this morning different priorities it was facebook to slow to stop the spread of video of last friday's mass shooting. but. to deal with political views. if i put certain stories about certain political issues i can shout all bad so. that's what my concern is when we continue to ban these kinds of things can they end this kind of stuff that's only going to perpetuate shadows. the venezuelan government announces the so-called occupation of its offices in the us up to diplomats from the opposition vie for control of the. under russian traitor accused of money laundering appeals for release from custody in greece after being held for more than nineteen months. how many of these are you know hundreds straight.

a day. and still no answer. to. their life they are to networks international h.q. here in moscow is kevin always with me this morning bring you this world news update we choose the morning is going well reviewed soon didn't run the world first the facebook spring criticized video to be spread of awful shooting up mass shooting in new zealand last week while being quick of the market seems when dealing with political content it doesn't like the country's prime minister's demanded answers from social media platforms over a live streaming of the terror attack on two mosques in christchurch that left fifty worshippers dead. i would call on our social media platforms of all variety to demonstrate the kind of responsibility that both lead to these have been and

that includes stars who capitulate their messages in the aftermath there's a lot of work that needs to be down for about seventeen minutes that live streamed the massacre on facebook shortly after copies of the video appeared and other social media outlets to the platforms did try to block the content but not before widespread public outrage in the first twenty four hours that removed one point five million views of the attack globally of which over one thousand content using a combination of technology and people clues no we are working vigilantly to remove any violent footage. facebook deleted the video after warning from the police actually authorities said that the distribution of such content is punishable by imprisonment we will read your legal counterterrorism expert to the supreme where the should and could have acted quicker to block the video. i respectfully submit that when you show violence against human beings it's a form of pornography we have to as

a society say no facebook you can do much better for kids for people who would see this not necessarily because it would inspire the next shooting which you very well could because these losers need some form of acclimation out of just human decency without bringing in the government as laws and penalties or hearing from officials government officials from the prime minister in new zealand talking about preventing future attacks like this and then going on to censoring when this attack happens how in the world does that prevent this attack we're spending so much time talking about we can have videos like this with as or so or think it might lead to more rather than answering questions that need to be asked i mean one of the main problems on the scene here is that we continue to put band-aids on gunshot wounds and we need to stop that we need to stop putting band-aids on we need to stop saying let's just stop everybody from there that he doesn't you know we can get rid of x. rated movies should it come down immediately yes should this be kept from the

public yes take it down i want facebook and others abroad to have a sack of you know whatever and out of the aisle here whether or not they have we're talking to you now and you're going to keep you know they're talking about arguing people will hardly blinded from these sightings will fly low lying dead but you're not talking about how will this prevent it nobody's talking about prevented the question is should be banned i'm saying yes what i want facebook to do is if i put certain stories about certain political issues i am shadow bad show fast and i want them to use that technology in their genius to figure out wait a minute. we're having somebody right now people are being killed this is going to come down from our platform what my concern is when they continue to ban these kinds of things can ban this kind of stuff that's only going to perpetuate shadel ban and that's something i agree should never happen but we're giving subject and our and authority to social media platforms to never run tent that that is allowed

so when to hurt us later we don't know who they're going to not like it's all subjective no matter what kind of computer algorithm at the end of the day it will be subjective now listen dr burke do me a favor if you see somebody shooting and killing people shut it down or talk about it later don't have a debate do you think that maybe we're giving one person die die die die die die the right to automatically and who's to say whether this could one day be done today people being shot and whether this might include war coverage how many people would support me that while as we're debating this there is some kid somewhere would you ever talk about watching this seeing real time slaughter or the families of these people or whatever of this is violent pornography yes this is horrible that i never want to see this i never want my children to see this i don't want any person to be subject to this kind of violence in this horrible obscene material these publications but this is what i have seen governments cannot stop this these

companies cannot stop this people who post something positive about donald trump are being taken off of social media because of social media heads and managers and so we want them to ban other things instead of us and that is my main thing is that they can't they will not. have another point of discussion for public discontent not just. hate cones and video but also for how we treat personal data it's pretty you know since the scandal broke political consulting from cambridge analytical it reportedly bore personal data from facebook which it then sold on to third parties used to gain political coverage an advantage donald cool to looks at whether nor facebook's privacy policies about some chains says that in the last twelve months. one might say facebook's had a productive year in its fight against fake news perhaps you've seen their war room . read the headlines.

and heard the assurances we've deployed new ai tools that do a better job of identifying fake accounts that may be trying to interfere in elections or spread misinformation mark zuckerberg has gone after both sides of the political spectrum from alex jones to the russia friendly left it's also been a year since it broke that the social media giant had sold off the data of eighty million users to a political advertising firm transferred facebook data to cambridge analytic or personal data mined for nearly eighty seven million facebook users the largest security breach in the company's history this is this is a challenge for market companies so what is facebook actually done aside from zuckerberg saying sorry that is not it was a big mistake that was a mistake and it was my mistake and i'm really sorry that this happened i'm sorry

and i'm sorry for it spoiler alert not a lot facebook promised a forensic audit of cambridge analytic but never delivered then they said they'd look into apps with suspicious activity and punish those who broke privacy rules the last we heard of that was august twenty eighth team and then there was the promise of a new option to clear personal information from the platform if the user wants facebook said that the changes would only take a few months back in may last year and we're still left empty handed but will facebook come out unscathed the researcher behind the cambridge analytical app is suing facebook for defamation alex did not lie alex was not a fool it's alex did not deceive them this was not a scam facebook knew exactly will this app was doing was should have known facebook desperately needed to scapegoat and alex was the scapegoat at the same time a british newspaper is reporting that some facebook shareholders may have been complicit in the data harvesting and the buck doesn't stop there either the federal

government is now investigating how zuckerberg treats client privacy. to see deeks very seriously recent press reports raises substantial concerns about the privacy broke to freeze book it's been a year since the biggest privacy scandal in social media but at least facebook's got the round of censoring alternative media donald quarter r.t. . according greece is due to consider the case of russian bitcoin entrepreneur alexander vinick he spent nineteen months in custody exceeding therefore the maximum term for detention without charge but it was arrested in greece in twenty seventeen after the us accused him of laundering four billion dollars for a bit coin trading platform since then washington paris and moscow have all demanded his extradition next this morning our senior correspondent regards the of has more on the story for you. this is alexander vinick two years ago free and healthy a pioneer in tech father and

a husband this is beneath now literally a shadow of his former self for twenty months he has withered in greek jails without charge than your boredom of yes i mean pale. my soul harassed but i don't have many leverage some insight from kindness i can shout at them a kind of curse of them and greek everything that doesn't kill us makes us stronger in talking about myself and not you're looking at the thirty nine year old man wrinkled aged drained by his predicament the entire family has suffered. then and wanted our lives will never be the same the moment he was taken everything changed things will never be as they were but now we live differently only through hope that our family will be together again that our family will see its father its

mother the children will be happy i hope. and hope is all there is for her sasha may not have long left the day agreed court decided to extradite her husband to the u.s. she reportedly collapsed and was diagnosed with brain cancer triple tumors she's being treated in germany chances are very very slim but she struggles on hoping to see her husband her kids one more time they all struggle on. how many days are you on the hunger strike. paging eight hundred eighty today. and and still no answer. to. be. on the verge of death alexander vinick was hospitalized according to the greek constitution he should have been released after eighteen months his lawyer says

barring a court decision to prolong his arrest there was no court decision only accusations vinick scrivens says his lawyer was being too successful in two thousand and seventeen alexander vinick consulted one of the biggest bitcoin trading platforms in the world called bt she lose days with a wild west in crypto currency he pioneered in the field before regulation arrived to give it to the sleepers for various business men began using the exchange sidestepping taxation in all countries which was that legal or illegal at the well you can look at money and it was legal at the time of his arrest as there was no government regulation of crypto currency as it was absolutely legal and it continues to be so identical exchanges exist in huge numbers and no arrests are made over them. but it may be more since that the

us did not control just what justice is there to speak of when according to greek law international law he should have been released but what we all understand is that this is a political case for now vinick will continue to serve a sentence he was never given and he will continue to watch his family being torn apart lendl's and here being treated once he's there starving the children are just there waiting and they don't know what will have. which of us will come back me over there father it's hardest for them our little children. two boys aged five and seven thankfully orphans may never see their mother or their father yet they all struggle on the nick doesn't give up there's no

hate in him no bile only faith and hope. were never. a footnote to this story i can tell you that r.t. is requested coming from the greek authorities on this if they get back to us we'll let you know what they say. venezuelan government has denounced what it called the seizure of its diplomatic buildings in the united states after opposition representatives started to take control of the caracas is called it said a legal and forceful occupation after washington recognized self declared interim president won quite though venezuela broke off and i think relations between us and withdrew its staff but he's done cohens got the latest this morning. this quiet street is the latest battleground for venezuela a country thousands of miles away and opposition leader why does representatives are planning to seize control of this building the military attache carlos vicky

was why don't so-called ambassador to the united states before entering the military attaché his building he took control of another nearby building owned by the venezuelan government he was able to do so simply by calling a locksmith and perhaps more importantly receiving the blood on here that basically destroyed his house and again this is a not just just i mean you saw what they did and so imagine the they do these here in the u.s. you can imagine what they are doing in this way that. outside the military attaché is building vecchio raise the venezuelan flag and sing the national anthem drowning out code being protesters chanting hands off venezuela inside the building vecchio replaced a portrait of elected president nicolas maduro with one of quite bill it's not the first time the u.s. has recognized alternative figures in place of an existing government in two

thousand and eleven washington did the same in syria and seven years later bashar assad is still in power i asked vecchio why did this time would be different i don't have any doubt that their benefits are ready for a change the change will call he has been called because we have but they don't you think that is what we have on the table that he's willing to give the people he's got into privilege but that would be the end one boy those being investigated in venezuela for allegedly sabotaging the country's electrical system asked what would happen if he were arrested vecchio said it would be a step in the right direction i would say that would have positive impact in that changing this way and that with the city or a change if they decided to do with meanwhile vecchio is setting his sights on the venezuelan embassy. maybe sees that building is early as wednesday in washington. it's a long running developing story michael maloof former pentagon security policy analyst

told us the actions by the venezuelan opposition to will be on diplomatic norms right now. we're seeing here is a is a diplomatic posturing a diplomatic dance if you will that and in which the united states is carrying on in a way that is not. normally allowed. in with diplomatic norms in international law it sets a precedent anything like this could send a potential precedent especially if the united states did it then everybody else can point to say look the united states did it it must be ok now you know it's only only. international law is only as strong as the countries that abide by it and if you've got fifty other countries that are recognizing. over. duro that is again. a de facto recognition and also another level of diplomatic approach that heretofore has not been done coming up to the

date of the brics it twist may. the speaker of the house of commons blocking a vote on to resume is planned to leave the we're going to go now that we'll try and work it out after the break. you know world big partisan movies lot and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that made stream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the back and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks.

make this manufacture consent to public wealth. when the ruling classes protect themselves. in the final merry go round. the one percent. nor middle of the room six. minutes past ten o'clock the morning mosco time good morning for me kevin zero in this is international so britain's prime minister is facing a new setback to a plan the speaker of the house of commons says that could be no meaningful vote unless significant changes are made all this with less than two weeks to go before

the u.k. supposed to leave the european union bullyboy to reports from the u.k. . if you got an f. for your homework which you take it back to the teacher and try to get him or her to change the grade simply because it was coming up to exam time and you really needed to pass and most people wouldn't but that's pretty much what to reason may was trying to do with her beleaguered brags it would draw all deal it's been rejected by politicians twice already and yet we've been hearing rumors ever since last week that the government was planning to bring the unchanged deal back for politicians to vote on for a third time this week the only difference of course would be that the risk of a no deal bragg's it or no brags it through a lengthy delay would be increased because we're so close to britain's departure date from the e.u. so that might have made m.p.'s change their mind and sort of choose to resign may's

deal as the least of all the evils available take a listen to what's happened in parliament in order for them to be turned around and for the motion to pass it would require a significant change what we've seen meaningful both one two three four five of them for night time would be their way of getting this book deal through the house won't do to leave the european union in eleven days and there is no. certainty the speaker of the house of commons has thrown a constitutional curveball into reason maze court the it has been strongly. though i have not received confirmation of this that stood even possibly for meaningful vote. will be attempted what the government can more legitimately do is to resubmit to the house the same even proposition or

substantially the same proposition as last of last week. which was rejected by one hundred. or so that he is told pierre in the idea of a nother meaningful vote on bragg's it unless to reason may change is what she putting in front of m.p.'s to vote on now he's based it on a legal precedent called us skin may the reason i'm telling you about it is you might be airing this phrase skin may a lot this week essentially it is a parliamentary mechanism a terribly old one it's been used as far back as the seventeenth century to stop parliament or rather to stop government's bullying legislation through parliament a lot of politicians think that that is precisely what to resume a is trying to do here but what does all this mean for the brags that well if it was possible this is made her job even harder than it was already and she's set to attend the council summit in thursday but now she needs to come back from that

with a substantially improved deal when the e.u. has said repeatedly that there is absolutely no way that they're going to reopen these negotiations or give the u.k. any more concessions. because watch this space meantime on the lighter side of this some people say you more lighthearted view the chaos of westminster for instance the french minister for europe and the big brics it because apparently it's got a habit of asking to be left with refusing to leave.

he wakes me up every morning meowing to death because he wants to go out and then when i open the door he puts undecided and then glares at me when i put him out. on tokyo from the eighteenth to say the weekend of protests there it seems the government said enough president says the central powers is now out of bounds to yellow vest demonstrators. if it's at the meet complete nonsense made this afternoon by the prime minister for public order response to the reality we face a whole of hooligans and not a protest by free citizens because we're giving ourselves the authority to apply and find inside the. city disowns elisei as well as other places that have been hit

by the crisis will be closed to public gatherings. those demonstrations were marred by violence with fires being set luxury shops looted and clashes with police french police will come to. the ban these things will not get to the root of the problem the. the problem is that we have had faulty social he said that we can speak to police. forces i don't want to never mention anything about all of you. he really did lost. the only concern about. this. being damaged and he's enjoying his people even more so it's east as sponsible for he and also going to the ski when he knows that paris is going to be in trouble everybody has announce it that's his is the question also why didn't the police prevent that

because it was in the newspapers everybody knew that the writer. a former british spy branded infamous trumped russia dossier has been further discredited cities now admitted using unverified sources for his report christopher still seems relied on a c.n.n. citizen journalism website active at the time which is not edited or even fact checked. controversial document of alleged. p.p.t. .

i report dot com is easy to generate. the stories submitted by using. the screen before they post. makes no guarantees about the content all the coverage i report. i forget the famous chris christie it's very broadest assertions a large percentage of it is actually accurate. revelation about christmas still sources came during a court case between russia and. the business when

companies mentioned in the dossier had been libeled ultimately we lost that case political analyst. told us his latest revelation comes as no surprise though. the dossier was false from the beginning it was based on just a guy just looking on google finding information to put in a piece of fiction to present to the f.b.i. and then they used it to engage in really kind of unconstitutional who waged against the president and against anybody that goes against their particular narrative. russia dashi a was just totally phony i mean it didn't make any sense from the very beginning and if you have more evidence come in now that. about it the fate is now proven but the media won't just try to totally avoid it if it's brought up that should i dance around the question and not because the narrative about russia being this big bad monster and i don't show being colluding in a bit with them is a moral poor narrative to push so they'll ignore facts they'll ignore any

information that goes against the narrative they've been running with for paris two or three years now. i'll leave you with that my name is kevin allen thanks for watching us international live from h.q. here in moscow the time is now coming up to half past ten in the morning this cheese day heavy choose day goes hope it passes that well for you. greetings and salutation. the week begins hawk watchers with many around the world across the entire web still mourning their epic tragedy that struck christchurch

new zealand last week by now most of us know the ugly story of how a white nationalist maniac complete with manifesto live streamed himself attacking two separate mosques were being fifty and ultimately taking the lives of fifty innocent people in their place of worship.