let's reflect upon the failed summit in hanoi what is the most important lesson to be learned if anyone wants to learn any lessons go ahead well well food named the united states needs to revise its approach to negotiation because what the united states doesn't have to get beyond trump situations is they they don't really negotiate tool they make demands of maximalist demands and they expect the other sides to could they too late to do that and what happened in hanoi would is that donald trump came along you made the usual demands the united states always makes with complete denuclearizing and steps towards denuclearization and he said to kim jong un i'm not prepared to do anything in return. are not prepared to lift all moderate sanctions in any way and it was john bolton. mortal not apparently glenn you know one of the things i found very interesting is

in public approach right before the summit in hanoi is he was talking and i'm talking about him trying to convince the north korean leader what kind of future his country can have prosperity. making you know the potential is enormous i mean is here's a pearl of language as usual but what was interesting is that the korean the north koreans are first and foremost interested in security guarantees and then we can talk about what can happen after that complete. misconnection between the two leaders in i think maybe that's why chosen are serving us well because we're going to straight in effect demonstrating this is a communist country former adversaries of the united states. it's not allied with china and now they're becoming more and more prosperous relations with the u.s. such of this could be you if you just fall for the lung get rid of. nuclear weapons

maybe we won't bomb you and i guess maybe and i think you're going to so you're going to bet the farm on a maybe here that's of course what the north koreans are thinking about it but i wouldn't that it was a failure i mean there was in terms of getting the grand deal they were hoping for a different it didn't it didn't get it but this i feel was always an overreach however at the end of it they didn't get back in their trenches and begin threatening each other instead kept here are speaking kind words that in this really blame each other in the beginning he was it was about a unified exit and that then of the north koreans said they're going to test nuclear weapons so long range missiles and americans want to any military exercises on their borders how long this lasts not a thing but it hasn't failed yet i guess i don't know if there is a good one i like your optimism because a london alexander with the good news about all of this here the.

mainstream media fails to report and the pentagon and the state department are probably behind closed doors irked about is that the two koreas are actually working together this is the real story here ok the real story is can the united states let go and let the koreans sort out their own affairs because they're they're making progress go ahead in line that's exactly right ok just quickly one very quick point which is of course yes yes now these no the united states after that was a conflict which the united states lost in a way that yet man's security guarantees now with korea it's rather similar there are two koreas the two koreas are no negotiate with the chancellor they have concerns about each of them as concerns about security south korea does not wanting you on korean. territory it also has an aspiration to move

forward with its relations with the north because that's very south korea economically also and the risk the united states takes by sticking to these maximalist positions and not moving full is that the koreans will start to negotiate with each other and will cut now that you know it's ok that's a good way to end this part of this topic let's move on to venezuela i'm calling this program deadlock so we went from a noisy now let's go business been his way or the coup attempt apparently has stalled the the. the photo ops in the media coverage of the humanitarian aid over the bridge failed here and then we have the random guy chosen by the united states basically in exile where does this coke go from here because the u.s. still has a lot of tools in its tool kit. guess it boils down to what temple do because it is

still a lot of uncertainty about what kind of a precedent it will be in foreign policy again when he ran for president it was very clear he wouldn't have anymore for morse now it's a bit uncertain whether or not after syria iran whether or not this is something he will really follow through i think initially it could be it could have seemed like hanging fruit in terms of like a nonviolent something that minimal effort such a change the government completely but now that they have to use that term it's going to be a walk in the park or what looks like a cake walk this sounds like you know the planning for iraq two thousand and three here not only there's a complete misunderstanding of what's going on in venezuela and i guess his base is looking at him as well because if he does decide to use military force against fairness or a law then essentially the same obama bush and everyone before him so it is an interesting. to look at his presidency because so far he has only use kind of the

threat of war in order to extract concessions but now is kind of at a crossroads either push a stimulus us military in or he starts backing off so it's i would be very careful to look at my crystal ball on this one i think everyone here let's go back to london i was going to weigh in on that because it looks like the planning for this they thought it was going to be easy they thought it would be just a. the government would collapse once they've chosen their their favorite one and now it's not come about and now we have venezuela looking to move them out of its export oil operations to mask out out of. i mean their material government has resources and of course the most important thing is the military remains loyal and this is something like ten miscalculated you know that i warn you about abrams he's a trouble maker he'll make you false promises go ahead alexander well aren't there miscalculation. because i think what they've done has actually strengthened the

venezuelan government i think it was actually quite unpopular for because of the situation with the economy but it's quite clear that most venezuelans do not want to see their president of the united states very few of them why do individual who none of them had elected and i think what has happened and it's entirely unsurprising is that the people of venezuela and the military of venezuela have rallied to the defense of their country as they see it and i think the great danger here is that now political trace teach all the united states easing this in engineering before all of the venezuelan government and time as i said when venezuelan painting is rather. behind that government and

when international look has very far from moved against that development there is way that has friends the united states will now double down and you mentioned the name elliot abrams and of course he has used three zero orchestrating wars against latin american countries and there's already talk blockades and charging up sanctions and secondly sanctions against other countries and of course the day injuries that this conflict could escalate and grow and draw all neighboring countries it's a very good point you know because. as we speak right now colombia and brazil seem to be getting cold feet again i like your phrase of the low hanging fruit to look like was going to be a done deal well it's not a done deal and if there were to be a military operation against brazil and i agree with your logic probably doesn't want to go there because of his reelection prospects here but colombia doesn't want

to be pulled in as alexander make yours just said i mean this could it could be a regional conflict that nobody really needs and nobody wants. but one of the u.s. options right now just continued intensive economic warfare against the population of venezuela and i think the u.s. is running out of options because obviously it could continue. to make life more difficult and hoping that it will do over time bring down the government but. quite correctly pointed out a lot of it's backfiring because i think a legitimate argument can be made that. some mismanagement of the government. has. passed away but of course another quarter was on the record as saying that they might call for the united states to invade his his country his own country or so obviously that's not going to sit well with venezuela so that was all in a polarized country but that's not going to win him much support from the other side and. again. you have invested

too much into intervention just it's just saying that all the cards are on the table that this all aggressive rhetoric is cheap but he hasn't actually. put on the red line such as obama did something that could be used against him so he left him enough room to maneuver to pull back and well the interesting let me finish of a segment where what alexander make errors the rhetorical are very interesting here you know this for this rhetorical battle against socialism and using venezuela as an example is actually part of his domestic. reelection bid here twenty seconds alex go ahead yes i mean that's exactly the point because she's pointing to see economic crisis in venezuela and he's talking about how the like a world opponents of the united states he's left wing democratic opponents in the united states to find themselves socialists and he says well we don't want didn't you know in the united states what's happened in venezuela place to him to lead to

any engine may stick ok and if the washington don't mention it it's a very interesting dove tailing here are a gentleman we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on some real new stakes with r.t. . what i see every tuesday and hear things what they're dorie. i see people who are afraid not see these young lives as some women in these ways purposes and i see those as really scared. to go to the movie. ali have a hole or that is the color of their skin that's all they have going for themselves to their white skin. live.

yeah. so. yes so well this is how the. cut cut. if played. cut. cut. cut. i do think the numbers mean something they've mattered the u.s.

has over one trillion dollars in debt more than ten white collar crime families each day. eighty five percent of global wealth you long for the old bridge with six percent world market thirty percent some with one hundred to five hundred per second per second and fifth when he rose to twenty thousand dollars. china's building two point one billion dollars a i industrial park but don't let the numbers over. the only number you need to remember one one business show you know board the mint one and only boom box. welcome back across all things considered to mind you were discussing some real names.

ok now we're joined by john locke when he's in france he's a lecturer in political philosophy and i says that the big catholic university of vendee john welcome to the program glad to have you on my least favorite topic these days is braggs said i'm tired of thinking about it. i used to think long apart that there was a democracy deficit now i'm convinced there is the worst problem is a leadership deficit here can you do your best to try to sum up what's happening now with briggs and this is like a two year nightmare that never ends go ahead john in france well if you're old peter you're you're not alone there are sixty million british citizens who feel the same way as you do and many hundreds of millions of observers from all around the world i completely agree with your question and what strikes me about this ridiculous drawn out nightmare is that it's in bodies one of the systemic problems

of today's politics and that is the inability to change and i think the inability to effect any kind of genuine alternative to choose an alternative so we see this of course with bricks it the agony over bricks it over mrs may's deal is all the more absurd because her deal is not a deal it is a response to leave everything as it has the last forty years. and the same goes for populism in europe and for donald trump what we see is in all these three cases people announcing radical change promising radical change and then sticking with the policies that existed for decades trumps. colonized nation the colonization of trump's foreign policy by the neo cons is a perfect example of this trump just us the opposite of

a neo con foreign policy and we have of course now you can you can't move in the oval office for neo cons at the moment and the same goes for the european populists who make a lot of noise and you know claim they're going to put an end to immigration and so on i'm thinking critically of it. but actually see it with the same policies and particularly of course with their commitment not only to the european union but also to the atlantic alliance so what it's there let me jump in here you know glenn john brings up a fascinating point i mean it seems that the double whammy here is that you have a inflexible neo liberal philosophical outlook and then you have a structural problem where there is no food it isn't fluid enough for for any kind of change so you have this structural problem and this ideological problem reinforcing the worst parts of both. in i think what john mentioned is for much

more summer isis or what the finance the populist i mean this seems like they ask the right questions this is what brings them into power that is questions which has been suppressed for too long however they don't really have an answer us and i think this is problematic so the question i would ask is you know to what extent is this neoliberal economy going to work for the seller is mistaken thing for two decades to an extent through a mass immigration until the social fabric begins to tearaway as nato expansionism made us in a safer this endless wars medicine is safer so they ask all the right questions which. so sure no one has been allowed to ask but one of the rides the wave into office on this election is the effectively don't have any great answers and they don't necessarily do much to change you know you're going to go back to john in in friends i mean then i ask a very serious question and i'm not trying to be flippant or anything but i mean but what is democracy for if people are given choices the voice vote for choices something different and nothing comes about i mean it's all throughout the

continent and brags it is probably the most glaring example but there are many other examples that demonstrate the same phenomenon go ahead john and friends. well we don't live in democracy in europe it's very straightforward i've spent twenty or thirty years explaining that the european union is an undemocratic organization and showing why and showing through with constitutional arguments why that's the case but we can see it in the pronouncements of politicians to reserve may is the absolute epitome of a european politician who regards the brics it vote as an absolute catastrophe she regards her role in this whole thing as clearing up a mess created by voters and that view is held across the entire continent and certainly of course in the institute actions of brussels cameron david cameron the prime minister who organized the referendum is regarded as someone who created a terrible situation for no good reason at all in other words these people are

really opposed to democratic choice precisely because of what i just said which is they do not want things to change they do not want there to be a choice they do not want people to say yes or no to something they want people to follow the lines which have been set down and which are institutionalized particularly in things that the european union and i don't think the populists lack the answers that's not my diagnosis what i think is the populists and indeed politicians of all colors lack is courage yes we know that many things in the european union that various individual governments don't like viktor orban doesn't like the immigration thing he's fighting on that but on the russian issue we also no matter who sell beanies party the league has a full partnership with united russia they are full allies of the governing party in russia but they have not changed they have not managed to abandon that for

example the sanctions against russia even those even though those are prolonged every six months as a result of a unanimous vote see we see this extraordinary phenomenon of group. or at least. which means that actually very little ever changes in politics you know again i guess it's crystal clear what john is saying here is it. from an elite perspective it's the people that have failed not the leadership of these countries and not the leadership of the e.u. because they're infallible they're like there it's almost like a purple ball we cannot be wrong only you can be wrong glenn yeah. we actually had a prime minister making that argument that because we we rejected the twice so she said. it's putting it up the referendum would be a mistake because the people devolved quite emotionally while. they all act in their politicians they would know really what's best for our science and they get

in it's not that different from britain our c.e.o. john pointed out it's the political class never wanted this for david cameron this referendum was a way of restoring harmony among the tories and taking some air out of the balloon and then expect the referendum to go through but now that it's gone through the sensually offering two options either the remain the respects it so that only a name or we can see. the e.u. so because no deal would be american as well is it would be a better choice because they had two years to try to figure something out here let me go back to john in france here i mean just how much longer can these that lead to hold the populations in voters in contempt. well the situation we're describing is very similar to the one that was going to church by battled back in one nine hundred fifty three i would treat exactly this yeah but i'm trying to think of a quote if well go ahead exactly where he said well they'll have to dissolve the

people and elect another you know the government continues but the people has to change the art so it's not possible to answer your question. peter when when is it how long is it going to carry on we thought or i thought or some of us about it might things might change in twenty sixteen but people were predicting the downfall of the soviet system for many decades before it happened and you know it's very difficult to know exactly when it will happen in the case of the european union which of course as we as i've said many times on your channel bears a number of resemblances to the soviet union yes so it's not possible to say all that we can say is that there are increasing tensions and there is no good news for the european union yet everything is bad news so there's north-south conflict between germany and the southern european countries over the euro crisis and the debts there's east west conflict on the liberal values versus traditional values particularly with poland and hungary there's obviously the major crisis with brics

it which means the european union is losing the world's financial capital its second biggest contributor and one of its bigger meant biggest member states there and there and there is no good news to temper this series of bad news events which has been going on now for for well over a decade and so at some point it will collapse but when i pass on that question and go back to glenn here you know one of the interesting things is when you look at these populist movements across europe they're very dissimilar in many ways but it's with the way i look at it and populism is a dirty word apparently in the mainstream here when what these populist movements are doing is is pushing up against the. i'm in an ideology that doesn't work and of course every single country will have its own specific elements there but this populism is deemed bad because they're demanding change change or a status quo that isn't working for them i mean i think even on a rhetorical level this is trying to pollute any kind of activism in people wanting

to we gain sovereignty in every sense of the word and i think the best thing if they really want to get rid of the populace the best thing they could do is to engage with their arguments yesterday and that's the reason why these people have come to power is because to ask the questions which been denied now. so you can ask this in terms of what is the what is meant to be european a strong point it's about cultural. history is it is what should be the ideal economic politics there so what about tradition the sense of community i mean this experiment wants to destroy nation states they want is destroyed any sense of community i mean everybody is basically either married to or a ward of the state but effectively they're trying to suppress the populous movement in again with because they want a gaijin with arguments like be bricks it or. poles and here is think that there

are very different colors because unless they are all portrayed the the rest being a racist. or they are simply kremlin puppets so this is the way of censure of shaming opposition we are john real quick question we got thirty seconds. when it's all going to be another vote ok twenty seconds i hate to quarter you on this topic go ahead john. i believe they'll be a series of votes on the twelfth of march twelfth thirteenth and forty to march and my feeling this morning is that there will probably be a deal in other words that mrs mazed ill in a slightly game and it will go through and britain will leave the european union at the end of march or very soon afterwards but then the battle will really start because out of all really start our idea rather than to leave it up it there but will be but we'll be in touch with you on this topic here many thanks and i guess i here in moscow london and in france and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time remember prosthetic rules. go

in and you may never get out some sort of people this is. really. my teenage gang rules here. i don't want to be moved you don't know let me my. name you will. come out. minus a murderer. and now it's looking for the.

gun and melanie when. you know the monkey. music. life expectancy in america is plummeting if you look at the chart it's shocking to look at almost every other country it's kind of inching up on one side of the chart and that as an outlier is the united states is why over here it's all crashing down from the drugs from having junk food having junk culture having it's junk politics and fake news it's all fake and fake doesn't sustain life and you see it in the

numbers it's clear. my son doing drugs my nephew was still in drugs my sister just with doing drugs it was like an epidemic of drug abuse america's public enemy number one in the united states. is drug abuse is sort of going after the users in the prison population who are we started treating sick people people who are addicted to these drugs like criminals while i was on the hill. that the war on drugs was a mistake there are countless numbers of people who are in prison for. sins for. minor offenders in the drug trade it's a lot watching your children grow up and miss you in waves and say by daddy as you're walking out of a business it's just it doesn't get easier. the country has gone into

a nihilistic fever that's why i think we've got to hit the road and get out the traveling across america to find what makes america take them to charlotte is the genius of this place the special american hero this is it we've come a point around which element is done something we always are on the margins something. called culture listening morning america. where starting last with is going to headed east into the swamp we're going into the belly of the beast and i think i want to leave now doesn't get any more ground on the net it may be completely different but the end of this journey. it's. just.

it's. an offshoot of the al qaida terror group stages a deadly surprise attack in syria as the u.s. offers a million dollar reward for information on arsalan bin ladin son. in syria heavy fighting resumes as u.s. backed kurdish forces close in on islamic states last stronghold that despite donald trump having already announced victory numerous times in the past few months . i'd like to see as broad a coalition as we can put together to replace the replace the whole corrupt regime . u.s. national security adviser an international coalition to help get.