the leadership there in tehran did not hesitate in returning the details now from new york with a trunk. the first punches were thrown by the two presidents here at the u.n. h.q. on tuesday trump and rouhani speeches were only a couple of hours apart on iran's leaders so. death. and destruction you know if you stay some just. relations area the corrupt dictatorship in iran. and in peace and the perpetrators of the. plunder the nations resurfaces. to enrich themselves. unilateral sanctions in themselves constitute economic terrorism. donald trump the iran nuclear deal struck under his previous us or obama according to the us president's version of events the iranian government exploited the green ones to

dodge sanctions continue following its people and expanding its toxic influence in the region plus donald trump is a big fan of sanctions on iran tehran is blaming washington for treating agreements like rubbish they're not ruling out coming back to their nuclear programs as part of their measures in response anyway washington is clearly on a mission to teach iran a lesson this week in new york the top man in charge of the american foreign policy their national security adviser and the secretary of state are hopping from one event to another making open threats against iran and warning anyone who dares to deal or even talk with them i. want you.

we must put pressure on the regime to rein in its destruction and demand that iran act like a normal country if you cross our allies or our partners if you harm our citizens if you continue to lie cheat and deceive yes there will indeed be held to pay. the language work continues right behind these doors where donald trump is chairing a you want security council meeting on iran on wednesday previously u.s. president has only done it twice and there is barely any doubt that mr clark will be trying to convince the rest of the world that iran has close links with terrorists just like in his main general assembly speech finance terrorism and fund havoc and slaughter in rome we condemn all acts of terrorism without equivocation

trump is basically trying to defend himself and he is trying to basically talk about his accomplishments during the two years which was all even sarcastic for the people at sounding the assembly iran basically is trying its most efforts to cooperate with its allies in the region fight terrorism which has been caused by the you asked and of course we know that president rouhani had declared earlier that he will not be because of different elements one of which is because of the iraq that the u.s. government withdrawing from the deal and proving to be untrustworthy and inconsistent in its foreign policy although. as mentioned iran it will again come on the discussion of the security council today and here on our international we'll be all across the updates for you in the meantime we took to the streets of tehran to get reaction to what is being said at the u.n. . what drum set of the ground and bod support in the iranian nation is

a sheer lie because if you don't really so they wouldn't have had the. tech he quit an international agreement which the us government itself had signed before shows that he's worth cannot be trusted and we can never trust the us a whole talks without him assessing trump speech any sane person even a child can understand that is contradictory on the one hand he puts pressure on people yeah on the other he says he supports the iranian nation well this demonstrates he's a liar and i believe every negotiation with the us is needed because it believed to the fulfillment of our demands i think it would be helpful if we can reach an agreement with the us and generally they have now been friends with us and they have never cared about iran now will they. i made his speech didn't just focus on global adversaries he also talked up the allies as well it seems the group is growing. there is india and three

society over a billion people. successfully lifting countless millions out of poverty and into the middle class. there is saudi arabia working. and the crown prince are pursuing bones to reform. there is israel proudly celebrating its seventieth anniversary as a thriving democracy in the holy land. in poland a great people are standing up for their independence their security and there's. move to spread over the significant host nation support to cover the majority of costs would want to permanently deploy us division to the president offered us. much more than two billion dollars. we didn't discuss that in this meeting

but. this was a useful meeting with the minister. i think it is important to have invited by the russian nato. and you wrote to us just a taste of the headlines in the british tabloids over the negotiations and if indeed they were designed to incite europe's leaders it seems to have worked the e.u. now complaining the u.k. press has gone too far as our correspondent shot it depends it seems they. are feeling a little vulnerable in the wake of some media headlines in the u.k. hold the front page the sun the u.k. is a right leaning tabloid used a clever play on words to get its feelings across the recent salt spec summit you know the one where the need is over the outright reject. kase briggs it proposals

well that headline has caused a tailspin in the e.u. and the commission is now calling for a more responsible approach by the media in the way that it informs the public about issues like brigs it and there i was thinking that freedom of press was a cornerstone of the new media can build the culture of dialogue or so divisions spread disinformation and encourage exclusion the braggs a debate is the best example of that i would advocate for a european approach to media based on quality and smart regulation if needed the sun front page which set the justice commission off is not the only hard hitting act on the part of the british tabloids known for pulling no punches and surely the breaks of debate coverage is no exception.

but oh yeah headlines like this really that offensive earn sewing deficient to the extent that some sort of regulation is needed to rein them in i think a newspaper can write whatever they want to but if it's aggressive towards a community in terms of law regulation. which it should be forbidden to media needs to to remain free whatever is written in those media and that's it. i think the freedom of speech is important so we should be able to write anything but simply to have to be more serious journalist to explain on the other hand it is unacceptable to write such things if it's necessary to respect why they have expressed by the

public should also. they respect it like it seems the e.u. justice commissioner is proposals all prissy unpopular at least here in paris from what i gathered the view on the street is mostly don't touch the press we asked the same questions in london and it seems opinion across the english channel is divide it and also influenced by readers preferences i think they've got the discovery regulations in place to keep everyone playing by playing fairly i don't encourage strong language here that kind of headline could be offensive to people but that isn't going to compromise the action of a free press is country press can look after themselves they won't print that i think it's readers let's face it i think the paper should be. a bit defensive. appealing for the lowest common denominator guarded would you try to say. well if indeed the e.u. was a hoping the warning would lead to

a getting better press in the u.k. it seems the sun did not get that message at the top lawyers taking another swipe at the bloc today. or to afghanistan now where hundreds of locals who had previously carried out work in the country for the german government have blocked an entrance to his military base demanding help from land they say their work has put their lives in danger but it seems for now their requests for asylum seem to be falling on deaf ears. we want justice done we want just. gone on they don't. want justice. i was working at the front line with them i will work.

together german senior mentors with the german generals when i started my duty they told me. we would help you if you for some problems. knowledge we have this german war in afghanistan in our. german officer. look at the safe place. we received direct and direct threats. sixty days ago by the militants he's tortured and. his face is smashed on and then not

a minute not. sure maybe that we are really in danger we are not here for big nick we are not here for passing our time so we are here to show them that we are really in danger we have really a big problem. for . our families. it is a busy wednesday if you will but headlines here on out international if you can give us about one minute program returns. you know world of big partisan movies lot face and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that made stream media refuses to tell more than

ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the bats and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely for watching the hawks. make its manufacture consent to step into public wealth. when the ruling classes protect themselves. with the flame and merry go round listen to the one percent. in the middle of the room see. the real need for.

it is good to have you with us today austria's far right freedom party has been accused of trying to restrict press freedom offer a memo advising the country's police not to share information with certain media outlets were somehow and suddenly leaked peter all of our picks up a story the austrian interior ministry has been left red faced it's after an internal memo was leaked in which they instruct the police how to handle the media essentially if they don't write nice things about us give them nothing i would suggest that communication with these media should be limited to only the most necessary levels and that they should not be allowed to contain sweetie's such as exclusive accompaniments the leak included some of the media organizations on the do not engage list editor is raging with the ministry and interior minister but

this is informational blockade for bad media and sweets for the good ones our democracy does not have to be in darkness just because a minister feels too weak to withstand criticism and appears unfit for the sensitive ministry the austrian interior ministry of justified the email saying it had nothing to do directly with mystical saying that this was an attempt to try and establish a united front between the interior ministry and the police against a media that they say is biased against them this is their rights and the best way to communicate both from a legal perspective and for the journalists themselves considering this is bishan of mice against certain media does not come out of thin air but austria's top officials have been unequivocal in expressing their anger at the news that this e-mail existed governments and public institutions have a grave responsibility to protect for. independent journalism and any restriction

of freedom of the prince is unacceptable freedom of expression media and press freedom of the cornerstones of our liberal democracy and constitutional state. any restriction of press freedom is unacceptable that can't be discrimination against individual media the austrian chancellor deemed this leak important enough to take time out from the un general assembly to comment on it it doesn't look like it's going away from the austrian press any time soon we'll have to wait to see if mr kurtz follows up on his words with actions when he returns from new york. basti in a missile defense system has been put through its paces during military drills in the arctic. the system was only delivered to a base on the island on special military exercises during which it was tested are

aimed at securing the northern route in the arctic. complex as a coastal defense system is antiship missiles can reach. speeds and have a range of at least six hundred kilometers. so it's been helping people fight the flab for more than half a century but now weight watchers is toning it slimming scales on itself it's showing off a more slender frame with a new slimline name however the decision has left some over the possible motives. we are really excited. around the world.

on friday the fate of brett kavanaugh as nomination as u.s. supreme court justice will be decided following a string of damaging sex crime allegations since the stories came to light just last week judge coven or has been the target of trump's opponents now some have questioned whether he can be presumed innocent until proven guilty this was tempted

. perfessor ford cavanaugh has lied multiple times she doesn't kavanaugh have the same presumption of innocence as anyone else in america his credibility is already very questionable in my mind and in the minds of a lot of my fellow judiciary committee members the democrats. as well i believe put it that way there is credibility to her story. to allegations of sexual misconduct have been made against governor or the first woman to come on come forward out of christina blaze you ford says he sexually assaulted her while they were at high school the second deborah romero's claims kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party at yale university in the one nine hundred eighty s. it is also expected to come forward this week now the allegations have led democrats to call for cavanaugh's nomination to the country's highest court to be blocked. he will give testimony on the claims levels against him for the meantime

he denies all allegations a fair process and a minimum. waters hearing from both sides before rushing to judgment so we invited guests to debate the possible political motives behind the story and ultimately what's happened to the good old idea of innocent until proven guilty convincing people who probably had no idea anything about this case or even that there was a supreme court nominee to suddenly think that brett kavanaugh is a monster based on these these these allegations these paintings of how he's been meanwhile all we have are the words of two people that's not to say that they are lying but we have absolutely no evidence for that and that is simply the complete opposite of what the united states constitution and our judicial system was set up to to create. so i don't think anybody is assuming that anybody's guilty but that doesn't mean that we don't have a responsibility to take victims of sexual assault and sexual harassment very

seriously and i think that's what we're doing right now particularly as it applies to the misuse of power by people and in particular men in power in our institutions in this country so i think right now it's perfectly plausible and important to hear out these women a lot of people believe some very important things in danger of being overturned and i think there's a some very serious implications there is not and i understand the role. that i hear and disagreements and the fear that roe v wade is going to be overturned but again these are more media allegations these are more allegations from from liberal stating that if trump has his people and if conservatives come in that then roe v wade will be overturned and all of this that's simply not due process of the american legal system or the supreme court they can't just come in and overturn laws there have to be cases there have to be precedent that this is politically motivated against cavanagh it has nothing to do with any evidence that's actually been brought forth besides about besides allegations from two women all processes

that bring about the interpretation the production of law in any society is inherently political trumps appointment of cabinet is political there is an agenda at play here this is a field of deceit are you mentioned that the legal status of an american are all in america is actually contingent on political ideologies but in fact actually if the code of judicial conduct itself which all judges and all legal process people are supposed to adhere to it why do you think our founders actually passed these things presumption of innocence there is no presumption of innocence right now in the media there's no presumption of minute in a sense right now in the u.s. media what i'm suggesting and what many people are suggesting is that we take this seriously and put forward a real process that hears out these voices and puts forward the converse a. do we want to put this person into this position is that who we want to represent us is that we want to have tried to have as we have that i as you reside

are certainly. so the point that you're making was that we need to listen to these voices the question is now going to is this going to be is this the person that we want in the in the highest office of our judicial system of the supreme court of the united states and so now we're already talking that he's he's guilty i think the fault is more on the media it's more on some of the loudest voices against this by automatically assuming that he was i don't think anybody is not a horse's aren't your voices of it those are voices from u.s. media it has been a pleasure having you with us for your wednesday worldwide stories here on our two international my colleague andrew follow me here and half an hour's time to bring you all thanks for joining us.

medical use tells you it leaks last only god. when you're. told doesn't that it would pull so that look at that is that was most of the book includes it's a but. just it's cool stalls that it's about seem to me yet there's. just too little.

what politicians to do something to. put themselves on the laws. to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president. or somehow want to be. considered like to be for us this is what the four three of the four can't be good that. interested all those in the waters of the holocaust. first six hundred. to make. me. laugh. at the. peak of.

the war. yeah. well less than twenty four hours from new york u.n. meetings between officials from russia britain china france germany the usa and e.u. i.m.f. general times in this is going underground coming up in the show we speak to the founder of a charity in yemen who dodges british backed saudi weaponry to help millions on the verge of famine this is not just about finding out who is responsible for what happened it's about ensuring that support and here now just days ahead of threaten

defacto eviction for grenfell survivors what ensured support is there for survivors of a fire scene is emblematic of u.k. universalism from the news the exotics present on cable t.v. as the e.u. gets frisky with chinese for all but first to a u.n. security council of asked me to update you today on the humanitarian situation in yemen in a word it is believed.