that you see the pirate nick successfully had that sound that you get at that late late this interview from the live images from the frontline i don't. know if you're going to be one of your how the billboards are going to do. this but everything's despite the tear gas. fired tear gas despite that your gastro that's right you guys and despite the snipers that shoot live ammunition on the palestinian protesters journalists and paramedics the palestinians continue to protest east gaza strip along the fence in five different locations in the gaza strip meanwhile the israeli defense forces estimate of the number of what they call violent rioters at eight thousand friday solve the ninety three great march of return rally since they began in march and comes as hamas and israel reportedly consider a deal brokered by egypt to end protests along the border earlier my colleague you

know no talks to west bank based political science professor saeed. accuses israel of again using disproportionate force. as a member of using the life i mission or over the place not only in gaza whenever it's comes to the palestinians a confrontation usually they use the left emotion most of the times sometimes they use their bullets but mainly in gaza they are using the life i was initially to israel say have changed or fires and also people are constantly running up the fences and those kind of protests are organized by hamas that is what israel. well organized by a lot of busting in factions all of palestinian factions and it is representing the palestinian will. go to their borders and go to clean the right of return back to their homes which was a land which was taken from them in one hundred forty eight and the other hand is

better seen as have nothing what do you mean by guides israeli have if sixteen and thirty five and they have tanks they have artillery they have everything and there seem to have kites this is absolutely unmatch. a russian mall inside the u.s. embassy in moscow it is so late stuff but britain's guardian newspaper has been reveling in its scope but all is not as it seems are cheesy what is done of comments everybody loves a spy drama mystery suspense and a russian fan for time. the name of the future is stable in. my name is evident then you are a russian spy. this guardian story had every ingredient for a thriller recipe the u.s.

secret service as quite clearly stems from the very name is one of the most enigmatic agencies of the u.s. government its main function is to protect the lives of u.s. presidents ministers the top political brass and that is where the russians according to the guardian planted a mall the russian spy had been working under texted in the heart of the american embassy in moscow for more than a decade she had plenty of time to gather intelligence without supervision said the guardian's head of investigations claims she was operational for a whole decade in that time through the agency's internet in e-mail systems she had access to all kinds of highly classified stuff including the shared jewels of the president and vice president all of that according to the guardian the woman fled to the physic be russia's key security agency before being let go last year over security concerns they had lying the narrative the details looked spectacular in

the scoop which was even projected to link to a spy ploy in washington d.c. . her activities of stealing and sharing information could shed more light on how the russians were able to hack the twenty six thousand presidential election office of the d.n.c. except the secret service was well and impressed by the reporting and no doubt of shame or embarrassment but because of the facts according to the media release within the agency the woman in question held the position of a foreign service national these employees have their duties outlined very strictly as by default the secret service views every one of them surprises as potential spies the woman's responsibilities were limited to things like translation cultural guidance administrative support and i don't mean to offend anybody here but this. sounds more like the job description over tourist guide rather than a spy a material employee and i wish i could say the guardian did not know all these

things when publishing the article but they did prior to the guardian publishing their article the u.s. secret service provided they are editor in their official statement clearly refuting the unfounded information despite all this the article was published as is after all everybody loves this spy drama but some plots a better be saved hollywood script. journalist john white believes many media outlets over reliance on a new name to sources is eroding the audience's trust but this is a very sure the reporting in this is the epitome of fake news because without naming sources then they can make anything up they want and expect people to believe them and this is an out of there's been spun over the last few years when it comes to russia they are forced to rely on unnamed sources because that is know to place in proper investigative journalism and this is just part of

a downward spiral and it will only feed the growing distrust in the group growing this juncture between what people who are supposed to be reading the guardian and no longer are believers going on no world or what the guardian is tell them is going on it's a really big problem for the mainstream and the west. friday was a day four of the. friday was day four excuse me that was the kind of weird of the trial of donald trump's former campaign chairman paul man afford it is the first trial to result from the moeller investigations probe into a supposed collusion between the u.s. president campaign and russia and yet charges brought against metaphor and have nothing to do with russia or the campaign instead they're related to alleged tax fraud. the day for the discussion this is a chance to. enter once at the center rather transfers that's

a good day for the call metaphor is on trial today and it's already moving at lightning speed it could also free the screens on a man a fortune cooperate with knowledge on a broader investigation into russian collusion with the trump campaign. the fifteen thousand austria to come out of her body with an international way transfer according to a man's cloudier who testified today government exhibit it's not about cool i mean if you're going to deal in pirates call it make it a call that at least if i spend one million in suits and fifteen thousand nine hundred jack could only to come out looking like manna ford i would see.

this as an enormous waste of money in my view it is a gross miscarriage of justice it's setting for a lot of precedents and so it must be corrected i think in the end this trial judge judge ellis is a remarkable individual he's being very tough on both sides of a particular mall or i think the metaphor is likely to skate here i think that the special counsel is likely to be told to stand down and then i think there's going to be a wholesale housecleaning in that i was hopeful anyway the wholesale whole as. me of the partment just this was a screening of the iris elsewhere and it will give us the real investigations into who was conspiring to rig the primaries and rig the general election two thousand and sixteen. you have has released seventy one pages of alleged

correspondence between the bureau and christopher steele the former british spy who authored a dossier alleging collusion between donald trump and russia and the records show f.b.i. payments to steal as a confidential human source over an unknown period they also show that steele told the f.b.i. he had informed a third party he was acting as a source for the bureau however the document is mostly empty with important information removed so much so that it almost looks like a blank form and follows the f.b.i.'s release of documents on former trump advisor carter page with most of the text heavily redacted in that as well investigative journalist max blumenthal thinks that despite the redactions the documents prove trumps that narrative about f.b.i. clinton clinton during the two the clinton collusion excuse me during the two thousand and sixteen campaign these documents aren't heavily redacted they are completely whited out it's

a literal whitewash i mean in this seventy one page file there is more white than at a coldplay concert or the republican national convention it is all white it's a it's shocking really despite that complete redaction it it does confirm part of trump's narrative that the f.b.i. was colluding with the clinton campaign because we also know that christopher steele had been employed through fusion g.p.s. the opposition research firm in the contract was taken out by perkins koyo which was the law firm of hillary clinton's campaign. well that does it for me for this segment of back in a couple minutes you're watching international have much more news after a break. from the people in you know. we were in

number one. all day it's clear in just a little to see him of the. massive growth that's. and you would not want that. disinflation very little inflation for decades they just trace and gone down for thirty years markets have rallied for thirty years now the whole thing is reversing interest rates are going up so is inflation so we'll see how that plays out if wages rise faster than inflation. as such then trying to wonder if wages don't rise as fast as this neo inflation then we had trouble. coming.

back this is our team international controversy has broken out over a new tech editor hired by the new york times and it turns out junger has a record of racist tweets dating back several years though she has since deleted some of them the revelation has caused an uproar on social media some have even accused the newspaper of double standards. oh man it is kind of sick how much joy i get out of being cruel to old white man. he must be so boring to be white council white people. democrats have redefined racism precisely so people like sarah jones can say racist

things and still get jobs at the new york times would the new york times be so forgiving if white was replaced with black new york times i am an older white guy and you find it ok with sarah jong inflammatory racist comments to be just fine shame on your double standards. sat on the stands that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable of the times and we are confident that she will be an important for us for the editorial board moving forward. it's rector of the blockbuster guardians of the galaxy movies james bond was just fired after a bunch of tweets dating. from two thousand and eight i guess. the day a.b.c. stepped up did the right thing canceling the hit reboot of roseanne after the star

of the show roseanne barr doing something so abhorrent i wish i didn't have to repeat it. fellas cause a lot of two horse coper an adjunct fellow with the national center for public policy research and a legal commentator a horse thanks for being with us here on r.t. international. thank you sir so. this is not the first time that we have seen a social media outcry over someone's all the tweets is it fair to comb through people's social media accounts looking for dirt or should people take more responsibility for what they write online. well we need a standard either you're going to be accountable for the things that you say that we can uncover and see that you said that were hurtful or we're going to say that it's ok it's an open zone for anyone to say and do practically anything

what we can't continue to do is to say that conservatives or republicans or non progressives whatever they say we're going to watch them like hawks and then hold them accountable but only other hand progressives and the left can say whatever and whenever they want we need one standard it to me is unfortunate that these comments have still yet to be repudiated by ms young it would appear to me that the new york times is trying to take the responsibility for distancing themselves from these comments but i'd like to hear from her having her apologize and acknowledge these comments are totally unacceptable.