sports so what do you want to do or do you feel like in the time you want to spend time with your family do you want to do you on the dates. you know is it a work meeting do you want to relax so some more of the directions a little bit let's say i want to go on a date while i'm traveling am i going to have like a separate cabin for a day or how it's going to look i mean i'm sure how like a visual aesthetic perception of it as well and so the way that we do this is actually using an ecosystem so we work with companies we work with. startup founders if you want to a new eight years you innovators to come up with. the whole ecosystem the marketplace so you know of course i can give you some of the years but at the end you know you can always only have so little and i just really wonder yeah that's a little bit different from i don't know like this amazing first class airplane service they have a lot of detail in there so those will maybe it's

a separate cabin maybe you have a global shrimping there maybe you have the right music in the background maybe you have a projection mapping around to you and through to you know you can create an atmosphere if it's a business meeting maybe you have some more tenuous translation and they're great that's so you don't have language areas or you have recording or you have the connection you or you're able to have your doctor's visits. rather than spend time when you get to a destination to do is easing so you can actually do them while you're traveling and and again for us it's more about providing the technology and then open it up to other companies that that can provide services that they were going to take a short break right now and they're allowing him back we'll continue talking to turn and c.e.o. of hyperloop transportation to college and stay with us.

it's hard to imagine decades after the war a nazi don't it was still active and rich in the nineteen seventies cretonne had as the chair of its bowed a man convicted of mass murder and slavery at ash was a german company develops in the denied a drug that was promoted as completely safe even during pregnancy. it turned out to have terrible side effects what has happened to my baby is anything but. you know

she said he's just. mimics a little mind victims of to this day received no compensation then never apologized for the suffering that. not only want the money i want the revenge. we're back with al gore and c.e.o. of hyper live transportation projects derek cars are going to technically feel physically fella to be inside well first of all it's super high speed right what happens if it crashes everyone dies it's not funny it's a viable yes that's i mean you know so first of all we don't feel speeds we feel a celebration of the celebration if you have been on a transatlantic flights you already went roughly

a thousand kilometers an hour or so if you it's the same way a solution of the situation is something that you. that you basically modify based on comfort and comfort comes first right comfort when we do a route planning us is always the first the first part you need to build something that works for a two year old as much as for an eighteen year old and safety is i mean that's a given that you're building a system that is the most safe you can build the system in the self is ten times safer than an uplink to give you an idea the reason for that. they are ten times ten times less failure modes if you think about it the napping is actually fairly scary you're right it's up there in the sky somehow and. if something happens and needs to land we are able to stop within seconds. we can separate the sections we can depressurize and you can leave those emergency exits very similar to what you do today in a subway or a train. of course we're talking about a pressure i mean when you're talking about a crash your already assuming there is

a crash but in an ideal case you have safety systems in place that prevents that there is a crash if now you know there's a terror attack and things happen right in front of you of course i mean there's always going to be certain scenarios where you know you can't really do anything so it's faster than plane and that's that it's moving in a back and and i got me feeling like an astronaut. knowing you have no it's actually very similar to what you're already experiencing so it's not like i'm not going to floating around in the air right that's that's gravity so that's for that we need to be outside of space so but you're in a pressured a vehicle just like an airplane rides a pressure vessels basically it's and it's not a complete vacuum it's it's a low pressure in london so to still some you know left it's basically very similar to an athlon that would go in very high altitudes and we do that so that we can move much faster using much less energy because it has less resistance that's

a whole trick when we looked into the physicality of the system so one thing that was really neat you know surprising for me is that there's no rail no meter on the whole wolves that makes money they're all losing money as a whole using taxpayer dollars but they're not supposed to make money they're public service it's not a business like because it's how we experience it just to make people's life easier not to make money well i mean of course you know if you tell me that i get money every month side don't have to think about. how to make things better but i do believe that. if we start thinking on how we can make money and how we can build something that makes economic sense for us all we will have more of it it will be a better quality isn't it is today. you can i mean just think about what it does to not even surf world countries but second world countries rights and don't have an infrastructure today we are able to create mega regions bring people closer

together changing the way that relives the hyperloop will have the same impact or a similar impact on the railways and the key to everything france says what kind of impact it would have on countries like america because the way railways works there is that it really just trains are really just making money and east coast and then the profit from the east coast is what funds the railways in the west and midwest and the west so if you come in with your business and i'm pretty sure it's coming from one big city to another big city right you're not going to be having like little local towns connecting through hyperloop right so that actually would mean that you're putting out all of america's railway out of business so we're not a competition we're with technology companies so we develop technologies. that are basically then used by transportation companies so we are if you one so the next step and again it's about building some of them makes economic sense because those

trains on the east coast end up making money if you really take a look and to the cost of the infrastructure and everything around it and you take away the government subsidies the old losing money and that's something that needs to change in fact in america just to take an example. the infrastructure for trains is terrible there's accidents all the time because of that infrastructure in addition to of course human factors but we we need to solve this issue we need to be able to. build infrastructure that makes them in the sense that has a return of them this means and sayings that it's not necessary that it's something that you know just should be there. you know what i believe is education should be there health care should be there. if there is something that can make money and should make money and ideally it's going to be a better system that's going to be better so do you think it will be an

infrastructure that will be closely working with comments do you think it will be like that or a level thing or is that a private business so it can be private however in most countries the government wants to be parts of anything that's infrastructure related because of course you know it's it has closely to to do with the development of a country so normally these projects are p.p.p. projects are private public partnerships to develop together was a government. in our case most of the companies would talk to our existing transportation companies that have an existing network where we're able to hopefully create a better network. could ever go under the ocean. so technically it's possible there are. already the first troops on the water if you want souls in norway. and norway has the engineering capabilities and the know which in our case you know . going under the ocean most people actually think of connecting america to asia

for example so going on the pacific there's a lot of safety issues with that of course you know because the moment you have to get out you would be somewhere in the middle of the ocean. for now we concentrate on that and young thinking new york to l.a. now recently that is that something that could happen no so. we have our top speed is right below the speed of sound which is around one thousand two hundred kilometers an hour. that's more than a plane it's planes normally are on the thousands i mean the passenger train plane right so. jets are going to three thousand kilometers an hour but. going from the west coast to the east coast would be happening through a network so you would have stops in between and that also makes the most sense when you thinking about the cost of the infrastructure you have to build this is something that would be involved ground our ground that really depends on the

routes and ideally it's above ground because we're using the same structure to fuel the two for use alternative energy but you know what you might have to time though you might have to dig trenches in many cities specially in new york for example where there's existing infrastructure and very difficult to just go through and get into the center and you have to you will have to come in each aspect cargoes of course actually afraid there is a very important part of our business model and as i mentioned earlier. it's a so broad project one road one belt it's definitely something that enables a completely new way. our economy with the current holds economy or the enabling an on demand economy that's you know basically revolutionizing everything around you transport system can feel like it's going to have some kind of legal implications do you feel like a new. pricing new set of las actually that's

a biggest challenge so it's not so technology it's not the funding but it's regulations so you need to create these new laws it's not an app thing that's not a train when we when we innovate we try to not think about regulations at all because it allows us to just work was a blank sheet of paper and that's a big advantage that we have. towards existing modes of transportation we really want to invent in transportation system the way you would do in two thousand and eighteen right so rethinking and questioning everything. but then now is that we're moving into commercialization of the system of course you can't really sell the system in. ferments assistant system worldwide if you don't have regulations in place so we have been a working was all partners from munich re for example which is the largest reinsurance company in the world and say published a risk report last year saying that they are going to be able to ensure our

technology which is a very important part on this important step to towards commercialization also technology we're also working together with that to suit which is one of the safety institutes to create some safety guidelines and we need to work with governments around the world so at this time we're working was india indonesia. south korea. slovakia czech republic. brazil and the emirates of course we are starting to implement a first commercial system and these are just some of the countries so we're moving worldwide that's important to not only were there is one because you never know when you talk about politics you know things are going to happen since can change very fast so being able to work with several governments around the world as an infant i know that the group of vending engineers that are working with me they're working for free and. unfortunately not really in the number ration yet so

this is a little bit of misinformation because first of all we have we have over eight hundred people on our team in addition to fifty companies most of these people are working for participation in the company so they are working for free but they are receiving stock options and the company which all fours are worth money especially if you talk to my investor is the worst lot of money. and then we have of course also a full time team that many just all of these companies and contributors so you said the first tank you ometer is our lady going to take place what like now or is it taking place there so we announced the. our agreement together with the are in the emirates we're looking in through our first implementation of the first ten kilometers in a good year. so now we end up running things a stage we are in the meantime working on or in the center in toulouse where we're

going to be building version number two until two hundred and twenty they said this was the same when it is like for a town to town thing going to take place so timeframe in the emirates i would say i would estimate roughly three years of construction we hope to have the first the first phase done there on two cells and twenty so that's kind of the goal for us it's a very ambitious goal because again it doesn't only depend on us but that's hopefully when your meat can be you know using the first type of to get them and then when it becomes widespread well like a decade or so that really depends on the regulations so depending on how fast we can move through was a different. you know governments around salt i would estimate probably you know it's it's not a sprint it's a marathon. right there good luck with everything i hope we can make it happen very quickly i can't wait to be one of the passengers going to date actually on

a hypo but i read like you have to actually be. safe and have your seat belts all the way through is that true i think this information can so you know it would depend on the situation on the routes and of course on the regulation as well so ideally you're able to move pretty for a pretty free that you have and there will be a point at which was of those people rightly i was concerned about that well good luck with everything thanks i'll be ready to make our program. like a bull in a china shop donald trump style and negotiation skills were on full display at this year's annual nato gathering he was not shy about how he feels about the alliance

now the trump summit is front and center to be a mere photo op or something more. imax keyser one more of my guide to financial survival this is fun it's a device used by professional scallywags to earn money. that's right these hedge funds are simply not accountable and we're just getting more and more into the. totally destabilize the global economy you need to protect yourself and get in for a while because we. that is your last yes does he. she does it with the people most of. all what i mean

. i mean. really i look so good me from a week and he has enough us by you. if you're in the form of the media. i'm with you more with the baby when was and i'm what i'm old enough and you want money for something in this bum i will if you must i will start to feel.

a. little. bit.

headline stories of the us twelve russians with hacking offenses linked to the twenty sixteen presidential election but say the interference did not influence the outcome of the vote. british counter-terror police say they've located the source of the nerve agent that killed a woman in the town of spree left her partner in a critical condition. launches a stinging attack on the british prime minister over her brags of. reporters that american relations are stronger than ever. the broadest deep depression relationship is really something very special to give our relationship terms of the

highest level of special. wherever you're training in from right around the world this hour welcome to moscow and to r.t. international my names you know neal good to have your company our top story this hour the u.s. justice department has charged a dozen russians with hocking offenses linked to the twenty sixteen presidential election. and charges twelve russian military officers by name for conspiring. to interfere with the twenty eight sixteen presidential election. eleven of the defendants are charged with conspiring to hack into computers steal documents and release those documents with the intent to interfere in the election well i have the document here in my hands and as you can see it's pretty long twenty nine pages

to be precise so let me read to you exactly what it says while russian intelligence officers knowingly and intentionally conspired with each other and with persons known and unknown to the grand jury to gain on authorized access to hack into the computers of u.s. persons an entity's involved in the twenty sixteenth us presidential election still documents from those computers and stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere with the twenty sixteen u.s. presidential election but regardless of what this says the department of justice found out that this so-called conspiracy didn't affect the vote count or the election results there's no allegation that the conspiracy changed the phone count or affected any election result well the announcement came during trump's meeting with the queen at windsor castle and just days before he's scheduled to meet with president putin so we'll just have to see if this is a trigger some sort of

a domestic resistance. reaction to this of course the russian foreign ministry has commented on washington's charges and moscow sees the timing of the announcement shows that its purpose was to affect the trump putin summit which takes place on monday with more here's igor. as for new information i mean the military man himself they would never reveal their sources or that we know that they've been questioning a lot of people as he has a few men in his at his disposal so their capacity is quite limited and everything in this investigation when it comes to the hacking of the democratic party it devolves around the d.n.c. server so we don't know as i've said where moolah got his information from but what we do know is where he didn't get it from apparently and that is the f.b.i. as they themselves have numerously admitted to fail to examine the server themselves have a listen when the d.n.c.

provide access for to the f.b.i. for your technical folks to review what happened. we never got direct access to the machines themselves call up begs the question doesn't it if the f.b.i. had no access to d.n.c. servers who hurt in this exact case we don't know exactly but we know that previously all the information about this server came from a company named kraut strike it's a company that was hired by the d.n.c. received money for the from the d.n.c. for maintaining in taking care of their servers and so they were the ones who provided the f.b.i. with all the logs and all the information and although strike itself says that the information they gave it's a carbon copy of it's like the exact same thing as what was on the actual server there's no way real way of proving that. you know very fine that because they have

tampered with this quite a bit they have already restructured it back in twenty sixteen in this whole server so that did raise some questions as well you did see never turn the server over to law enforcement if you're investigating either from a law enforcement or from an intelligence standpoint that hacking by foreign hostile government would you want the server wouldn't that help you number one identify who the attacker was if they had turned the server over to either you or director call me maybe we would have no more so i guess what i'm asking you is why would the victim of a crime not turn over a server to the intelligence community or to law enforcement and this question is what many many people are asking because think of it from a following standpoint say there was a crime in some apartment the police show at the door and then the victim's roommate shows up and says look i live in the same room i saw everything happened

here's your forensics like fingerprints you know traces of hair d.n.a. pictures from the crime scene you're all good. and the police they say oh then fine then we won't examine the actual crime scene since which was showing to us is the exact copy and the exact like account of events of what happened this is pretty much what the f.b.i. did there so that's that's why this raises so many questions right so the situation we have though as it stands we've got twelve russian agents so-called agents indicted what happens now is there a trial well naturally yes this is what mueller is pursuing but there's a catch because look at who he's indicted is indicted several intelligence officers of russia and obviously if the residual that's based in russia of course and if there is a trial it is said to happen on the u.s. soil no one in their right mind would be sending intelligence officers to

a foreign country i mean it doesn't really matter whether or not the are accused of anything whether or not they're guilty or not it just it's intelligence officers they have like information clearances and everything the some of them may not be allowed to travel abroad at all so miller has found is finding himself with this indictment in a very comfortable position because if a trial happens it will be a trial in absentia which means the chances are nobody will represent these intelligence officers which pretty much guarantees a guilty verdict. on top of this say for reaction to this we cannot cross lines to william binney former national security agency technical director and n.s.a. whistleblower welcome to the program first off why do you think it was that the f.b.i. was not given to the d.n.c. these physical servers most likely because they didn't want to. know who hacked into the server. and. it was done locally.

then f.b.i. director komi said the the carbon copies of the servers containing what was believed to be the same information were enough to arrive up the conclusions do you agree and how crucial was that for the f.b.i. . no i mean it i don't agree at all you there's no substitute for the original evidence i mean anything else you get could be fabricated changed manipulated there were three basic reasons though i had a problem with the mueller indictment at least what i wrote about so far is based on false information i mean we had forensics data showing that the goose agreed to materials of fabrication and we published dad here in the united states mueller has never asked any of us to come in to testify or bring that evidence in. plus we had we had to we had attempted to do the transfers that were claimed to be a part of the clues for two hack of the d.n.c. to supposed to be

a long distance act from russia to get the data across from the d.n.c. server we took that data and looked at it closer to put it on the web we measured it and it came down it is the download speed the maximum was forty nine point one make a bytes per second that is not sustainable across the web and when you went across to europe and tried to do that we tried to pull a dataset across the atlantic at the ads to try to get any higher speed we could the highest we could do was data center to data center from new jersey to the u.k. and that got twelve make up by her second that's less than a fourth of what's necessary to do that transfer and then when you look at the transfer rates we're all compatible with the thumb drive or some local download plug into the storage device into a computer download. you know plus the fact that the the data from a goose for two from two different dates that the joined first to september that he put on the web those datasets merge into one file so that tells you that bruce for

two is manipulating the data playing with it and changing dates in time plus the timestamping we got showed either you east coast central time or west coast of the united states this is all a fabrication concocted inside the united states. there is another aspect to this the timing your thoughts on the significance or otherwise because i'm pointing towards there's a big summit on monday trump and putin meeting for their first official summit is this a coincidence no no obviously it's a it's a friday night. and timed assertion just to try to detract from the from the summit i mean it's going to cause both issues i mean the president shouldn't pay any attention this though but there is quite a lot of attention on it i'm just looking at democrats william quite a leading demo.