exactly right and it's as we predicted turned off years ago i get back to that point because the. let's use a reset extended deep state this extends beyond america that includes for example much of the british establishment the british intelligence services and so on we talked endlessly and i'm glad we did because it's all pretty largely correct that they were seeking to discredit and undermine any possible even impeach trump even as he was being inaugurated and their worst fears have come true he has had to play a careful game and i think after two years he's learning to play that game but he's learning to handle a deep state know where he has to give a little pound of flesh here and there where behind the scenes he can continue with what he wants to do as you say fulfill his promises in respect of russia and otherwise but there's still two years to go and we'll have to wait and see if he can survive those four years it may be possible he can actually fully turn around american foreign policy it's a big gamble that he's taken but he's and he's learned to do it in small stages yes the big big question will be november elections here last thirty seconds for this

part go ahead erick. the point is people and he was talking about civil wars and you've got to realize that there is a low intensity civil war underway in the united states right now where if you look at the media everything is now defined in terms of black and white you cannot there is no analysis of trumps strategy because when you're talking about the devil in medieval theology you don't ask what are the devil's motives he's evil because he is a demon trump is by definition evil so you don't they don't think about they don't try to analyze what you're going to get into we're going to go to a short break here and we have to keep in mind that donald trump's. public opinion numbers are going up down after a short break we'll continue our discussion on trump's agenda stay with our team. it's. her.

completely. zia's says harlan kentucky. overboard this move them boys to go grocery bunnies leave. a ko money since it was almost no coal mines left. the job to grow all the coal mines of said. that it was love to see these people the survivors of disappearing before their eyes. i remember thinking when i was younger that if anything ever happened to the coal mines here that it would become a ghost town but i never thought in the million years i would see that and it's how it's happened. the

idea of spending money to acquire region to acquire territory to acquire wealth is an oxymoron there is no more wealth to acquire the ecosystem is collapsing the economy is flooded with worthless feel paper and the species is migrating over to the digital sphere feasibly these networks and platforms people are uploading their minds into cyberspace and hope to become a more coal so every dollar spent on defense every dollar spent by the pentagon is a wasted dollar it's a nineteenth eighteenth seventeenth sixteenth century mindset it's completely antiquated and it's utterly worthless. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy loon from day shouldn't let it be an arms race is on often spearing dramatic development only

mostly i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical thought i am time to sit down and talk. welcome back to crossfire were all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing some real news. ok let me turn to deman here we still continue to get articles that again you know helsinki is an interesting program is that henry kissinger is giving advice to president trump that and kissinger actually comes to i think he's been to russia seventeen times. a year and that the united states has to somehow come to an agreement with russia against china of course an echo of what kissinger engineered during the nixon administration nixon went to china i still think that

train has left the station a long time ago i think it is going to disagree with me a little bit well i agree with you because it was basically president obama who i think was the most disastrous president in u.s. history primarily because he just rode institutions you know he made people does believe in the elections for the first time in many years. his foreign policy disaster the main foreign policy disaster was that he managed to make russia and china elyse you know when russia became basically for the united states because of the ukrainian adventure of mr obama and mrs no one trait. putin plan to meet and to china and what did obama do he visited all of those competitors philippians he reassured that will against china and the chinese gave us a great surprise that we have been asking from them for ten years maybe more so

china became you know unwittingly probably russia's their way and it's not going to change in the near future because mr obama. may be about to change but the point is that this is an on. russia russia has interests are been arguing for the last fifteen years that russia's interests were to turn towards china but that does not mean that it was to be totally beholden to china russia's best interests are to be able to balance the world is going to break up into two competing poles you've got the western pole and you've got the greater china pole and russia would be very well to be able to move back and forth between them play them off against each other where possible and i don't want to sound. still in this from one thousand eight hundred three did it bring black as it were i mean just tore also had it they had a point basically in this triangle the soviet union now russia china the united states

because always been like that every poll wanted the other two poles to quarrel over evidence when they made a really good globus a good relationship with both of them to metoo next is it a yes that science i'll know was and they need nixon went to begin and managed to have good relations with china have normal relations with the british there and china and the soviet union of our mortal falsetto make it it not only did the op is it me go to charles here the thing is that in looking at this gambit of you know three major polls the thing is that what does the west now have to offer to russia because russia since one thousand nine hundred one and i would say that china during its modernization remarkable margin modernization russia and china have one very important thing in common the defense of their sovereignty the us the west is always asking everyone to compromise their sovereignty the fact that

russia and china are cooperating there is their sovereignties brings them together they have a common cause charles and you have that's absolutely right and that's clear to any observer of what's been going on there. last decade of the united nations within the united nations security council where the west's thinking obviously about libya and what happened with libya although there was a consensus in respect of libya in terms of the resolution it was passed but then that resolution of course was abused by britain france and the united states today and effect regime change in libya and i thought of course was very instructional i think for russia and for china that the west couldn't be trusted and therefore when we've seen with syria the various resolutions that the west is attempts to pass there and elsewhere in the world the west well really we mean the west by what we mean is pretty france in america pushing a constant agenda of interference in other countries affairs for that section of

benefit and that has been opposed consistently by russia and china so even on the united nations security council russia and china have been pushed constantly together by the west and the comment you just came out with peter is really backed up by what putin himself said recently when trump said he would almost impossible he would like russia to come back to the g. seven to become the g eight and of course response again was very interesting one person said if i can quite correctly said well actually thanks for the invitation but there are other forums that are available to us and of course he was talking about china and the rest of the world that isn't the west to answer your question peter what ken. is threatened by the u.s. . they have do not underestimate their ability to cause havoc the united states as you pointed out controls the global financial system. a system they could slap i mean they slapped sanctions on mr. roussel and this is

caused major this year ok even by november and european companies if they trade always buy oil from iran and the ok but that's that's for the russian instead. point some degree of detachment would be useful simply because otherwise the the the entire financial market is getting up right now and it's you know i'm working out the financial markets and raising funds for russian companies right is quite complicated right now the bond market has become a lot more a lot a lot more expensive to access because of the constant threat of american sanctions now whether trump can avoid further sanctions i think is and is another question and we should do a separate program on the weaponization of the dollar here if you're going to see i mean let me go to you about iran because you know we had we had president truman and we talked about he was kind of the world according to trump here but then you know he kind of goes back to the old script here and says to iran never ever

threaten the u.s. again or suffer consequences like the which few have ever suffered before i mean what gives mean the united states and then there's these rumors maybe planted rumors that the u.s. will have a one off strike on iran is this all bluster to keep the israelis and the saudis and a packet of home in the u.s. well i hope it is all bluster about that's very dangerous bluster you know and it's kind of standard for each one of these things. i mean starchild a nuclear strike there you go and he kind of back pedal look what it did to the european union well i agree with eric in principle. talking about irresponsible talk if someone should not be given the lessons on the responsible talk that's the united states you know that the states is rightly criticized the most on fundamentalists for overreacting or being the rage in their racial when they hear of all the holy koran being mistreated somewhere right well when the united states

just hears rumors about elections not end in that way the right away. and in the right way exactly as they behave as the regime that they asked the arrangements is that was he does want. what are you going to be going to charles will be going to charles in the london eye because it. could be moved to a lot of great things here but i mean eric's right is this this like this opening salvo in the negotiations i have kind of like a rocket man come in here more charles more seriously we know that donald trump has a visceral hatred of everything that barack obama did and that's one of the reasons why i walked away from the iran deal ok i still think and maybe this is tattooed on my brain it's all about the mid terms he said he was going to be against iran that's one of his check things on the back of the envelope he's just doing everything for some kind of red wave in november charles. what's interesting

we've mentioned pows and there was very in the last few days of course appalled i asked americans whether they would support an attack on iran. the overwhelming majority in fact by a factor of two to one said that they would oppose an attack on iran rather than support it and so that shows that people perhaps are coming around to trump's way of thinking i mean his wife thinking rather than what he actually says if i can read it this is. if we look at the his his negotiations with the e.u. with korea and we've seen this again and again what he does is make these threats his opponents respond with similar threats and we'll get a very entertaining twitter spot that ends up often with compromise and agreement and of course that's the basis of much negotiation and i think people understand also of course it gives the pound of flesh i mentioned earlier so here's to mastic critics a.t.m. tough on these various so-called enemies of the united states and to the lobby

groups important in the u.s. in other words saudi arabia for example is right obviously but nonetheless i think it's important to make this point that despite trumps what might be his best efforts the big ship of american foreign policy has not been turned around and it is still based fundamentally on confrontation and domination of the world rather than in cooperation and partnership and that of course is enshrined particularly this year within the u.s. national security document which named russia and china as enemies i mean large force as competitors to be actually guarded again as we have let everyone know about it but i think that you know i've read that the those. pronouncements here and make it does fall into the trumping world view that there can pet it turns as can be compete with here it's not it's not like we have the the u.s. has to change the world to make it safe for democracy we're no longer in that realm we're in a different well when you know or bush or for. chrysler compete for their new auto

models they're not competing against enemies they are not competing against the forces of evil they are competing against competitors trump understands perhaps bristly that other countries have their own interests too and he wants he described in this press conference with putin he described the russia as a strategic as a competitor and he said a good competitor well they're competing for markets they're. for ok i have always been the first time ever that i've seen american president meet the kremlin leader and didn't lecture about democracy and even a thirty second well following. metaphor that eric has just used for annoying to push your compete but you can't imagine or nor seen or we need a management change we need to change the right see it all and then there is little be fine and we can change him yes in some you know sanctions or whatever. any kind

of competition is better than the regime change which is basically a. euphemism for war in current times ok gentlemen to jump in here many thanks to my guest here in moscow and in london this is the end of our broadcast segment stay with stay with this was the extended version on our you tube channel see you next time remember. the church secret indeed the priests accused of sexually abusing children can get away with it it's going to literally like to call this the do graphic solution so what the bishop needs to do then he finds out that the priest says is

a perpetrator is. simply moves him to a different spot were the previous standards not the highest ranks of the catholic church conceal the accused priests from the police and justice system to that and that's the last the i intend that i included tuesdays out until. it's felt as true. right we're all set to start in five guys at the studio house a signal. he's not going to talk about no fly just maybe right after the mars explorers one who would have their meeting. record. to say last week i'll.

go to alice room welcome to sophie and co i'm so sweet shevardnadze said today we've got lots to talk about in our program and our gas to. little rock little. float. some people simply. use indigenous people as you know we that the speed in the oil trees. mostly see him say that's the only thing i do but the other thing.

all of a sudden the man just. simple be there joe you were fired. i said i will enter it even if they will not allow me. even if they will shoot me. i don't. mean you are indeed on the market now menominee been thought you have been killed by your minuteman by the government army because. he. looked up at least.

that. the divide over breakfast keeps up amid reports the u.k.'s ami's set to fly in food and medicine in case of a no deal with. the shocking postwar practices exposed in canada where authorities for thousands of unmarried mothers to give up their babies we hear from one of the victims there was no conversation about with me about how i got pregnant all they cared about was the fact that i was. pregnant and that i had a baby that they could. take. the u.s. confirms all the drones have been operating in asia from also six months. adding to

the long list of countries where america is fighting its so-called war on terror. thank you for watching the news here at r.t. international broadcasting live from moscow i'm kate. a british m.p. has tweeted god help us in response to reports the army will fly in food medicine and fuel if the country exits the e.u. without a trade deal the military says it hasn't received these instructions but the news has created concern in a country deeply divided over practice it is an assessor churkin a report with those perks a deadline fast approaching it seems the uncertainty about what exactly is going to be achieved come march next year has been peeking at the specially in light of the reports that have been circulating here in the british press over the last couple

of days talking about how the british army could be involved if there is a new deal brax it in terms of helping provide supplies such as few food and medicine and certainly this is something that would usually be associated with an emergency and of course the reaction. has been very swift to these reports some saying they're shocked and others refusing to be manipulated with what they call scare tactics god help us this is not coming from remain as this is not project fear pro bricks that ministers are drawing a blueprint for the army to deliver food fuel and medicine if we leave with no deal we have a duty to prevent the self immolation the plan of scaring the crap out of people with no deal horror stories in order to make a free trade agreement which will tank the economy look like a good deal is beginning to work well in reaction to all of this we have seen british prime minister theresa made was always said no deal is better than a bad deal making. we try to calm down the public when it comes to all of this all

from being worried about preparations that we're making i would say that people should take reassurance and comfort from the fact that the government is saying we're in a negotiation we're working for a good deal i believe we can get a good deal but actually it's right that we say because we don't know what the outcome is going to be we think it's going to be a good one we're working for a good one but let's prepare for every eventuality while luxury summate there is obviously trying to convince the public that everything is going to be all right we do know that downing street have also said they've decided to stop drip feeding information in the time to come about some of the details about contingency plans in case of a new deal brax it and of course they've also said that there are no plans told the british army in such a situation following those reports that have turned up quite a bit of trouble however with all of that said it seems the public is not quite

business that the government knows exactly what it is they're doing in this situation seems a bit shambo makes to me that they kind of you know need. to everything. anyone in london for us has really across from it really is do you think officials that are in charge of this process have done a good job so far figuring out what's going to happen and negotiating with the. just one party even though i mean. you know jamie france getting a real understanding of how this will affect the country itself those are some opinions of the people we talked to here in london but we also know that there's been a latest sky did a poll that was released that said that only ten percent of the people surveyed believe that the government was doing a good job when it comes to bribes and as many as seventy eight percent thought the complete opposite. the canadian government has acknowledged the practice dating

back to the one nine hundred forty s. when pregnant single women were forced to give up their babies to married couples some new mothers were lied to and told their children were still born we spoke to one of the victims of a practice meant to promote traditional families. as soon as they found out i was pregnant they mark my records b.f.a. baby for adoption. i was a fifteen year old girl pregnant i was pregnant from a sexual assault. and. there was no conversation about with me about how i got pregnant all they cared about was the fact that i was. pregnant and that i had a baby that they could. take. a healthy born haired blue eyed beautiful baby.

you will forget the child go home get married and have other children or if not get a puppy. that is what i was told get a puppy. it was a very abusive in there. we were isolated from our life i was isolated from my family as my community my sisters and my parents i was completely left alone. my parents were not canadian citizens they're there from europe and my parents believed they would get deported if they didn't follow that. what the government

wanted at maternity homes mothers were routinely denied their right to see older feed their babies there are still some mothers who do not know when their day delivers a boy or girl being told well it's none of your business to hold my daughter i actually had to ask three times and i. that first i said it quietly and then i started a little louder and then the last time that i asked i had to yell and i had to yell bring me my baby now. and then the nurse thought looked at the doctor for permission and i was quite surprised that the nurse would have to ask for permission for me to hold my own daughter since i'm her legal guardian and my daughter in my arms and. the room went black i started to get i started to pass out and then they took her away from me.

i met my daughter she she actually found me. so she phoned me. and she said. you don't know who i am and as soon as she said that i knew who she was. we talked on the phone for about six months getting to know each other getting from earlier with each other building some trusts she needed to feel safe because our children were told that there was something wrong with us they were told an alternate story that we were drug addicts prostitutes.

the us has confirmed it's always drivers have been operating in the west african country for more than six months there is not yet know if they carried out any strikes. in coordination with the government of nis yeah u.s. africa command has armed intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft already in the share to improve our combined ability to respond to threats and other security issues in the region i a saw aircraft began flying in early twenty eight. the u.s. military presence in asia has recently expanded due to concerns about the increase in militants the decision to deploy the drones was made in twenty seventeen after long negotiations were awaiting comment from both the u.s. and asia as all sources were drawn strikes have played a key role in the war on terror which the u.s. declared after the nine eleven attacks the us has carried out strikes on militant groups in afghanistan pakistan somalia and yemen the drug strikes have resulted in

nearest civilian casualties in every country involved with up to two hundred civilians dying in yemen alone. the. the. the question at the end of the. for the. foreign policy analyst jonathan shafi saying civilians in asia should be worried about this development billions in the media not just of it i say they should be concerned about the taint of damage that these drones can do and we've seen a new minister cations hundreds actually over the years.