Skip to main content

tv   News  RT  October 11, 2018 1:00am-1:27am EDT

1:00 am
our headline stories this hour israel blocks a us student from entering the country over her political views leading academics worldwide are demanding she be allowed in. claims a number of british fertility doctors are illegally letting couples choose their child's gender for a fee sparked a debate between ethics and choice. that people really only want to pull away and should we be forcing those people to have a gun. on the basis of that six and i think that six discrimination. the woman step closer to space age health care russian scientists set off
1:01 am
a few hours equipped with a three d. printer capable of producing human issue. twenty four hour news live from the russian capital. international reverie or churning in from hello and welcome i'm going to know you are top story political terrorism democratic votes so u.s. based jewish groups on palestinian officials are describing israel's treatment of an american student of palestinian descent laura arrived in tel aviv a week ago with a valid visa but was held on arrival after being accused of israel sentiment here's her middle east correspondent paula. this is the closest we can get with a camera shooting going into the international airport which is just behind me for
1:02 am
more than a week a twenty children old american students are all for the same has been held here share arrived with a valid student visa but was stopped up border guards and asked if she had if it even a member of the boycott disinvestment and sanctions movement the media is now she said she hadn't but according to israel's strategic a face ministry she was an active member and because of this in line with and his rating board was inactive last year she has been misused and treat that goal states that any foreigners he topically knowingly participate in boycotts against israel can be refused entry and they're already fifteen people who have been denied entry under the sole lot of filed an appeal in the israeli judicial system but the court ruled that who refused all of entry was valid she then followed a second appeal and the israel district court is due to begin hearing this on thursday these raids have repeatedly stated that she is not being detained and is
1:03 am
free to return to the united states and in each time she can fly back to the united states whenever she likes she decided to appeal and has been held in the facility for those refused and three the longest says not only was she not a member of the b.d.s. she would not have applied to study that in this rain if it's a big institution if she was she's also promised not to do so in future now out of the israeli university people knew that where i wanted to she was supposed to study a mosque just a green in human rights has also come out in support of her and a number of universities kids have written the literature the strategic ministry saying that if they default to open fainted from entering this would only bode negatively for the country if the issue again highlights the ongoing discussion over how israel candle's critics against a sort of altie. site television. the usas it's aware of laura's case
1:04 am
values freedom of expression but it is for israel to decide on who is let into the country law professor alan her relf from jerusalem's hebrew university thinks israel's jeopardizing its international relations. this is improper use of the pose of the beast and this case of these homes could do. very serious if you will not register after his removal cities because if they participated in the demonstration or if they did this or if they do this there would have to reconsider the decision to come here and then on the top of many people find it so. that we've stopped cooperating with this road because they want to cooperate with a country that would meet the joys of free exchange of ideas we this isn't restricted is rejected you know and i think it's really a kind of makes this case. to take very extreme events including a straight to the decisions being overly. right another
1:05 am
story generating a lot of discussion this week britain's for till it's the regulator is to look into claims that a number of doctors have been secretly allowing couples to choose their baby's gender for a fee the practice is illegal in the u.k. unless it's for medical reasons we're confident that the vast majority of the u.k. is for to it equinix do not recommend sex selection either to more brought how they would take allegations of sex selection seriously and will investigate any specific cases brought to our attention while newspaper reports claim by some couples are paid up to fourteen thousand pounds for the illegal procedure several senior doctors allegedly set up appointments at private clinics in the u.k. before arranging to complete their medical treatment abroad in countries like cyprus they knew the. well we got the thoughts of the josephine
1:06 am
valley who's the founder of comment on reproductive ethics and political activist it's more thwaite. there are medical conditions which either only affect boys or only affect girls and it's actually fairly standard practice in lots of places around the world for couples who have a family history of those kind of conditions to be given i.v.'s and given the opportunity to select the gender of child that is less likely to suffer from those conditions i think we would all take steps to try and make sure that children were less likely to have problems later in life in all sorts of different ways the idea of just choosing the sex of your child based on a whim i think you know i think to me it sounds horrifying but what we should be asking really is the question what kind of cultural reliving in if people have a really strong feeling if people really really only want a boy should we be forcing those people to have a girl do we want a girl raised in a family that really only wants a boy and in a culture that evidently values boys much more strongly by rejecting the embryo you don't want on the basis of that six and i think that six discrimination give women
1:07 am
the vote i believe in women's rights etc i think women are quite capable of accepting a pregnancy and do not need to go into this nonsense of i want to boy or i want to girl you can suggest i might like one i have five lovely sons i might have at some stage four wouldn't it be nice to have a girl i've now got four lovely granddaughters you know boys and girls in my opinion are absolutely equal and i don't think you should do anything deliberate two to make. a choice because the price is that you need to do is to discuss the embryos of the wrong six when i.v. after is done it is absolutely standard to create more embryos than you intend to implant the spare embryos are normally kept in a fridge freezer or whatever to be used in the future if they're wanted every year lots and lots of embryos are discarded because people have i.v.'s i'm actually don't want to have ten children they want to have one or two children it's
1:08 am
absolutely stan that if you are against discarding embryos then you are against i.v.'s and you welcome to campaign. on that front person i think it's a very fantastic process and it's brilliant that it's available to couples and if couples have a strong feeling about what the woman does or doesn't want to be pregnant with want what she wants to go on and it is inevitable that they're going to follow up when you are choosing which embryo you want you're going to analyze which is male which is female you're making a choice and this is what i'm saying i don't accept that because in choosing my eyes i'm not going to i am going to forty and many occasions these issues come to light because some conditions pass through the male rather than the families that are hard to meet in diseases go down the i.q. route in order to to see how they're going to solve that problem but just in a purely basic choice position you cannot just randomly choose
1:09 am
one without discrimination you. inspirational quotes fill up most people social media timelines but choose your words wisely one prominent nasa astronauts has learned that lesson the hard way after referencing british wartime prime minister winston churchill in a tweet apologizing only seem to make matters worse as more up goes the experience scott kelly he's one of the few men whose name rings beyond our planet the u.n. champion for space a man who has been lightened thousands and through his fascinating experiments his charisma his achievements helped keep humanity's passion with space alive so imagine his surprise when he quotes winston churchill about the need to be kind forgiving when you win and is virtually stampeded with objection and criticism.
1:10 am
churchill forgot to refer to his decision to know india's plight in fighting the famine during his administration cause millions of indians to die on the street stealing their greens and supplied it to british chinese he was a mass murderer of the records of the bengal famine of india where his policies and decisions looked to the earth of millions due to disease churchill was a mass murderer and the racists scott scott kelly apologized and promised to do better did not mean to offend by quoting churchill my apologies i will go and educate myself further on his atrocities and racist views which i do not support my point was we need to come together as one nation you'd think that would have ended it but no what a time we live in now it was the british press the british people who were upset angry and raged how big he apologized for quoting one of the greatest brits
1:11 am
to have ever lived strange days make no mistake winston churchill who saved his nation his people from the depredations of hitler is now too controversial to quote day in europe day. tomorrow we're all be. in europe. but what if scott kelly self years entertained and educated so many what he has done to make him a hero lazy i am awfully excited because my next guess is rocket man scott kelly captain scott kelly. today i want to demonstrate what happens when you cry in space. how much will learn from what he has to. think where does all of this leave
1:12 am
scott kelly he boosted his tweet a singularly divisive anniversary for america and its discovery called columbus day by some indigenous peoples day by others where barack obama spoke of the date of supplied trumps been silent on it in these times are there any angels left was mother to raise a saint for her selfless charity or an abomination for her views on abortion was j.f.k. an icon of american presidency all the more a womanizer worse than trump or is it something else we have created an atmosphere where discussion is impossible where every debate is so heated so emotional so hateful that no one can agree that says a lot more about us in the present and it does about them in the past.
1:13 am
medical science could take a leap into the final frontier this week russian scientists prepared to take a three d. bio printer into orbit and attempt to grow human tissue there on the next mission to be international space station which launches later this thursday from the baikonur cosmodrome their forests is donald quarter. however was not using great people levy is a war crime not that liberals would know what work actually it is going to use gritty to peddle your hate on behalf of a feeler fanbase we don't condone these idiots using our latest mascot as their long was
1:14 am
way. histories come back to haunt a c.n.n. reporter after a homophobic tweet she sent while at college reemerge we'll have the details in a moment. they put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and you. want. to go on to be close this is what
1:15 am
before three of the more people. interested in the waters of my. city. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy. let it be an arms race. spearing dramatic to follow the only closely i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical. to sit down and talk. ninety minutes past eight am here in moscow in death row prisoners request to be executed by the electric chair rather than lethal injection has been denied by the u.s. state of tennessee edwin is of course no appealing to the supreme court. faced with
1:16 am
the choice of two unconstitutional methods suffix accused mr gorski has indicated that it hasn't is to move forward he believes the electric chair is the lesser of two evils ten to eighteen minutes oh drawing separate and chemical burning is unspeakable. of course fuels convicted in nineteen eighty three of murdering two men who had been expecting to buy or run fifty kilograms of calamus from him he shot them cut their throats before stealing their money truck well in tennessee a lethal injection is the primary method of execution for death row inmates but if their crime was committed before nine hundred ninety nine then they're also offered the electric chair electrocution can also be used if the injection is all available or deemed unconstitutional in sikorsky case prison officials say he needed to have
1:17 am
requested the church two weeks before execution but failed to do so legal expert thomas roughen told us the inmates lawyers appeal will likely be rejected. most of the people who would be executed would probably prefer lethal injection that is to be poison the death as opposed to be electrocuted lord before the deafening electric chair so this choice by mr the gorski is rather unique most people choose lethal injection i think the supreme court with this current make up would be likely to go forward to allow this execution to go forward unfortunately i think that's what will happen and there might be some question about the nature of the chemical mixture but that has been explored so much over the last ten years or so that i think misters of course case chances of being saved in that way are limited so on the other hand i think the more appropriate question is why would the united states in two thousand and eighteen still persist with executions when there are
1:18 am
much more humane ways of punishing people. the white house reporter for america's c.n.n. news channel has apologized for a homophobic tweet she posted while at college caitlin collins' remarks were brought to light by a conservative group that the fens l g b t q writes the tweet stage from twenty eleven before collins began working for c.n.n. and were aimed at a gay lesbian friend the spike the under the highlighted comments of cause the news network sais it accepts or apology i'm a proud gay man and i'm a proud friend of caitlin collins who i'm disappointed she have used the word even as an immature college kids i can say with certainty it doesn't reflect her feelings towards the. community she's apologized and i accept that. well caitlin collins isn't the only american news broadcaster to have homophobic
1:19 am
comments come back to haunt them in april m.-s. n.b.c. presenter julia reed was forced to apologize for offense or for marks that appeared on her blog years old offensive tweets also that disney to fire james gunn from directing his third movie in the guardians of the galaxy. front while legal commentator or a script or say media firms are being inconsistent. it's very disappointing that the double standard that members of the mainstream media including a well known highly regarded mediums to shun like c.n.n. it's clear that if it had been any other non liberal mainstream media type if any of their workers had been found to have made these kinds of offensive comments c.n.n. would have called it a breaking news story right now
1:20 am
a few media organs are covering this there isn't any reason why this wouldn't be covered in the new york times or the washington post except for the fact that it's in that fair. all right so always up to the minute updates quite literally on our twitter page and do join me again in just over half an hour's time for the big news stories this thursday morning you are watching or. the way to the united states is dangerous for most of the illegal immigrants. cause he was most just as there was a simple i want to become
1:21 am
a lender and i wanted to ask on this but if many of them look for refuge in the so-called sentry sides the drifter used to share information about undocumented migrants with federal authorities the last person asked the ankle mom. policy to point out that there had a question i get a man or a westerner what that. they have or what are their options to stay in the country with donald trump in the white house all over for the gravels. also be one of the who could be about to do the job of the old affairs it struggles of many couples won't. kill with the push to put impulse response both of you up to do the bulk of the. join me every thursday on the alex simon shore and i'll be speaking to guests of the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then.
1:22 am
it's easy to find an enemy where there are fought in areas where there. bangs much more difficulties explain how things are once you start telling people look you my hate the band. by where do you put your money. you put them in the bank and what happens if the bank goes. on any more these kind of reasonings will be much more a handful to make people on the stand of the dynamics that in why people lock on the consequences of price is that of post nobody wants. what politicians do you should. put themselves on the line they get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and she. wanted.
1:23 am
to go right to the pros it's like the three of them will be. interested in the waters and that. this should. be. greetings and sal you tell us since the year two thousand the united states of america has spent close to ten trillion dollars on its military from bombs to tanks to fighter jets to battleships that there was a defense system dreamed of more than likely we here in the land of the free bought it hook line and sinker speaking of sinkers the government accountability office has now discovered that an entire generation of u.s. weapons systems are open to hackers yes the intercept reports that the g.a.o.
1:24 am
has found that despite numerous warnings even from the us national research council all the way back in the days of the one nine hundred ninety one our good friends at the pentagon have not made a serious effort to safeguard the bast packed work of software that. troels planes ships missiles and other advanced ordinance against hackers and that mission critical cyber vulnerabilities cropped up routinely during weapons development and that test teams easily took over real systems without detection using relatively simple tools and techniques how simple you ask well according to the report multiple weapons systems used commercial or open sourced software and never got around they never got around to changing the software as default password after installing it into the weapons systems meaning meaning the general accountability
1:25 am
office test teams could literally at look up the password on the internet and gain access to the weapons systems. our government the job of the mayor a computer science professor at princeton and former technology advisor to senator kemal harris called the report damning and stated on twitter i briefly worked on this in the silent and no hyperbole it's terrifying so. what does it mean when the department of defense can't even dependent self. i think it means it's time to start watching the hallmarks. forty. three it looks like. it's what. the bottom. like you said i got. was that we.
1:26 am
welcome everybody watching our science i robot and top of the rise and i'm a i'm a big kid fear is how all the way back in nineteen ninety one. that there was nothing to know about best i mean the movie hackers came out ninety five then we all know that half it's kind of academic but it's pretty it's pretty incredible when you break it all down it truly truly is and it and i was just like the research council they've had multiple warnings over the years saying hey your systems might be a little too easy to get into hey maybe you need to like kind of you know defend against this and apparently it was until i twenty fourteen then on that they actually started saying hey let's make systems that are hard to get into but let me just say one thing after another well let me just give you an idea of just how bad
1:27 am
the screw ups are right ok so the g.a.o. general credibility office discovered that in some cases simply scanning a system just scanning a system caused parts of the system to shut down and no one test team was able to guess and administrators password into this.

22 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on