there's a lot of bipartisanship when it comes to passing legislation like running up the deficits and getting involved in foreign wars and being involved like this they're very much the same but i think the disagreement is more of a cultural thing and there's a difference is unfair on philosophy as not so much and we would like we as libertarians would like to see the discussion about you know like our federal reserve system and spending and deficits and personal liberties and civil liberties but there seems to be too much agreement there but right now there's no doubt there's a lot of hostility between the two groups never very very angry as the a top stories this hour and next up it's watching the whole site don't go away.

greetings and salutation so what do the cheese danishes bags of sugar a semi truck and department of homeland security g.p.s. trackers have in common well sadly it's not a new cooking show on the court t.v. but it has everything to do with the recent drug case involving homeland security agents placing a g.p.s. tracker on a semi truck crossing the canadian border that has raised many disturbing questions about the d.h.s.s. and its attitude regarding the fourth amendment to our constitution you remember the fourth amendment right you know the one that protects us from unreasonable illegal search and seizure well apparently u.s.

homeland security is interpretation of that amendment is a. blog either say track to a destination in southern california the semi truck carrying illegal frozen food was raided by the f.b.i. in multiple bags of sugar were collected into evidence which law enforcement believes were being used as a dry run for cocaine smuggling however the federal judge threw out that evidence citing the fourth amendment and calling the practice unconstitutional meant they needed a warrant before tracking the vehicle outside the border exceptions the homeland security responded to the judge's decision declaring that given their job as defenders of national security it is policy that a customs officer made install a g.p.s. tracking device on a b. a goal at the u.s. border without a warrant or individualized suspicion h.s.i. limits warrantless g.p.s. monitoring to forty eight hours within the exception of or with the exception of airplanes commercial vehicles and semi tractor trailers which obviously goodly

reduced expectation of privacy. so the homeland security looking to frisk away our fourth amendment i think it's time we start watching the hawks. if you. it's like. the bottom. like you that i got. with. the. well the watch and the heart so i rolled with her and i have a lot less. blood. welcome to america welcome to i love the border as other divas our duty as if you know i think

you're not a you're not in the military. you're not going to irag here trying to stop a little cocaine coming across the border and bags of sugar and throw immigrants in jail like this. like i don't know that we don't want to hear about it is this is one of the most bizarre cases in the world i mean it reads like a breaking bad scenario from the old television shows that apparently there's this drug kingpin like a canadian allegedly who's like sending drugs across the border and there's some live trucks filled with food to go to starbucks and then like laced in mirrors like bags of cocaine and that's what they wore that's why they were watching this particular truck and across the road like port huron of michigan at the canadian u.s. border there and that's when the f.b.i. after consulting with homeland security said hey let's put it g.p.s. tracker on this which is not exactly legal standpoint like you can when you would

you cross a border into the united states they can search everything they can also have your car like you have you don't really have many rights at the border you know they can do that but it's usually within like this hundred miles alone it's not one someone leaves the hundred miles on which is the real problem here and they track that truck for thirty three hours as a michigan to sue. go all the way down the southern california and that's where the l.a.p.d. they have the l.a.p.d. confront them and bring in the true drivers and that's where this whole case kind of spring out we're a judge said you can't do this homeland security f.b.i. sorry yeah i mean there's always that question about what's constitutional search and seizure and what's not and one of the things that came up with this is prosecutors think the d.h. does are arguing. so installing a g.p.s. tracker on a vehicle it's valid under border doctrine which is as you were saying this is the exception to the fourth amendment that within one hundred miles of any of our borders they have free reign to kind of totally free reign but much less

exceptions to rules and things like that so brian mosley is a law professor at the university of north tac says had told he formally served by the way as a federal maddest magistrate magistrate judge along the border and southern texas and what he told us technica in an e-mail was that congress has established that a warrant is necessary for in the installation of a mobile tracking device which includes g.p.s. devices congress does not discuss any exception for border search as a number it is when you really look at the law when you look at the specifics if there aren't a mix if there isn't a specified exception to something like a border then that means it covers everybody but homeland security and this idea of border security being such a major issue is. it's obviously very politicized. and you don't get a lot of answers from the government about that policy at all no that's how we end

up in situations like this where no one seems to agree on what the policy you're exactly right because they're all in there saying later hey what you just pointed out there are no mirrors so that you can put a g.p.s. tracker on these cars were you know or somebody trucker someone's volkswagen like you can do that. ars technica asked homeland security investigators to say ok then show me where your policy is show me where this says it's ok and they were told by the agency spokesman the policy is law enforcement sensitive and they would have to file a boil request which then the attorneys for the two drivers they could have jumped all over the motion in court arguing against the government position essentially saying if the federal government does in fact have such a policy that's trading. law enforcement agencies agents to act as the policy suggest which is a violation of the fourth amendment the government should be deterred and the agency's internal policies and training should be revealed and scrutinized i couldn't agree more if you have a policy that's violating before the member at the end of the day you should be

scrutinizing most of. the controversial and strange case of jamal going to show gate the saudi journalist a columnist for the washington post who disappeared last week inside the saudi consulate instable is raising even more serious questions with very few answers on the horizon some of those questions involve not only who showed he was and who he was connected to but also what the u.s. response will be towards its close allies saudi arabia if they are indeed found to have been involved in assisted parents another important question being raised is whether the united states intelligence community had any advance knowledge of a plan by saudi arabia to arrest interrogate or even ultimately kill him and failed to provide any warning here to bring us the latest on this bizarre case is r t america correspondent rachel blevins thank you for joining us today rachel thank you for having me rejoice you know a lot of mainstream reports and in common some social media have indicated that there is you know rage about the possibility that saudi arabia would assassinate

a journalist who was critical of their government but. i think anybody who's followed the exploits of the country knows that it has a history of targeting you know political i mean that seems to be because there are billions of dollars worth of arms deals at stake here between the two countries and so when there are reports about saudi arabia executing civilians for peacefully protesting the united states and then looks the other way so it will be really interesting with this case to see if the united states actually pursues any action against saudi arabia and how about affects the relationship between the two very close allies this is sort of more and more interesting as it goes on all those little pieces and i saw when i was sort of mysteries that gets everybody's attention but i hope we stay on this story because there is a major international policy issue at play here about how we interact and how we you know follow our own morals and guidelines and you. can't look the other way

just because their allies are rachel but instead you're so much for coming on and illuminating on the latest in this case always a pleasure they are going to break or quaters don't forget to let us know what top where what you think of the topics we've covered we're covering on facebook and twitter and see our poll shows that are t.v. dot com coming up is free speech and our right to protest about to be monetized in the outlawed you're of washington d.c. find out as we bring out a definite free speaker himself jesse ventura to join us after the break so stay tuned to watch the whole. hillary clinton so civility can only return when the democrats are back in power former obama a.g. eric holder is calling to raise when they go low we kick them without

a doubt both statements can be dismissed as political banter as the. but it would seem no one can play much virtue in civility in this environment. this is critical. to the need to actually physically pulled it out of the ground you know well well well well well well well. there's a lot of money with the oil and with that comes. a lot of a lot of people from all over the country. you don't make a hundred thousand dollars a year. there's an issue. here in the. they were told sixty dollars a day hard work well work is not easy work and so they want to relieve their stress

of how do they relieve the stress. these men that outweigh these men that comfort these men that. people have been murdered up here people don't raise their massive drug issues up here you have a boom you have everything else that comes along with money. in nine hundred seventeen of the very first picket line appeared outside of the white house it was to get them president woodrow wilson to expand the susan b. anthony act without women the right to vote in the united states over the course of a year or two hundred eighteen protesters from twenty six states were arrested for disturbing sidewalk traffic those protests were an awakening which ultimately led

to women finally getting the right to participate in u.s. democracy on the nineteenth a memo was. ratified in one nine hundred nineteen but these days that same protest would yield many more arrests partisan conspiracy theories and probably a bill from the city according to proposed changes to the national park service all but five feet of the now twenty five foot wide sidewalk in front of the white house on pennsylvania avenue will be closed in addition the n.p.'s wants to charge protesters a fee to recover administrative equipment and monitoring costs by the park service and most importantly the new roles would limit the amount of people who can spontaneously protest in a particular area now many of the rules were suggested by the secret service who have seen an increase in security breaches at the white house since the obama administration but others seem to stifle the exact purpose of a capital city and what is supposed to be a free democracy however there seems to be a major discrepancy between how armed spontaneous protests like the bundy standoff

in twenty four eighteen and on armed standoff like those that occurred during judge kavanaugh his confirmation hearings are handled so with the a.c.l.u. calling foul on capitol hill more worried about the next election than the next constitutional amendment to be shredded we welcome former minnesota governor jesse ventura to help us understand more welcome. great to be here i hope by the help us understand. you know it's a no sold on the constitution the bill of rights the first amendment guarantees us the right to protest it's that simple as long as you don't commit actual violence you can permit peaceful protest and this is public land public property so therefore protesters should be allowed to be on the public land but what you have helping here is the way that you rode our rights they're not going to do some. big lotto slapper i'm afraid they're going to do it slowly choose

a little juice or match with pierce type of stuff does it slow. chisels away the edges so that pretty soon they'll be tell us where when and how we can protest and will probably be the only legal place will be like up in the north woods by eally minnesota. i know that town i've been there to visit us the really funny it is. you know i think even though like you know the three of us know why it's so important but just in case people are still kind of like confused or you know well maybe they do need the security why is it why is protecting the right to protest so vital for this country and any country. because that's part of freedom it's that simple it's a way for people to speak out and make their government hear them you know these people in washington they're all isolated i've been a mayor i've been a governor and mayor is the place where you actually see the people one on one

every week where you got to look him in the eye these people in washington like mitch mcconnell and all those bozos they don't look nobody in the eye they live in their own little isolated world see and protesting interferes with that isolated world that they live in they actually after see their scrum told them happy people at times and that that bothers them greatly you know i serve six years in the united states navy. i took an oath to protect the constitution and bill of rights from all enemies foreign and domestic and i can tell you right now domestically the biggest enemy to our constitution is our own government so i view them as the enemy that's why i would watchdog them so much all the time. well jesse one of the main reasons that keeps me giving about changing protester all's around and changing how you know all of the park functions and how many people get me in certain areas are

really looked to be very poetic late draft and as i said you know what was at the. months of armed protests and by the bundy is well that's there right now everything else and we walked around it where you know if anything happens here in d.c. it's very different one of the things that they're doing already is to replace the very old fence the one that kept getting jobs that everybody i think a toddler got through what i want because it's a very thin or very wide spots between it so they're replacing the fence with one that is more modern and has anti climbing technology on it so in reality like do you think the security of the capitol and its parks is more important than free speech because at this point if you're getting the fence why do you have to take away twenty feet of really important real estate for freedom and for freedom of speech like being able to protest to that were president is so important to you to both to have good to do both they can put in a new fence with better security because certainly you want security you know want

people to be able to scale the fence and run across the white house lawn you know i understand that but they could build today's technology if he's talking about building a wall on the mexican border why don't they just build a modern security around the white house not have to disturb anything and people will still be free to protest all they want let's remember something you got a congress here in washington they are a bunch of as we used to call them spineless pukes when i went through buds training to become a navy seal they're spineless pukes they've given up one of the major things they've given up these people in washington and they ought to be protested they now allow the president to take us to war that's ridiculous our constitution was set up so that it could not happen so one person could not take you're still war and these people should be protested over this but see they are they want to isolate

themselves they want to have no contact with their. regular people and that way they just go to their washington d.c. dinner parties and run our country and take all their bribery money in the process move here's one for years when the changes were first proposed back in august of this year samantha miller an organizer with the d.c. action lab you see a lot of times in these like spontaneous protests you know both with kavanagh and other times she told the washington post that quote imposing any more cost on people expressing their first amendment rights is goal is just going to stop people from doing that or it's going to increase the number of permitted protests which can be a concern when you want to keep people safe basically you know when i want to ask you this when they're talking about putting cost making protesters pay to be able to protest when we were a choir payment for the exercise of a basic constitutional right like freedom of speech what message are we sending

about the foundational stones of our democracy. will the message we're sending it to tied to the message we're sending is simple only the rich people will be able to protest go have the money to pay the bill you know all poor people won't have to and so of course rich people aren't going to protest so thus they've solved the protest problem it is utterly absurd that on public land they're going to tell you that somehow you have to pay a cost for walked into a round and holding a sign which is protected by the first amendment of the constitution of the united states of america the biggest law in the land. one of the things that i enjoy and i might add the law that allows you to burn the flag if you want to exactly what is funny is that all of these rules about where and when you can protest and how this works and whether it helps our society or hurts our society or

this is the n.f.l. it's always this what kind of protest and you have this entire country if people didn't. throw bricks of tea into it into boston harbor many many years ago we probably wouldn't have that story that teaches us that a bird house is a really important yes doesn't want to know what you think i mean one of the things is that this really seems to be a class divide if you have the money you could have speech because as we know money is speech and a corporation is a person so where are we headed in a world where only the money to classes only those who can afford it can have a political opinion and the poor or the working class are just shut out and less they want to follow another rich person. you know well it sounds to me i guess a little bit like it sounds to me a bit like fascism it sounds like things i've read about nineteen thirties germany and italy and those type of places where you have dictatorships and not freedom you

know the first thing you know the first thing the dictators want to do is quell the masses put them under control and by eliminating our first amendment and not allowing people to voice their dissention of government policy that's an effort of him cuffing the public putting them under control and that's what this is all about right now it's controlling the public putting them under control so that they can speak out against these milk toast but man those out there who can't stand the heat and truly all of them ought to get out of the kitchen including that slackjawed mitch mcconnell you. know i got to you know it's interesting cause we've been talking about mass protests here on the national mall in front of the white house but what about those smaller ones that we've all seen videos of recently where you saw like you know the group of people confronting ted cruz at a restaurant or things like that you know which is a private business what how do you feel about smaller protests like that where

they're kind of singling out individual congressmen or leaders. well deal you. you've got a protest on public property you cannot be walking inside of restaurants that are privately owned i don't think that's the proper place to do it now if they want to wait outside on the public street and wait for ted to finish is dinner and then protests the hell out of him well again for all your elected officials if you can't stand the heat get out of the damn kitchen you know but the point is you could to get too far if it's private property you don't have the right to go in there and there's a private enterprise or anything like that with protests keep it in the street keep it public land and for sure no vada once the worst thing you can do is commit an act of violence that gives them the excuse to lock you up and that's very true and i think we far too often forget that the at the end of the day

a lot of this is optics because it's not just about the physical protest there that's happening it's also about what people are seeing at home and it's very important that those people at home get your message without being scared by it or seeing you violence is never going to get the message across just see always a pleasure to have you on thank you so much for talking to us about the freedom of speech and the right to protest today. save you all try to be a little more controversial next. to your robot is one of the moons that orbit the planet jupiter a mere three hundred ninety million miles from earth our short trip and its spiky surface could make the search for life there are two bit of a challenge see a new study from the inner city of cardiff predicts that the surface of jupiter is not smooth as did previously thought a covered in fifty five foot shards of ice see they form because water can turn from ice directly to water vapor without melting first on that on your own this process known as supplementation is what creates the sharp blade like shards that

would make landing a rover on europa are going to want to tricky thing is europa is such an interesting. site for future man on man space missions that the ice shards will just have to figure out a way to navigate out men while the one be habitable for humans on the long term the presence of water mean this is the presence of light and the possibility that europa holds the answers to some of the solar system's greatest mysteries just kept past that fifty foot i share it's little things like little little things like any fifty foot i show you'll never catch me that's a call to a warm weather tie like a sweater weather. fifty foot i shorts weather weather to the store but i. still think it's good for you not for me all right everybody is out of the harsh over it is there remember everyone in this world we are told real love doesn't help so i tell you i love i am tyrone and on top of all that he thought of watching those dogs and of a great their mother was. facebook

will be x. in the fight against great news and pans hundreds of pages and accounts. go penns it's almost in a warm welcome to the two astronauts who escaped death from day an aborted book launch and the journey in mid-air as they crash landed in has expanded.

oh i don't know if he did it. in the middle of the book good. barely three minutes and an immense speed and the quick thinking crew were forced to abandon the malfunctioning people and nail biting to send back to.