you know with colleagues. that. support carrying arms openly like they're being imprisoned she just went to the u.s. promoting the ideas which are shared by the national light arms association of the united states. or national rifle association is it has been called there are some no fresh examples guarding interference the u.s. appointed. court. representing. all the settlement of station in ukraine he matic up with that is love so work off a couple of times he promotes the ideas which can true addict point blank the arrangements reached the means by has of russia france and ukraine and germany so those arrangements of two thousand and fifteen included the you would like to do

that will go through all of dumbasses into gaza territories and key the rule that they would be engaged in direct talks agreeing on the special status of the region the constitutional reform amnesty. reconstruction of economic ties and elections. meeting the requirements of both sides. but you. mr walker says no we shouldn't be doing it like that we should first deploy the twenty to thirty thousand. but i'm close you military personnel members armed with having. equipment under the or an awful auspices then the five to six hundred civilians who would form the new administration. dispelling the current authorities which ensuring the livelihood of people and they said mr should be deciding on the

elections so there's al the u.s. sees these arrangements. ok. mr walker can talk to as much as he lie about the ukrainian settlement you can but he also says that russia is to blame for everything and it takes the liberty of saying you know if the following failed quotas the russian people deserve to be free they deserve freedom this particular u.s. representatives and and of all you for ukraine says and you would know the conclusions are up to you it's up to you to decide who interferes and who doesn't not to mention how all eastern european countries are not asian and let an american an african countries have been told by u.s. ambassador nord to be in any kind of conversation a dialogue with russia not to buy anything from

a russian to buy oil gas military hardware and by the way now when we're being blamed for interfering the mystic affairs in the balkans just look. we could. at what is happening in macedonia before the referendum heads of governments really i mean the house of e.u. countries come to macedonia and say you should opt for nato and here you membership and change your name name of the country to that's the kind of call we hear from them on u.s. officials have the same kind of cause mattis was there by the way just recently so . if we would have said it when tempest and from there we would have been blamed again and again for everything and the high percentage of the e.u. in one of the statements to the words in the first days of this month she said the

balkans is a territory which belongs to be you so there is no room for anyone else only for the e.u. . and you'll know you should really talk to them and make them listen to reason so that will be a bit more culture too in their behavior. days ago hearing and she asked president the question was granted but that. is me. thank you very much. mr lavrov. up hospital which my question will be in russia because i present the russian media. so. it was back in may that there was a request towards general regarding the russian diplomatic property in order to prepare for the seventy third session of the un general assembly you met with

secretary general did you talk about the stopping was there any kind of reaction. on this. in your opinion are there i don't know any opportunity to stay within the league. your framework and solve that problem of the russian diplomatic property thing here which we haven't touched upon this issue because it has already been resolved. the relevant information is part of the final report of the this issue has been discussed during the sessions of one of the committees where it was said that our position was legitimate as for further legal actions by russia we are concluding our preparations for filing a lawsuit against the us we've all we already have hired lawyers we know that there's a long way ahead we are ready to achieve. any

kind of agreement with the u.s. so if the u.s. officials if the u.s. wants to cooperate with us on this issue. outside the court of course if. mr lover of benny avni of the new york post. the israelis that visited moscow regarding that incident over syria downing of the russian plane of they changed any minds there also. as is it do you think that is really the russian agreements or understandings that existed before the incidents can come back and when will russia deliver those are three hundred and start jamming. jamming the skies new york the do start it will resume and there's president putin sir you start early on after that incident and we gave the picture which our

military prison to the press conference in the minister of defense. as president as the president so that the measures which will do will be devoted to ensure percent hundred. safety and security of. my own in syria and we will do it and we will do this. as i said the full briefing was presented at the minister of defense and the president exhaustingly comment that the pond is. in public. yes so this is from any t.v. in india fellow at the u.n. this year. with your president coming to india in just a few days i just had two short questions about that the latest information we're getting is that there could be a possibility that the signing of the defense deals to the tune of eight point five

billion u.s. dollars may be put on hold may not be done when he comes mr putin and the second question in light of the allegations that have come about with france and india's defense still it's the biggest controversy in india is russia doing anything to perhaps you know be more part all in in the signing of the deal with india checks and balances except. i didn't understand what the both fronts you mentioned france . follow the jet deal for thirty six fighter jets and there's a controversy around that in india that it is a corrupt deal so i'm just asking in your deal with india are you going to be more thorough are there any. i haven't heard that there was some corruption case around the deal about rafael wrote that's right is that what you're saying yes well we participated in the beat for the delivery we did not get that i haven't heard about this since. before the other deals which should be negotiated

i haven't heard anything about the timing about bastone month about putting anything on hold. i understand that india will be. taking the sovereign decision how to how to proceed and what kind of weapons do nudes. so you got us here because you're. russian also you talked about ukraine so there are fall in that context of mr poroshenko has been saying their joint resolution has been developed. ukraine u.s. france or germany they say that the are a kind of a united for odd and he is not willing to go into too many details because russia may know about this and torpedo this so yesterday you had a meeting with one month ago he said well that kind of step could be

a bit too pretty much you're diddy's position change or europe on the u.s. have different positions for regarding what you said about mr walker. but the ukraine is not about mr low draw. as for statements by mr poroshenko i wouldn't want to comment on them because we have the minsk agreements. but it was raining and there's a proposal on the on the un table with a vote in the form of a resolution proposed by russia which involves sending their own un. peacekeeping mission with. the mission to protect the observers because. sometimes we need to provide. good environmental conditions for the observers. i haven't seen anything in the side because you can drive up anything make up

anything you want discussing with within your inner circle so i wouldn't want to comment on that that's for sure mr walker has been talking about this makes me smile actually i am really surprised as a grown up person. will are that people grown up people could actually come up with something like that thank you is the father. of the new york to question what he's about to leave i ask you this question libya and libya. are you satisfied with the situation in libya so far do you expect that. now we should be in a different situation and then the second question he said to his speech speeches on tuesday president try and before the secretary general good. we. rush out what what does a like better what is that these young for the for the world for russia that causes closer to that one president trumpet who is the secretary general. no

i'm not sure speaking of livia libya. sort of it's kind of strange to be hearing question is russia satisfied with the situation in libya i don't think russia is that is by saying are you satisfied the sense or you expect that they leap out of the situation will be different i thought you would be more thinking about thinking more about whether italy is satisfied with the situation. or france or france for that matter that actually that's not. what we are throwing we are trying to pull harold create conditions for the political process. frankly speaking. we don't believe that in this case as well like in the case of syria there should be any artificial deadline we welcomed the meeting which took

place between the four leaders of various libyan barges in paris in may i think was it. and we support the efforts of the special envoy of the secretary general mr solomon. but to say that we must die but make sure that the elections take place in december i don't think it would be sending the right signal elections must be filled when all cheap political forces. have understanding that this would be something the result of the exit. we still don't see the level that level of agreement between them. and most people never do you like. load supervision you know mr trump by the way is that she stands firmly for the sovereignty of each

and every country in the world and this is something i strongly support and certainly. we. wish them well it would do us. not just through or that's what the trouble is saying but the us itself is saying sovereignty is important and all the other things are secondary looks like the look of that and that's basically what the us constitution says and what its laws say the laws regarding its participation in the un has rules but. so far there hasn't been such strong and rigid actions by the un or by the us administration with regard to that. but if you work with them what in your view by the basic principles should be with you shouldn't interfere into the affairs of other states as for multilateral see multilateral

actions well that is a priority of modern day because countries are united throughout the world through technologies and. opportunities are being provided to people all around the world wherever they want developments whatever they want. to use this technology is but it's also these technologies are also becoming available to. some individuals who want to do evil you and other people your government have criticized you know that should rise of fascism in eastern europe do you see the same thing in western europe with the new government neo fascism and austria or in italy do you see the same tendencies and secondly are is russia delivering weapons to me and more and if so we can think of perhaps using that as par

for the generals to stop their ethnic cleansing. why should. you. talking about the new nazi turned and says well we see there from the chair of the you in that fear story of the conduct marches a regular basis of the former. members they praised them. and i mentioned that in my speech that day there molly the monuments in memory of those who liberated here up that is the case was poland most of all in other countries it's also. happening so this is why we on the regular basis introduce the reserves on the basis of will so use the condemnation of siegel if occasion and the e.u.

will never votes in favor because they see that as an assault on the freedom of speech but if the you things that this is an assault on the freedom of speech to demand to fall of the nuremberg tribunal. what the ruling then they need to sit with their lawyers again and just see what kind of obligation they embrace back then and as for the second question we've got in myanmar. austria and italy which are government is friendly with both do you see the old fashion stand with those of polluted skimmer boats we were friendly with the political parties which are you know part of the system we're not friendly we have relations with them there is no part of the system they are. have no all kind of had to root towards people they do not demonstrate any. symbols as is the case with ukraine in poland so there is no ground to you know connect the

dots in any way that's for supplying weapons so i don't really remember the statistics which we sell weapons only in full compliance with the current international laws which have to do with that area area of arms trade. yes thank you foreign minister lavrov we've been hearing creasing the strong rhetoric from israel in the united states against iran russia is a friend of both israel and iran which like russia are both heavily involved in the syrian conflict is there a way russia can act as a mediator to promote reconciliation between the two sides. because also the process. already commented on that for many years been promoting the concept of of creating an issue of security. in the area so

yes we think that kind of cooperation should be established we just should start talking about this at least. we can both sides. see this as a good platform for negotiations we would only welcome this and one more question. and then the normal. means through love robert thank you so much for coming back here to new york i see all the best to you i have a question or different type of for you if you don't mind given the political. trends dominate in the world today and the new development what do you think of the future of the united nations. the other was so that you think that the united nations. should.

get in the. the right to. hope for the future will be difficult once a year you said that. the us is increasingly unilateral. they say that there were little that this sovereignty should prevail. and meaning only their own sovereignty is that it should prevail in every kind of international each year but i am confident that this objectively create a thing. world order where would we see the asia pacific region is developing india china are rising. so if your major resources. there's no bottled shoots i mean what's the world that africa see you'd see its resources and the potential of latin america's been tapped into by the countries of

this region as well as here with other regions of these processes cannot be controlled by one center or. one. country cannot dictate. and decide for other sizzles. this threat is there is a good word seeking to which arrange the trade for other so that countries will be trading with the. very country only this is all temporal so no later we will ever have to see it and you go she ate and there is no better place for negotiations and for fighting the interest between all key places used to remember about every part . there's no better place in the united nations. it's eleven straight please. it is possible. and think you my name is

a link. to ask you why it's my fall in question what do you thing. these are the relation between russia and the us become better in the immediate future the second question i have. when president putin planned to visit washington and meet with president trump. well the fact that relations is perfect right now they're actually quite bad they are the worst so. in a long time with regards to the us we all understand that. as for the meetings that are two presidents have already had in hamburg in helsinki. have been quite constructive quite productive and this is also something that everyone understands and notes on. the agreements that we thought. were in the interests of both states are.

received positively by both presidents is also something i can see because but dissipated in all these meetings it's also obvious that those. who should be implementing these agreements are not certain you know how to do so i mean our joint to work on counterterrorism we had a word group before now it's frozen out of work we've had joint work on cyber security. something our also also mentioned before we had dialogue on. stability including the issues that need to be resolved so you know in order to. allow our agreements. that already exists existed to function i'm talking about the shortened middle range. treaty i'm talking about.

and the start treaty but there are many factors that. affect this of the deal that we have with this issue. this is a this is a dialogue that's. should have been started a long time ago and the fact that it is not moving forward is not to be positive we've used to had two plus two meetings used to have meetings with tween our foreign ministers our defense ministries we've had meetings between the. chiefs of staffs we had meetings between isn't used to. be where your. other officials in terms of intelligence officials have been. but when the officials are presenting other bodies and now all of that is suspended in a way because of the horses that go what will surely as four of the meeting between mr barr to serve and mr bolton they have met in moscow in your choosing.

they met in geneva in august and now they're preparing for an upcoming meeting and this is at least something that we have something that allows us to maintain our relations. at this at some level and not allow them to degrade even further a dialogue between our two militaries is key to your ensuring that there are no incidents unfortunate incidents as you well know in the u.s. it is agreed on by law that congress cannot cooperate with the russian military the only exception is the dick infliction activities that we were engaged in and the other thing you asked about. the president's. transportation to president putin and trampas also has also been invited to visit russia when all the

parties already was once we hear some proposals on the schedule on the way to come then we'll be able to decide when this meeting could happen there are. a lot of somebody asked to issue an order from that sure that was the president. and. so the question is not part of the. mr lavrov i want to ask you about peace in the middle east you heard the speech of mahmoud abbas and of prime minister netanyahu peace in the middle east looks now very and i think very far the administration is trying to dismantle the basic tenants of what is called just peace in the middle east that including jerusalem their right to put it down for refugees the illegality of settlement now the moment that passes suggesting a new mechanism to expand the number of cars or peace mediators to include russia

china france maybe other countries what do you think how can the palestinian believe that the international community did not abandon them what russia can do to make peace possible and the middle east thank you very much we never abandoned. the mechanism which was universally endorsed for mediation namely the quarter. the quarter the. voice met during this week here in new york in the modules of the general assembly there were no. practical result but at least the. conveyed to each other what they think about the state of the game though. we are committed to the decisions of the security council the general assembly and the arab peace initiative of course really see what is going on as you say that

it's not them to their system that them to dismantle the basic. cornerstones of the but then still deal for at the state solution and this is a cause of concern i met yes the deal was mahmoud abbas he is. very much frustrated i would say and whatever the palestinians believe they should do in this circumstances we would certainly understand and support. and another thing which is always some is the state of the situation in gaza and the situation between gaza and the romola. we really appreciate and value and support the gyptian efforts to bring them together. but the latest round of efforts did not bring the results and this is also.

worrying because. it does not add to the ability of the palestinian people to present their case more forcefully. and. so on and are going from m.t.v. lebanon israeli government is running commercial warning travelers not to go to beirut or via airport because i thought you know he's claiming to attack three sites relate to hezbollah holding thousand of missiles dress about iran near the airport do you think that the israelis will act on this threat and you know hezbollah will respond because he will feel like he has to stick with his slogan that we are also able to fire back. well this would certainly be a gross violation of international law and we would be very much against such an action. what actually will happen i cannot predict but we warn against in your violation of the security council resolutions and that

there could well be actually even even the use of the lebanese airspace as a violation of resolution of the security council midwest elaborate i have an important question there please ask this you made a comment to the security council opposing your weaponization of care that is a sure the you know it is ation of medical care can you comment upon the fact that humanitarian exemptions to the resolutions against north korea here have been a notorious failure and the global. fund to combat aids malaria and tuberculosis has cut off funding to north korea this is a form of fully a lot i walk away i fully agree with you it's not a biological warfare it's it's. really again violation of the security go on for solutions which provide for human use there in exceptions from the sanctions regime and i said yesterday in the security guard.