arland it kind of takes things. in very different russian well. twenty fifty the referendum was put to the people but the country has been changing for about twenty years the catholic church has been in decline less and less people go to church and of course young people are much more progressive than advanced in their os and shoot so the referendum. majority primarily by young people persuading older people and people showed solidarity with people and wanted to affirm tolerance and then young people then said well the next is abortion now let me ask you specifically about the blasphemy law i saw people characterize it as medieval but from what i understand it's still a fairly fresh legislation i mean it was passed less than a decade ago the did more detailed definition of blasphemy what happened to your

country between two thousand and nine and now to produce such a dramatic turnaround because you mentioned that the country has been changing for two decades but it seems to have changed in just the last couple of years. the political establishment have been very slow to change i mean the ordinary people on the ground have been way ahead on all issues in terms of blasphemy i mean blasphemy has never actually been used nobody has been prosecuted but you are right yes it was only renewed ten years ago by a previous government and it really shows how out of step the political establishment. but now what's happened in the last number of years there's been a huge movement of women and young people reflecting a global famine assists movement as well that we see and alter countries have been pushing the political establishment you know relentlessly on the issue of the abortion rights. ten women

a day leave the country and five others were taking abortion pills on line illegally now you mention that nobody was prosecuted for blasphemy and yet there was an investigation opened into the british comedian stephen fry a couple of years ago for his questioning of the existence of god on public radio that case was later dropped if it weren't for that failed investigation do you think the question would have been on the ballot this past weekend didn't that provide and necessary. for the social movement to galvanize itself i think the government was concerned to be seen to be moving in a more progressive direction in terms of separation of church and state which still hasn't happened and they wanted to pick things that were very easy to get past so stephen fry incident you're absolutely correct. case was pushed by. a group the prosecution of the iona institute and the place dropped out because

there wasn't sufficient grounds the fact that it is there means it could be used on it can be used against people who are religious as well minority religions now arlen's current t. shirt prime minister. who incidentally comes from the same constituency as you do seems to be very fond of the word revolution he's used it after every mark both and i know that you disagree with him on many issues i wonder though what term would you use to describe this avalanche of social changes taking place in your country. the word squiers revolution when you describe. but i think. issue here. i mean people have been campaigning on all these issues for many many years and we were you know bit on abortion rights me now groups have been. forty years for marriage equality so

what i would characterize it wasn't quite but certainly yes there was islands of revolutionary change below the surface because this involved. of people campaigning on the ground knocking on doors every nice to persuade people and it was truly an inspiring thing to be involved and now you previously accused the irish political elites of submitting too much to the catholic church and i think during this interview you suggested that they may have been doing that for political reasons for self-serving reasons as well these societal pushback that you know. how much of it is driven by the opposition to the church and its role within the society and how much of it is political people against the old ways of doing politics. while i think it's there's definitely people fail these oppressions very it's very real like if a woman becomes pregnant and has to save money to go abroad and stigma secrecy and

shame that's a serious thing and people women were told to be silent about these things for so long so there's been a about these issues young people in particular have led the way in saying no we will not accept this hypocrisy on the longer and they've pushed the political establishment at every turn i mean we have to participate and marches we have to break the law in terms of peaceful but civil disobedience. for example importing abortion and spreading awareness about them just to make the law seem completely redundant and ridiculous so all of those things push the political establishment until they've no choice whatsoever well and yet i think they still tried to maneuver that way out of it. talking now about the abortion issue because i thought it was a very interesting case study in both keep. participation but also political tactics

from what i understand the government didn't have enough conviction she initiated changes itself so it kind of outsourced it to citizens' assembly is that a case of democracy in action or on the country democratic no functioning because supposedly we all elect our leaders you be the conduit of the changes that we want to see rather than outsourcing them no you're exactly right it was very interesting the government hadn't got the goal from the courage themselves to make the change so they outsource the decision to a ninety nine citizens under george bush actually this turned out to be a rebound in their faces because it proves that ordinary people when they listen to the arguments they decided that actually yes they should we change and they actually propose really radical change they actually propose much more than is in the current legislation for example up to twenty two weeks for socio economic reasons twelve weeks from to give no reason whatsoever so this rebound on the

government on it made it very difficult for the parliament there was a committee established which i was on to go back to most so we really have to time the citizens assembly and we also obviously the case of servatius which is six years ago yesterday a woman who died of complications doctors being unable to help her they realize from what i understand point that her case could only every day result in the in the death of both the child and of this woman was actually having a miscarriage and even then couldn't get an abortion and she ended up dying of septicemia so that the whole country on a reignited the whole abortion rights movement and galvanized which can happen. in a process of six years in some respects russia is the very opposite of our land in this regard because the historic ties between the church and the society of the.

broken here very violently by the bolsheviks the soviet union was the first state in the world to legalize abortion russia now has the world's second highest abortion rate. in my opinion is not something to be particular proud of and you concerned something like that would happen in our land that abortion will be treated way too casually as almost another form of contraception i think russia has been a bit exceptional though if you compare the figures in other countries where abortion has been made. fully free contraception that's very accessible for people well then the abortion race remains very low. if you take for example greenland which if i'm not mistaken has the highest level of our bush and the contraception there is free but the women is still not using them so per capita they still have a pretty high incidence of ok but if you take for example the netherlands which has

the lowest abortion rates in the world they have. in art and we have a severe problem because we don't have proper sex education in school so young people don't get access to full information because of the council of churches they can prevent these issues being learnt in school or to school and i think it's really important that changes as well well i think we both with agree of abortion as a woman. my contention would be that relying it. comes from a significant public health risks and what i want to ask you is whether you believe that the state while permitting abortion should also do anything to. minimize the incidence of abortion out of public health considerations well abortion is a painful thing so nobody should want to have an abortion or does want to so the government needs to look women wouldn't be using contraception at the point you mate. russia being the first country to legalize abortion one hundred years ago

really interesting and it's been something that i've been discussing with people since i came here because they've raised very similar questions here and is going this way. and i think it is quite incredible that things can go backwards. to an abortion i think is under severe trash. that the. decades before. well to be honest with the i don't think there is any risk to abortion rights here in russia first and foremost because the government understands very well that once you. you will have to deal with all those major public health implications stemming from illegal abortions in sanitary conditions a doesn't want to deal with any of that i would agree with you though

the productive. big here in russia primarily because of the concerns that giving women all the control over human reproduction may have profound implications for society as a whole change the institution of family has been no if there is a statistical correlation between abortion rights and. abortion rates and the number of single parent usually single mother households. up damaging the women's quest for equality in other areas because it's much more difficult to pursue a high powered political or business career if you have to raise a child all by yourself by giving women all the controls over human and. protection don't you think that we undercutting them in other areas for example equality in. a

famine isn't that i would campaign for would be linked to it it will be socialist reminiscent where it would challenge the you know profit being the guy to do most of so the things that you raised there in terms of child care of course you're right it's very difficult for any single. mother to get child care because it's expensive but that doesn't have to be the case you know we could have free childcare the problem is that the wealth in society is all at the top well we have to take a very short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned. what you should. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected.

so when you want to be president and she. wanted. to go right to be close this is what we look for three in the morning people are. interested always in the water. there should be. terrorist i am at but it is. these days no matter where you are in the world the chances are you're being watched. in the deaths of innocent people just like any anywhere and thousand you probably won't have the slightest idea. and if you won't see coming.

when are you. been given a license to kill the villages villages the houses the mud houses. sometimes the. rest and then you see is a lie so who have the. children for a country for profit. how can you smile. when you factor. public wealth. when the ruling class is to protect themselves. in the final.

we can all middle of the room. welcome back to well the parts with ruth. politician and a member of the irish parliament. just before the break we've been talking about old the social changes that's happening in your country and what i find interesting is that there are there is a lot of conversation about national identity both in our land but i know even more so in europe and the united states people rediscover a national identity when they are faced with the changing world around them the irish national identity. very pronounced both domestically and internationally

represented in culture it's represented in other countries do you have any concerns that they irish national identity as we know it will change beyond recognition because of all those social changes or perhaps this is something you would actually welcome. yeah. i don't have any fear that you know our culture such as music the things are and exports in terms of its artistic life in fact hopefully will improve. it will be more representative maybe of men and women. no i don't have i think the culture that you're talking about. we're talking about when the church was in control in the comparable but i'm not sure you can parse this out because i think when people think about our land they also think about family values they think about the work catholics they think about many of the immigrants for example in the united states of the irish sound so those

things tend to be kind of. very close to. what was swept under the carpet was the negative side. that if you didn't conform. to we have a history of where women in particular were pushed away into mother and baby homes where our institutions. actually overing all of this which is one of the reasons that people have moved away from the catholic church in droves in the last decades i mean we now before i left the country there were talking about excavating the sites where babies bodies are buried not accounted for in one of these homes and institutions where single mothers people were married to report so people have about against reality where you know the catholic church i mean the pope visited recently. there was massive indifference to his visit so.

the image the reality was a lot different you made the point in one of. only because of the more youthful more liberally minded rising up against. the older more conservative establishment. to be observed in other parts of the world with middle aged citizens more conservative. than rebelling against the liberal political elites what do you make of the political and social changes are allowed for example in the united states or in europe i think there is a feature now if you look at the us where we would have seen the election of. for example bernie sanders who was the democratic candidate that was ousted if you like in favor of clinton but there is

a huge interest. in america because people say that the system isn't working for the majority of people. similarly in our land there is. as well where i know the conservatives are in power. a threat. there is an interest among young people in the left ideas and the reason is that there are really from a housing crisis certainly an ardent it's the biggest biggest problem that we have . young people are paying the price of. the bank bailouts of the last ten years. introducing teachers younger nurses aren't getting paid the same as older people and i think that feeds into what we saw with the referendum on paper much more inclined to challenge you know what's been handed to them now you are a member of a socialist party with a very telling and name solidarity people before profit and you are committed in your own words to being an economic system where one percent control both political

power do you find it. you can alter that economic system. both within your country more broadly well we now have a system whereby. it's never been more equal on the planet it's now men and they are men five of the richest people control the saying wealth is three point five billion people i mean that's completely and utterly untenable on most of the wealth that's a must for the one percent is horrid it's not invested productively in society you know they use tax shelters tax havens. or whatever to hide money. and spend it so we've reached a. dangerous situation on the plumbers whereby all of the wealth that's been created i think something like eighty percent is just soaked up to the top it means

that you know things that were taken in you know advanced copland's countries like europe like garlands like the u.s. normal like housing are no longer things that anybody can expect to how exactly so what makes you believe that you can actually change that because it is one thing to abandon a now dated blasphemy law but changing anything where money is involved that i would suppose takes much more effort well obviously that's what i'm fighting for i think we have to make it impossible i think the people in create the wealth and our ordinary working people they have we have the talent we have the ingenuity to these things for ourselves with this parasitic elise it's quite interesting visiting moscow and seeing these designer stores what i'm hearing about is the income of people most people is so low they can never attain to buy these products well that's for sure by the end of the same time in defense of moscow i think moscow has

also seen a lot of public areas rain away to everyone regardless of their income can enjoy benefit from their lots of sporting opportunities there are also lots of employment opportunities for the people so i'm not sure i would draw the. comparison. but i want to ask you specifically about the ability of changing the system because arlen gave a name the largest tax avoidance tool in history the irish double the double irish rather which still allows u.s. multinationals to you avoid corporate taxation on the u.s. profits and that is supposed to come to an end in january of two thousand and twenty and i would guess as a global citizen to you with probably. indorsed closing that loophole but as an artist do you think that's a good development for for your country i don't think it's right it's. multinationals of all kinds of but obviously particularly american multinationals

are is the basis of our policy i don't think that's a good idea at all. what our government previous governments have done is corporation tax down to twelve percent but these companies don't even pay twelve percent many of them we've discovered pay nothing at all the bigger they are the less they seem to pay so we have companies who do pay corporation tax we've got the likes of apple google facebook who are using art and to pretend that they generate revenues in aren't and to avoid tax people who pay the price for us are the people all around the world to you know in some of the poorest countries who are been deprived of the bamford's of taxation i would disagree with you that they do not pay any taxes in fact i came across the statistic just the other day that they pay over eighty percent of all irish corporate taxes and they directly employed twenty five percent of the irish labor force can your country afford to

lose them because i was suppose that it would come with major detriment to the very same people that you just put it in context i didn't say they pay no tax i said some of them pay no. so obviously there are companies you know supermarket giants after they pay corporation tax to those figures there are behind the scenes details . so we know when we've discovered time we discovered through british and american parliamentary commission and the likes of. the average that's been worked out by economists isn't anything from three to eight percent is what they're paying they rarely pay twelve and a half. recently for aapl how to pay back thirteen and a half billion to the country and our government didn't want to take. the message very interesting case i want to ask you about that because as you just mentioned in two thousand and sixteen the european commission for competition concluded that

apple received illegal state aid from the irish government now owns the government . the range of thirteen billion euros plus interest in unpaid back taxes and yet the irish government this very strongly desisting that presumably because it wants to keep their business. where do you find yourself and are you more strongly with the european commission or well i mean the commission did offer a reason there's a competition between different capitalist countries and they don't like the fact that our this knock down rights which jeopardizes all the countries in europe so they're making a stand for that reason i think the key point is this they've now. we have a housing crisis and aren't they are not building public housing social housing or affordable housing that money could be used to solve our housing crisis but we have

a government that's saying no because they don't want to send a message there aren't isn't open for business but i've also seen some analysts suggest that the cost of u.s. multinationals leaving. would be much higher than the billion. euro's isn't i mean you can criticize the government all you want but i suppose they're not doing about out of their own private considerations they perhaps believe that the role of those multinational companies are so huge that the country simply. changed yes i represent a constituency where there are a lot of multinationals. i mean i'm a jobs that we have are welcome but the point is it isn't the case that for example if corporation tax was raised to the level that germany charged it will be double. what they leave i don't think so because they're in arden for a reason. many of the reasons you know proximity to the e.u.

marcus so tax isn't the only reason we have to look at is it is it a safe thing to base your whole industrial policy on having low corporation tax not in my view because we're close to bracks it now where the british may leave unquote their corporation tax lower than ours trump in america is talking about of course in corporation tax as well so arden's policy isn't sustainable well i'm sure we have to leave it there i really appreciate your coming over and sharing some of your insights thank you very much thank you encourage our viewers to keep this conversation going in our social media pages and hope to see you again same place same time here on worlds apart.

while give easy vasan this us. and. rational. design need a thief. more

than a natural. law. and twenty forty you know bloody revolution to correct the demonstrations going from being relatively peaceful political protests to be creasing the violent revolution is always spontaneous or is it your style or here i mean your list. spilling into the former ukrainian president recalls the events of twenty four g. and. those who took part in it invested over five billion dollars to assist ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic. subscribe

to roughly paulson get all roughly content for just twelve euros fifty per month. and the stories that shape the way karen r.t. china gets its military battle ready we need to speak so betrayed in terror worsening relations with washington. meanwhile donald trump announces the renewal of prng nuclear deal sanctions against iran a decision that angers washington's european allies who vowed to protect their business interests in.