caution in those those were but that one potential interpretation of the term some have suggested john bolton's words were that of a veiled threat towards the leadership in pyongyang in the meantime a christie north koreans are planning a full day of meetings with u.s. officials do you think this is a positive movement and in the right direction you know i think that north korea has made. every possible juster to indicate that it's coming to the negotiating table attempting to actually hammer out a peace that will conclude ideally an ending korean war and it made every going to be a measure possible to not only had north korea released three korean american who were imprisoned in north korea in advance of this moment with donald trump of north korea all to destroy the nuclear testing site and fill in all of the different

weight it has indicated a visionary high degree of seriousness with regard to this government you cannot say that they unfortunately of the united states the message has been incredibly erratic and then you know as the typical for the trumpet ministration unmixed a very mixed message well some some of describe donald trump when it comes to selling peace he sells peace like a like a dodgy deal or as you say in some words he has flip flopped about the summit being on the summit being off that we have a james mattis saying that in the south china sea these military drills in that region will continue do you think do you think north korea has much wriggle room when it comes to negotiations with the u.s. as you just said john young has been making a vast array of gestures to to move forward with the potential peace process. north korea has in the post cold war period during

a lull during an historical area and which is actually a boom that it would be coming out of the cold but it would normalize relations with the united states and that being that both koreas would have the possibility of some form of you know haitian you know basically north korea. had you know it has made all of these. are gestures toward pursuing peace and with regard to be us end of things in terms of donald trump you know it's peaking about peace the fact of the matter is that donald trump as recently as last year was threatening north korea with total annihilation the other thing that just happened recently is the united states took part in an operation max thunder now according to the penguin john declaration that the two korean leaders basically released in april it stated that the two koreas and this includes

south korea in terms of the joint ward exercises with the united states that in terms of air land and sea that there should be no sort of nuclear threat the fact of the matter is that north korea has been within the crosshairs of the u.s. war machine it has known intimately what it means to be between a rock and a hard place in this impossible situation what is north korean done north korea done it's actually taken to the nuclear road and it's by developing a nuclear deterrent that north korea has actually created the conditions for peace talks at the very beginning of the year kim jong un actually stated that north korea was a peace loving nuclear nation as ironic or contradictory as that me down to many people in this wrong is a tremendous. true that it was. the nuclear pact that north korea

needed to wiggle room that was interesting here we are here we are seeing the russian foreign minister sort of jump in but here we are now witnessing the russian foreign minister sergey lavrov visiting north korea it does seem the some of the right players perhaps are coming to the table to try and really push this potential peace process forward christine hong a fellow at the korea policy institute grateful for your time and very grateful for your insight thanks for joining us here on r.t. international thank you for. the syrian president has for the first time responded publicly to the nickname given to him by donald trump this happened during an exclusive interview he gave to our. here's a quick preview. if anything the syrian civil war is growing hotter on the ground by child assad is winning the rebels and islamists are in retreat unlike their backers forces from five nuclear powers are now directly engaged in military action in syria each determined to win with

salvage what they can on the ground which makes the perfect ground for an escalation and escalation that no one wants but one that nobody would be able to control in the exclusive interview with r.t. syrian president bashar al assad has shared his thoughts on the coming future on the precarious dangerous and fragile months ahead and on the endgame of this devastating war with regards to the united states relation to would you president trump has called you quote animal asset you have a nickname for the u.s. president. this is not my language so i cannot through a similar language this is his language you to prevent him thing there's a very. no in principle that what you see is what you are three wanted to

prevent or to if. in any way. you didn't move anything and if this kind of language could move anything. in full for for anyone the only thing that moves you if the people that you trust the people who are liberal headed people who are thoughtful people or. if because that would move anything inside you with a positive or negative somebody like we will not inform all of this full interview with the syrian president premieres on this channel right after this bulletin after that it will be available on our website r.t. dot com.

the europe must be much stronger and makings with decision at twenty eighth can we around the table agree on tougher measures on these are china always the us and then the unfortunately easy answer to that so far is not to really europe has been too weak and that's why we have being beaten on the head sometime by the chinese some time but the american un does got to stop. what politicians do you sometimes need to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and should. somehow want to be it's. actually going to be for us to see what the full spectrum of more can be good that i'm interested always in the waters of our. first sit.

it is good to have you with us today a new artificial intelligence tool created by the university of southern california could potentially predict if a protest is going to turn violent by analyzing social media activity the program analyzed eighteen million twitter posts for moralized language during the twenty fifteen protests against police brutality in the u.s. city of baltimore it turns out there was a correlation between the number of arrests and the use of this kind of language moralized tweets doubled just prior to violent protests the ai tool to text texts evoking moral notions such as. fairness and loyalty here's an example of it in action why does their position speak on new broad black on black crime as

a rebuttal to police brutality all murder all crime matches right. regardless of how anyone feels pres to the police force in the family. in another study scientists polled around two hundred people on whether they condone the use of violence during the twenty seventeen class years in the us city of charlottesville over the removal of confederate monuments and they found that people were more likely to condone the use of violence if others shared their views well futurists are great scott believes violence of protests is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what artificial intelligence will eventually be able to predict. i think we're going to see more of this sort of predictive analytic behavior from ai in the future as ai develops so for example there's a new study that came out in front two years in human neuro science that shows that ai can predict behavior and traits just by looking at pupil dilation and eye

movements so what's happening is that date we have more data points now from social media but also from just the fact that we're quantifying ourselves and quantifying our society we have more data points and so the ai will be able to use that that set of data those data points to predict their behaviors and that's really the key in the story is is will the machines of the future be able to predict our behaviors before we even know what we're thinking and i think the answer is yes. iran is seeking support from the organization of petroleum exporting countries opec to which it belongs and getting the latest u.s. sanctions lifted but that's not the only way to iran is looking to protect itself it's also suing washington for its involvement in terrorist attacks in iran last year so i think donald trump was a key witness. and a small now the crimes of the i still terrorists have horrified people all over the world many people want justice to be served currently the islamic republic of iran

is preparing a legal case but against washington it's based on allegations that the usa was involved in the terrorist attacks in tehran in twenty seventeen which i still claimed responsibility for. that lawsuit might seem a little farfetched but they've got some pretty solid testimony here's the president of the united states on national t.v. isis is honoring. president obama he is the founder of isis he's the founder of ice i think will give hillary clinton the you know if you're a sports team most valuable player m.v.p. you get the m.v.p.

award i says will hand her the most valuable player award her only competition is barack obama now perhaps this was just a figure of speech maybe he meant that washington's irresponsible foreign policy decisions had resulted in the terrorist group emerging is said the president was the founder of isis i know what you meant you meant that he created the vacuum he lost the p.r. but he's the founder of rice as i do and there could be some more high level witnesses and a potential washington versus tehran case this is senator rand paul from kentucky had the president had his way or had hillary clinton had her way we may well have had isis in charge in damascus now because they have been arming and creating a safe haven for them as it is i think isis is more of a threat to us now because of the arming of the islamic rebels in syria iran is lawsuit may actually come across as a counter claim that it was the u.s. that originally took iran to court for alleged involvement in the nine eleven

attacks the quds decision is unacceptable and we reject it is not a new mockery of the system of international law but also more clear to the american people especially the victims of the september eleventh attacks and the families now the nine eleven commission found no evidence of any iranian involvement in the attacks the report simply states that the hijackers had traveled to iran without having their passport stamped it's a pretty tough sell but the u.s. courts bought it now as for iran's case we'll have to see if trump's word is actually a guarantee for success to be fair if donald trump's word is enough there's certainly a lot of criminal cases that need to be reopened remember what he said about ted cruz's father his father was with lee harvey oswald prior to ours where he was being. you know shot at so with all these. wrong word of the allegations that donald trump likes to make many of the bout time to get a disguise a fake name and hide out in the witness protection program. r.t.

new york we spoke to political columnist ted rall who believes tehran these days is winning more hearts and minds than his professional partners in the west iran is taking advantage of the fact that the united states doesn't have much of a leg to stand on when it comes to accusing other countries of supporting terrorism this is about pure politics and public relations in iran for those who have been paying attention i think has been winning that game that particularly is true given the fact that the truck administration recently called up the iran nuclear deal unilaterally which did not make the u.s. look very good certainly true to people who've been paying attention that the u.s. did have a role in the rise of isis it's a little simplistic to say that the us created isis that's not quite true but it certainly is true that when the civil war in syria began against president assad that the united states court of money and weapons into the hands of what would

eventually become isis so did the united states create isis not exactly but the united states certainly played a contributing role oh thanks for joining us so far here in r.t. international more of your worldwide news at the top of the hour. completely. lose. you never know what's around the corner you never know what's in the pub you can walk into any site excitement it's that not knowing that's where the adrenalin much comes from. and you can use

a nice clean definition and the extremes to will full support. the violence is a part and it's almost a schizophrenia gang culture where you can do all these things and behave badly. important people of course colorful but all. those more so focused on the last. punishment and infirmed. wall all this in the start. of a broader way enough i figure out i really did a poll down down went up with. the meaning reason is that beast if you don't win the involves it's constantly evolving in the. skies or financial survival guide. when customers go buy your supplies. in elf well reduce some of our. stuff that's undercutting not what's good for market

it's not good for the global economy. this is the president thank you very much for inviting this year for giving this opportunity having spent years now traveling to and fro syria reporting from here it is honored to finally met you but mr president should. first question you need just victories in good in yet a move they have drastically changed the situation on the ground in syria how much nearer the end of this war are we now in your estimation for all you all will come here. with every move forward in the battlefield with victory with really

been liberated we are moving closer the closer to the end of the conflict with it without external interference it won't take more than a year to settle the situation in syria but at the same time with every move forward for the syrian army and for the political process and for the whole situation forward in the positive meaning toward the most ability. or any means. opponents mainly the with the by the united states and in europe and in our region would be mercenaries in syria betray to make it father. by supporting more terrorism bringing more terrorists coming to syria or by him during the political process so our challenge is how can we make this guy up to close this gap between their plans and our plans and i think we are succeeding

in that regard but at the same time. for anyone to tell you when but it is getting closer that's have everything well you lead this military victories they have being objective the speaking spectacular the speed with which rebel defenses the stood for years of collapse you planning on taking all of syria by force we're talking about the border with israel as the you have control there do it. the war is the with the troops. i think if he didn't agree with the fact that you only have this choice especially when you talk about factions like. like like. and like minded factions actually most of them have the same ideology the harsh

comments or. they're not ready for it they don't have any political plan and they only have this ideological blood is that to be like any controlled area anywhere in in this world the only option to deal with both factions is forth. at the same time in other areas we succeeded by implementing the conciliation especially when. become unity in those different areas made pressure on both militants to leave the area so i think the best the choice is to make a conservation this is the old plan but when it doesn't work the only resort to use the force well with regards to we can see lesions how wise is it to send all of these veterans harvests with their small arms to italy by now

tens of thousands of tens of thousands of gone gone to live they have consolidated they have built the fences eventually as you say you will have to fight them on the other hand you perhaps planning on building an area that is outside of government control. you all of he will go to liberate it so it's impossible for us to to intentionally leave any. on the syrian soil. controlled as a government this is the natural and as you know it was captured by the. there is two thousand and fifteen with the turkey supports. it was it was mainly captured by a muscle and some of the supportive factions. very cause issues before that time but every conservation happened after that time after two thousand and fifteen it was i think may two thousand and fifteen every faction what the to leave.

the city or the village they choose to go to egypt. this is a very good indication but. they have the same ideology could be used to go to a b. or b. did you have to go to any other area so we didn't think people do it would they want to go to it live because they have the theme you could beat or they have the same atmosphere way of thinking and so on this one. the other part which is military speak of that of your question the plan of the terrorists and their masters was to destroy the syrian army by scattering the different units all over the syrian sword which is not good for any army or plan was to put them in one where you have three areas if you if you have two or three or four four two you've beter than having been in maybe more than one hundred forty of the think

that so militarily it is better they choose it but it's better for us from the military point of view on the other hand talking about similar mindsets it is predominantly the rebels the overwhelming sunni even as a sunni myself i have a long distant relative who. came to syria to fight against you to resist you because he was told that you would target you with killing soon and that is what many people. believe why is it that so many people in all these different countries in america in russia these sunni's these muslims they believe that you are oppressing because the first thirty of we need to started in turn internationally mainly in the with of course. within syria when in some mainstream media in our region and in the with. their plan was to create this rift within the

society that would make things easier for them when you have such a civil war kind of civil war between thanks or if the cities and the true. now the keep using the same narrative at least to encourage some fellow at the x. in different places in the world to come and defend their brothers in the theory of god that's how with the imagine imagine that this conflict between faith it's all because of the. not all minded way of thinking some maybe all the ignorant they came here just to support their fathers know if i'm going to do this is right or wrong your audience does it more if it doesn't know me the they don't have any idea maybe above my credibility. you know theory of it or will it's better to go and see the reality on the ground now give the order to validity in reality. thick skin in another state syria should be divided

according to sectarian lines you should come to this is beyond the old control and see one color or a few colors of the syrian society you have to go to the other where you have the terrorist you should have different gods and the reality is not like with now in damascus in early pour in homs in. every area under the theory and the syrian government control you would see every spectrum of the syrian society with no exceptions so that this reality will debunk this narrative. how could they be with each other why the government is killing them according to sectarian. basis it doesn't work. they're enough but with regards to. the reconciliation. talks of there have been efforts to start

talks to achieve a result in geneva in as the now there has been limited success but it is been hasn't been all that great now let's be honest you're winning you're winning on the ground your forces are advancing the rebels are in retreat why would june negotiate with them now that they're losing. the very beginning we think whenever we can fifth theory and blow through we have to go. ford and the would be thin it with any initiative any kind of initiative even if you if they have bad will some people some some initiative have have bad will but in spite of that we deal with the reality now if you go around theory of the reality the result. that's been embodied by. very conservations is a proof of what i'm saying without this policy with this intention of having blood negotiating talking to people we couldn't have reached this week on solutions.

this is one thing and the other thing not everyone for the government have the same basic some of them have ideological background some of them poor financial background some of them be made mistake of the very beginning they were forced to go in that direction and they couldn't with a do so you have to open the doors and you have to distinguish between different kind of people and the most important than the if the majority of the people who were against the government the government at parentline in the different debilitated area actually in their heart they are with the government could the because they are the difference between having government and having cable with regards to talks and you know retaking areas by force let's take for example is the have controlled territories in there is or there have been clashes there between troops who were loyal to you and the s.d.f.

itself he lied to his partners and the united states brought to bear force to stop the troops will to you from taking territory this is happened as well how are you going to deal with the united states presence military presence in syria. after the liberation of aleppo and later deal with the war and before that hans could actually united states is losing his sky. it's they've been called worth. that was called moderate but when the scandal started leaking that they're not more that they are of that was supposed to be fought by united states they look for another court this god is the if now because when as it seems as you just mentioned we are moving forward in different areas to defeat the terrorist. the only problem lift in syria this is the if we're going to do that by two option the first one we started

now opening doors for negotiations because the majority of them are syrians. and supposedly they like their country. the don't like to be puppets to any foreigner that we supposed so we have the same basis. we all don't trust the americans for decades because of the war will be only three thing and they do the opposite of dick they lead our youth so we have one option is to live with the childbirth even like for ever this is the first option if not we're going to resort to liberating by force to leave it in both areas by force we don't have any other options with american or without americans we don't have any other option so this is all learnt it's all right and it's a duty to liberated and the american should leave somehow they're going to leave they came to you lot with no legal pieces and look what happened to them they have

to learn that this iraq is no exception and syria is no exception people will not accept foreign of the ndis we can any. well you know the cars they were kind of adopted because we were called pirates took so long. i mean they're in the smaller boats next to the harbor one ships and it's still very. much on. the limited shelf to be told fish already ninety percent of the dock and a ball in the collar. cons fifteen scoops.