allies are a necessity to the potato. i know took any sauce from those it is just simply literally to maintain an investigative documentary. ghost war on obscene. russia's foreign minister reiterate small willingness to cooperate with britain on the script poisoning case but not on the principle of a scene guilt starts after some stock reactions from u.k. politicians you see that you see what's happening. with these two characters produced in this city to recruit by putin and it really makes my. british m.p.'s mainstream media explode into

a frenzy after the russians accused of carrying out a nerve agent attack in the u.k. come forward and speak to auntie's editor in chief didn't i any involvement. in other news concerns are raised over the potential presence of french troops in syria the photos released by the us army appear to show a french military vehicle in the background and also to come the sound. people here are. pretty upset their products were i've been a very long time hillary supporter it was a shock to all of us the results of the election. in a link to video google's top executives revealed her true thoughts on donald trump's twenty sixteen election victory raising questions over political bias.

for getting to your international first this hour for you the world and t. doping watchdog has announced that it will discuss reinstating the russian anti-doping agency rosado was declared non-compliant in two thousand and fifteen after an alleged drug scandal even staying there will be. officially discussed on september twentieth says that it has fulfilled all of the criteria in order to be reinstated. murderess having a holiday for how and only strengthening the case against them that's just a taste of the response they're greeted artie's interview with the two russians accused of carrying out the nerve agent poisoning in the u.k. city of salzburg russia's foreign minister is just spoken on the issue for the first time since our exclusive during a joint news conference with his german counterpart here's what they both had to say. on the ship all our official requests received just formal notes and even

simply spoken responses boiling down to your guilty all we need from you is to explain whether it was an order or an accident used to maintain discussion on such a level is pointless we are still ready for serious dialogue based on the rule of international law but not on the principle they call highly likely to shove in four months when we got the information on the script from the u.k. and we have no doubts about it we are also interested in an investigation of what's happened if everybody is ready to exchange information on the issue to clear up the situation nothing more than prevent an investigation. interview even spot reaction from the former british foreign secretary reportedly a contender for the next prime minister boris johnson. but you know you see the you see what's happening now with these two two characters produced in this city through kuwait by putin own russian t.v. these ludicrous she questions make

a mockery of the whole thing and it really makes my blood boil typically boris response really you hear him using vivid language about his blood boiling and he said that alexander patrol found respond to share of on the murderers and that they're welcome to sue him in court if they want to challenge that fact and he also spoke of his work as foreign secretary saying that he holds the kremlin in absolute contempt and that he made what he called the classic mistake of trying to engage with moscow take a listen to what he had to say i made the coffee classic mistake of thinking it was possible to have a reset with russia and. then it just became clearer and clearer to be true that was before. when he was foreign secretary as top diplomat it was his job to represent the country to travel and he called himself

a committed rasa file back in twenty seventeen it was his job to meet up with his russian counterpart sergey lavrov now however when he happens to be speaking in washington he says he regrets it all very much and it was a fool's errand and to quote something he once said about his own views in europe his view on russia appears to have been like a supermarket trolley as well so quite an extreme reaction from the former foreign secretary why does the view of a former cabinet minister even. well he is widely tipped here by the bookmakers to be potentially the next conservative leader so clearly his views are getting a lot of air time also the current lead to resume a prime minister her spokespersons rubbish the interview that alexander trough and we did with our t.

saying that the account provided by the two alleged attackers is an insult to the public's intelligence and outright lies so downing street wasn't having any of it but most foreign ministry spokesperson maria zahar of earth was unimpressed with downing street's response she came out yesterday questioning why london immediately dismissed petroff account forty minutes after that interview was first to add and the latest development from moscow comes from dmitri peskov the spokesperson for the russian president vladimir putin he said that russia would consider any request to interview the man from the u.k. in accordance with russian law but moscow is yet to receive such a request from london. just to remind you the two suspects accused by british authorities of poisoning former double agent so your script came forward on

thursday and they spoke to auntie's editor in chief margarita simonyan denying any involvement in the incident. was one of them in them i've been to the one you called me on my cell phone and told me that you are a slumber shooter from the looks on the floor. if you really look like the pictures shown to us by the u.k. doesn't mean that if. you are someone who are you. we are those who were shown to you in the pictures. and i would throw at the russians are those your real names national yes they are real names and would suggest that even now when you are talking about it to tell you the truth you look very nervous on them. what would you look like when your life is turned upside down in a moment in just one day and changed our lives. what do you work for the g.r.u.

at work and you meet and you and i don't either but no one accuses me of that working for the gerry you but you are being accused of that your colleagues accuse us of that by your colleagues you mean journalists you are being accused by u.k. authorities and yes that's the scariest thing where do you work if you are adults you need to make a living if we tell you about our business people we work with will be affected tell me anything so that we believe you everyone has questions what do you do to cut a long story short we're in the fitness industry. and he said in chief said she didn't give her view on purpose preferring to leave it to the viewers to decide whether or not to believe the men here's what she had to say following interview. you know there were nervous and sweating a lot i had to turn up the air conditioning a lot higher than usual and still there were sweating and wiping their foreheads

which obviously happens when people are nervous there could be a lot of reasons for it i understand this was the first interview in their lives but they could have been nervous for other reasons as well that's also possible they refused to show their i.d.'s on camera because they didn't want to be pursued and identified further but they showed them to me i did not run a polygraph on them as a journalist i believe what they see i saw those were the people i saw their i.d.'s and that they feed the photos and videos what was going through their minds and whether they were speaking the truth it's hard to say. former british diplomat craig murray says that the media rejection of the suspects story is a concern. some of the things which were being said they widely in the u.k. particular by the media to be implausible are in fact not implausible it turns out that it is absolutely true that stonehenge was closed by snow on the barge so the idea that they went there on the third of march time soulsby the city center snowed

under and stonehenge closed and came back and tried to connect state is perfectly possible those were the weather conditions of the day i found the straightforward rejection of the story by the british a fart is very troubling indeed given that this is meant to be a criminal case there's meant to be. a possible trial and where you know potential defendants have outlined very defense and the government is immediately said that's ridiculous and it's an insult to make that defense that's not how you'd behave in a democracy in criminal cases these t.v. footage isn't isn't hard evidence of anything except to people walking around stalls because that's all it shows plainly of a british government determines this investigation on day one the day after the attack the scope of attack happened basted up in parliament and said russian government to done it and they've been trying ever since then to fix the evidence.

around that conclusion which is not the way an investigation should be done. new pictures released by the united states only appear to inadvertently expose a much larger french military role in syria than was previously thought a french army vehicle could be seen in the background of a photograph from their resort where the u.s. is fighting what's left of islamic state terrorists the picture though was quickly deleted it details. well we know that the u.s. army released this photograph on wednesday to show its special operation joint task force on the ground in syria in this particular region. but what the egalite members of the public clearly spot is a french military vehicle in the background now people have said they sure that it's a french military vehicle because this particular type of vehicle is only used by french and saudi arabian forces and saudi arabian forces are not on the ground in this particular region now what it showed is that

a military vehicle in the background and what's really interesting about this is that the french government the french military has never acknowledged that it has french troops on the ground in this particular area of syria now we do know that this area is where the u.s. backed fighters have been battling against the hardest and we also know that france has been part of a u.s. led coalition which has been cut ducting operations over syrian air space over the last three years but in particular it's been aiding forces on the ground as they fight against isis forces now and we know that france has pledged in the past full support to syrian kurds on the ground the president should the syrian democratic forces and the french support in particular for the stabilization of the security zone in the north east of syria within the framework of an inclusive and balanced governance to prevent any resurgence of i saw it while seeking for

a political solution to the syrian conflict well that support from the french military has been vegas to water actually means and what the context of that support actually is and there is actually a question of the legality of the french and the u.s. troops being in syria to all of course they do not turn off a u.n. mandate and they do not have permission from the syrian government. to be that we also know that francis repeatedly warned that if it believes a chemical attack has taken place it will seek retribution and retaliation for such an attack on the syrian ground scenario with their troops seemingly absolutely on the ground in this area nobody has acknowledged previously perhaps france is raising an even bigger warning flag. and then time tensions in syria hundreds of pentagon troops and allied rebel militants have finished rare large scale joint

drills in the old town face us and forced the completions and top syrian rebel commander was that the drills are a message to russia and iran that the militants intend to stay in that area these exercises are of great importance they have beefed up the areas defenses and have raised both combat and civilian capabilities and morale we are staying with are the russians or iranians once or not rebels call the rules a response to moscow's warning that it could attack near the u.s. garrison in pursuit of terrorists your hardest jihadists are hiding in u.s. protected areas denied by the pentagon which adds that it is not seeking escalation and maintains de confliction channels with russia both russia and syria view the us and force the conviction bases as a violation of syrian sovereignty middle east affairs expert ali risk thinks that international law doesn't apply to washington. we have had these double standard when it comes to international law you know international law is applied in the

very selective way at the same time we see that the u.s. accuses others of violating sovereignty while the u.s. is the biggest violator of the sovereignty of other nations by syrian army and its allies if they do talk of these here was forces there is a clear legal justification because you know legally speaking as a sovereign country you do have the right to use military force against any occupying force be it the u.s. or from any other country as one get rid of what remains of terrorist groups in the country i don't think this is the syrian army will stand for continued american presence continued american presence means continued american occupation. facebook bans then suddenly readmit the accounts of a campaign or after he announced his interview with the controversial media platform in four walls details for you after the break.

with the advent of the trump presidency much has been said about america's culture wars even a new civil war the country is clearly divided but trump didn't do this on his own there are two americas now can call it six. ministries police forces and city administrations of many countries depend on one corporation and another by michael hoping the boy doesn't come from one present god i'm stunned this is not the guns not woods as that on into the sea it's just a proprietary software you don't know the source code isn't that such a security risk when you have a black box operating in the public eye to microsoft dependency puts governments

under a cyber threat and not only that. mole. is still the only one of the most vocal. these two groups. with. these this is. the host i didn't miss the old vision stopping there was a sting of phone calls a front is up and his cards on the fine. welcome back the impartiality of google has once again been called into question after a link to video showed the company's executives expressing disappointment this was back in two thousand and sixteen a double trump's election victory he's done of course picks up the story. google's always tried to maintain a political front but recently tells

a very different story and if true it outlines google's executives pick for president in the twenty sixteen presidential elections most people here are. pretty upset pretty sad for. you because of the election and i certainly find the selection deeply offensive and i know many of you do too this is none other than surrogate brin google's cofounder and if his assumption that every worker in the video was a clinton voter was upsetting it gets worse that was the first moment i really felt like we were going to lose and it was really doing all it did feel like a ton of bricks dropped on my chest and that right there is the chief financial officer of google's parent company alphabet ruth poor at holding back tears at the thought of their election defeat but whose defeat exactly last time i checked google wasn't a wing of the democratic party nevertheless they seem to have

a mutual understanding on why trump won zina phobia hatred and a desire for answers that mean it may not be there here we have senior vice president for global affairs tend to walker looks like despite google's claim to objectivity walker's got some pretty partisan views on american politics but google maintains those are personal views ones that don't affect their product. to the rise of fascism and also to the communist revolution i think it's worth be very vigilant in thinking about all these issues what can we do to to you. maybe a better quality of governance decision making and so forth solid explanation of ideologies that shaped the twenty first century survey but fair enough google is looking for ways to make the world better but that hasn't stopped the flow of accusations that their strategy is politically biased like that time google removed

a pro-life singers music video on you tube. i had known. and you tube's move to hit popular users before conservative users especially presidents not draining the swamp dime it is that was going to be it bottles enough to make it a movie. but there are some at google who don't agree with the company's liberal leanings james to moore a conservative engineer wrote a memo just a memo to highlight potential bias in google's policy and he was fired for it google has several biases a new discussion about these biases is being silenced by the dominant ideology what follows is by no means the complete story but it's a perspective that desperately needs to be told google google has always claimed

its hands were collina when it came to political bias hate speech or other inappropriate content the company always claimed it had its reasons but with insight into what the top brass at google is apparently thinking perhaps it's time for a better understanding of what bias really means quarter r.t. . founder of the wall cohen campaign brendan straka found himself banned from facebook this week it came after he announced an interview with the controversial info wall's media platform the ban however was lifted shortly afterwards walkways a viral campaign on facebook encouraging liberal americans to leave the democratic party the movement involves over one hundred eighty thousand members from instructor told r.t. this is mentioned devastated his ability to reach his audience to lose my platform that way is devastating and essentially i think that what they are trying to do is

to sabotage the walkway march on washington using this info wars word as the catalyst to do it why should i be banned from using my social media platform for using the word in four wars i wasn't even state i wasn't stating an opinion i wasn't being controversial i wasn't being provocative i was literally alerting the members of my group that i was about to do an interview on a website. if it was a site hosted by alex jones it's right to more than one and a half billion views on you tube but the platform was repeatedly criticized for promoting conspiracy theories and especially using hate rhetoric donald trump has previously expressed support for. leading social networks bands jones and his media outlet for violating their policies twitter recently announced that he was being banned permanently. i think that based book is using its policies completely inconsistently because these. blocks and suppression only seem to affect people on

the right they seem to only affect conservatives they never seem to have any impact on liberals or people on the left i never see them getting banned or suppressed it's time for action in to push for freedom of speech i mean this is what this is all about with their suppressing free speech. or tears across a comment from facebook about why brendan struck his account was bound to let you know what they say if and when we get any response from. the u.s. state department has praised the rabies actions to reduce violence and saying riyadh is doing what it can to minimize civilian casualties that we see them taking steps is it perfect no absolutely not do we see them doing what they can to mitigate civilian casualties absolutely we deal with the comments came after the two states might pump a zero certified to congress these are delayed coalition is quote undertaking

demonstrably actions that certification allows washington to continue providing aid to riyadh in its war against rebels and al-qaeda terrorists in yemen started a bombing campaign against rebels which they deemed terrorists began in twenty fifteen with substantial support from the us government the two groups like al qaeda which washington's been fighting against for nearly two decades have taken advantage of the crisis capturing areas in the south of yemen has done off looks into how the u.s. approach in fighting al qaeda differs depending on the region or the motive. al qaeda a whole generation of americans grew up with these two words engraved in their minds since preschool years two words that have seen hundreds of thousands of u.s. troops fanned out all over the globe with an uncompromising objective to defeat terror.

for the past few years one battleground yemen some four thousand troops in the country even now and that's enough for the u.s. to turn a blind eye to schools hospitals and homes flattened by saudi bombs the administration's policy is to focus on ending the war and avoiding a regional conflict countering the threat from the islamic state of iraq in syria in yemen and al qaeda in the arabian peninsula but yemen is just the latest in a sequel which started back in two thousand and one in afghanistan where a force of between two and five thousand dollars to fight has ignited the now infamous war on terror on my orders the united states military has begun strikes against al qaeda terrorist training camps and military installations of the taliban

regime in afghanistan today we focus on afghanistan but the battle is broader at that point obviously it was a way to rally the country to to create you know a much larger military for the united states at that point between about two thousand and twenty eleven the united states spent about one point three trillion on its wars in iraq and afghanistan but al qaeda is biggest lead is not in yemen it's not in afghanistan it's in syria's northern prove. libya is a province just the largest al qaeda safe haven since nine eleven and it live now is a huge problem it is an al qaeda safe haven right on the border of turkey the u.n. estimates al qaeda is fortress manned by at least ten thousand offshoot fighters that's at least twice as many as in afghanistan back at the dawn of the war on

terror yet washington is not nearly as trigger happy as one would expect while we had three meetings in the security council on syria to stern us warnings came down from most members of the security council telling them that not just chemical weapons would be addressed by the united states and our allies but any. on the civilian people and level was going to be dealt with when russia and the assad regime say they want to counterterrorism they actually mean they want to bomb schools hospitals and homes the obama administration had already loosened rules of engagement in the war against islamic state in syria and iraq to permit more killing of civilians in in the bombing campaign that the u.s. conducted they expended over one hundred thousand bombs and missiles to destroy

cities like rocka and mosul president trump has reportedly loosened the rules of engagement further america's humanitarian concern for syria is remarkable especially in the sense that it's seemingly peripheral elsewhere except the terrorists don't exactly share washington's geographical discernment. firmly remind of our breaking news story this hour the world anti doping watchdog has announced that it will discuss reinstating the russian anti doping agency saga was declared non-compliant in two thousand and fifteen after an alleged drug scandal the reinstatement will be officially discussed on september twentieth results as it has fulfilled all of the criteria in order to be reinstated. rough things up for this news i'll see you in.

when gold make this manufacture consent instant of public wealth. when the ruling classes project themselves. with the famous merry go round lifts only the one percent. we can all middle of the room sick. i mean the real news is. my body told me that i belong with the board but my thoughts my mind was in that along with the girls. under the surgery stops to be of any particular.

person's doctor. i was born a male had a sex change when i was thirty years old. i've now been living as a woman for twenty eight years and i fully regret this. problem should have gone away from it by now but they hadn't so these surgeries are nothing more than plastic surgery i've had several female to male friends and you look at it and you just go oh god you paid for that it's horrible nobody can change genders is impossible. is delusional it's a mental illness. this is now one of my bones and flesh of my flesh she shall be called woman because she was taken down from a.