and get out the traveling across america to find what makes america take the charlatans the genius defeated question especially americans this is a weak point on what is going to sign we always are on the margins something. called the culture party. starting last with. the beginning headed east it's a just want to go into the belly that the i think i want to leave now doesn't get me more than it may be completely different and in this.

i've determined that you're the one. who did it. so i'm going to move into the interrogation. i'll leave the role. there for several minutes because i want you to get anxious. to think about the error of your way. and then i walk back yes when i walk back in i'm going to have a big fix with me. all kind of a person it may have seemed like the surveillance video be blank. but the show you that i have a strong investigation that i have all the evidence. so the first thing i tell you where's. our investigation has proven that you are. the one who committed this

crime there is no doubt about it whatsoever we have the evidence that you did it there is nothing that you can say that will convince me otherwise all i want to know is why. could you confess to a crime that you did not commit. and interrogation technique used by the majority of police officers in the united states is causing controversy across the country. created in the sixty's by the private company john reed this method has gone on to influence most of the interrogation techniques taught in american police academies it involves nine different stages leading from confrontation to spoken confession to a final written confession this technique has allegedly compelled thousands of innocent people to confess to crimes that they did not commit interrogation should be conducted in a non supportive environment and want to get the person on to our territory away from his or her own surroundings interrogation room should be quiet private free of

any outside distractions or noises. so please. remember what. i don't know they tell these interrogators that you can tell whether someone is guilty by looking at them and listening to what they say that confirms their belief that the suspect is guilty and it is a recipe for disaster what our family realised what had happened in that interrogation room it was like oh my god oh my we begin to move closer shortening the distance between the suspect and ourselves moving into their personal space does. not need a yes or no they are down for. the united states to be proud of the many failures of the criminal justice system nobody saw that coming nobody could see coming that fall. confessions would be that prevalent in this population of

wrongful conviction accusing yourself of committing a crime seems unbelievable but recently an official study from the u.s. department of justice has revealed that almost a third of the exonerated people have confessed to a crime that they did not actually commit at the beginning of the interrogation investigator enters the room stands about three or four feet away from a suspect looking down on the suspect and in a very direct and unequivocal way accuses him or of committing the crime. that's what happens when you're dealing with crooked cops. crooked people who don't care about other people's life so. they took an oath to help to save lives and fight for people and they did not do that that in mass once case.

they were comfortable it was satisfactory and they had a man and that's all they really wanted was the body. so they took. from twenty one years and twelve days. all. right and then he says well there's twenty three. fortune our way. or direction i want to go and i and everything. fine

job was. kind of slow and and when our time it's more of a seasonal type of thing. so i looked to supplement my income a little bit and i made a bad spare decisions and also got off in the a bit with our contacts a little bit. some people my say for of the other. and. that's where i was at that time just trying to figure things out. were. that age forty three more months and has spent twenty one years of his life behind bars. in one nine hundred ninety six he's convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty years in prison at the time he's making

a living by selling drugs in an apartment building in detroit. is accused of killing christina brown one of his young clients on the night of the nineteenth of january one nine hundred ninety six. however on the night of the murder lamar was far from the scene of the crime. he was at home with his six year old daughter. more member waking up watching cartoons with my daughter that's saturday morning and she woke me up at nine and i was like mom we're watching cartoons and davey and i want to wear my daughter saturday morning and. that's like i want to fondest memories you know perhaps the vast day i was out. that saturday morning lamar monson is the first to arrive at the scene he finds the apartment in a. of chaos and then he sees the young christina brown lying motionless on the

floor on january twentieth one nine hundred ninety six lamar went for his afternoon shift to the apartment and he found the body of christina brown he knew her as crystal. he thought she was seventeen years old it was a young tall young woman who just cried herself a seventeen after she was twelve and she was another one of the dealers who dealt out of that apartment and what he found was this horrific bloody crime scene. were. she was in a state of needed medical attention. or if it were. but she was a. she was waving to me and trying to say my name and i was told the nurse. just hold on i want to get you know. i'm going to be long. and

frantically. banging the knowledge doors and that apartment for asked to call the police call him as the police came and lamar spoke to the police and the police immediately decided that he was their suspect and so on that day very day he was arrested in fact we have a police report where the detective basically says on the same day of the killing we can close this case if we can just get get our monson to confess. i got a phone call. telling me that my son had been arrested for killing a young lady. i know that could never never never be possible from the training that he had had from the time he was born until twenty two years when they took him away from me. i was devastated i with. i couldn't eat and i

couldn't sleep i want the floor wondering what had happened why it happened and where would they choose. kristina brown dies a few hours later in hospital. the officers of the detroit police force take more monson to the station and begin to question her. questions like she was my girlfriend and she was not girlfriend is more like the little sister of a bunch. we live in there i never live there in the one me i'm there. just stuff like. questioning was core from witness to suspect. part of the interview process

is you're supposed to use what recalls the behavioral analysis interview. and in that if you use these techniques it's like you know you're watching a person's body language or you're watching the way that they say something or the way that the answer your questions there's also a series of seventeen questions that each is that you can ask the person and you know based is that based on your answers on their answers and based on your observations you will be able to tell whether or not they're being deceptive or not they're guilty with over eighty percent accuracy. verify judgment i'm very it's like being a human lie detector test and the problem with that is really read itself the read people at mit that is not based on any science whatsoever just based on their own observations the real science says it's baloney it doesn't work.

and it when they've done experiments with it they pretty much show that the accuracy is like flipping a coin it's fifty fifty. the read into. technique makes its debut in the sixty's it is revolutionary for police stations. john reed a police officer from chicago proposes a new and less brutal approach to interrogation. i think john reed was a reformer in many ways you have to understand that when reid came to prominence. the method that was used widely throughout the united states was what's called the third degree police officers were feeding suspects into confessing to crimes they did or didn't commit. they were tuning them up they were using the rubber o's they were grilling them for hour after hour after hour and

read to his credit knew that that was a way that was fraught with danger in that it might get false or unreliable confessions the problem is they eat and weed in this is today have never come to grips with act that psychological interrogation tactics can also produce false confessions. centers financial planning guide i don't buy any i'm on a teacher's. think on the final assessment of my ex in the future. what's keyser.

soze something seemed wrong. but all. just don't call. me. yet to say proud disdain to come to cancer clinic and it gains from an equal betrayal. when something find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground. us veterans who come back from war often tell those same stories. we're going after the people who were killing civilians they were not interested in the wellbeing of their own soldiers either they're already several generations of them so i just got this memo from the circular defense offices we're going to attack and destroy the government and seven countries in five years americans pay for the wars with them money on those with them dives if we were willing to. go into harm's way and willing to risk being killed for

a war and surely we can risk some discomfort for an easy miss for. the first problem is they have this analysis by which they tell their trainees that you can tell when someone's lying by the tone in their voice or by their posture or whether they sit rigid in their chair or relaxed whether they look at you and give you i contact or look away or look down whether they fold their arms fold their legs look up look left look right you name it it's a cue and the retreat interrogator. has a whole list of body language behaviors and verbal behaviors of the suspects says i

don't know that's considered deceptive if a suspect says oh man i swear to god i had nothing to do with this appeals to religiosity are considered deceptive behavior they lead their trainees to believe that they are lie detectors but they are human lie detectors and once you make that judgment don't turn back move on to interrogation. when i first entered into the homicide division you had a lot of officers that's what they were saying and you did it you were to know who you know it was bombard me with that as i'm in a turkish. arcus m m i was just all over the place just devastated by what i've seen what was going on and then to get here and. now you're trying to suggest that i committed the crime. the more

monson's interrogation continues through the night as the hours go by the questions progressively turn into accusations so dros she sold those for you. you killed her she was your girlfriend and just creating a scenario that they wanted con despite what i was attempting to relate to far as what on. so i would go back and forth and back and forth and that interrogation lasted maybe. four or five hours because it. is important issue you seldom will find a false confession take it in an hour seldom will you find it in two hours when you look at false confession cases twelve fifteen sixteen eighteen twenty hours could

be broken down at some point the average person does what an average rational person does they conclude that i need to get out of this situation desperate they hate it here among comfortable i'm stressed and the more i deny it the more they call me a liar and i just can't get out this way so they're looking for a way out of a bad situation. tired . confused and that's funny over which. taken to. nine floor lock up at the time and so i'm up there there's the world can't sleep k. rest. came believe was gone oh and. i'm. you just can't imagine them just americans to scramble.

the process of interrogation is designed to put people in just that frame of mind make them one comfortable make them want to get out and don't take no for an answer don't accept their denials. now during most interrogations the suspect is not going to just sit there and listen to you while you develop your theme they're going to try to deny any involvement whatsoever but that should be expected many guilty people introduce their denials with permission phrases such as can i say one thing which is just listen to me but sir if i could only explain when the interrogator hears those phrases it's important to interject yourself and stop the person from continuing because you let him talk they'll say the words i didn't do it and the more often a person says they didn't do it the more difficult it becomes for us to get

a confession. if you look at any interrogation out there what you'll see is threat promise threat promise threat lie a lie a lie as fact to back it over and over and over and over and it's cutting the person off and like you said is narrowing your options and giving you this perception that oh my god i am facing this guy knows the things that i'm guilty he has all this evidence i know that is bogus these witnesses didn't see me but they're lying on me and he's telling me that the only way that i can get a break from this is by telling him what he wants to hear. there so stressed and may have to do with how long they've been there may have. with the fact that it's late at night they've been accused they've been called

a liar they've been threatened promises have been made whatever it is they get to a breaking point where they decide that it's in their best interest to confess at this moment it's in my better interest to confess than to continue denial. lamar munson sees that he is about to be caught in a trap police detective joan going places a file on the table. of the broader her office. and. she said she had apollo files on the desk and she mentioned where you noticed she was making a reference to those files being evidence begins you against me and i'm like. ok. i don't know what that is book i haven't done anything and i don't know why i'm down here and i want to go basically.

what was inside of this fight. for anything. lamar monson tries to ignore her but american police officers have the right to lie to a suspect lying is a normal part of the process used to put suspects under pressure. i can lie. about the evidence i can tell i think i absolutely the courts allow me to live up to a point you know there's certain laws that are so outrageous that good not records are going to lead it but i can tell you all kinds of lies i can tell you that we have three or four we have four witnesses who say that they saw you take the money and you're going to cock oftentimes it will come in with a. file folder filled with papers doesn't matter what's in that file folder it could be take out menus from

a restaurant ok and oftentimes they'll be clipped on the top of that holder a d.v.d. ok and police officers will tell the suspect that there was a camera across the street that was filming the area where the crime occurred and that their images on the d.v.d. so there's technological evidence that police officers sometimes use other times they'll claim that they've had they found for your prints or blood evidence or d.n.a. evidence imagine a suspect in an interrogation and they're there for again some period of time that is uncomfortable and the police now are lying about the evidence that's suspect may well know full well that he didn't do anything wrong but he's starting to feel trapped and overwhelmed by this presentation of incriminating evidence thinking i didn't do this but they're claiming they've got evidence and whether this is. well

set up for what i've got to find a better way out anybody who's been the victim of a high pressure sales tactics knows what this feels like anybody who says that they would never ever confess to a crime that they didn't do they haven't been under this sort of pressure. these tactics are relentless for lamar months some time seems to stand still the police detective offers him what appears to be a way out. she was saying that she believed that i didn't do it and this she was willing to help me but i had to help her help me. so she began to give me a scenario. self-defense. she suggested or it probably helped my situation and then. she said if i would cooperate send

a statement and i would be home by that time the next day. over a series of other techniques with the interrogator does he narrow down for the suspect. two choices to pass oath of them involve the suspect admitting their guilt but one paints the suspect as an evil person a monster a cold blooded remorseless killer and the other one provides an excuse for the suspect for why they committed the crime maybe it was self defense maybe it was an impulsive act not a deliberate act not a premeditated act and over time you know with increasing pressure on the suspect. many suspects will accept the path of

least resistance. and accept a less heinous explanation for why they can be taught to cry. during the theme we offer to the suspect psychological justification for the commission of the crime we don't legally justify it but we offer him a moral excuse that will minimize or justify in his own mind committing the crime and this should be done in a monologue format. it comes to the point where i'm doing this over and over and i start to see you getting to check to and i get to the point where i think i need to come in with the final question my job my goal of the interrogation is to limit your options and to give you the at least a temporary perception that your only option is to confess to this crime.

that's the best route for you to take. legal process the words when we have a conversation we don't process literally what is said we process between the lines we process not what is said but what is implied when an interrogator says i think you're a good person i don't think you meant to do this i think it was an accident by the way i would have done the same thing you're thinking oh this is no big deal i can confess and that's my easy way out here. and that's the point at which people can fast. i was out of it and they're. just ready to whatever you want to me to do maybe decide i'm sinusoid it and my mind. turning that he would be able to. the what's necessary to sort it out was innocent and i didn't commit this crime because i didn't commit the

crime. on the third. at the january one thousand nine hundred ninety six at six o two am after ten hours of interrogation detective obtains a single signature from lemoore monson in this document he explains that he involuntarily stabbed christina brown detective going in was subsequently removed from the homicide unit and later terminated from the detroit police and the reason she was removed from the homicide unit was because she was accused of fabricating can trash the words tricking people into signing false confessions. desperate for a single purpose. of a superman. they start training very young.

eight months of intensive school. rats. and they save lives. because there's survival guide look stay single malt to start simply at least. be sure you don't forget them. oh heck no. repatriations look at the after seven years. though of the separate kaiser report.

national sporting more alleged dirty tactics come to light in the twenty seventeen u.s. election in alabama after democrats will recuse the false flag linking their rivals but campaign to call it a state. this is in the headlines two women in congress now holding their own yellow vest demonstration ending in another weekend of clashes with police. u.k. government contingency plans for a no to pull for the ridicule with drivers prodding a staged traffic. always to talk.