come into force an arrangement with which there is no time of it already and point it lots britain into a deal from which it cannot leave without the agreement of the e.u. and as my friend a member of a hogan simpang has pointed out in so many occasions this is unprecedented in british history. the last two years gives us no confidence that this government can do a deal in under two years so at some point before december twenty twenty the focus would then inevitably shift from negotiations on the future relationship to negotiations on an extension to the transition period including negotiations on what further payments we should make to the european union. the vedic partnership documents say and i quote it can lead to a spectrum of different outcomes as well as checks and controls that

doesn't show to me any clarity whatsoever in that document. and there is not even any mention of the famed frictionless trade that was promised in the checkers proposals. the former secretary that's one of the former bricks and secretaries. promised a detail precise and substantive document the government spectacularly failed to deliver it. so mr speaker i can confirm this that labor will vote against this deal tonight yeah. you. anticipate. labor will vote against it because it's a bad deal for this country yeah ok. and as we have heard over the past week

members in all parties including many in the conservative party will join us in rejecting this bunch and damaging deal. and i welcome the fact there is a clear majority to reject any no deal outcome the amendment to the finance bill last week demonstrated the will of the house on rejecting the danger and he is a danger of a no deal outcome that would cause such chaos to so many people across this country but mr speaker it's not enough for the house to vote against the deal before us and against no deal we also have to be full something i so miss to speak of.

so mr speaker in the coming days it is vital that this house has the opportunity to debate and vote on the way forward to consider all the options available. the overwhelming majority of the house voted to respect the results of the referendum and therefore voted to trigger article fifty so i say this to our negotiating partners in the european union if parliament votes down this deal then reopening negotiations should not and cannot be ruled out. we understand why after two frustrating years of negotiations this i'm saying to the european union you would want this resolved but this parliament our parliament here. as only one jew to

represent the interests of the people of this country and the deal negotiated by the government does not meet the needs of the people of this country the people of britain including many european union nationals who have made their lives here these are people who contributed to our country have contributed to our economy and to our public services including our national health service and those people are now anxious and have no faith in this government to manage the process of settle stace this fairly or efficiently and the early pilots of the scheme of very far from encouraging. the prime minister claimed that this is a good deal. and so confident was she of that that she refused to publish the

government's legal advice. but government's own economic assessment clearly tells us it is a bad deal it's a product was to speak of two years of botched negotiations in which the government spent more time arguing with itself and in its own cabinet than it did in negotiating with the european union it's not only on bricks it that they have fails. under this government mr speaker more people are living in poverty including. chris just because i'm talking of the poverty of harper a million more children who've been moved into poverty while this government's been in office i'm also talking of those that have been forced into rough sleeping and homelessness which has risen every year. many people are stuck in low

paid and had secure work too many people are struggling to make ends meet and fulling deeper and deeper into personal debt on credit cards and loan sharks. nothing in this deal another thing on offer from this government will solve that that is why labor believes that a general election would be the best outcome for the country. if this deal thank you if they still is rejected tonight we meet mr speaker to keep in mind that the vast majority of the people of this country don't think of themselves as remain as or leavers. whether they voted believed all remain two and

a half years ago they all of them are concerned about their future and it's their concerns this house must be able to answer and meet so mr speaker. i hope that tonight this house vote down this deal and then we move to a general election so the people. this is big so the people. vote labor who's going to show right on the general down just as nobody will shout the prime minister doubt all they're doing by causing me to intervene is taking time away not necessary rather foolish really counterproductive jeremy corbyn. mr speaker the people need to be able to take back control and a general election would give them the opportunity to the site to their employees work who their government flaws and who was negotiating on their behalf. and it

would give that new government a mandate and the mandate that is needed to break the deadlock that has been brought to this house by this government. but has to speak up. but first mr speaker i ask this of the house. vote against this deal vote against this deal because we've had a very long and very detailed debate in this house more members are spoken to dissipate in this debate than almost any other debate i can remember they've given a heartfelt analysis of this deal and a very large number of asked said why they will vote against this deal quite simply mr speaker this deal is bad for our economy. a bad deal for our democracy and a bad deal for this country i asked the house tonight to do the right thing

reject this deal reject this deal because of the harm it would do and show that we are simply as a speaking up for the people that we represent who recognize this deal is dangerous for this country and bad to them their living standards and for our collective future yeah. yeah. i've had. this mr speaker. mr speaker today this debate has lasted some eight days over fifty four hours with speeches of powerful sincerity from over two hundred honorable and right on noble members it has been historic for our parliament and for our country we have heard contributions from every

perspective looking at all aspects of this complex and vital question we've seen this house at its most passionate and the chorus and i thank everyone who has contributed no one watching this debate come be in any doubt about the strength of this house of commons as the fulcrum of our democracy this is a debate. this is a debate about our economy and security the livelihoods of our constituents and the future for our children and for generations to come it goes to the heart of our constitution and no one should forget that it is a democratic process that has got us to where we are today in twenty fifteen my party stored on an election manifesto that had as a centerpiece the promise of an in out referendum on the u.k. snow. the ship of the european union the british people responded by electing

a conservative government to follow through on that promise that is what we did when this house voted overwhelmingly to hold the referendum and put the choice in the hands of the british people here indeed four hundred seventy current members voted in favor of it and only thirty two opposed it that campaign was keenly for to cool the public imagination like few campaigns before it turnout was seventy two percent higher than for any national poll for a quarter of a century and while not overwhelming the result was clear and it was decisive something this house accept it when we voted overwhelmingly to trigger article fifty four hundred thirty six current members voted to do so only eighty five opposed parliament gave the people a choice we set the clock ticking on our departure and tonight we will determine whether we move forward with the rest drawl agreement that honors

the vote and sets us on course for a better future. the responsibility of each and every one of us at this moment is profound for this is an historic decision that will set the future of our country for generations so want only alternatives that present themselves first we could decide it's all too difficult and give our either by revoking article fifty or passing the baton to british people. in a second referendum but i believe we have a duty to deliver on the democratic decision of the british. and to do so in a way that brings our country together a second referendum would lead instead to further division would be no agreement to the question let alone the answer it would say to the people we were. let it to say that we were willing to do what they had instructed. now the second possible

outcome is that we leave on the twenty ninth of march without a deal but i don't believe that's what the british people voted for because they were told that if they voted to leave they could still expect a good trading relationship with the european union. and neither would it be the best outcome. our deal delivers certainty for business is for the time limited information tastes different. nations which. means no in from enter a sion period our deal protects the rights of the citizens living in the u.k. and she praises living in the e.u. so they can carry on then i as before no deal means no reciprocal agreements to protect those citizens' rights are deal delivers the deepest pockets security partnership in the e.u. sistering so our police and security services can continue to work together with

their european partners to keep all our people safe no deal means no such security partnership. and our deal delivers the foundations for an unprecedented economic relationship with the e.u. that is more ambitious that is. becoming really rather a noisy and unseemly spear that has now resumed mistaught the prime minister must be heard by minister here our deal delivers the foundations for an unprecedented economic relationship with the e.u. this is more ambitious than anything they have ever entered into with the third country it will give us the benefits of trading with the european union and the ability to force new trade deals in our own right no deal means those new trade deals come at the expense of a trade deal with your. not in addition to it so while it is categorically wrong to

suggest that our country could not also make ultimately make a success of no deal it is equally wrong to suggest that this is the best outcome. now sir that was the path advocated by the leader of the opposition and we've heard it again of calling a general election but today's vote is not about what's best for the leader of the opposition. it is about what is best for the country. i don't think any other general election whatever the result the choices facing us will not have changed it will still be it will still be no brics it leaving with no deal or leaving with a deal and there's no guarantee that an election would make the parliamentary arithmetic any easier all it would gain is two more months of uncertainty and division. in two thousand and seventeen the two main parties both stood on

manifestos that pledged to deliver the result of the referendum they got over eighty percent of the vote people had the opportunity to vote for a second referendum by supporting the liberal democrats in two hours. seven. just seven percent of voters did so. it is the job of parliament to deliver on the promises made out the last election not to be seeking a new one now some suggest some suggest there's a fourth option to agree that we should leave with a deal on the twenty ninth of march but to vote this deal down in the hope of going back to brussels again and negotiating an alternative deal but no such alternative deal exists the political director ration sets the framework for the future relationship and the next phase. negotiations will be our chance to shape that relationship but we cannot begin those talks unless or until we agree the terms of

our withdrawal and the european union will not agree to any other deal for that withdrawal so having ruled out all of these options we're left with while to vote for this deal tonight was. one that delivers on the core tenets of bricks it taking back control of our borders malls money trade and fisheries but in a way that protects jobs ensures our security and honesty integrity of our united kingdom one that strikes a fair balance between the hopes and desires of all our fellow citizens those who voted to leave and those who voted to stay here and if we leave with the deal i'm proposing i believe we can lay the foundations on which to build a better person and as prime minister i would not stand at this dispatch box and recommend a course of action that i do not believe is in the best interests of our country and all. and there are there are differences in this house today but i

believe we can come together as we go forwards and let me reassure anyone who's in any doubt whatsoever the government will work harder at taking parliament with us and as i. say. as we move on to the next phase of negotiations we will be looking to. parliament to see that consensus but mr speaker let me turn to the most contentious element dale the northern ireland protocol i said. i will do. my right honorable friend the prime minister knows but what concerns many of us is the possibility of the public nature of the north of and back. to my amendment be on the order paper which says such a deadline of

a stop and ask what is the after truth of the government to my members. and i think my on the throttle framed for the question he's asked and for the work the team has been doing to try to find a way through on this particular issue and i know he spent a long time consulting with international lawyers on this issue the government isn't able to accept the amendment that has been selected that my right only friend has put down has been selected tonight because we have a different opinion and a different interpretation of the vienna convention but i know my right arm a friend has put out an alternative proposal is in relation to this issue the government is willing to look at creative solutions and would be happy to carry on where we are. in relation to that issue. i said i would. i so. i said i would to be northern ireland after the order.

to order the house was comit so zen in a strange patience the prime minister. i set out the government's position in detail on my state and yet in my statement yesterday so i'm not going to go over it again but the key thing to remember is this isn't a commitment we're making to the european union it's a commitment to the people of northern ireland and ireland that they will be able to carry on living their lives as they do today it's about saying that whatever happens when we leave the e.u. we will belfast agreement its success has been built on allowing people from both communities in northern ireland to feel that their identities are respected under the principle of consent for many people in northern ireland that means having a seamless land border between the u.k. and ireland which is also essential for their economy for others that remains fully respecting the fact that northern ireland is an intrinsic part of the united. kingdom no one wants to see the return of a hard border and as

a proud unionist i share the concerns of members who are determined that we do not undermine the strength of our united kingdom. but it is it is not enough simply to make these assertions we have to put in place arrangements that deliver those ends and it's not just a simple as some would like it to be so as prime minister for the whole u.k. it's my duty to provide a solution that works for the people of northern ireland the answer lies in agreeing half you economic relationship but we need an insurance policy to guarantee there will be no hard border if that future relationship is not in place by the end of the implementation period i'll give way to the age of the democratic and very very grateful to the prime minister for giving way and would she agreed that whatever war view on this withdrawal agreement whatever argument the people deploy that we should not be using the peace or the political process should the northern ireland as argument for voting for this do you or voting against it would

cheer agree published completely and utterly out of order make that clear to all of our cabinet colleagues as well here to the right honorable gentleman i think everybody everybody across this house is committed to ensuring that we maintain the arrangements of the belfast good friday agreement that we also ensure that we maintain the many benefits that have come from the peace process in northern ireland and that should not be disrupted and that not should be should not be affected in any sense but i also say that whatever future relationship is going to be negotiated or people want to see being negotiated that insurance policy is essential any of the other proposals canada norway any number of variations of those models all of them require the insurance policy and that is the so-called backstop and no no backstop simply means no deal now. and for the forseeable future and i don't want to see anybody being able to explore each no deal bringing doubt

about the future of our union as a result of that. and let's remember if i may say to this house what the withdrawal agreement does deliver for the people of northern ireland an implementation period certainty for businesses protection of citizens' rights certainty to thousands of families no hard border unfettered access to purchase me you markets protection of the single tricity market across the island of ireland securing energy supply in northern ireland continued security cooperation with our european allies that the police service of northern ireland say is essential and above all the protection of the historic belfast good friday agreement the deal we have puts our union first now let me turn to the contribution of the leader of the opposition characteristic a characteristic speech characteristic his whole approach to practice it normally

which of cism and short on coherence. these claims that you'll be able to renegotiate the deal in a matter of weeks get a drastically different outcome and despite the european union making clear that's impossible but everything he does is designed to avoid taking any difficult decisions he's saying one thing to one group and another thing to another. in the general election he said his manifesto in his manifesto freedom of movement will end on sunday he said i'm not against the free movement of people when asked by the great satan or german newspaper he said we can't stop it the referendum took place article fifty has been triggered. it is speech at wakefield last week and again this evening he said a second referendum was an option on the table he says labor would run an independent trade policy but he wants to join the customs union he says he's opposed to no deal but he says he's. to withdraw all agreement on the backstop without which there is no deal so the question is what is his position because he

has failed in is in it is responsible. and it is responsibility to provide a credible alternative to the government of the ten by pursuing from the start a cynical course designed to service. not the national interest has forfeited the right to demand more oil from those of his n.p.c. take a more pragmatic view because he doesn't care whether we leave or not with a deal or not as long as he can maximize disruption and uncertainty in the likelihood of a gentleman. and i hope that members opposite to faithfully pledge to their constituents that they would respect the results of the referendum so they think carefully before voting against a deal which delivers threats it and i hope that those who fear leaving without a deal whose constituents rely on manufacturing jobs think very carefully about

rejecting a deal that is the only guaranteed way to take no deal off the table. mr speaker. mr speaker this is the most significant folks that any of us will ever be passed in our political careers. after. after all the debates all the disagreement all the division the time has now come for all of us in this house to make a decision. a decision that will define our country for decades to come a decision that will determine the future for our constituents that. children and their grandchildren. a decision that each of us will have to justify and live with

for many years to cause. we know the consequences of voting for this deal they all made out in black and white in the pages of the withdrawal agreement. yet deal or no deal that is the brags that question will continue analysis and look ahead to the same things photo op about with more and about three minutes time. officer. told him to get up off the ground after begin to sound. heard them freeze on the sounds of. grown man the christening essentially. through his trying. to push through away from the officer. of his group. the obvious or did they kind of lunge for the weapon once missed and then when it

happened on tree swung at the didn't hit them i never saw any contact with. any kind went back to where they were so the answers back here they're try again fifteen feet apart at this point and that's when the officer pulled his gun and he bit on tree. what politicians do. you put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president. i want to be ripped. into going to be close with you want them before three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters of. course it. looks like there's someone else living inside of me or controlling my body.

the byproduct of the drug is the cause like severe depression. because it literally made him into a zombie it's crazy. you know we don't have to do anything it's not our fault you know she was crazy and all that. took years of traumatic things long time to get rid of. your health care executive or bank your costs like getting a gift from a fellow governor millions hundreds of millions trillions of dollars if you're not part of that cobol you are the one paying for it yes and that's why there's a lot of social unrest that's the yellow vest movement in france and around the world it's the global insurrection against banker occupation is coming to america in twenty nineteen so get your yellow vests and your torch and let's party on and

did it because it's all about the rebel that. i. minister gives a. speech in defense of six hundred fifty to decide its fate. to

take the.