we were teaching these kids about racism about police brutality taking pride in who they are. all a part of history. currently underway in new zealand the day after the terror attacks in christ church in which . an australian national has been charged with one count of murder. in the french president's national dialogue initiated in response to yellow vests protests wraps up as a new poll finds seventy percent of the country think the exercise was a waste of time. and the un says people should eat less meat in order to protect the environment and proposes taxing people can be asked to pray to the idea. that somehow it's manmade and that car flatulence is going to kill

millions of people around the equator is just the one of the most laughable things i've ever heard of you because otherwise you would have to take the numerous different scientific studies. and it's midday here in moscow and you're watching international line from our studio with me. welcome to the program. vigils are underway in new zealand after a terror attack on two mosques in christchurch killed forty nine people over forty others were injured the twenty eight year old australian man appeared in court on saturday and was charged with one count of murder the suspect has been named as brenton tyrant the presiding judge said he expected tyrant to face further charges later a video of the aftermath of one of the attacks has appeared on social media and a warning here that you might find it disturbing.

to. the to the to the the the the the. the right to the massacre a seventy four page racist manifesto was posted on a page believed to be connected to the gunman there he identifies himself as a fascist and encourages attacks on nonwhite saying they are in vegas as the attackers senshi out waves across the globe i think it's now being pointed in many directions as it explains. in the hours after the dreadful events in new zealand america so horrid so so miller said before our eyes understanding in those hours it seems every one's become a detective judge and jury everyone seems to know who to blame

starting of course with trump mr trump your awards not. your policies not that here's the u.s. president with his friends trump inspired an australian white supremacist to murder a group of new zealand muslims trump also inspired the murder of jews in pittsburgh now he threatens violence if you lose in twenty twenty america this is the racist thought you were elected even the u.s. senate does declare that these small. as in various degrees trump's fault words have consequences like saying we have an invasion or border. and talking about people as though they were different in some fatal way this partisan madness has well and truly spilled over the chairman of the democratic coalition has published a poll asking people whether trump was responsible ninety one percent said

yes well everyone has a right to their opinion but it wasn't just troubles fault no no you see this he missed massacre carried out by a self professed white supremacy was actually inspired by get this by a black conservative activist. people with deep psychological impairments show them most clearly moments when healthy humans would feel nothing but empathy and sadness and grief candace owens is deeply deeply it seems that everyone's milking this tragedy using it as an opportunity to sling mud at those they disagree with even beauty pilot youtube's biggest star even if he got the blame someone didn't like his blue eyes and blond hair i suppose the white supremacists who carried out the killings of christ church new zealand you don't

subscribe to p.d.p. before the shootings i have two to three years working people about pity parties dangerous rhetoric or connections the reason all of these people and others are getting flack is because they were mentioned by the killer in this manifesto or in the lives therefore because they were mentioned by a deranged maniac as somehow complicit the logic goes oh really this madman is being taken see. c.n.n. is studying his manifesto so we've been pouring over eighty seven page is a hate filled rants another thing the murderer roots is that what he did will set off a larger political conflict global pit the right against the left and unfortunately it seems to be happening exactly as he wanted because everyone

seems to be determined turn run their mouth point the finger blame blame blame selectively of course shooter also likened him self to nelson mandela and thank goodness no e.d.s. has yet come forward to blame the global i. mean people have gathered outside one of the mosque that was attacked pay tribute to the victims. you. know just want to point. out that. many people in the world. who are living in. not just the great church in new zealand want to do. i want truth i want to i want them to know we have together we must fight. in the field.

we discuss the terror attack and the question of radicalization without stephen morris of the english democratic party and catherine schachter the institute for middle eastern studies. i think that the issue of radicalism is rampant nine our society and across the board recall is of geography and i think that's a problem we need to actually be courageous about and face up to and it's not limited to islamic radicalism i think that fascism is on the rise wherever and it has a lot to do with the fact that there's been so much you know identity politics there is so much part of the ring of certain demographics that people always doing behind i would say very broad to call lines when it comes to the way that they identify politically socially ethnically and of course religiously and this is this is an

issue we have this kind of brand new views and now that is targeting everyone i need to see the misreporting all the luck of reporting from the mainstream media and you know our country obviously we're. all over the press will report it however when these extremist islam. in the middle east talking christian groups did get don't seem to get the same kind of coverage it shows that well it's a lone wolf somebody with mental problems. well no it's not the case we need to start to report these things properly and we need to pour all over my concern now is that they will try and use this to trying to squash any debate or any conversations regarding extremism both. of the. sky came from people not have an understanding of course that it's ok to go back and killing muslims because they're the other day the foreigners and therefore you know they are literally it's all put market on them then people feel free to just

target them or demonize them or criminalize them just for existing in the west you know they have been portrayed so many times as foreigners as if religion is a nationality this identity politics not that is running rampant in our society across the board regardless you know whether we're on the right on the left this is something that is pandemic we are in a situation where we are criminalizing people's differences and trying to raise through behind incline and it's a dangerous dangerous leap multiculturalism doesn't work it's been shown not to work you can't have different cultures different laws in one place you have to have a common purpose of the common purpose the law of the country. but you have to follow what you've got trying to bring people from different countries into one but have different laws of the want to use their own laws from where the trouble from that doesn't work you know we are losing our values and this this is being seen now

and being manipulated by people who do maybe have mental issues but i think a lot of the time is being driven by a very sick in a forest agenda they know exactly what they're doing and they're quite happy doing it so the it's a form of global sourcing i think it would say more updates on what happened in new zealand please do have to our website that's r.t. dot com. that to france where a new poll has found that seventy percent of people think the president's efforts to engage in the national debate have been a waste of time and money on micron told the country talking to the public in response to the social unrest that came with the rise of the yellow best movement here are some highlights from his soapbox speeches and reactions to them. i'm not going to talk too much as my goal is to listen to you in a free and fair manner. you know i'm not sure if i'd been born with

a silver spoon in my mouth or the son of a politician you could have a go at me but that's not the case you know bones human stupidity even by law i just heard about this i participated in four official debates it was so my. little soldier and as a result i was just an official yellow vest representative mark who did not count. one you would a conclusion as a conclusion to the national debate it happened as it should have he did it only to hear the movement's complaints and to ease the situation he would surprise me if he takes any measures but i don't expect anything and this is why i'm here we gathering here because this is a real debate. despite the public skepticism that i have actually improved lately this month they hit their highest level since the dramatic for last november which is when the best protest began we've got more reaction to his big debate or

on the streets of paris. so in my opinion nothing will come of it micron has a habit of just talking but with no results in the end he knows that european elections are coming up which he doesn't want to lose. at the beginning of his term he was up on his cry horse and now here close is trying to communicate with people . personally i think it was necessary but i don't think it will really help anything mainly it is a way for mr mccracken and his party to get ready for the european elections which is a way to let people voice their views without really having to change his policies . he was not. good to talk always good it's call me i don't think it will change anything this is typical from our own there's a lot of the hot air there's a lot of talking. shown on every t.v. show these past months saying that he's going to try to solve problems but the only thing he's doing is talking talking talking and i think that what he doesn't

understand is that the french are sick and tired of what they want are real measures taken by the french president and the french government to answer the questions we've had very strong demonstrations and unfortunately. so far not bringing the responses so that is why there is this big satisfaction with what barack was doing with this given us you know this big national debate so i think it is a showing that he's trying to use this situation as a political platform to defend himself to prepare actually the european elections and they may. yet special counsel robert tamala says he's ready to report on his preliminary findings on alleged trumped russia collusion president donald trump has labeled the probe illegal. so if it was knowingly and acknowledged to be zero crime when the special counsel was appointed and if the appointment was made based on the fake dossier paid for by crooked hillary then the special counsel

should never have been appointed and there should be no more to report this was an illegal in conflicts that investigation in search of a crime. the president's words come just a day after the house unanimously voted four hundred twenty two zero for the report to be disclosed the dossier everyone is referring to is the infamous steel dossier which accuses trump of links to the kremlin it was in directly funded by the us democratic party and written by former british intelligence officer christopher steele the dossier suggest russia has compromising material on the us president. recently released testimony given by a u.s. justice department official sheds new light on the still dossier bruce all says he told the f.b.i. it was likely biased against the us president artie's more pain has more. meet bruce or he's a former associate attorney general and director of the federal organized crime and drug enforcement task force his testimony about the christopher steel dasi on trump

is now in the media's focus under review apparently is demoted d.o.j. official or big story in washington those allegations that russian officials have compromising information about donald trump tonight we're learning more about bruce and here's why according to the latest revelations bruce or is looking a little bit two faced here's face number one so the record is clear what the department of justice and the f.b.i. was aware of prior to the first foreign intelligence surveillance act application was your relationship with christopher mr bush against donald trump when i spoke with the f.b.i. i told the my wife was working for fusion g.p.s. i told them fusion g.p.s. was doing research on don't trump i told them this is the information i had gotten from chris steele now that so lacy is an unconfirmed written by christopher steele is the basis and foundation of the trump russia investigation according to his

testimony given behind closed doors bruce or thinks it might be biased against donald trump he testified that christopher steele seemed determined that trump not get elected i provided information to the f.b.i. when i thought christopher steele was as i said desperate that trump not be elected so yes of course i provided that to the f.b.i. now at least some in the justice department were actually suspicious of steel from the beginning but let's look at face number two despite his warning about the da ca mr or and mr steele were in close contact you have my sympathy and support our vote i really need to the bureau contact points or number who is briefed a million francs understood i can certainly give you an f.b.i. contact if it becomes necessary now for ten months after donald trump was elected bruce or function. as the middleman communicating with mr steele on behalf of the justice department so on the one hand we've got bruce or testifying before congress

under oath that mr steele had an ax to grind that he wanted trump to be removed and that his report may not be credible but on the other hand we've got bruce or communicating with christopher steele and reassuring him that everything's going to be ok almost as if they're working together now after two years of investigating collusion it seems that congress has finally found some but it wasn't between trump and russia. r.t. new york. the un has concluded that in order to protect the environment people need to eat less meat the reports suggest attacks on red meat saying it will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and make people rethink their diet choices. it's estimated that worldwide emissions taxes on foods could save around one gigaton of c o two and results in net health benefits at the global level due to reduced consumption of meat. the report also states that space for livestock accounts for almost eighty percent of the and in the world the livestock industry is considered one of the

main contributors to de forestation yams and we put the issue up for debate with social and environmental justice campaigner jewish baltar and former republican state senator john newton. think the important thing from my point of view is that as a point of principle the idea that we try in bring in the real well understood costs of meat eating to human health to the planet we bring that into the economic calculation i think that clearly makes sense one thing it tax would do is as we know is make people more poor i mean we know that in the united states we typically except in most states not california that taxation is supposed to be about raising money to operate government change people's behavior if you're going to go down the road of taxing things to change behavior then we make enemies of our neighbors or people in america and europe there are billions of dollars of negative health

impacts from meat consumption but what we're talking about across the world is devastating impacts already to hundreds of millions of people from the climate change the meat eating drives enormously we have all sorts of looming crises i mean this is absolutely demonstrably the case we're already seeing droughts floods typhoons flattening countries this idea that somehow it's manmade and that karl flatulence is going to kill millions of people around the quatre is just one of the most laughable things i've ever heard and it's really amusing to see people like you come on with such veracity as if you've got your case prove it and you have to laugh at this because otherwise you would have to take the new different scientific strands that demonstrate this seriously and what we're talking about is millions of lives already being hugely damage and impacted by the. pollution caused by the meat industry you know we have the healthiest we have probably among the healthiest poor

in the world here in the united states the lifestyle the poor here very well taken care of and and because we have the largest to care for them and by the way they eat a lot of meat in this country so it's hugely destructive to the health of the united states i mean you wouldn't really struggle to find a single medical professional these days that wouldn't agree with the fact that we need to reduce we need to reduce consumption of meat and dairy to live happier and healthier. protests and italian city after tomorrow just to write convictions of quashed because the judges didn't think the time was attractive enough. in just a few minutes. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy. let it be

an arms race. and spearing dramatic development only really. i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical time to sit down and talk. it's up to the government to step in and be a player in the economy not just an enabler for monopoly you know the government should be competing for health care and drug prices they should be competing in transportation and education and they should offer an alternative people should be able to get a public utility bank for example account and get out of the matrix of the big wall street banks they don't have that option they should have that option and therefore you would restore some competition in the economy. and.

welcome back to the program hundreds of people protested outside an italian appeals court this week after two men were cleared of rape in part because the alleged victim was deemed too unattractive to be a target to judges express various reasons for deciding to acquit to defendants but one was because they said they didn't even like her because she was ugly also wrote that a photograph reflected this. in twenty sixteen the two peruvian men were convicted of raping a woman in the italian city of on kona however they were later acquitted by the appeals court on the grounds for the ruling have only now been revealed the judges all female decided that the defendants could not have been attracted to the alleged

victim they said that she was too masculine in appearance the woman also of peruvian origin was twenty eight years old and at the time of the alleged attack doctors said her injuries were consistent with rape and found traces of a date rape drug in her blood the woman's lawyer said that she was forced to return to peru as she couldn't stand the burden of what had happened to the case will now be heard again tonight the court there was much anger online about the latest ruling. i guess in italy the men never get raped since they are all masculine in theory anyway while donna italy had no idea that masculine women and were not deserving of dignity this is what rape culture looks like judges who need to ruled it can be really because the victim isn't pretty enough or to discuss the issue with actress and model powerless syleena she sings that this case illustrates why many women do not report rape to the police this whole situation is this good

and absolutely and that's the vote you know or at least a year to warsaw to make progress for women rides a wednesday wish earlier the state police gays are much more war there if. somebody is more than eighty percent of grey but never even reported to police and direct these are shot while. we should ask any subjective opinion struck me. if they said the job and not their special have using got any more. now in a groundbreaking case a german court has begun hearing an appeal by a group of yemenis suing berlin over its involvement in the war ravaging that country they allege that germany has been complicit in the killing of innocents thereby allowing the u.s. to launch drone attacks from its military base in southwest germany with the

details his peter oliver. well this is an interesting case that's come before the high administrative court in germany in munster the family versus the state of germany now what the army are saying is that the state of germany is responsible for the deaths of two of their family members after they were killed in drone strikes in yemen but in twenty twelve here's what they have to say about it. gave a sermon he addressed the killings conducted by al-qaeda and challenge them to present a religious or thirteen that is willing to debate with him so we can demonstrate to the people this behavior of al-qaeda is wrong he was taken out by the american strike unfortunately he was not killed by al qaeda he was killed by an american missile or the ultimate goal of this court cases essential e to take the ramstein air base the famous infamous depending on how you want to call it u.s.

air base that exists in southern germany out of the equation when it comes to drone strikes now it's an important part of getting the information from the drone pilots to the actual drones and what the well certainly those that have brought this court case is saying is that they need to if they were to close out the ramstein part of it then the drones wouldn't be able to strike innocent people as the plaintiffs claim their family members were it became apparent to us that the germans through ramstein air base on german soil were involved in these strikes and what had happened to my family and it is possible that my family would not have been a target of such strikes and had rented an air base not provided such information. so far germany has refused to send weapons to saudi arabia they put a course on that at the moment or sleaze along we have decided to extend this export to the end of march the human war must be ended as quickly as possible and

we have decided for this reason not to deliver any arms to parties in the conflict during this month. i'll be back in around thirty minutes but do stay tuned as there's plenty more to come here not international next it's going underground. what politicians do. they put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and she. want. to go right to the press that's what before three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters and our. first sip. of. the internet has no bill for security so we have to take it to

a different level and we have to take the new value that is five g. level when you can embed security security as an industry and the security has all they need to expose the fears and all the hacking devices so that people get afraid and they get to know we have to come up with new infrastructure this is very important to start thinking of this me about the new tools to build a new system. time after time you know what you're going underground sixteen years to the days really defense forces were involved in the killing of american activist rachel corrie

coming up in the show. came straight. out an exclusive an uncensored interview with one of the world's most popular living philosophers. dissecting the major issues facing the planet today level remains but duro oak why do republicans or democrats. coke or pepsi but first because all the data of the daily mail and your peers is here to keep us abreast of a chaotic week in the british breaks it grazes thanks for coming on you've been on british t.v. normally stop it seems at all hours of the day i think the issues are getting lost in this process of parliamentary chaos i think i've got lost with the issues to what is the issue now is the incompetence and chaos in ten downing street never before have i seen a prime minister humiliated by not one but four cabinet ministers who refused to support or normal circumstances they will be taken out and shot none of them are being fired because she has a little tricky not literally no but you would expect

a prime minister to have hemorrhage that much support to had a visit from the men in grey suits that we wanted to women of course in the age of equality to say here's the poll handed evolve a prime minister time to go but does that work anymore because of the i want to get to war going to brazil a self but of course in tatters time it was different that only twenty two could be all of those things are off the table there aren't any pool handed revolvers there are actually because the low the tories have used up their one shot to the back benches had one chance to get rid of her you have one vote a year they did that in december and one hundred seventy without their support what can happen is cabinet ministers can withhold their support threatened to resign or mask and i have to tell you during this extraordinary week i have never known a week like it and i've been working at the house of horrors on and off since one nine hundred eighty eight i couldn't find one m.p. who thinks to reason may has a long term survival rate in downing street the lady is on the way out.