expert system and also public. house the basic foundation for the system so we are trying to. find a way to reach in you know how you know how effective each action. we have to try many things is you know this is very complicated and very significant issue so it doesn't happen. again you know. so we're trying to do. whatever we can in a find more effective way. to achieve our goal we're going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking to governor you jackie will discuss more who is right behind the policy or those who want to

stay with us. because you know what was you know my point i wanted to. ask but i. know i lost his boss because i just got the. resources you know. any of

those it doesn't but that's honest i don't mean to any of them. so i said you know what i was you know i got you know just i mean what almost did i'm already but it was sped up out of me just a lot of the media. i mean it was a lot. to sit up and i must admit that he was i just don't get off on getting the rest but those were the olds that if people saw that those people are going to respond on one of those but i was listening to this but it was one of these i'm going to scream i want my but if i see credible but you suspect that's already yes it will be and he thought a good thing of it but i think with you you seem to mean to carry out my thought aloud problem you just got to go you. would hope to. put themselves on the line they did accept the reject. so you want to be president and she. wanted. to go right to be

precise this is what before reasonable people. interested always in the ones. sitting. and we're back with governor governor so there are some serious steps towards nuclear issue going on in your neighboring north korea i wonder what you think about that because it has announced

a suspension of nuclear missile ballistic test and shutting down a nuclear test site. this is widely seen as a positive step towards nuclear zation do you think kim jong un is actually not going to make any nuclear tests on what well we cannot have a conclusion yet we have to see you know we have to see the actual actions. you know being. betrayed so many times. so what's important is. you know it's been one of the word is used. you know reversible. how. reversible you know how to prove it and you know of course. in the czech it. very important issue but we need to do that to.

actually be the most korea nuclear so you have an arson a south korea is that are meeting right now in the talks between america and north korea are being set up and all of the partners south korea north korea south korea america japan the. are saying that the ultimate goal is to see completely denuclearized north korea but wait a logical question is why would came down and give up his nuclear arsenal i mean why would all of a sudden destroy completely something that is building up for a decade world that is exactly why we have to really see the actions of those korea i think. you know. motivations of course. one extending. the current regime and if he believes. having

a nuclear. is more beneficial to extending the regime he may hold onto it. if he believes. giving it up is more beneficial. for extending their regime if he will so. we have to prepare an environment that he believes in. that you know. so for he knew the more precise in your opinion what should be getting. in exchange of giving up then you know what he's saying is security assurance and denuclearization in you know there might be i mean this security assurance there might be more concrete. requests are you quote i meant conditions like

having no. u.s. force in peninsula or something. so i don't know they will come out but you know it's. very difficult. to to predict now you know what conditions he would give up the group and at this point we need to see and also. the timing i will discuss the timing because japan's foreign minister says that north korea should abolish nuclear arms by two thousand and twenty. do you think that's a realistic goal time wise because i mean it took two years of tops to just stop the iranian nuclear program they didn't even have an actual weapon i mean how can this diplomacy with north korea work faster than with iran. you know whether it's realistic or too fast or. too slow you know i

hope you feet by twenty twenty that's very welcome. to the extent. it's possible everyone should make every effort to to to achieve that. you know. i would say there's no too early for that so. i don't know if it's you go or not but at least you could try so like i mentioned south curve. america are going to sit down and talk to north korea as as of now japan has made about it to those talks to think it should be part of those talks so what can they bring to the table. well. you know. you know

a lot of fools in the. entire sitting an entire condition or sitting the entire environment or longer process of you know post agreement to. i don't know a this point. can do but at least you know carefully. you know see a. curious. movement or options and think you know. in a given position but. no relieve the pressure on north korea on this we actually see put. options it's also quite interesting to see what's going to happen to your country's security because japan

has been relying on us for protection for decades and now trump is saying its allies in asia pacific should rely more and more on their own resources their own security and then you know we have personally heard to japanese government saying that slowly japan should be expanding its own japanese military do you think it's time to rethink the security concept of japan well you know i don't think the big picture will change will continue to lie us with the united states and of course it will have close relationship with korea. and other. some of the other. countries too. but in that balance or some roles could be redefined. well for example. you know we.

would like to see japan to. u.s. nuclear nuclear deterrence not the deterrence as a whole but nuclear deterrence. will give a better position in terms of promoting nuclear. nation or nuclear disarmament. and. for example if you look carefully we recently received a report paper from you need year. research institute. if you go back to the first question. if we look carefully. at the. situation. of nuclear deterrence against north korea is not necessary.

you know. that every minute. you know that american nuclear terrorists in a way is a guarantee that no one attacks japan as well now well known though not necessarily because you know for example north korea. their motivation is to. not to be invaded not to be. attacked to destroy the regime. you keep interrupting you but you know i'll forget to ask you this it feels like you don't think the north korea is actually capable of attacking. and they very well they are and they are they are capable of attacking neighbor but whether they will do is a different question right you don't think they'll do they think they use the nukes just to keep the regime in place that's it you will. feel. oppressed

or. there they feel there is an immediate very imminent danger of being attacked but they know that once the use of nuclear weapons that's basically there is seen no. because there would be. there would be fight for about and you know there's so much. you don't feel like i just have to go to the question because you didn't quite answer you don't feel like you need american nuclear deterrent because you don't feel like north korea is actually about attacks and when it's more about keeping its regime in tahoe it's not about feeling or you know. it's not about feeling it's not me saying this but i'm talking about disunity and people paper. from north korea's point of view their nuclear deterrence know what their deterrent

against is a time. from. to destroy the regime and if. the top first you know it's there is. very certain that their regime will collapse so their real possibility is there a high probability that north korea is going to attack you know from themselves but what we're talking about at this point. and if you were. again talking about space is to destroy the north korea's nuclear capability you know they need to use so many nuclear weapons if they use nuclear weapons and is very realistic which is

going to cause so much radiation issues not only was in those korea south korea china and russia too they're all. in original question was that japan always enjoyed america's protection because we don't have the military security system in place to protect your country now that trump is saying that you should rely more on your own resources do you think japan needs an actual army and actual security system in place. i didn't say we don't have at all we have a conventional defense system to certain extent and we're partnering with states my view for example you know. nuclear deterrence against north korea we may have. meant we could be out.

to change. the roles and the balance right so there could be a new balance in new thinking of our security. system i just have to question that sensitive issue you know nice perception. of japan in general so the american president has a visit here ashima but do you see a situation where a japanese prime minister for instance visits non-germane because the chinese are saying you know. so anti-nuclear complain in japan of which you are part of of course is sort of a way to whitewash japan's role in a world war two and not fair because you can't discuss the bombing without the reasons behind the bombing do you do you see a situation where your prime minister would would actually visit nineteen like american president hiroshima you know maybe possible. you know.

and of course depends environment and context if dot is. in the core of the context. think you'd be difficult for a prime minister to go but the parties are out of the context you know it may be he may be able to go. all right thank you very much for this interview and wish you all the best a lot and have a nice rest of the same question thank you you thank .

and our going out there how can i better learn to love the idea that that not out of the mouth of the mahdi the day of the nightmare in germany. this was a good time to. try to move there i'm doudna mom. no loud loud loud loud loud enough why not get into our socks or x. chanting in the hall people we believe just a little bit here. bottom of my case i live on the bubble side johnny volare of the moment i don't matter how the little accusers are there a lot more of them i'm a little white community older looking at the things i don't want to put out a lot more party with an older mother brother.

when i was child small seemed wrong why don't we all just don't all. the world yet to shape our disdain comes out of the book and in gains from it because betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground.

moscow is there is the u.s. expansion of its trying capabilities near syria could be a sign that washington is pretty getting prepared ahead of a possible both flank chemical attack by terrorists in italy a province. hundreds of far right supporters rally in the german city of kevin it after a local was stabbed to death in an incident involving people have quoted various nationalities. the french president emmanuel mark wrong say as the security of europe should no longer rely solely on the u.s. .

a very warm welcome is five pm here in moscow and you're watching our international with me airing our top story this hour the syrian government says it's ready to recapture the last major rebel stronghold in damascus has been deploying additional forces to the front line of the enclave though it still says it's willing to pursue a course of reconciliation however that idea was snubbed by the key militant group controlling the area where our son its leader warned other factions from talking to damascus.

meanwhile the russian defense ministry says the u.s. is expanding its strike capabilities near syria moscow says it has intelligence that jihad its are intending to stage a chemical attack which the west could use to justify action against the syrian government a strike on cases item using poison laden missiles is planned within the next forty eight hours that some players outside the region are preparing yet more provocations on syrian soil involving chemical weapons with the aim of destabilizing the situation there and undermining the positive dynamics of the ongoing peace process. more the missive warns that it's the white helmets pro rebel group that will be there first with cameras and tweets as they usually are whenever there are rumors of chemical attacks and we reached out to them for comment and as is also usual the u.s.

and its power stabbed ready with guns drawn we now see plans for the syrian regime to resume offensive military activities in it with. we are obviously. about the possibility that it may use chemical weapons again if the syrian regime uses chemical weapons we will respond very strongly it's getting very hot in the area america's just pulled up another guided missile cruiser packed with tomahawk missiles the weapon of choice when attacking syria also u.s. strategic bombers heavy duty stuff have just arrived in the neighborhood the russians also acting moving more and more ships to the mediterranean rumors say submarines tool and it's tool dreadfully reminiscent of what happened last.

meal weeks before the alleged chemical incident in ghouta the incident that provoked a british friends and u.s. missile barash well mia weeks before that the russians warned that rebels were preparing to stage a chemical attack now they're warning it will happen again. which begs the question why oh why would the who has almost won this war why would he launch a chemical attack and invite disaster now there is no value for syria or its allies in using chemical weapons against any of the

terrorists syria is already winning syria has already won along with its allies along with russia and with iran and hezbollah they have already essentially defeated the tech feed terrorist cleanup time the other thing you've got is we have so many times been told that the organization for the prohibited prohibition of chemical warfare has emptied syria of all of its chemical weapons this happened a few years ago but we keep getting told syria is making chemical weapons. almost a thousand people gathered as an anti migrant demonstration in the german city of kevin it says right wing sentiment continues to raise its head protests protesters held both halls at police who are trying to disperse the crowd. to the. well we can get more

details on this now from marty's pay to all of paid to. such scenes. well that crowd that we saw there of around eight hundred people including it said members of a far right football hooligan outfit marauding through central came that all was sparked following the stabbing to death of a thirty five year old man in the early hours of sunday morning two other people were seriously wounded in that incident a twenty two year old iraqi and a twenty three year old syrian man have been taken into custody following that and it prompted opposition figures to come out and say that this shows that integration in germany isn't working that the police are failing to keep people safe now since twenty fifteen germany has taken in over a million refugees and migrants and integration has been a problematic issue the most recent proposal that was put forward which involved

compulsory community service and also. also conscription into the military was recently dismissed by the chancellor. i don't want to every time he is compulsory military service i've consulted with military chaps the i'll see the profession of soldier is not what it used to be and has changed for them and peter maybe you can give us a sense of the general feeling in europe over the issue when they're all together. all we've seen recently from a leading figure in the center right republican party in france is him saying that integration isn't working when it comes to finding a role in a cohesive union between those people who've arrived european culture as it stands in fact he went as far as to say that european culture as we know it was at risk by current policies. how can we fail to realise that we have reached the

limit as regards integration and that this muslim immigration of today poses a cultural threat to european civilization. but we're over three years on from the initial musser arrival of people into europe of refugees and migrants the certainly no consensus on how they should be integrated no catchall integration policy and it is continuing to cause problems across europe. thank you for those details that's artie's peter oliver speaking to us live from berlin there. now u.s. intelligence agencies are reportedly complaining that their sources in russia have thirdly gone quiet quiet it comes amid a host of fresh russian meddling allegations ahead of the american midterm elections artie's daniel hawkins picks up the story. less than two years after the twenty sixteen u.s. presidential election the russians are at it again the end words this time it's the

u.s. mid-term elections in the crosshairs of kremlin meddling another russian attack on our elections a serious warning about russian meddling in future u.s. elections there are also hacking or attempting to hack political campaigns russia is at it again it's clear for all to see what happens after all how can one refute such a mass of sources intelligence sources tell him b.c. news there is no doubt the russians are trying to influence the presidential election a source tells n.b.c. news law enforcement and democratic sources telling c.n.n. . sources two sources with links to the counter intelligence community anonymous sources according to anonymous washington post source now we may not even have those through a lawyer according to the new york times they've gone to ground gone quiet what's happened there could be a couple of reasons it's ok the times reassures us they've not been killed and risk yet although says the article putin is intent on killing traitors and the russians

are willing to kill sources perhaps they say the assassination attempt on double agents script file has affected flows of intelligence as with the meddling accusations minimal evidence was also enough to expose the kremlin's hand in that case russia has long arms russia has lots of tentacles we imagine that they will continue to have an interest in our elections but also many other nations' elections as well we continue to see a pervasive measures in messaging campaign by russia to try to weaken and divide united states intelligence blackout could also be down to a fall in u.s. operative numbers in russia the russians kicked out a whole bunch of our people laments a former cia officer a reference of course to moscow's retaliation after dozens of russian diplomats were first expelled from the united states the russian meddling saga.