things and the end of the day it's who is in the best form and that guy that dictates how russia place. so three mil and really just chaotic scene syrian central moscow this point deafening cheers from that from the crowds below us then there's just the flick and you start to wonder is there a comeback on when this happened this is in the seventy third minute so that the golden man for egypt is pulled down most along the referee gives a free kick and this is where we saw vulcan in things first of all what a finish that water what a confident penalty kick that is you know it doesn't matter what the goalkeeper does in that situation that you pick the right side well i'm going to put it out there because the gold a very very rarely pick the right guy so i guess an absolute perfect example on how supposed to work the referee things like free kick but he gives is committed outside the box so the rules are that the assistant he then says we have to have

a look oh i can tell you that was inside the box he cannot argue the decision the referees already done that so that can't be changed but the plays where the offense was was made can be changed and first ok the free kick then you listen to the assistant and then he was in realize you inside the box straight away get a penalty no complaints from anyone. this might not have had a major impact in this particular game but this could be you know very significant in a later match especially in the knockout rounds this is one of those incidents where sometimes you don't get the penalty should a done and you complaining that cost you the tournament i think and if i can tease a little bit for the pain is right the show goes out tomorrow we actually have and this sort of we try to explain exactly what it is. we've been to fee for and ask the revelent relevant people. to to put us in the picture and we're looking past. a

little bit on on how the decisions has been made some of them have been good this one was absolutely perfect and so exactly to the letter often though and the intent of so i have to commend the referee and the assistant that's what he's called this is before about referees i have to commend them i thought they did really well i'm just starting to smile because in previous world cups i was thing this kind of an iconic item you know we had to visit his in a moment previous to order and i think rapidly becoming the iconic item of russia twenty eighteen could be the mustache if maybe it's going to be the mistress of victory the way things are going it's the chip a chance so from a stance there it is everybody wants to beat the russian manager because he has the golden touch you know this was a gimmick started by a late night russian t.v. host i wanted to show support for studies of chess of who we're still going to see smile at an f. and yet. and everyone's been encouraged to go first that's a semi smile i would say. that's when he has at his very very i was probably on his

wedding day i think the focus is this is good you know this is this is binding people together it's like a common denominator their way they were they everyone talks about the world cup and they have this they see that that's it. that's going to be a bestseller now i'm sure that that's going to be more of a popular you know he he is a hero at the moment for russia of course is every decision that he has made has been the right decision and every self to choosing his mate has paid off and has actually worked to eighty four for him so so far the russian manager is a hero off of the russian team of course he can talk about the cherry shifa score three goals and zuba but you need someone to lead and he has done that and when he picked the squad and people forget that the picture of really old fellas picked fellows that had retired from international football and still is working i saw they were excellent today again like they were when the e.u. think. thirty year old sent home from his muscle some people saying the best friend

well. he got a kick from the front seat pretty impressive tax plan the well i said oh no i'm doing something to say some people some people i think it's our legs who are whose accidents and people are watching the shows he's a massive new crew supporter and he obviously he's been watching he's actually been saying you know he's watching this with two hearts which i don't understand anything off alexa countries just want to games what's out on a. i. you can see that people are walking out from the stadium well maybe not as loud at the moment but there are bits and pieces of them chanting russia russia. celebrating this victory and last night i spoke to a lot of egyptian fans a lot of russian fans they both told me that when you lose are still going to be a massive party on the russian side it's clearly obvious that the party will be massive egyptians will see whether they will paci well they will live up to that

promise and party as well but undoubtedly the atmosphere is building up already a lot of people here a lot of jubilation and the same goes for the stadium itself the level of support from the russian national team supporters was absolutely unheard of. everyone's happy here so it's absolutely unheard of in a sense that at luzhniki at the opening game five nil demolition of saudi arabia there were very loud but yet very monotonous this time they were actually songs that were actually dances in the stands and something along the lines of what you mentioned earlier peter that maybe this is something that the lessons that they have learned from the visiting supporters from all over the world particularly from latin america but we're expecting again a massive con of all industries of st petersburg tonight just as it happened ten years ago in two thousand and eight when russia beat the netherlands to make it to the semifinal of the euros which was also unexpected i remember those scenes very well the city's went wild particularly moscow and i'll be in the streets in st

petersburg tonight to see what that would look like and have the same. militant if it's joined in central moscow in chat his impressions of the world cup so far. i hope you're enjoying the atmosphere first of all what do you think of this world cup so far it's three super super on rio's oh so very proud to read the book. you know it's all good to see cause people enjoyed to be in how many teams did you coach into and during the world cup five five five is that a record steve must be annoying or a cause what is the very for me i don't look for the record all that with all your experience he thinks that i steamy things and far in this comes just now. i've suffered being too much to day so they go to say thank you talk to their either play a good game speed they have everything organisation or if related to live they play a perfect game to be a perfect game show they go first never fricken win or long on the resume normal

all the word of this surely was about that my impression would begin today with the way to everything when you need to. well be bringing all the world cup highlights over the coming hours and we've got more news coming up your way after this short break. let her. play. play.

thank you welcome back to the program the u.s. has announced his decision to withdraw from the u.n. human rights council section of state. challenging it with hypocrisy.

president trump wants to move the ball forward from day one his call that institutions are countries who say one thing and do another and that's precisely the problem with the human rights council. as president trump said at the u.n. general assembly there's a massive source of embarrassment to the united nations that some governments with the greatest human rights records sit on the human rights council. are going to cost lives to scale up more pain with more on this story and give us a rundown of what's happened well for a long time we've heard the trumpet ministrations speak highly critically of the united nations and specifically the un human rights council but now we have the dramatic move of the usa officially withdrawing from the un human rights council not being a member of this body that it's been a long critical of now we've heard from mike pompei o secretary of state and he

specifically cited criticism of israel by the un human rights council as a reason for the usa withdrawing this is mike palm pale and the council's continued and well documented by skins israel is unconscionable. since its creation the council has adopted more resolutions condemning israel and against the rest of the world combined. now israel was very quick to thank the united states for this move and there's been other reactions from around the world kenneth roth the executive director of human rights watch responded to the decision from the usa saying quote the trumpet administration's withdrawal is a sad reflection of its one dimensional human rights policy and he went on to say other governments will have to redouble their efforts to ensure that the council addresses the world's most serious human rights problems now it's also worth noting that recently human rights the un human rights council did release

a report that was highly critical of the united states in relation to economic issues and specifically poverty saying that the u.s. policies were not sufficiently addressing the economic human rights of the citizens furthermore it's also interesting to note that there are nine un human rights treaties and as of the moment only only three of them are signed by the united states the u.s. only is only a signatory of three of the nine un human rights treaties so furthermore now we have heard that the president of the u.n. human rights council is coming forward and saying that the withdrawal of the united states is something that the human rights council should take up and put on the agenda for future discussions that they will have a discussion about the usa making its decision to withdraw so quite a reaction to this dramatic move from the united states in her remarks nikki haley did say that this did not show that the usa was not concerned about human rights

she said that the usa would continue to push an agenda of human rights around the world however she said they would no longer participate in the u.n. body. ok time so they run down on these kind of. shortly before the u.s. announced its exit from the un human rights council washington was denounced for a new policy on immigration enforcement that results in migrant children being separated from their parents on sunday the investigative nonprofit nonprofit pro publica published audio of children crying in a detention facility run by u.s. customs and border protection.

in april attorney general jeff sessions introduced the administration's zero tolerance policy on illegal border crossing it means all adults will be charged with illegal entry which results in children being separated from their parents when they're detained the policy was announced following a rise in the number of illegal immigrants crossing the border in the last six weeks over two thousand children have been separated from their parents facing an outcry the white house defended the policy necessary. ok we're going to discuss this issue with. professor of urban studies queens college and steve malzberg conservative t.v. and radio host thanks very much for both coming on to the program the world will be watching this announcement is going to be

a fuse shockwave so i think. let's start with you people they leave the country in search of a better life. for them and their children obviously and they find themselves separated. you know is there any reasonable justification for this policy. absolutely not it was actually quite sadistic and it's not only. families human rights you children it's causing the trauma to these children you've got to keep in mind whatever's upsurge that's happening right now and you can see if you political side based on a very very difficult to find a political situation happening in countries the united states those avenues through foreign intervention so it's a very very there should and there are. just a short version steve let you answer there we have

a few problems technically with a connection there but. i'm just saying that there's no justification surely there recent justification for separating children from their parents. oh children get separated from their parents if they were americans and they're a single parent and they commit a crime and they go to jail guess what the child is separated from the parent first of all it's not true that all these people are arrested for just crossing the border they're arrested for illegally crossing the border there are points of entry where they could come and claim political asylum seek political asylum and these ports ports of entry a well known and they're set up and if that's the case they are not separated from their children but these these people if in fact they are families and not you know sex traffickers are others who come with children elect to break the u.s. law by entering and crashing the border illegally so the onus is upon them for

choosing to disobey the law we have people who are legitimately trying to get into this country and seek political asylum who are waiting in line and doing it the correct way and their children are not touch but if you break the law you will suffer the consequences we are a nation of laws and you have to have a rule of law and as you shaking your head at steve's comments surely those who are taking the risk and despite the fact that they're looking for a better life to chile they know the risks involved and that might be that they are separated from their children if they go in illegally. well off people that are integrating your to the united states know kind of risks that are involved even if they're doing it legally which oftentimes just the racism that you hear from people like shopping. to buy a car park here in the case of these people coming to united states it's not quite as simple as just having to meet specific points eventually people are cleaning

product while and they're coming here you know to try to seek political asylum and i don't understand how in any way that justifies taking your kids away and important family in if you break the law in the united states why get incarcerated for something like that but that doesn't that's not the same as putting children in cages in all these detention centers that is a completely different issue totally also it's important to note that traditionally speaking illegal immigration into the country into this country a lot is something that's handled by immigration courts and it's something that's awesome. it's something that's happened by immigration courts it's something that is. held accountable by the party justice and we're seeing our transformation of the way that we're using the law so this idea that we're just kind of americans we either we have a rule of law we just completely or borders and fox says about the. situation the

absolute incapacity of all of our leaders all of the last any kind of adult church look understanding and what is happening right now and we are see chuck take advantage of this and turn to suits which was that sadistic kind of policy and really his political base just are i do know i'm glad i'm glad i'm glad he's getting his speech and called me a racist which i'm not surprised it doesn't anger me i wouldn't expect anything else from a leftist who has no facts and throws out the racist word without even knowing who i am and nothing i said was racist but that aside you know there's a three hundred percent increase in kids coming to this country presented with an adult who turned out to be sex traffickers or pedophiles are others who are not their parents and by the way i'm sure you were is outraged sure when barack obama did virtually the same thing in fact deported mexican children back to mexico

without their parents' knowledge where was the outrage when that was going on where was the outrage when he sent children all over the country when they entered this country illegally with their parents i didn't hear a peep out of people like you on the left this is nothing more than an attempt to villainize donald trump where a country of laws if these parents choose to put their kids at risk by breaking the law they're going to suffer the consequences and the american people are fine with that there was plenty of racial. the mainstream media never actually showed the amount of outreach that was happening from people that were genuine for grassroots not all democrats are the same there are there are plenty of criticism to get to what rock obama and hillary clinton state department did to immigrants that were here in fact we set up the conditions for what is happening it now it's. no problems just like i just like i have no problem when you know that i have my entire life here and the kind of rhetoric and

dog whistles from racists like donald trump and you saw i mean i think what's what's happening you know god arrows right you got you got a lot of nerve i'd like to give you what if you give me one example of how i'm a racist what the kind of narrative that you're creating to try to do the false acts that you're putting out there kind of say that we've got all these was your bait that's right so this are you're using a very particular propaganda tool to try to create negotiations to go out and get all that is racist obey the law imagine that imagine that. yeah well at one time people on slaves was law as well i'm sure there's plenty of people in this country mike you saw what happened to the next. interstate integrate all go. and use your great and you know race is ok guys. and it has it's been wonderful watching you both get this is get very personal on this

we're going to have to end it there it's always seeking to create more and more debate the subject and has been our presser and studies at queens college and steve multi-player conservative and radio host thank you gentlemen for coming on to the program. thank you ok that's the end of our program. cup highlights and. i'll be back well i won't be backtracking that it will be back at the top of the hour to take over thanks for watching. during his years serving his region his chief executioner jerry would hear inmates swear they were innocent. when you hear a person going to his death be staking out that he was innocent to the last syringe go into his body he's taken out that he was innocent on his last words as less.

and give me something to think about as execution and it place some doubt there there was one young man in particular washington jr. he was five tell society back being that he was innocent to get no one really paid no attention. in one nine hundred eighty three was arrested in culpepper virginia and brought in for questioning he thought it was for a burglary he had committed these are all a question of the by different. and we'll use it as data. and they've done no i want to call up my. call kept. the death penalty. after intense questioning police officers

extracted a confession from her for the brutal rape and stabbing murder of a one thousand year old mother of three. at his trial experts testified that earle had an i.q. of only sixty nine and was extremely suggestible casting doubt on his confession. despite inconclusive evidence the jury found guilty and the judge sentenced him to death. he was taken to mecklenburg a supermax prison in virginia. he was scared to death he was tempted he didn't want to come out of so. he's mentally retarded he can read you can write i walk in to the cell and canadian thing mangled or come see what you want that was earl the whole time he was on the road he was. scared to have it. out as they were for me my mom did it means that the problems with mr.

moti was an aid to see the mom would have needed. two weeks before earl's date of execution the guards came to transport him to the death house in richmond. a charity mob put him in a way saying handcuffs shackles and they walk him out. literally drugging him out and me everybody's banging on the door to hear that the casa guards. joe reached out to his caseworker marie deans to see if anything could be done. i called mary in a panic as i was. out of this god or not but i don't think he did i'll bet this god knows what's going on when early arrived at the death house he was handed over to jerry i receive earl from mecum ber and when he came in i gave him

a good trade into the infirmary he was given a complete physical. at that time we only had. death by electrocution chair so he didn't have a choice either her or you know you had led to the one through to your home and in the day but all we got was the he said he would get new really from. what i have been. in the daytime either willow want me to go out go or yeah if you know nothing or no way. working day and night joe and marie secured a rare stay of execution. marie was convinced that earl had been pressured into falsely confessing my work was mentally retarded defendants i know that this was a what we would call a coerced confession whether of course psychologically or some other way that you

kill that woman knows. but you told the police that you did. it why did you tell the police that you did. our no no no no you understand then that you were being. accused of a murder. they didn't understand most. new d.n.a. tests proved earl was not the murderer he was moved off death row but he remained in prison virginia law at the time did not allow the introduction of new evidence. gerry heard little about what happened to earl his focus was on preparing for the next execution. and one year after the boston marathon bombing a memorial service brought everyone together for the first time. when we walked.

down the road to the site. ron and i and christie stopped at each site and said a prayer. a week later karen and ron united with survivors at the two thousand and fourteen boston marathon. they cheered their friend celeste in a symbolic run across the finish line. i am angry at what he did and when i see my friends and they struggle and i see other survivors. i don't want my decision to be based on how angry i get in those instances. that

paul judge will tool announced the trial would be held in boston. and we have two choices we can either let him stay alive and have his interaction and have his joys. or put him to death and have that be the end of it. they don't get to see their little boy playing baseball anymore or reading him a story at night and this young man is in jail and he's reading stories that he likes he's got books available to him that he enjoys or he meets with his sisters and gets to see pictures of their children growing up and i just don't think it's fair that they have had their their joys taken away from them and he still is able to experience that. care and decided to attend the trial.

i want to be there to see. justice. in philadelphia nearly four years after vicki instils daughter shannon was murdered the police got a lead. in two thousand would there been a series of assaults started there you blois fort collins colorado they put out a report to police agencies all across the u.s. united states. so they sent from shannon's case to fort coord. the d.n.a. was a match. the suspect was married in. employed at an air force base. about eight o'clock that twenty third day of april. two thousand and two this fellow and his wife walked into the police station and by midnight that night they had

a full confession for the dozen different cases. the man they arrested twenty nine year old troy graves philadelphia's elusive center city rapist graves was accused of multiple counts of sexual assault and one count of murder in the death of shannon schieber. the prosecutor was district attorney lynn abraham. the prosecutor in the city of philadelphia who is known as a pretty deadly d.a. in other words she put more people on death row then any other prosecutor in pennsylvania and probably any large number around the country. graves was found guilty and the district attorney wanted the death penalty but the she bers did not . it meant they would have to fight for the life of their daughter's killer we had said to each other and consulted with our very large families that what we do if they were caught of all women.