but i do know about guns i think that is why they try many times to target guns or try to impose to kill more people more victims but they did not succeed to achieve their goals to break a mass down all to break the policy not people in gaza or to push him to. realize the way to fly i think we are struggling for our freedom to put into for the q patient to put in for the blockade and to get already kitty we will not suffer and i do not equate we will continue to fight against occupation now we want to defend ourselves because every every two days three days israel tried to strike in different places now we kill four people in the last we could to kill more than five people since the beginning of the march to kill more no more than one hundred fifty people and and injured more than fifteen thousand people so we as palestinians with all the racin of actually trying to defend ourselves in order to make kind of deterrence now to stop taking place right this is this is that the

message of a massive brigades or the other policy infraction military wings we want to stop the israeli aggression against our people nikki haley trumps ambassador united nations says that this is a freedom watch where all these casualties were. undertaken by the palestinian people it was all a hamas operation today israel are complaining about something called balloons against their. warplanes and chris missiles i think and again is a lot is to be doing just once to just to to say israel they put the losses of israel and there is they don't take in about the palestinian about the direction of the policy in all the american administration i think they're very strong with people who think they can they can impose their political team on the policy nancy companies from a space policy and people even they can accuse the brits drive a bus and his the his over. i think they are going in the wrong way they will

achieve nothing they will get big zero because i think as a policy and we are united in order to refuse the deal of the century we are united to it to end the occupation we are united to stop the military aggression against our people sorry what they what scenario for will not help israel to achieve its goals what's the deal of the century i think sometimes they're talking about. a new political plan they want to pull a scene and just to forget. their identity they want to cancel what's called the right of return to cancel that jerusalem is a cabbie to afghanistan and they want to cancel the borders of palestine then they want a policy not just to live as a slaves under this week a patient and they want two months to make kind of. humility not development's no again will not accept this we are struggling since seventy years in order to indicate patient and to establish our state and to achieve our dignity the american

that tested this to do that many times in the time of it land john and bush and obama but they never succeeded to do to impose anything on the palestinians by using force the british government abstained on a motion of the united nations on wednesday night telling us to release israeli prisoners and dead bodies but israel is being supplied weapons by britain what would you say to prime minister resume about where israel does not release more than seven thousand palestinians who are in jail and they spent more than some many of them stood more than twenty years ten years fifteen years and they are suffering and now all the world just think you're about therefore you just keep for five three years they don't talk about the policy and tragedy the palestinian suffering why ok we want to we are ready to have a negotiation and to have a deal but we need. also israel to release our prisoners we need them to do that we

don't want our people not to southern florida and for a long time and you know that when you have a show he did in two thousand and eleven now is a real reality is that all the action prisoners and they kept him in the prison since the two thousand and fourteen ok but i want you would you say what would you say to theresa may britain is arming israel with weapons at the moment look i think they're all the time they pretty put the government making their own good decision when they support israel and its policy i don't care that mr there isn't it's say talking about the settlements are against international law or against the building this is the discriminant war or against stealing our lands or against a blockade on gaza i think the war is there is full with their political hypocrisy they don't want to care about and say that the rest of the policy you know they try to you deal with israel a spoiled boy they want israel to build more settlements to take our lands and to

take jerusalem at their capital and they want to proceed to keep silent i should say that i say the british government does deny that and the european union as well because they both the british government in the european union see the settlements as being illegal but this is good i mean two weeks yeah ok they have some statements but they did nothing this my way for example now they're still unsure of hamas and the. terrorist organization but did not get the call as israel when they built settlements kill people still lands and they were not international law no one put is right in the blacklist one well i'll tell you why one reason is two palestinian children say i mean i'll number and emira and. they were killed in an air strike israeli air strike british back in gaza. district two weeks ago. presumably and the way it's reported here with a hamas operatives where they have us human shields ok i think we're human beings we know of them we know. use people as human shields we never do that now people

now they go to the mud to the bar or the board does when openness infections ordinary people represented of the association and syndicates in the us and no i don't look at them to get to go then no one and we have many many journalists many pressed media and the borders and they took control taking photos and then once you and i thinking putting people at shields i think israel try to fabricate and try to lie and try to deceive the ward in order to to blame have to blame the policy in a faction that they have a violent must know we are doing in order to keep this must as peaceful march but look the reaction of israel now tell us they can move one hundred sixty people there were documents and one hundred and sixty people were killed ninety nine percent of them civilians the attack ambulances they attack a journalist they attack every thinking everything under the striking gas and every

day they strike sometimes the strikes the farms the. ambulances and i think it's open for them you want two thousand and fourteen they destroyed more than twenty thousand homes in gaza they destroyed the spittal did a story schools they killed people inside the schools they destroyed some summer clinics in young israel and have nothing israel have no limitation for its crimes for it's a brutal. action against the palestinian people no one is there to stop them so really the international community two thousand and fourteen they kill more than two thousand two hundred people you know any plans of the killing we have about four hundred children and two hundred seventy five women will kill no one taking about this this is kind of a genocide again a simple as you know what you expect from people to do what but expect to own them people are both. people are upset people are frustrated and you are just what

you're watching and doing nothing so people will do something in order to get the attention of the world to tell them that you have to do something in order to stop the crimes of the israeli completion against the policy in a civil insensitive citizens in gaza that we have invited the israeli ambassador to london and yet again he doesn't seem available to come on this program thank you. thank you after the break from the smoke bombs to a legit smokescreens we'll ask the jewish voice for labor of its anti-semitic to criticize the israeli bombing of gaza and after a triumphant brick summit in south africa we asked the original economic hitman john perkins what nato nation sabotaged me in school noticeable coming up about to a going underground. far away. down there and. he does the dollar vigilante and he's an actor against

and that is anarchy it's anarchy in that there is no centralized authority that is corrupt of all that leads to all kinds of bad outcomes when you have got to centralization of power you know you have the wherewithal to have a more peaceful existence. until the. locust to its. muscles has. nothing. to. do it is a little too warm this is. the single

divinity school united for you. all for school it's only about the looking on the other and the couldn't fulfil one of them i mean my columns on the old. boy. gulu mother. we are going through a dramatic economic and social and cultural transformation that women want to participate gay lesbian people want immigrants want rights in many cities are saying that's my way but there are more traditional parts of society that are saying no i don't want that i live in a more of a world community i believe we shouldn't have one national policy i believe in a country that's divided as much as any in the world we actually have to localise our government.

closer. to some form something on. indigenous people as you know we that. in. the treaties. mostly say that only the kids. out of a sudden a man just temple be there was a time. i said i will then be in there they will not allow me. to meet if they wish should we. had all along a million million indeed i'm not i'm not picking on you need to be indicted beachhead didn't don't punish you may not mankind that i got

a medical book and i'm tommy because the i you. i've been saying the numbers mean something they matter to us of the one trillion dollars and. more than ten white collar crime family each did. eighty five percent of. well the rich six percent market thirty percent. some with four hundred to five hundred first first and. twenty thousand dollars. china's building two point one billion dollars. but don't let the numbers over. the only number you need to remember is one you can't afford to miss the one.

welcome back in the past few days the u.k.'s three main jewish newspapers have united to brand they believe the german call been an existential threat to jewish life they accuse him of dieting the international holocaust remembrance alliances definition of anti semitism but an international coalition of a forty jewish groups from fifteen different countries have backs the leader of western europe's largest socialist movement they reject the idea that it's anti-semitic to go israel racist one of those groups is jewish voice for labor and joining me now is one of its founders richard cooper richard thanks for coming on the show. can you support a labor leader who is a might and a racist according to a senior former labor cabinet minister margaret hodge has apparently now they deny that she swore. jerry is not and has never been marked or a racist it is from margaret hodge to make this accusation and to make an accusation in that form whether or not with the expletive deleted should be an

acceptable behavior and she should apologize that is not the way in which we conduct debates of the labor party which is a lot of support from blair and factions within the labor board he may have support from blairite factions in the labor party it is nothing to do with the labor party to the day with its absolute commitment to fight anti semitism in all its forms the argument is to water is anti semitic and to what extent criticism of israel may or may not be anti-semitic and it's important we make these distinctions anti-semitism in our view is hostility to jews as jews and it needs to be opposed believe interest of israel is criticism of israel and unless it shows hostility to jews as jews it is political criticism and argument and has to be fought on that basis while it's being reported and supported it has to be said by journalists who are supposed to be impartial and press regulation in this country to broadcast regulation that the international. has

a working definition they were announced it. is not or they have a definition and it's actually not a particularly useful definition in my view it's a definition which has been around since two thousand and five when a european body or m c originally put it forward as a working definition to collect comparative statistics about anti-semitism and of the band and five years later as not fit for purpose they were issued a press release it has been recent rectitude it is now become holy writ it was never that it was a draft to be discussed and worked out and that's indeed what the labor party has done with its code of conduct it's accepted the definition it's accepted many of the notes of guidance but it is argued that other notes. guidance are not useful in the form in which they're incorporated in that definition and it is offered reformulations of them it is taking out in so much as a more seriously than the i h r a and trying to provide

a working document so it can be dealt with in practice and in order to do that one has to be able to distinguish between what is semitic and what is acceptable criticism of israel the i h r a definition makes it appear that criticism of israel is likely to be anti semitic and puts the onus on people who do not like what israel is doing israeli government policy the racist foundations of its current nation state will use recently semitic to do so roughly. forty five percent of israeli m.p.'s alone would be anti-semitic and the mass movement of people in israel seen on the streets protesting about the spill they would all have to be deemed as anti semitic why is it possible for us to have criticism of israel within israel regarded as legitimate debate and such criticism when voiced by jews like myself in britain as anti-semitic or potentially anti-semitic why should i have to prove that my criticisms of israel is manifestly discriminate three laws are not

a matter of are not motivated by anti semitic belief but motivated by a deep commitment to universal values to the gala terrorism to treating all people equally and within societies all citizens to be treated equally because discriminating against citizens and making some of them the enemy within that is a dangerous path and we know from the nine hundred thirty s. where that part can lead one to their cause here. and. why did the prime minister support this definition you have a problem with because britain selling arms to israel i don't think it's as simple as that but my feeling is they wanted a definition and this one was being touted it is not a good definition as i said before. it was actually abandoned by the fundamental rights agency in the u. s. not suitable for the purpose it's been drawn up for suddenly today it is now holy writ in the jewish tradition there is one book that is holy writ and it is not the

i h r a definition which has to be subject to critical purview told me that is a criticism of the bible line by line paragraph by paragraph and the two is tradition is proud of its ability to take a sacred text and view it critically and suddenly we're faced with a text the i.h.r. a definition which has got to be regarded to separate and they one can voice a word of criticism of it some of its causes are good some are very poor and contribute towards a restriction of our right to freedom of expression under article ten of the european convention on human rights why do you think your organisation i'm old school was of others into the support gerry gorgons line on this and yet what we're being told on stage when they did media here and certainly all the press corps little and the board of deputies everything all these groups are saying we represent the jewish community and your group seem to be much more silent and we political narrative about the subject out our groups are part of the jewish

community the jewish community does not speak with one voice the jewish community has never done so and it's important that diversity and plurality within the jewish community are recognised and encouraged and we would argue that we speak firmly within the jewish humanitarian internationalist tradition and that we are basing ourselves on jewish values of respect for the other respect for all religions agalloch terry anderson and not making the kinds of legal distinctions between citizens which is now occurring in israel this is not acceptable democratic practice in jericho israel wishes to be called a liberal democracy it has to abide by liberal democratic values during a journey called a national autocracy it can continue along the line. it is getting old getting jeremy called in his prime minister will be cowed by all this type of criticism of the less critical of those policies you dislike of the israeli government i hope that jeremy abel continue to be cherami can stand up for what he believes in and speak openly and honestly and to see that the values he has always stood up for

international family and gala tarion values to midst of all anti racist values and standing up to all forms of racism including county separatists which are going to thank you thank you very much. well while the u.k. arguably debated food shortages after breakfast it brics nations wrapped up a groundbreaking summit in south africa last week what dangers lie ahead for brazil russia india china and south africa trying to forge a post imperial world free of u.s. federal reserve neoliberalism joining me from new hampshire in the u.s. is who else the former consultant lead to the u.n. the i.m.f. and the u.s. treasury john prachanda author of confessions of an economic hitman the shocking story of how america took over the world john thanks so much for coming back on the show so back in your day when you were an economic hit man how would you have responded to this new kid on the block seeming to undermine or these threatening to undermine the i.m.f.

and the world bank's supremacy you know i mean we had a similar situation through the soviet union it was on the same by anybody but to resent there was a balance so if we were jewish strong just pushed too hard and strong i mean at one tree like nixon there were two or lundy or indonesia. their governments i turned to the soviet union. and force us to try to soften our approach and then after the soviet union collapsed in the early ninety's rollback the iona in their sister organizations had a monopoly and they really abused it and i think that's a shame they used it to exploit other countries even more now we've got to rex and we've got the air. b. eight in infrastructure investment banks and these banks have as more financial power in fact in the world bank and it's just this and so in a way we're reaching a balance here i think probably if i were if it were american day and i think

robert people who are at the world bank today are really having to look at how they need to soften their deals what they need to do to be more competitive if you know if these basically chinese directed banks looking at it in be more a shadowy way though the be in breaks brazil is that is already now run by a former cia asset its most popular leader of course is in jail news every day against jacob zuma flooding mainstream media on there are other ways to attack this brics new. new future yeah it's difficult to stay exactly what the future will bring in this regard because it's same time of course the u.s. government is having this competitive it's almost like it as a tennis game are very very suspicious to me with china which we are with north korea with russia over trade wars in trade deals and i'm sure that's and people at

the world bank and the other side to sions are being very much plato's crohn's in that game. i guess you have problems in tennis maybe i'm talking about assessment yeah but then some a saying that as the the old policies a divide and rule fail to actually start to unite the perceived enemies of that. that paradigm is it was russia and china are arguably getting closer together in their relationship president putin and i was with him in st petersburg on a year ago at a conference there we were both speaking at night and a lot of time with his top economic advisor they are very very sharp they're very kind in a very clever and you know there's no world leader going to do as much experience as president putin at least not a world leader of a major country with nuclear arms and i think it was very obvious that in the meeting between putin and trump putin want you know couldn't just make trump look

like an idiot so i'm sure that putin and china are really looking at how they come together they can say soft no question that deserves huge brader gee it was a caused a stench in within the european union what supposed directed britain going to have to do to get closer ties with brics because apparently the pnd in moscow relations have never been lower and you think london can make these post break to deals maybe with the shanghai cooperation council that the whole bracket issue is iraq in question right now. i think a country like england however really needs to look at how its kin does strike deals not only with the u.s. and other u.s. and european but also with russia and china you know we're going to this period where we get something that's called the silk road is connecting china through cows of sound and many other countries with russia as i was in st petersburg i was also

in conference on and president putin was there also as well as his chief economic advisor and this whole silk road idea of uniting that whole area is certainly got to be something your great interest to europe and to european and to the e.u. and just looking back on that seminal work of yours confessions of a hit on the hitman i mean is it does it sound like something of a hero i mean britain has failed to destroy say the assad government nato nations of failed to destroy him a duro in venezuela. england trying to destroy putin that doesn't seem to be working and the days when they do nations could destabilize countries. over now because of the differences in this century i don't think it's over all i think it's on a big scale the difference is. that there's been another factor that's coming in and

that's a very strong militarism so about the time i was an economic hit man we were understanding that the war in vietnam was a failure on the other hand the overthrow of most adak in iran by an economic man was very successful so for many years the economic it francis that morris set into place as a way to make respect and the global empire is really a corporate empire i think a big mistake was made in the round the year two thousand and later in the bush administration the clinton administrations in the united states were in the military industrial complex basically said hey you know. the world has been kind of taken over by corporations but we're not part of that we're going to get back into militarization and nine eleven provided a fantastic excuse for the bush administration to get back into the military process we're in that yeah it's lose and it's our working on the other hand the

russians and the chinese are playing the game that we used to play which is really our economic hit man. and that seems to be doing quite well that's going to be six david. thank you and that's it for the show will be back on wednesday when we speak to one of the world's greatest social geographers professor danny dorling about his new book the inequality britain's ticking time bomb and nearly one hundred thirty thousand children to be homeless in britain christmas till then he would not drive social media with you on monday forty eight he is to the day of the death of suspected communist hollywood actor francis foma played by jessica lange and also going on in a front. that's

a very rough terrain you saw it's rough climates and you have to fight to be able to flank. it was gunshots on top of him and so many friends who would have been in the end i mean even not. having any you know i don't want. to see everybody in this world when they did it to participate in the good. old to me but when. you don't think about these things these soldiers are on the you've got three teams like you know do you know their patients. what politicians do something to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president i'm sure more somehow want to.

have to go right to be press as a white woman for free in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the wives of our. first city. d.j.'s national camera. roughly once they showed some movie for the. uncool videos and someone with a broken string of apps. going down more on string i don't roughly don't t.v. . enough. good. life. good. family. good good food russia

sharing good nice. the headline international the palestinian teenager and two men killed by israeli soldiers at the gaza border with protestors mean a journalist working with god he was caught up in the on unrest. we just look up for me and suffocating. you and. there are holes in the united states to stop law enforcement using facial recognition tool after it wrongly matched photos of members of congress with criminal mug shots. and tech giants like spotify and tesla suffering huge losses in profits on the program we assess how this is threatening the livelihoods of literally thousands.