states say you can't go off the grid unless you pay taxes or they tax you on solar panels they're trying to do a lot of laws to still control people. here in the aware that unlike the central florida area and they. live in completely off areas and they came in and like. you could live there anymore and i made her when i get back on the grid. and i just think it legal to like catch water on a lot of areas. yeah you know yeah especially for even like for drinking forget it . i guess you just have to do a lot of work around with the more developed the country is the more difficult it is to do these kinds of things that it's industry and government isn't necessarily and certainly not a lot of times looking out for the people. for their own interests and yeah absolutely us to looking out for their money for money i mean we elected donald

trump for good say. it's all about money in the u.s. it's all about money. that's the only thing that matters i mean it's it's nice to go to other places where they're not so industrialized and developed where there are more accepting to these kinds of ideas. so some of the more challenging places could be the u.s. or europe. like. yeah. yeah. i think that. one of the fundamental things that mike has been fighting for is to get alternative and experimental building except in locale. state wide in national building code it's easier for people to develop experimental harms not just earth ships and now

it's t.v. mascaras scrutinizing that all over again and tell him not to continue working on this sustainable development cast say sero. it's sad to see that that would be a lie protheroe are now in terms of acceptance and all this and found. it's still a struggle. that. new mexico is known for having tested you know nuclear bombs for a long time and well michael reynold tried to do is to basically say if we're able to you know blow these bombs why are we not able to build alternative buildings that don't necessarily you know go to codes but that makes sense and function better than in buildings to really know if they if they do try to stop humans from

getting sun getting rain. getting when and if they do try to stop that they will have an uprising like they have never seen before i'll die fighting for their. so the first ship is just providing a very clean sustenance that is in countering the phenomena of the planet in a way that that it could make people become more a part of the planet like trees our trees are really part of the planet you can imagine a planet without trees so i would like to see if you can imagine a planet without people but the way the people are treating the planet now i like to imagine a planet without people because they're destroying it i want people to evolve into their real potential and that potential is actually being a part. of

the plate for many flips over the years so i know the game inside guides. football isn't only about what happens on the pitch for the final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the superman each of killian erroneous and spending to twenty million one player. it's an experience like nothing else on to

because i want to share what i think of what i know about the beautiful game like great so one more chance with. a nice minute. think you see a good. mood in this is in the church secret indeed just like priests accused of sexually abusing children can get away with it quite literally i like to call this the geographic solution so what the bishop needs to do then he finds out that the priest is is a perpetrator is simply moves him to a different spot were the previous standards not known the highest ranks of the catholic church help conceal the accused priests from the police and justice system to that end i know that's not as the i intend then i think lawyer that it is this

out and. filed. this. case path. president if it. turns are high ahead of friday's g. seven summit in canada with world leaders in gauging and tough talk over new u.s.

tariffs and donald trump saying that he is ready to fight over the. world cup two world war three foreign policy he shares the spotlight with us to get shoes during one of your proteins and sixteenth q. and a session with the public. and time for a wake up call the british parliament or the house of lords is over a member falling asleep during sessions. the space plan i would be let's have a nap before i went to work say washington state i'd love to be paid for having a campaign in my office long day they just listening to other people all day long so they get none of it so i let them have. we can go to our tea dot com for more on the latest headlines up ahead sophia and co talks to a member of the british parliament on you care russia relations and what comes next after breakfast it was.

sort of that shevardnadze the controversy surrounding the poisoning. has plunged relations between moscow and london into another crisis what is the way out of the deadlock while i ask lord peter truscott a member of the u.k.'s house of lords and former member of the european parliament . and you're. it's between the u.k. and russia is widening following this republic ace london is running its european neighbors against moscow lobbying for new sanctions and a joint diplomatic effort but with the u.k. on its way out of the european union county council on the continent of its back how does going to brussels for him go along with a tough break that negotiations and will the new anti russian moves actually accomplish anything for the united kingdom. lord peter truscott welcome to the show

it's really great to have you with us now had i met five recently said that the kremlin is to chief protagonists in the complaint to undermine the west while the russian government want that i mean the e.u. being russia's number one trading partner means that russia can be strong with the west being weak well i think you know this is this is this is the sort of the position of not just the u.k. government but other other governments as well in the west i think it's sort of unfortunately spot of the this historic patent of wanting to contain russia and seeing russia as an opponent on this is really goes back to the formation of nato really in the one nine hundred forty s. which was established as an anti soviet military pact in those days and of course there was that there was a hope that things would improve on after the fall of the berlin wall and the breakup of the soviet union but unfortunately about housing but hasn't developed as

many people hoped you even have people like james baker the former u.s. secretary of state saying in one thousand nine hundred three that russia could perhaps join nato and that i think there was a lost opportunity there at the end of the calamity like broke into the u.s. our side joining nato is nato was originally created to counter soviet union and big part russia i mean medo in itself with russia and it is absolute doesn't make any sense anyway so the guardian has reported that u.k. is planning to use upcoming summits like the g seven g twenty nato and the e.u. gatherings to tighten the diplomatic front against russia do you think the foreign office will succeed. look i think i just did it just going back to the just going back to the whole nato thing i think if nato was norm's. pact designed to counter russian the soviet union there's no reason why this as a collective security organization that russia couldn't join not think about what's

the point point about russia joining nato or not joining nato and i think president putin has has talked about that. so it's not beyond the realms of possibility well you know i think i think times times are changing you know i mean since the second a war they have british foreign policy has basically been to keep close to the united states as possible on the clear reasons for that britain relied on the united states from that perspective to defend them against the strength of the soviet union and that was the first and british policy has always been that if we wanted to influence will the phase we needed to stay close to the united states an un trying to influence them through to our advantage but the world has changed i think the the will that existed before where you had one hyper power off of the fall of the berlin wall and breakup of the soviet union or the united states is no longer the case you have rising china where it's already the population john is almost one in six of the world's population it's already overtaken the united

states in economic terms in terms of. spending power and. you know the actually standard living in terms of the growth that's down to living in china the growth of the economy so the world is changing and i think the united. kingdom needs to bear that in mind when it comes to assess the foreign policy for the future so i feel like you know russia being this infernal anime is like at very confortable thing to have for many western countries for many razors force and u.k. defense secretary kevin williamson has recently appealed for more defense funding citing russia's resurgence under putting and you may remember his predecessor michael fallon using the very same language. asking for increased a fan spammy i mean that this is russia card work like flawlessly every time here are the fan secretaries just happy about putin's emits fitting their budgets well i mean the first thing is the u.k. defense forces they're underfunded i mean the army has not been as small since the

time of the napoleonic war but i think you need to get this in perspective nato spending already is collectively twenty times out of russia so russia is in terms of its spending on military forces is still some way behind nato as i say there has been this sort of ratcheting up of rhetoric in terms of the security threat that russia poses but i mean the world is actually facing a bigger threat from say international terrorism which clearly we've seen both on the streets of british cities and across europe and indeed in russia and notably of course in the middle east so i would say that the greatest threat to the existential threat to the west and other countries in the world is actually international terrorism and there are other areas that we need to work together fighting for example the global trade in drugs people trafficking and there are areas where we need to work together to bring peace notably syria iraq is still an

issue afghanistan and the latest example in north korea as well where president trump and his administration is working to achieve good denuclearize ation in the korean peninsula these are all areas that we should be working together not focusing on what is effectively cold war rhetoric sometimes for from both sides and we need to actually move away from that and some of the rhetoric has not been very helpful in terms of engagement on to in terms of developing a will peace so how far do you think london will go in confronting russia can it afford to i mean for instance cut financial ties with russia all together with all they were russian investment in the u.k. do you think they can do that. well i mean russia is not a major in would invest the the u.k. and the united states is major and would invest the fronts for example of a you country's major investors but it will have a disproportionate effect if for example russians do not invest in the u.k.

we've already seen that every move it has said that he'll council the one billion pound development of a football stadium in west london which will fit about local economy and the london economy so there will be a cost to taking this sort of action of course i'm not against the u.k. or other countries fighting an influx of dirty money because we all know where the oligarchs in the early ninety ninety s. got their money from with the breakup of the soviet union and a lot of the wealth business applied to russia ended up in the hands or in seasons because you just brought him up as an example because he's money seems to be quite transparent clint what do you read into or not promote his work this end up being renewed in the u.k. is this a very first of many more refusals to come.