tv Watching the Hawks RT February 5, 2019 6:30am-7:01am EST
6:30 am
support of the republican and was attacking the democrat during a special election for a senate seat in alabama conveniently n.b.c. news left out this little factoid up from their article i guess giving context for the reader just isn't as sexy as practicing a little twenty first century mccarthyism now let's find out why they left this out when we start watching the hawks. to. get the. real that this would be. the bottom. of the day like you that i got. with that we. would. be. taking. the welcome member on the watching they are so i robot and that happened while it so. yes apparently if you talk about news relating to candidates and you
6:31 am
or you know you have the little green and black symbol in the corner of the t.v. rights group in the yard to some of yours you're now pushing the kremlin but the everybody in the kremlin is like yes her the one machine is the one that we all know i'm. confused about that but i got to ask what what is so dangerous about polls the gabber that on the day of her announcement you saw mainstream media outlets like n.b.c. c.n.n. they put out an article reporting that she's n.b.c. reporter up the article reporting that she was russia's favorite c.n.n. claim that her campaign was off to a rocky start why is this like she's so threatening to mainstream outlets in the well i mean any of them also even the day that this thing that she had announced you had people major reporters tweeting out that she doesn't have any plans stop she's not doing any rallies is she even bothering like why is there what's dangerous about this is. one there's. seems to be this idea that before anything's
6:32 am
even started that you can begin to start to tear down candidates and this is what we saw with bernie sanders from the beginning and so all they're doing is repeating the same this the democrats are repeating the same mistakes they made and the last forever elections. and putting everybody at risk because if the truth is they really do want all these things why are you so afraid of someone whose only threat is that she will cut the profit margins of the military industrial. that's a great point that her threat she's very nonintervention is involved in syria we shouldn't be getting involved. we've got to figure out how to terror yeah because there was a russia likes or. so russia is a big. piece no one minute they're building bombs the next they're trying to stop all war from happening rose ok now what. would you know what will be left out the of the new knowledge knowledge this company lulin surely admitted to creating
6:33 am
a false flag operation that made it look like so new york times quoted eight new knowledge report in their own words and they said we orchestrated an elaborate false flag operation the plan of the idea that roy moore's campaign was amplified by social media by a russian keep that in mind this is a man who was accused of sexually harassing possibly assaulting his girls under the age of eighteen when he was a grown and grown man a grown adult him is twenty. and the idea was what will make it look like russia's then the paedos i. mean the guy on many levels of wrong it is i can't hold it and the new knowledge of c.e.o. john at the morgan glenn greenwald reports that he used his own fake russian accounts to a lot of the public and deceive the national media into believing the kremlin because it's we're trying to beat the democratic senate candidate went back to come . he was citing were ones he himself but they're obligated to control now years
6:34 am
more thing how are we supposed to trust the expertise of this group where they've lied clearly lied and how you know the what they're going to say we're supposed to trust their expertise that oh yes all of russia and all of these outlets are combining to push polls the jabbered you know but but we're supposed to trust new. information we just posed to take face value that's that's that's what i'd tend to avoid sure that you tend to avoid taking using sources from people who've been caught blatantly lying or in ways that could cause a national incident the way that gets people killed you know and that's the thing such a response to it i think was pretty on ploy she said as commander in chief i will work to end the new cold war nuclear arms race and slide into nuclear war that is why the neo con we'll have more wankers will do anything to stop me and that's it that is exactly the problem you know the neo cons and they all libs and there is
6:35 am
a muslim everything else they just don't like somebody who just they don't like anybody who has like a moral compass and tries to stick to a payment with the mcgurk the right of most loved. as the minutes ticked down and lowest scoring super bowl in history the washington post unveiled its democracy dies in darkness super bowl ad and for many in the industry of journalism the commercial celebrated the. digital of these commercial and celebrated has added a list of some strong emotions just not the ones the washington post says billionaire owner jeff bezos were hoping for because while the commercial slide shows featuring major moments in u.s. history journalists lost in the line of duty and tom hanks powerful narration did convey the important need for good journalism in a free society it was the price tag of the ad that many in the industry feel betrayed its core message as you know my friends freedom isn't free and neither are super bowl ads as. actually it seems for the washington post to reportedly shelled
6:36 am
out a cool five point two million dollars for it as you can imagine this price tag did not sit too well with many in the industry has been steve as we've seen story after story week after week of budget cuts and layoffs in newsrooms around the country in fact frederick console the co-chair of the washington baltimore news guilds bargaining in an app the washington post took to twitter explaining quote the post is now paying say five million for thirty seconds to tout journalistic freedom during one of the glitzy it's glitziest and given the n.f.l. as me taking protests and concussions or controversial sports events in our country this seems like an especially infuriating expense for a company that is a try to take away health insurance from part time employees be moved everyone toward riskier forms of health insurance see made it easier to lay people off cut their severance eat frozen their pensions and resists is the smallest enhanced as to remaining in for a tyrant benefits until senator bernie sanders shamed and doing so so hot watchers
6:37 am
of the washington post in their zeal for super bowl exposure just expose one of the main reasons journalism is dying in darkness corporate great. this was this was because the ugs a beautiful. you know you know journals go you know you soon will you know you love journalism totally but then when you realize wait a minute you know during massive layoffs and everything else you know when guys are spending five million dollars on the super bowl or washington post is close i mean i think everything answers that it's like why is the billionaire does look at his company is the people who work for his newspaper don't make any money and i have lousy and i remain else people as it is a shipping centers have to get tagged and tracked this came back and said i was really extremely how you make a billion kids i guess the losers like super extremely bad timing i agree with what the critics are saying about oh yeah i was bad. no i mean i think it's bad given
6:38 am
what's just been happening in recent weeks literally last week we saw layoffs mass layoffs huffington post buzz feed vice vice is was firing people by just turning off their e-mails by the way mcclatchy and ghana and that's the largest newspaper chain laid off. and layoffs at huff post buzz feed and get a combined for roughly a thousand jobs it's everything out there every single person is talking about this you're watching a whole bunch of people and they're all going to license to entertainment we're going to do something else they're getting out of the news business right pleasant kind of what what was it called gold said it was like kind of like look at a fellow's great numbers go to them but they don't really have the best you know public image track record right now you know you want to reach a lot of people but still five million dollars now just think about this this is what five million dollars potentially could have bought the washington post five million dollars you could employ fifty journalists a year and use of one hundred thousand dollars which is now way more than most
6:39 am
journalism you know you know it would support twelve journalists for five years and seventy five thousand dollars a year which is considerably above the u.s. reporters medium income which is a rum thirty nine to forty thousand dollars a year you can see the yet again very sick leave the slide show you know i mean look think about this. one of the biggest things cut right now in journalism is investigative journalism that's like the first exist the most expensive although we do not have to k. to go as one things we talked about it was you watch the investigative journalism departments out of newspapers and everywhere just because. how much do you think five million dollars could have bought the investigative journalist alive you know i mean that's a lot is dying in the darkness because they've decided to spend five million dollars letting the super bowl fans know that while we're literally watching out now remember this whole idea of corporate media as the do gooders which is what i looking at that it's your big corporate capitalism news. which is fine if you have
6:40 am
alternatives in the fine but when they're these are the same people that back the newseum here this news museum here in d.c. they were supposed to showcase journalism in the first amendment which is now closed and i'm. sorry to say it's terrible was it really is like you can get that so the freedom forum which created and finds museum announces closer as part of a building sale to john hopkins university which if you ever want to know about some shady stuff they're doing in development go look at us baltimore. and they bought it for about three hundred seventy two point five million unsustainable operating who wants to go to a news museum a corporate news museum news yeah yeah it's really about them where you. go to look at the situation you know you go to understand how you're coming across cuba. maybe could've spent the money a little better but that's a good word optics are right as we go to break lock watchers don't forget to let us
6:41 am
know what you think of a proper to cover the facebook and twitter polls show that r.t. dot com coming up we discuss the latest news on the over two thousand by grandchildren that were separated from their families with immigration attorney alan ford jr stay tuned to watch in the box. is this is a sticker from a water bottle found in the stomach of a fish the brand is part of the coca-cola company which sells millions of bottles of soda every day the idea was that let's tell consumers there are the bad ones there the litter bugs are trying this way industry shouldn't be blamed for all this waste the company has long promised to reuse the plastic. stickle
6:42 am
capsules excuse. that seems cool sets for something they're plastic a six day course the only and i need to stay on your own is that special projects funded. on the new vest that is the end of it for the city of fun now the mountains of waste only grow higher. plane. plane. so what we. got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy confrontation
6:43 am
let it be an arms race is on all fronts very dramatic development only personally i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical guy time to sit down and talk. because the swarms of them so moving. who was before. much of those who heard the preview was. sneer move north we were going to . move. move. move she didn't look beautiful i mean it's a good looking good. move slow most of these girls with the view from good goof. to go to shows who look what do you distribute before you can show the story
6:44 am
to the issue or go. to start ups to. get to me to fill it with the little missed dates to look at is it. just testing understand just me it's the mashed old trick to stop the president and please introduce more students . as we have petitions to go to summer to snoop to come up with new it because that is the girls with you serious approach to your machine station shouldn't for you should cook door for the one who's doing. thank. last summer as questions mounted over whether the new border
6:45 am
policy implemented by the trumpet ministration was illegally separating families the palling its policy itself seemed just clean enough to give plausible deniability to those involved take jonathan why the leave for the department of health and human services unaccompanied alien children reunification coordination group he himself warned his colleagues of family separations and when questioned by the senate judiciary committee this was his response in july twenty. the answer received is that the family separation was not a policy there was no policy to resort to which can result in family separation you know the consequence of the policy but correct they both know that i would say that there was no policy which would result in separation of children from family and. so now seven months later mr white announced that reuniting families separated the border quote would present grave child welfare concerns it
6:46 am
would destabilize the permanency of their existing home environment and could be traumatic to the children in addition and maxwell of health and human services announced in january that the number of children separated at the border was much larger than the two thousand seven hundred thirty seven reported to the media the reason staffing it takes approximately eight hours to review one case file the health and human services office of refugee resettlement has over forty seven thousand cases to review meaning it would take one hundred employees working for four hundred seventy one days simply to determine next steps for those separated at the burr border so is the problem that funding isn't being allocated correctly or are the actual problems on the ground being ignored while those here in washington play politics with lives and security here to help us better understand the immigration system and what truly needs to be done to fix it is. turning in speaker allen or in cheney i thank you so much for joining us thank you for having me so
6:47 am
here's what i'm interested in is so there was a federal court order that was supposed to you know family separation at the border here we are months and months later and health and human services saying well it's too hard to reunite the families and they didn't bother to track the adults and children they took into custody the first place the a.c.l.u. a quote called the report a shocking concession that it can easily find thousands of children at risk from parents and doesn't even think is worth the time to locate each of them i have to ask you as an immigration attorney as someone who fights and deals with this every day do you think the government's excuses hold water at this point you know it's unconscionable because these are human beings this isn't chattel so even if these people did into the country undocumented which that's still arguable right if they were taken if their clothes were taken at their belts were taken at their shoes were taken may be returned at this point they're not able to return the children to them and there's actually two cohort there's the cohort that happen before family separation that the courts which are the thousands of kids that we can't even know because the government has given us that number yet and that is the coord that we did know the twenty seven thousand that you discussed and out of that twenty seven
6:48 am
hundred sorry there are three hundred fifty of them that are still in the custody at h.h.s. which have not been returned to their families with a government clear understanding that separating children is deeply traumatic to the child so it is justifiable unconstitutional and then it is black history month there's only one of those time in our history that we've done this and that is when the slaves were here we took rip families apart and did not bother to read about them that's a great point i never even thought about the context of that that's a really fantastic point and that's kind of where my not my where my question becomes is that. here in the u.s. we've obviously there was never any part of reparations wasn't reunifying family is . that there are certain groups that have always been at risk of losing their kids native americans have had still to this day i talk to native americans all over this country and there they have their children taken away by a child so. this is african-american family especially poor family class becomes a distinction they don't have
6:49 am
a money then you shouldn't have your kids. and adults with disabilities as well these are groups of people that have their kid snatched literally snatched by their system and nearly impossible to get your children back if some of the kids and and this is the the what may happen and up in these sort of defacto adoptions because they won't have parents to contact and the judges will just sort of hand off that what are the negative effects of that down the line traumatic to move the kids now what happens if you just leave this well you just are the culture right i mean that's really the real problem you destroy the culture and you sort of see them as a thing that you were able to reallocate which is unfair to anyone people are unable to be reallocated to cultures relegated by the courts and so the most important thing is that we're all about border security and in this instance we have people that we capture we have them in our custody and then we release them and now we say we can track them and the concern is that people aren't coming to court so it is a deficiency of the u.s. government v.h.s. pacifically with regard to these children and also we had the home i mean the
6:50 am
secretary of homeland security said in front of congress and say there was no policy when clearly there was a policy and then said that there were procedures that were in place to make sure these children could be united and there were no procedures in place to say these kids should be reunited and the only reason why america is not at the edge of their seat or burning down cities is because these are brown kids who don't speak english i think in any other culture or any other where in the world if there were kids that were separated for their families we'd be the first ones marching is this one of those things your experiences were is this kind of the culmination of a lot of policy leading up to this point over a long stretch of time or is there something that's like you need to know i think the family family separation has been a problem it is never had this sort of an issue before with immigration at the border i don't want to say it's a crisis because we are a large country two thousand people showing up at our border is not something to be alarmed about. hundreds of thousands of people in every day about both planes and overstay and there's no concern about that so when we start talking about that in
6:51 am
the northern border then we can talk about immigration as a crisis so what i sort of see is that this was supposed to tell people don't come to the border anymore it didn't send that message right there was also sends a message that you need to come to the port of entry you just traveled a thousand miles three hundred miles and you know the port of entry is that's ridiculous than ours that was written that way so therefore you see that the problem is that we're trying to send a message that no one's receiving and we need to re think what we're doing for immigration by solving the problems at home no where in the in our foreign policy are we saying let's address the issues at home and part of those issues are deporting the criminals back to their home areas to terrorize the people that are there but you know it's interesting because a lot of border patrol you know experts have pointed out that the current system of immigration has been kind of at least in the southern border has been kind of built upon and was designed to handle the process specifically like adult mexican men absolutely and families exactly you know so that is a fair assessment and how is that contributed to this kind of this confusion and
6:52 am
chaos we're seeing with these families the book i mean the secretary of homeland security basically said the exact same thing we have a system set up or been now they've been having women and children so it's just like our educational system we've been educating people for factories and we don't have factory jobs anymore and then we're concerned as why people are no longer doing these factory jobs is just not reshaping the narrative at all and then you sort of say you need a wall for protection and you're sending troops down and then you also acknowledge at the same time that it's women and children that are coming so how can you sort of say you need troops for william women and children it's just an inconsistent conversation very much and part of that i think and some of this has to do with this idea of assimilation like we don't mind as long as you. and i know as i said before this idea of taking away kids that's something that happened with native american children to happen with you know children of slaves is the same thing this is a simulation of. into this white anglo-saxon american culture that they're supposed to want to be how do we fix our immigration system do things
6:53 am
like have more clearly need more people there clearly underfunded that human services there is clearly underfunding and not being put in the same in the right play is but how do we fix our immigration system without falling back on to those myths about assimilation the myth of if you look like us if you talk like that that that's what america is everything that's what we already everything now so we should start with that first conversation the very first conversation is talk about money right money is never an issue for anything else so it shouldn't be an issue here so i don't know and specifically we're talking about human beings and something a problem that we created right if we can build a billion dollar walls we can also take a couple hundred thousand dollars our people into things appropriate in the first place right with regards to our immigration system we need to modernize it right we need workers there even that the trumpets bill these we have people that were undocumented that were working there were provided false documents from that so the key places a sort of start with the employers right if we're saying there's an issue let's give the employees a way to address the jobs shortage about making these people have the appropriate documentation to be here and stop yelling to deport people in the budget the budget
6:54 am
only allows four hundred thousand people four hundred thousand people a year to be deported right we have eleven million here as a four years ago it's not going to happen so any time when you're taking either to people who are undocumented once a child adult and separating them or a u.s. citizen child and removing their undocumented parents that's just not what the united states should be should. look like a member. as an attorney looking at this is this something are equipped to handle this right now our courts are but again right you're going to have to get to the issue right in there really sure what this is if you want to know what the problem immigration is it's all in congress congress hasn't done anything for twenty years the only reason that obama did something and the truck has been allowed to do something is because congress did nothing so they should look themselves the real hard look in the face and say it's time for us to get our act together very lovely that we're going to. speaker alan or i want to thank you so much for coming and talking about this great talk.
6:55 am
spiral galaxies were first interpreted in edwin hubble nine hundred thirty six book interpreted as part of the his hubble sequence which classified galaxies into classes based on their appearance from what he had available at the time photographic plates now in twenty one thousand the hubble telescope and a couple of his friends have captured more than a photo for science in these new images you'll see this supernova rich galaxy a mere thirty million light years from earth known as the whirlpool galaxy in three separate dimensions hubble gives us a view of the visible light the space space telescope took a gaze at whirlpool in its infrared showing the oldest stars and chandra as you see right there x. ray observatory got the x. ray of whirlpool revealing the energy emitted from whirlpool because of the cooperation between three telescopes scientists can now see the overall picture of the universe's largest known spiral galaxy and it proves that teamwork really makes
6:56 am
the jury more of a specially a galaxy far far away team or a dream or. a good bumper sticker or. that's a grub i was good he does some of those things again words like i marvel at the greatness of human invention human ingenuity and then as we were talking earlier about why we can't even figure out how to handle border issues we can take pictures thirty million light years away from earth but we can't figure out how to keep mother a father and a child together during there and we can do better that we can do about it for better and better than most or. to moan let's stop being the embarrassment of the galaxy. moon clean them as the party that is our show prove that they remember. everyone in this world we are told will love that up so it's all you all i love you i am i roll with and on top of the bar watching those hawks out there it was great day and night but.
6:57 am
as you read the stand had to be here from us and. our overall approval on one has. a good armor on mars rover and our brother democrats that are before fourth down together that. i'm going to let them but i don't cut him then you cut them and keep an eye on what i have flew to china for profit all that it does that make. me want to work
6:58 am
then i'm wallowing in my michelle the downside of. the thing they owned and why the . number suddenly on the hey how do you want to do it me. get this whole fool place choice for you john the i knew where you're from and theosophy chime in syria has said. pretty she ought to have a. model for them after the whole fuck around mr hates it for jim and then i hope that our friend in the course. of the morning. you know world of big partisan movies lot and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the bath and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the
6:59 am
middle for the truth the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks. what politicians do something to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president. or somehow want to be rich. that you'd like to be prosperous like that before three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters of our. first city. that's geysers mine it looks like a little place a muddy the bellatrix closed it is it is a central plank supported dying a film is called a club and right now it's a stop to. a
7:00 am
lot of stuff. cause. most of. the. headlines in aussie venezuelan president just do it out just a little to stop trump's goal of regime change in the next phase of the interview with us is to channel author spam. to take advantage of every means of communication that's off the whole well into the now and some stop the madness of donald trump of the.
26 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1448599092)