drilling phase radioactive debris brought back to the surface is a major risk for workers and the environment some companies clearly are not concerned and do not hesitate just because of these toxic materials into wild dumps . especially teams are left to ship them back to suitable treatment states. in north dakota no one with an oil rich piece of land will tell you that fracking could be an environmental hazard. doing so could jeopardize one of the best ways to get rich quick. of

course all beautiful stories have been in rhetoric christmas two thousand and fourteen all science turned red thanks to saudi arabia the staggering fall of the price per barrel of oil will put it in and the moment of euphoria the us rise and the first producers of crude oil based the shale. in. we can feel the concern brought by the price cut everywhere and will is to now shows the science of a boom town going bust. people in this town are very very suspicious of oil booms because that almost always comes with a large bust and the bust to be rather difficult and now that i'm a part of this town i'm a little bit worried because we're seeing gas prices start to drop down and i'm wondering what's going to happen to my business because we have a message here. january two thousand and fifteen the price per barrel fell below the crucial fifty dollars mark.

in this little town here west and is a major major reason why the price of oil around the world is. coming down because the opec countries saudi arabia leading them there out there they're very scared by the. developments in hydraulic fracturing they know that the united states in the past five years went from importing something like sixty percent of the oil that we use down to thirty percent and that is a direct result of the hydraulic fracturing that's taken place like here and williston in the bach and in other areas they want to put these companies out of business. even if circumstances are worrisome these days i fear that he has not stopped after ten thousand the wells we still need to extract the millions of barrels lying beneath the bakken. this situation brings happiness to the ones for him for serious companies but it is devastating to the oil workers who are no

longer.