him issue him wave and say bye daddy as you're walking out of the abyss it's just it doesn't get easier. venezuela's opposition leader one calls on the foreign powers to intervene against the president as rivals of rallies. following a nationwide blackout. as a solution to. crush the coup attempt. top it in the criminal. us embassy staffers caught with a mortar shell in his luggage at a moscow airport russia called the incident a problem but washington plays it down saying there was no danger to passengers and the man has actually left the country. and the u.s. house of representatives passes a bill to counter the influence of so-called dark money in the election process. it

should be happening and it's a deeply complicated the united states. you know it's legal. for the latest on the stories you can head to our team and dot com the charming individual that we call call and break he's coming here in about an hour's time but right now though the president of iran former president mahmoud ahmadinejad is a special guest on going underground if you're watching in the u.k. sputnik looks at the confusion and uncertainty over budget stay with us. semitism scandals the politics of washington and london we're going underground in an exclusive interview with former iranian president. this is within the past forty . ours britain announces former b.b.c.

media reaction instructor now as an ins a gallery radcliffe convicted for espionage that she denies is a defacto u.k. official and that's all while the e.u. britain and the usa continue economic warfare against another fossil fuel power venezuela welcome president mahmoud ahmadinejad's one of the world's greatest revolutionaries a good chavez remembered by supporters and enemies alike today died six years ago this week you knew him was he has a major mainstream media has it a dictator. in the name of god the most merciful americans and the british can label people however they want we have to see what their standards and criteria are fair labeling people in such a way do you know of a dictator who loves his people who could walk freely among the people on the streets listen to their demands and fulfill them of course mr chavez was against

the domination of foreigners over his country and other countries he was a strong supporter of freedom. he became president with a high percentage of the people's vote. the number because i believe you should ask the people who make such labels why they are trying to fan the atmosphere of vengeance among the public those who knew mr chavez closely know that he was a very kind man a really lovely person and on various occasions i saw him in many parts of venezuela he went to the people we without any security or bodyguards listen to the people for hours he loved these people and that is how he lived i think if you want to have a better world you need to have certain standards that's all acceptable by all the nations of the world the stand is defined by those with hundreds of years of colonial history who waged war was even today they set their sights on the wealth

of other nations and they cannot run their own economy independent of other nations . those standards have failed to bring security to the world it's not the food issue really don't have the corner. interest on the internet and this does not spring friendship among nations milat who do see this really well the u.s. and european union wants to overthrew his successor i'm a duro of the believe aryan revolution just like the us wants to overthrow the government of iran this is a reckless into who time before speaking about changes that we have to ask do americans have the right to overthrow them and do row in venezuela if we accept that others have the right to interfere in the internal in fez of other countries the no space would be left to talk about human rights international laws freedoms and humanity venezuelans are independent and brave well informed people they seek

freedom and they love liberty. let us allow other people to decide on their own the destiny of the venezuelan people should be decided by themselves and not the president of the usa. because after donald trump violated the un nuclear deal with sanctions the things basically the same between washington and have run as they were when you were president with the hoots that's was expecting too much we had accepted the regulations and the provisions of the i.a.e.a. can we think of a sustainable peace if a government is to enjoy more rights than others do or can we entertain the ideas of brotherhood and friendship. this is dictatorship but at the international level the us administrations should allow people to participate in running the affairs in

a democratic atmosphere. they should not seek more rights than others nor meddle in the affairs of other countries the path they have been on in the past decades has destructed the world security and created concerns for the future among all the people of the world americans are respectable people the usa however has many problems at home the us president and his administration need to spend their time fixing people's problems in their own country if they imagine that the resolution is to create trouble and put other nations into chaos and that would mean they are sowing deep vengeance and animosity among the nations on the milat whore who would . i believe that this is not the right way and the few in the me who do you think these kinds of violations of un resolutions are symptomatic of capitalism itself is not an ism and suddenly that is

a view of the let these yes capitalism by its nature is based on cruelty and injustice. actually we don't have capitalism in the world anymore it's the system of capitalists who are dominating the resources of the world they deprive other people of many opportunities the nature of a capitalist system is unjust distribution of opportunities natural wealth and riches in this situation there is no chance for others so the freedoms of other humans will be restricted and that is the greatest war against justice. while all chances for growth improvement development will be handed. this is injustice by definition it's unacceptable to see one side amass colossal wealth in astronomical figures while on the other side they remain in poverty as there are many prisoners in the united states we also have detainees in iran.

i oppose any form of prison in principle and i think many prisoners are held captive for two main reasons firstly discrimination social gaps cause extreme deprivation and poverty and secondly a number of people regard themselves superior than others they keep the rights for themselves to trump on the rights of society and other people if we try to put in place the joint management of the world then all human beings will partake in society's interests and effectively participate in shaping that society then hopefully detention centers would be scrapped and in future we will not see anybody behind bars anymore also some think is look at the phenomenon of prison from a different angle in any geographic location where some people or

a nation on the pressure their freedoms are confined their rights are ignored and they are not allowed to develop themselves and reach a proper status than that geographic location then becomes a prison where other superpowers pressure people can find them and infringe their rights that place becomes a jail. i hope through universal unity and joint efforts by all humans we will not witness anyone making prisons know anyone committing such a crime that would make them deserve to be thrown behind bars if natural sources of wealth and opportunities are distributed even. we would never see four million people sleeping on park benches in the united states. human's every single one of them are important they learned to use even. more how do you show here.

is there a lack of wealth in the united states if resources and opportunities were divided equally nobody homeless would remain on the streets. against it it have even foods that are diluted to zero zero your quota one hundred who you tweeted the picture from the u.k. backed war on yemen and said the starving child was because of the capitalist system how does capitalism kill. their movability yes any system that stands against the interests of the people would fall into decay even if they develop and grow for a short period you should look at the names of the weapons manufacturers who are taking the lives of people in yemen and you'll notice that the nature of capitalism is war and destruction and we want a world without weapons because weapons are designed to kill warfare cannot serve

justice so where. do they send weapons to produce food for the people in yemen saudi arabia and the persian gulf or do they do it for slaughter when arms sales are a lucrative business then this is in twined with conflicts and war everybody knows part of the us governing body are the owners of weapons factories. punish numbers without tension without wars those weapon factories will shut down. you could find a pretext and start a war among people and nations. the question is what's all the united states and britain doing in the persian gulf region. who are allowed them to come into our region and many problems in many parts of the world would be solved when the u.s. and the u.k. and their like leave that region. they must allow people to decide for themselves.

yemeni people should be allowed to take that position on their own. those who sell weapons to kill people will have a terrible fate and god almighty is just he will defend the rights of the oppressed let us close down weapons factories call can we expect to stop wars when some economies have production as a major pillar of their economic growth and employment can we assume know what will happen or in some countries economic growth relies to a large extent on the production of bombs. atomic bombs rockets and planes and the bulk of employment is the pendant on industry. we hope one day we will see that arms industries turn into an industry that produces equipment to improve the quality of life. let me give you some

statistics the world military spending is one thousand five hundred billion dollars while one point two billion people live in absolute poverty and counts afford even a meal a day if we make a global consensus to issue this military spending within a five year period and allocate it to the pool or improve economic growth of other nations us would there be an insecurity any more is this option better or is war the solution. it's better to earn revenue by serving humanity more money by killing people these are possible and feasible options if we have a humane approach and we think of humankind. we should care about every single person who loses his or her life in wars people have feelings emotions and families learned in our culture killing an innocent person amounts to killing all

humankind i hope that the day will come when all of us would act humanely and when others look at us they would see humanity in friendship. what's the difference between man and other creatures we don't love others i don't like us the extent of the love in your heart determines what kind of a human you want when your heart is full of love you can't produce means for taking the life of another person i cannot imagine this and hope the conditions of the world will soon change in favor of justice humanity liberty and friendship the. we believe that the basis of social life is justice mutual respect and cooperation so anybody anywhere in the world who makes an attempt to spread justice deserves our respect and support everyone everywhere should support that we believe

religions came to bring further unity and solidarity among human beings if they are dividing people in the name of religion then be sure that this has nothing to do with the truth of religion humans are all the same so we have to do something no one can scare me to do so honey they do it by your talents will connect these governments must stand by the people promotes peace instead of was friendship instead of animosity then life will become beautiful for everyone the joy to stevie's with the square. well that's in the you'd better. stop you the more from the former president of iran after the break. some british and american officials speak in a way that's give you the impression that they are living on another planet well they themselves are behind all these twenty questions that's coming up in part two of the special edition of going underground.

the maternity town the slums go in and you may never get out some sort of. my teenage gang rules here because i didn't want to be moved then let the my. name you will be. told will come. to. night and seeing her. and now it's looking for the yeah. and melanie when somebody who.

you know when you're the monkey that little music that i see. there was not it molded you trade or labor there's an environment standouts in the original nafta fifty five years ago those were kicked out because relations were more purity economy but now the religion is very very close intertwined so. i think it's ok to have a new treaty and you negotiation. welcome back we're still with mahmoud ahmadinejad former president of iran in part one we spoke of u.k. involvement in the world's worst humanitarian crisis u.k. prime minister tourism a says that britain must sell weapons to saudi arabia to

bomb civilians to keep britain safe from saudi linked terrorists but there's must really need to let people suitable for you into this the treatment was. well you should ask the british government officials how vast britain is this is a form of greed i said there are two reasons for wars the second one was that some people find themselves superior to others. does the u.k. recognise the independence of the people of yemen or not and the independence of other regional nations if other countries have interests in the u.k. then when the british allow them to behave the same as they do in yemen. the world is changing new powers are emerging of i would the u.k. allow africans for example if they became powerful to seek compensation for the u.k.'s colonial era or the slave trade. well it's in their interests but what if

the u.k. refuses to pay that compensation then are those african countries supposed to start a war if we accept the u.k.'s mindsets visa vi protecting its interests in yemen and the world will turn into a healthy. so we believe we are in this world to make it into a heaven not a hell. of unilateral ism has come to its end and i hope those mistakes would not repeat itself. the world is changing rapidly people are becoming powerful and they may feel that they have the right to adapt the current approach of the usa and the u.k. we don't want to see that happen when it is clear that the u.k. based on a preplanned skeen wage was sell weapons to undermine nations destroy their infrastructures to prevent them in the first place a certain nation from assuming power after already then they return to the war torn

country for reconstruction on one hand they tackle unemployment creates jobs and sell their weapons then on me other hand they destroy the civil infrastructure of the war torn countries and again they create jobs and boost their own firms and corporations this is like a person who is feeding on slaughtering other human beings. god almighty does not like such humans there definitely will be a severe punishment for then in the hereafter they should not assume that other people do not know what they are doing by using this very childish absurd reasoning every government can interfere anywhere in the world and eventually nothing will remain in its place and i hope they would hear the words of one out of seven point five billion people of the earth who favor peace loves other people and hates was

seeks justice and respects all human beings these are not my words alone these are what a majority of people express the super powers must abide by the demands of the nations otherwise they will not have a good future. to deter the constant jungle question should throughout history we have seen enough wars and bloodshed that is enough. now i ask you how come a man can order the killing of others and then sleep easily because of this i submit to his can we call such a person a human it's a significant question as an absolutely. well why do you think that major nation politicians and media call you an anti semite or in other words anti one of the three abrahamic religions with. designs with.

a lot in mind that you had to give it as if it's the dominant system of the world likes to introduce those who think differently in a way it's wishes and not the way they really are. i have said time and again that's we oppose occupation aggression tyranny and the killing of people who are still itty untag unism and the. we don't oppose any faith or religion but we oppose inhumane treatment and behavior. i have said this on many occasions but the western media have a double standard if you say something that isn't in line with their policies they will stigmatize you as a horrible person. on those going to this knowledge. my hands are going to do. i love all human beings even my own enemies but i stand

strongly against their inhumane approaches and resist them though i still love them when you try to prevent the collapse of even a tyrant you are actually acting as a friend. people have the right to have different ideas and beliefs they are free to choose their own faith but they have no right to violate the rights of others no religion should be used as a pretext for occupation aggression and slaughter. otherwise it's not a true religion. throughout history many dictates is hidden behind the guise of religion many atrocities were committed in the name of religion this is the greatest abuse of faith jews are an average tribe moses is a great prophets anyone who really follows in the footsteps of the prophets moses would be against occupation and atrocities no one can claim that he follows a messenger of god and occupy other people's land kill them and infringe on their

rights these are my arguments that whatever they label me that doesn't matter but if you are being fair you should publish what i say not what they label me as even if they don't give me a voice they are the real losers two of the we're going to be because human relations go beyond media and people will finally know that sure reality will occur and so can they do those who had this in the usa congresswoman ellen and in the u.k. labor leader jeremy corbyn have been called anti seen by why do you think there is this confusion between defacto racism and allez israeli crimes against humanity. to want to be a dean has a duty but being a nationalist has nothing to do with the religion of prophets moses some jews follow prophets moses and they are great people living in harmony with other people

the relation between the zionist regime the followers of prophet moses and jews should be redefined. we are against occupation and slaughter even if a muslim a christian a buddhist a hindu or even an atheist commits these crimes which you know they are free to have their own beliefs but if no one has the right to violate the rights of others in the name of a certain religion. we oppose aggression against the rights of other people no matter who they are. some u.s. officials claim to be christians however we are against their aggression. also in the u.k. some officials claim to be the followers of jesus christ because we argue that jesus never sought to kill or wage war. so they can decide for themselves but we wouldn't meddle in their affairs. if it isn't that you could attune between attacks when they get it but who is it through. the whole latino don't. we know the

reason the zionist regime was created everybody knows it why should we ignore it some british and american officials speak in a way that's give you the impression that they are living on another planet well they themselves are behind all these israeli questions maybe these officials assume the rest of us are from another planet and are unfamiliar with their schemes however everything is clear human rights must be recognized they should be no wars of aggression or wars that are waged for oil in the middle east or was that advantage their interests in the middle east they have to try and work in their own country and let others improve their own country then we could trade in a friendly manner and eventually everybody will enjoy tranquility and prosperity. a magician well and so have a good mother too but now you are in power and you are dominating the world and

want to impose your interests on others you who through time is called consequence to try milk only. that's not a good thing it will not have a good future this is what we stand against who caught him when. unsurprising that nato nation mainstream media not really headlining the un report alleging possible crimes against humanity committed by israel against more than six thousand civilians dead or wounded in the great return march in gaza. because of the band we do not have independent media in europe and north america media are mostly dependent on the capitalists even if there is an independent media it does not have the power and capability to spread its message to the entire world . the western media covers the news of the capitalists who dominates the resources of the world that's not a good thing. anyone who is powerful should use the media to serve people humanity

justice and peace not to serve their personal or political interests of the united nations have on many occasions stressed the rights of the palestinian people and that the zionist regime is the occupying force hermie the militant phillis to let the people of palestine decide their own fate regardless of their religion the jews muslims and christians should freely decide their political destiny i'm sure by doing so we will have a better world for. my people going and that is who had to have a big turkey where he goes well finally i've got to ask you will you run to be the next president of iran. moto because the modu has this well we have to wait on people's demands and then we will see both suck. and your leader. i would like to make his statements regarding the jewish people they are an average

damage tribe many of whom are followers of prophet moses some of them i personally know and they are true believers and pure people. who are your. porch d'souza. but the zionist movement has nothing to do with prophets moses his faith and the average amec religions. only who have not gotten. thank you and that's it for the show will be back on monday twenty nine years to the day the chilis you pay us back to take it was forced out after sixteen years of cia torture a new liberalism of the forgotten until then because special need to see only. my son doing drugs my nephews was still in drugs my sister just with doing drugs it

was like an epidemic of drug abuse america's public enemy number one in the united states is drug abuse we started going after the users in a prison population more we started treating sick people people who are addicted to these drugs like criminals while i was on the hill i increasingly became convinced that the war on drugs was a mistake there are countless numbers of people who are in prison for. a long sentence and for whom minor minor offenders in the drug trade it's a lot watching your children grow up and miss you in waves and say by daddy as you're walking out of a business it's just it doesn't get easier.