from the world cup to world war three foreign policy it shares the spotlight with domestic issues during in the sixteenth q in a session with the public. also the u.s. congress debates a new war frys ation bill introduced by some of its loudest critics and although it would significantly expand the president's power to launch military operations. we've gone through seventeen years of war. you would drop this proposal will have one hundred seventy more a loaded gun and a desk drawer of the president ready for him to take it out and shoot it whatever it was. called britain's upper parliament the house of lords parade today over members forming asleep during sessions we get to it we get reaction from the

streets of. the space i would be allowed if i went to work say why she thought i'd love to be paid for having a kid in my long day or just listening to other people all day long but. hello good evening she's gone six o'clock here in moscow you're watching r.t. international. now from domestic issues to the consequences of a third world for russia's president has wrapped up his annual televised q. and a session with the public this time it lasted over four hours. breaks down the highlights. some of the things that really stood out was what vladimir putin had to say about foreign affairs for example putin recently presented a snood of super weapons we're talking here about bigger more powerful foster

nuclear missiles but they stick missiles and one viewer challenge vladimir putin saying you know does this stuff really exist there are those who doubt new russian weapons are soon going to be put into service back in two thousand and four they were doubting the oven guard system but now we see it in syria and that's not everything that we're planning to produce and put into service as i said in my address it's too early to talk about it but we will speak out soon the president stress that this isn't about saber rattling or waving your guns around or you know measuring anything with anyone but this is about parity this is about making sure that russia has a deterrent that new enemy no potential opponent can overcome russia. here another particularly worried. that timea putin how close we are to world war three will need to change the in a moment don't because you know you can recall einstein's words he said i don't

know with what weapons world war three will be fought but world war four will be fought with sticks and stones with the understanding of the fact that world war three may be the end of modern civilization must deter us from extreme actions on the international scene all this war talk and fears is no surprise given current tensions between the east and the west people are you know where is this going to end when is this division going to end these sanctions these restrictions and that we're putin said that they won't and till we will treat each other as equals until nations learn to respect each other and to compromise that he pointed to the trade war that has just erupted between your. the united states saying that the new tariffs that washington has slapped on the europeans which of made them very unhappy those aren't so much tariffs as they are sanctions as minister of one of

the french government's ministers recently said that the us shouldn't be allowed to become the economic policeman of the world and he spoke about it publicly the former german minister of finance publicly said that germany hasn't been a fully sovereign state since one thousand nine hundred five everybody can see what's going on but probably our partners thought it would never affect them that kind of politics is counterproductive the politics of limitations and sanctions let me putin also spoke about the upcoming world cup due to kick off in about a week in all over russia really andy said that the russian team lately hasn't hasn't played as well perhaps as a somewhat expected and he said he hoped that now that the world cup is here they'll really show what they've got. us congress is set to decide whether to widen the war powers don't trump the new bill would let the president do to decide

who and where to fight with critics warning that capitol hill is formally giving away its control the bill did meet face resistance on wednesday. we've gone through seventeen years of war. you would drop this proposal will have one hundred seventy more a loaded gun in a desk drawer of the president ready for him to take it out and shoot it whatever it wants and it will put war making on autopilot do i want my sixteen year old going to war against al shabaab in somalia my boys have never lived in a country that has not been for both of them my son probably can't find. and probably very few people even in this room know who came korver prowesses there are no limits on war let it be known that there were at least some of us who warned. the new bill seeks to replace the two thousand and one authorized ation act among other things to grants the president the right to include new groups on the

terrorist list without informing the public some have expressed surprise that a lawmaker behind the bill claimed that congress had been granting a license to wage war for too long u.s. media scoffed that legislators don't even know what is in their own bill despite the bill extending the president's war powers is what the bill's authors think about don't trump. the president has great difficulty with for a. moment he's proven himself. unable to rise to the occasion and you know who i don't trust. i wonder donald trump. donald trump doubted lee they like the idea of the president being some sort of a king we go to war when he wishes what a disconnect here you have these two and many others in washington calling trump in a mentally unstable and all sorts of even worse things and then you want to give him the authority to go to war when he wants crazy war is what washington that's

made of war is washington's number one export discography officially throwing up its arms and saying you know what we give up it's all over we're just going to sit back sit in front of the camera collect our paychecks and do nothing. now in a bid to win back his trust facebook is flashing eyes on the series of news programs exclusively for its for the a streaming service. i . i hear you say that. i'm shepard smith on facebook live with the promise i will circle seen as live nightly newscast here on feast day i was coming out of this i include our public corruption is all around. i i. well as you've seen there the shows will be produced by us based media outlets from

different sides of the political spectrum from c.n.n. to fox news and it's reported to you that the social media giant has set aside something like nineteen million dollars for the project but despite its rapidly growing involvement with the mainstream media back in april chief executive mark was reluctant to acknowledge the platform's pivotal role in the news industry. are you are you a tech company or are you the world's largest publisher do we feel responsibility for the content on our platform the answer to that i think is clearly yes. but i don't think that that's incompatible with fundamentally at our core being a technology company where the main thing that we do is have engineers and build products. so let's get. the media lawyer and he's with this is evening stay very welcome thanks for your time what are your thoughts about facebook's investment in these new shows she think it will regain some public trust in the company.

well i think we went. straight to. the charts different feet with any. whine because when there are two branches of news organizations based on their interest in the facebook itself is an echo chamber so certainly getting more established news sources to feed into that content will help that goes some way towards convincing news in the morning. that there is going to be quite a broad spectrum of opinion as facebook inevitably one of the largest news publishers in the whole world do you think there will be a broad spectrum though of news outlets that i mean a pretty much just ones we get on the american network anyway the pretty much mainstream and i just wondered previously whether perhaps they might be active touch with their users who get their news from perhaps alternative sources on the internet one thing when they started out against

facebook. changed general say corporate content of content used content and events anyway ozomatli the wisdom of the crowd is going to win out and it's going to be the base again to assign how much trust they say here. and you can. assess it harder to assign calls at the same time context but it may not so great and so you like anything you know a lot of that works is very interesting concept and it's going to be in their interest right now content relevance. yeah we apologize for the quality to our viewers stay with terribly well but i think we can just catch what you're saying it was think with it facebook says it will have full editorial control too is there a danger here that they're just going to essentially so the phaseout are filter out

news that perhaps seen a people might suggest they don't agree with. i don't think it's in their interest . perhaps it lay in our whole number of different reasons. more than anything else more than moderates the more they become responsible for that content so ultimately it is a bit of a game but won't see it but certainly the idea of having all the voices in the conversation should be welcomed and finally. in terms of the power now that facebook has main it's sort of gone up a notch doesn't it in terms of its regulating the news that people can see and it has millions of users on facebook it's a powerful publisher. well it is a powerful publisher but it is a victim of its own success in that regard and it's getting used to responsibility . for what it's thought. responsible.

like everything else it's going to. start it's a little of what this. ok look steve we're going to leave it there. i'm going to have to interrupt you because the actual quality of your feed is so bad i'm afraid we keep breaking up so that we did catch the gist of what you were saying there we appreciate your time of a sequence of it's a media lawyer thank you. now there are fresh concerns the meeting between the u.s. and north korea may be off again we've got the details on that plus other stories after the break. and still to. come. i've been saying the numbers mean something they matter to us is over one trillion dollars in debt more than ten white collar crimes happen each day. eighty five

percent of global wealth you longs to be ultra rich eight point six percent market saw thirty percent rise last year some with four hundred to five hundred trades per second per second and bitcoin rose to twenty thousand dollars. china is building a two point one billion dollar a i industrial park but don't let the numbers overwhelm. the only numbers you need to remember in one one business shows you can't afford to miss the one and only boom bust.

welcome back he with art international in the u.k. members of the house of lords have been given a slap on the wrists over their behavior a memo has reportedly been sent to complaining about shouting ordinal conversations and also forming a sleep while in the chamber. explains why the parliamentary snooze is a such a sensitive issue. most members of the house of lords which is the chamber of the british parliament have been around the block for quite some time the average age in the lords chamber is sixty nine and from the breadth of their experience the lords job is to scrutinise british law and that can be pretty tiring so much so that even the most hardworking and conscientious lords and politicians can get a little sleep paid.

well rumor has it that the lords have now received a quiet telling off for falling asleep in the chamber according to the times newspaper a conservative peers have received an email telling them that their behavior and there isn't up to scratch and it said that the other political parties are sending a similar reprimand to their lords but according to established parliamentary convention peers are allowed to quote rest their eyes so i'm armed with photos of sleeping lords all sleepy looking lords and i want. londonistan help me determine which of these are just resting their eyes and which are most definitely

in the land of nod. he might be resting his they've just been told off for sleeping too much in the chamber guys lost control of his neck so he's definitely sleeping but i think he'd be asleep and he might be resting but i don't know their own just looking down as an e o's is ok not guilty not guilty what about what about these to . rest in his eyes they should be allowed to have a little clip in the chamber that's lots of hard. scrutinizing measures i would think this place i would be a letter and that if i went to work so why should i'd love to be paid for having a kid in my office think they should be allowed to have a little kip in the chamber were they well as far as i'm concerned they're all gentlemen and they deserve a little bit. long day just listening to other people all day long so they get on a bit but. now the highly anticipated meeting between the u.s.

and north korea leaders is in jeopardy again that after crude comments made by donald trump's lead attorney former new york mayor rudy giuliani about kim jong un getting on on his quote hands and knees. on the back on his hands and knees and beg short which is exactly the position you want to put him in where pyongyang has yet to react as you did undiplomatic comments there however many already do fear that they have perhaps ruined the talks already this is a great way to derail the summit in seoul and humiliate the man you're about to meet with well that's the end of the singapore summit time to damn giuliani trying to stop him summit by insulting him. ok well the summit between the two leaders was initially confirmed by the white house back in march but in the middle of may kim threatened to end the goshi ations blaming military drills by south

korea and also the u.s. response didn't take long just nine days later he canceled the meeting however the very next day the white house announced talks on the summit are actually ongoing as p.r. gang stated its will to meet well on the first of june washington officially said that the summit will take place as showed you will so what will happen next will be can they get the thoughts learnt it's an international china specialist and he joins us this evening good evening to you andrew thanks for being patient and waiting on the line for us no response yet from pyongyang but what sort of response do you think we will get. well i think that the the the bottom of the story you've got to understand that this kind of meeting will happen if either side if one of the two size doesn't want it. and why president tom wants it because he wants to appear to score a victory before the elections and he wants probably the. prize as well for that

matter. don't forget that. had been very very. religion and against any u.s. coalitions in the past in phase of donald trump's socor cocked and loaded fire and fury and yet john never stood firm so why is john and doing it now is because his knowledge confident that he will be able to get a good deal because he has developed his capability to deliver long distance. missiles on u.s. home soil so once it's got that that's his insurance policy. and he does then and. also all this rhetoric about how and he is is just kind of so serving the tube so at the back of it all both sides want it ok

both sides want it but doesn't it sort of show you the feeling the house from the trump's camp that his attorney would say such a thing or do you think it's separate to trump's thoughts. think we lost the line there with and that might explain paul we were talking over each other just a couple minutes ago i was on freedom will leave it there for now that was international china specialist thank you. now then a pensioner from northwestern russia has decided to give away his entire life savings and all to help others have a better stuff have a look at this. and their sheer. damn scary horror. reach.

their eyes reaches his ear or. are here now. birthrates are here whether for. a horse out or the sorrow that. he. has. plans for more daycare are doing are you. a better soldier over here and show you more of our provider of calm or are you of .

the new me when is money didn't know him before and from the documents we knew that he just turned eighty five and so we decided to get to know him. ok well i'm pleased to say i think we can go back to our guests and really learn who's a china specialist international specialist to andrey good to have you back on sorry about the technical problems we had a couple of minutes earlier we were talking about the impact that comments giuliani's comments could have perhaps on this summit between kim jong il and president trump you were saying you don't feel it might be a negative influence but what i was saying earlier is that doesn't it express perhaps the sentiment coming from the trump camp anyway. why i don't think there's such a remark is going to change the game because at the end of the day you've got to

understand that now both sides want it personal trauma wants it because he wants to appear to score a victory. ahead of the term elections in november also probably got a nobel prize as well and then as for. control in don't forget he stood firm in face of president trams socor cocked and loaded fire and fury i mean in spite of all this the threats of our military operations. stood very firm until he developed his nuclear capability that always become more confident as able to concentrate on the economy so both sides want it and i don't think that this remark which is self-serving rhetoric about kim jong un you know sort of crawling on his knees and backing for for a summit i think is a bit of a soul searching rhetoric but at the end of the day at the back of it or both sides

want to ok what can we expect then from this meeting do you think. well i think that. the united states is not going to. hand over everything it's not going to live all the sanctions and source of all because strong would be seen as. scoring a very bad deal and instead of a victory is it's going to be seen as a defeat and that's the last thing he wants so he's going to. put maximum pressure demanding the maximum but on the other hand his maximum is not deliverable by. can join because the last thing i want is to give up all his insurance policy which assists you could capability so i think that the whole thing has got to be managed by states in a sense that both sides would first feel confidence show some signs of a neutral kind of agreement to cooperate a kind of gradual does the as collations stage by stage so that one side takes us

step the other side takes us there. and all these a gradual process of building trust and ideally the deal needs to be supported and guaranteed by other powers and namely china and possibly russia because at the end of the day this talk about the libya mortal and also it's not giving to give in any confidence especially. the trauma mr ministration is now tearing apart the a nuclear deal with iran so i think there is a question of how much the control in can trust someone like you know the trauma administration so i think that the deal needs to be guaranteed by third parties and it's going to be based on mutual does the end of the as an escalation and deliverables stage by stage avert a viable but deliver but manage on both sides sort of both sides would gain the

confidence now can join in is concentrating on its economy and it's now recently. launch asking china at the develop. a large number of economic zones so he's not going to concentrate on his quality but still he wants the insurance policy which is pretty and is prepare only to give up give it up gradually provided that the united states can deliver the lifting the economic sanctions and bringing the north korean economy back into the fold ok and really good to get your insight we'll leave it there for now that was an international china specialist thank you. thank you. thank you for watching at home that's how are things looking so far today here on our table but with more than thirty five.

church secret indeed priests accused of sexually abusing children can get away with it quite literally i like to call this the do graphic solution. what the bishop needs to do then he finds out that the priest is is a perpetrator is simply moves him to a different spot where the previous standard was not the highest ranks of the catholic church conceal the accused priests from the police and justice system to that that's not going to. apply for many years so i know the game and so i got. the ball isn't only about what happens on the pitch for the final school it's about the passion from the fans

it's the age of the super manager. this and spending two hundred twenty million on one player. it's an experience like nothing else on here because i want to share what i think of what i know about the beautiful guy a great so well more chimes for. and thinks this minute. the reason we call these our ships is because they're a ship just sail on the seas of tomorrow that's kind of why we call it that they're

not a house house needs power lines coming in and gas lines coming in and so we had lines going out and water lines coming in. a nurse ship is a bessel or machine that provides all of these things there are six things that humans need on this planet they need water they need comfortable shelter that doesn't use fossil fuel they need electricity they need to treat their sewage and someway and they need to treat their garbage in some way and they need food these housing units called earth ships address all of these things all over the world and these are the same six things that humans all over the world need to have addressed . living in the ship community here in the greater welds there's about there's more than seventy houses about one hundred forty people with families living here you know. what when i was little i used to feel like some kind

of like. a fairy a living there because you know it's so very. very organic very like you need let's say something like i was a woodland fairy living man a secret castle and. it feels really good feels really solid and there's this sense of solidity living inside an earthen structure itself there's this sense that. waking up to something stable. and cooling can see the little to. trent than waking up in a house that's needed conventional materials. because a little more connected to the outdoors as well even when you're indoors but it's quite comfortable i think to like a few people can i compare you know being in a suit to a warm or in a sense to you know sweat lodge but once you're inside of it you do feel much it you feel that your needs are being taken care of.