donald trump doubles down on his latest claims against china telling journalists that beijing is meddling in america's upcoming midterm elections that it's off to he ratchets up the pressure on the wrong going into a base had to raise against its leadership the u.n. security council where the u.s. need to face significant pushback from allies. and the smoker who helped. get this deal together she's trying to hold

a deal together because she did it. washington's envoy to the u.n. is also putting a punch is she's issued a harsh rebuke to the east to the way of wrist efforts to save the twenty fifth the iran nuclear deal accusing the flow of egotism rights. plus crossing the line she warns that britain's coverage has gone too far off to the sun newspaper dumps the blogs leaders. leaks memory reveals austrian police were told to give less information to the media contribute to positive reporting. is just ten five am here in moscow you're watching us a international. after two days of fractious meetings with his counterparts at the united nations donald trump held

a special news conference with the world's media on wednesday nights while he was challenged on a whole range of stunning claims he's made basically things got off to a fairly light hearted starts. this is quite a gathering. a lot of people. out of media. america. didn't expect their reaction but. they were laughing at me they were living with me we had fun. wednesday security council meetings all the u.s. need to lash out at china and reiterate his allegations that beijing is meddling in the upcoming midterm elections he'll say claims he has a vested nuclear war with north korea singlehandedly prevented

a devastating sult on sirius and in a province where the breakdown has. darla's who were stunned by donald trump's united nations speech claim that china is meddling in the u.s. turn campaign a wanted explanation and president trump did say that he wasn't misunderstood and that he's in fact got evidence of the interference attempts but that's about it mr trump also spoke about syria well if syria is on the road to peace that is mostly because of donald trump's own efforts at least that's the way the president sees it put out on social media and elsewhere i gave my pompei oh john bolton everybody these orders. don't let it happen

i said don't let it happen. that doesn't mean they can't be selective they can't be you know go in they've got to do what they've got to do with terrorists assume the terrorists but don't kill millions of people. and it stuck to you so it's it was quite surprising to hear the president repeat the words thank you to syria iran and russia for putting the offensive on a halt but whatever else the president mentioned the word iran it was nothing pleasant to say the least very strong language and also at the press conference mr trump continued to bash the iran nuclear deal very hard we know that pretty much the rest of the world disagrees with the american leader on that but during his speech mr trump made it clear that he doesn't really get bothered by that this week you put out

a call to action to other countries to rally with america to put pressure on iran rouhani still calling for the u.s. to come back into the old deal but after meeting with world leaders this week did you make any progress towards a potential new deal does it matter what world leaders think going to run iran's going to come back to me are they going to make good do you and that's even after president trump's first ever chairmanship of the u.n. security council where he can't have misheard an entire round table of other world leaders and government ministers i ask all members of the security council to work with the united states to ensure the arabian regime changes its behavior deep greats the united states unilaterally withdrew from the agreement the decision with far reaching consequences that makes it more on c. bolivia categorically condemns the you know actual actions imposed by the government of the us against iran. we agree with the u.s.

president's objectives on iran but we disagree with. them is abiding by its commitments on the deal it remains the best means of preventing iran developing a nuclear weapon this is something that we are actively working on together with china iran and the e.u. the spears between the two and the u.s. over how to deal with iran has escalated dramatically in recent days on monday the block's foreign policy chief announced that europe will be working with russia and china to create special payment channels to allow trade with iran to continue in the finance of u.s. sanctions that drew some harsh criticism from washington's envoy to the u.n. the european union has this so wrong and it's all because of their ego and their pride. and their small greeny who helped. get this deal together she's trying to hold a deal together because she did it but she's not walking out for the best interest of the european countries who number one don't want to do business with iran we

discussed america's attempts to isolate iran and the impacts us having on washington's relations with its allies with libertarian twenty twenty presidential candidates in burra he told us he found making hate nikki haley's comments particularly arrogance. the reason that she's attacking based on ego and pride is because she's deflecting the fact that the united states has had nothing but ego and pride when it comes to the way in which we're mishandling trade deals mishandling the way we treat other countries what the u.s. should be doing right now is actually trying to go in that direction which is to open up trade with other countries let american culture spread would businesses and consumers in other countries learn more about the way we think and the way we are the ideas of america the ideas of freedom freedom of the present liberalism these are great ideas but we're not going to spread them by cutting ourselves off and there is nothing more arrogant nothing more foolish nothing more counterproductive

to cutting ourselves off cutting our ideas off from the rest of the world as part of america's crackdown on iran this national security adviser said cemented that the independent swift payment system which banks around the world holt business with the country. banks and financial messaging services such as swift must take a good hard look at their business with iran and ask themselves whether it is worth the risk you know the european union is strong on rhetoric and weak on follow through so we will be watching the development of this structure that doesn't exist yet and has no target date to be created we do not intend to allow our sanctions to be evaded by your up or any body else. here pinney this have head back when in america against attempting to make decisions. it cannot be accepted that the united

states would decide which will reach european companies can trade when they can develop economic activity. i'm sensitive to president trump's comments on the rise of oil prices but i think if he follows that thought to its conclusion you realize that it would be good for oil prices that the run be able to sell. an economist an investment fund manager we spoke to believes it's possible swift will bow down to the u.s. demands and cut ties with iran. u.s. does put a lot of pressure on the on many actors so swift might do that we don't know but of course the u.s. has had a very you know that's really a very aggressive policy of sanctions so swift will certainly listen to those words the u.s. has put a lot of pressure on various issues and it has used the sanctions work on an economic split and a more aggressively even against the european companies against swiss companies and

this is as really. put a lot of tensions on european companies and especially since the financial crisis so at some point europe might wake up and say this is too much i mean we have to go or own way and we have to find strike a new balance. the independent investigative group telling katz has issued a new reports claiming it's been able to identify one of the suspects in the south spain poisoning case it gives not only resend the share of alleged real name but also some other surprising details in sally reports. the online blog belling cat run by the higgins is alleging that they've found out one of the real names of the two men held responsible by the british government for the novacek attack in solve this year now of course the british government named those two men as alexander petrova and roselawn bashir of it is the latter of these two men which

brought in claims to have uncovered they say that his name is and that's an easy chair pick up and that he is a colonel in the g.r.u. which is russia's military intelligence agency now bella katz says that according to sources in russia mr chepe guy is a high ranking colonel within the g.r.u. but the same source within their article says that some. this type of operation would have been usually carried out by a low ranking field officer no higher ranking than captain now in the past there have been those who have called into question palin kat's billeted to carry out these types of investigations independently and without any bias what is doing is nothing more than reading tea leaves every level analysis is a method used by hobbyists never been to syria. does it speak of arabic and he can duck says press and reset from the content of his armchair now ever since

that incident in seoul very early this year the u.k. government have held the russian government responsible for what took place and that's a theme which repeated itself today in the un general assembly the u.k. saw the consequences of these norms being the road it installs pretty this year when russia recklessly deployed a nerve agent on our streets the united kingdom's present its detailed evidence clearly laid out in charges of attempted murder and the use of possession of a chemical weapon against agents of the russian state. uncorroborated rhetoric on the incident is on the rise the u.k. is stubbornly rejecting the idea of a joint investigation with russia which we have proposed on numerous occasions does disappoint the folk that such a joint investigation is exactly what's called for in the chemical weapons convention and you know if they don't want to cooperate it begs the question then of whether the u.k. has something to hide now there's been no reaction to those allegations in the

belling blog here in the u.k. the metropolitan police and the home office calling to make any comment whatsoever but since this whole incident took place the russian government they've denied any involvement as well and saying consistently that they want the british government to share whatever intelligence or evidence of they have so that they can help with the investigation. after the investigation was released the u.k.'s defense secretary took to twitter to thank those who had revealed the true identity of soulsby suspects but twenty minutes later gavin williamson deleted the tweet without any explanation. the russian foreign ministry spokeswoman maria has responded to the developments by claiming that palin cat is peddling false information about the attack and sold very. moving on now there to rats a new room up stairs just

a taste of the anti brussels insults printed in the british tabloids negotiations and the e.u. is now fuming that the press have gone too far charlotte dubinsky explains it seems there is a feeling a little vulnerable in the wake of some media headlines in the u.k. hold the front page the sun the u.k. is a right leaning tabloid used a clever play on words to get its feelings across of the recent salzberg summit you know the one where the leaders of the e.u. outright rejected the case breaks it proposals well that headline has caused rather a tailspin in the e.u. and the commission is now calling for a more responsible approach by the media in the way that it forms the public about issues like brigs it and there i was thinking that freedom of press was a cornerstone of the new media build. you should

build the culture of dialogue on the contrary we see divisions this information and . exclusion the bricks to debate is the best example of that. remember the front page of a popular british daily calling the judges the enemy of b p. just last week the e.u. leaders called dead rats on another front page and i voted medical care for a european approach to lead based on quality and smart regulation if needed this song on the front page which said that justice commission off is not the only hard hitting act on the part of the british tabloids known for pulling no punches and surely the breaks of debate coverage is no exception.

but headlines like this really that offensive earn so it deficient to the extent that some sort of regulation is needed to rein them in i think a newspaper can write whatever they want to but if it's aggressive towards a community in terms of law regulation. it should be forbidden to media needs to to remain free whatever it is written in those media and that's it i think that freedom of speech is important so we should be able to write anything if it's necessary to respect why they have expressed by the public should also be respected . it seems the e.u. justice commission is proposals all prissy unpopular at least

a encourage us from what i gathered the view on the street is mostly don't touch the press we asked the same questions in london and it seems opinion across the english channel is divided and also influenced by readers preferences i think they've got the discovery regulations in place to keep her around. by playing fairly i don't encourage strong language here that kind of headline could be fatal to people but that is going to want to have a free press in this country in the coffee themselves they won't print it i think it's readers let's face it i think the paper should be. appealing to the lowest common denominator and over god it would be expected so. if the a.p. was hoping its complaints would promise the british press to change tack it seems the sun didn't get the message on wednesday the red top ridiculed commission at

fair as an obscure figure nobody's ever heard of the outspoken newspaper as if they would be better off disclosing any piece expenses then trying to muzzle the press. to afghanistan now where hundreds of locals have blocks an entrance to a german military base the protesters have worked in the country for the german government and now it's a mounds help from berlin they say their work has put their lives in danger it seems their requests for asylum before laying on deaf ears. just not. just. on the you know. just. i was working at the frontline with them i was working

on a son. together german senior mentors with the german generals when i was taught that my duty there told me that we would help you if you felt some problems. you know. in the. knowledge we have this german war in afghanistan in our forehead so we are from german officers this is the look at us to the safe place. we received direct and direct threats. sixty days ago by the militants case tortured and. his face is smashed on. the other hand

on family. should show them that we are really in danger we are not here for picnic we are not feared for our time we are here to show them that you are really in danger we have really a big problem. with your fans. on. australia's ruling coalition has been accused of trying to restrict media freedoms after a memo advising the country's place not to share information with certain media outlets was leaked. to all of our picks up the story the austrian interior ministry has been left red faced it's after an internal memo was leaked in which they instruct the police how to handle the media essentially if they don't write nice

things about us give them nothing i would suggest that communication with these media should be limited to only the most necessary levels and that they should not be allowed to contain suis such as exclusive accompaniments the leak included some of the media organizations on the do not engage list editors raging with the ministry and interior minister. this is informational blockade for bad media suites for the good ones our democracy does not have to be in darkness just because a minister feels too weak to withstand criticism and appears unfit for the sensitive ministry the austrian interior ministry of justified the email saying it had nothing to do directly with mystical saying that this was an attempt to try and establish a united front between the interior ministry and the police against a media that they say is biased against them this is their rights and the best way

to communicate both from a legal perspective and for the journalists themselves considering this is against certain media does not come out of thin air but austria's top officials have been unequivocal and expressing their anger at the news that this e-mail existed governments and public institutions have a groove responsibility to protect free and independent journalism and any restriction of freedom of the press is only acceptable freedom of expression media and press freedom of the cornerstones of our liberal democracy. and of our constitutional state in austria any restriction of purse freedom is unacceptable that can't be discrimination against individual media the austrian chancellor deemed this leak important enough to take time out from the un general assembly to comment on it it doesn't look like it's going away from the austrian press any time soon we'll have to wait to see if mr kurtz follows up on his words with actions

when he returns from new york. on friday the fate of brett kavanaugh nomination as u.s. supreme court justice is expected to be decided following a string of sexual misconduct allegations say far three claims have been made against the nominee since the first i can say sions came to prominence last week cavanagh has been the top target for trump's opponents and some even questioning whether a presumption of innocence should apply this was attempted rape. professor ford judge kavanaugh has lied multiple times she doesn't kavanaugh have the same presumption of innocence as anyone else in america his credibility is already very questionable in my mind and in the minds of a lot of my fellow judiciary committee members the democrats i would have us lying that well i believe her let's put it that way there is credibility to her story. the allegations there leading democrats to call for cavanaugh's nomination to the

country's highest court to be blogs this isn't the first recent case of unproven sex like his ations damaging u.s. politicians career is republican roy moore lost last year's alabama senator actions following sexual misconduct stations from nine women he sued three of the accuses also in twenty seventeen eighty eight year old civil rights legend john quinn is resigned from congress following sexual misconduct claims from several women both politicians deny any wrongdoing on thursday brett's cover now will give testimony on the claims against him he denies all allegations. throughout the process have a minimal leave the army. waters to read from both sides for rushing to judge. where we invited guests to debates where the political motives may have been behind the timing of the story and if the presumption of innocence no longer

applies. we're convincing people who probably had no idea anything about this case or even that there was a supreme court nominee to suddenly think that brett kavanaugh is a monster based on these these these allegations of these paintings of how he's been meanwhile all we have are the words of two people that's not to say that they are lying but we have absolutely no evidence for that and that is simply the complete opposite of what the united states constitution and our judicial system was set up to create so i don't think anybody is assuming that anybody's guilty but that doesn't mean that we don't have a responsibility to take victims of sexual assault and sexual harassment very seriously and i think that's what we're doing right now particularly as it applies to the misuse of power by people and in particular men in power in our institutions in this country so i think right now it's perfectly plausible and important to hear out these women a lot of people believe some very important things in danger of being overturned

and i think there's a some very serious implications there is not and i understand the role again general but i hear your. disagreements in the fear that roe v wade is going to be overturned but again these are more media allegations these are more allegations from from liberal stating that if trump has his people and if conservatives come in that then roe v wade will be overturned in all of this that's simply not due process of the american legal system or the supreme court they can't just come in and overturn laws there have to be cases there have to be precedent that this is politically motivated against cavanagh it has nothing to do with any evidence that's actually been brought forth besides of besides allegations from two women all processes that bring about the interpretation the production of law in any society is inherently political trumps appointment of cabinet is political there is an agenda at play here this is a field of deceit are you mentioned that the legal status of an american in america is actually contingent on political ideologies but in fact actually the code.

judicial conduct itself which all judges and all legal process people are supposed to adhere to it why do you think our founders actually passed these things presumption of innocence there is no presumption of innocence right now in the media there's no presumption of minute in a sense right now in the us media what i'm suggesting and what many people are suggesting is that we take this seriously and put forward a real process that hears out these voices and. puts forward the conversation as to do we want to put this person into this position is that who we want to represent us is that we want to have tried to have somebody that i as you reside are sort of united like you were when you were about a month so the point that you're making was that we need to listen to these voices the question is now going to is this going to be is this the person that we want in the in the highest office of our judicial system of the supreme court of the united states and so now we're already talking that he's guilty i think the fault is more on the media it's more on some of the loudest voices against this by automatically

assuming that it was that i don't think anybody is out of course those aren't your voice is that those are voices from the u.s. media. global news roundup for this to have the headlines and thirty minutes time to see them. all. one of the most important if not the most important tellers of western society is

the rule of law. and the equal application of the law this is now being put into doubt we're told now it is the court of credibility that rules whatever that means is the kavanah nomination again change. i've been saying the numbers mean something they matter us has over one trillion dollars in debt more than ten white collar crimes happen each day. eighty five percent of the global wealth you want to the old for rich eight point six percent market saw thirty percent raise last year some with four hundred to five hundred three per second per second and when rose to twenty thousand dollars. china's building two point one billion dollars ai industrial park but don't let the numbers overwhelm. the only number you need to remember is one one business shows you can't afford to miss one and only.

so i walk on. my own body by the. hour in law found in self in the public mind my going to be killing this crowd into a spokesman for the handicapped children. not. least. over the years alvin will make appearances on telephones across the country. one thing. not better than either that. or.