but i think that it is a reason for the optimistic that to the both sides would reach to you finally so does having a deal agreed that trump can support mean that the american tariffs on threat of more terrorists and a trade war actually worked and the president has forced beijing into backing out of the stand up standoff. well if i understand a question correctly i think that the from the u.s. perspective they think that. the biggest the incentive for both sides come to the negotiation table is the tariff and the front page you suppose specked if i think table is that both sides have the incentive to settle down their differences to iron out of their differences and to remove those tit for tat a tariff so that both sides kim were not suffer from even further loss the u.s.

is demanding that china lifts its terror seven american products at the same time to u.s. measures may remain in place tail two thousand and twenty even if that's your country's clinches dale anytime soon that's according to government sachs american say such approach is designed to make sure china delivers on. the deal says washington basically seeking to establish its oversight in china with a right to slap terrorist whenever it wants to and well beijing agreed to that well i think that this is still one of the most contentious issues and i do not know exactly what those kind of differences will be out finally but i think that from chinese perspective i think it's unfair for the because this is. the trade in negotiation and i think if i no deal would be accepted by both sides if we're it can be called a creative deal so in a kind of a. unilateral actions taken by one side to

to to to have the leverage to try to have the penalties on the other side i think that that may be one of the most difficult issues to be accepted by the others so in that regard i think that it will be the most contentious issues and i tend to believe that maybe we could find out a some more mutually acceptable terms that will make the in-force meant likely they will not be decided by only by one side. so washington has accused the chinese high tech giant weiwei spying on behalf of beijing these accusations are pretty serious and though the company's leadership has denied them do you see that this issue could actually aggravate chata tensions even more. well you see i think that the most the chinese will believe that the case of the hallway is very much

politically motivated it is much more to do with the fact that the united states even more increasingly concerned about a competitive edge of those high tech industry and particularly those the flagship . companies like whoa way so they try to take some pretty empty if measures to prevent huawei to be continue to have even creasing presence in large market the shia and i think that this is what those very highly political motivated action those so called the charges very accomplice so are you saying that the americans are basically trying to get rid of competition in this very lucrative field well this whole affair because why away is one of the leading giants in five industry. yes definitely i think that in terms of the budget investment in the past few decades always has already coupled with some other leading china's high tech

communication companies they have already. been taking quite a leadership in that regard so i think that what the washington want to do is to try to to to impede to such kind of a competitive edge by blocking the hallway or some other chinese leading companies continue to have their presence in advanced economies the united states europe or even japan and some other countries so jim political strategists and actually even elected officials and the white house are saying that the u.s. china tensions are here to stay i mean as a rising power is bound to try and roll back you know it says influence in the world so is there any kind of a win win scenario of the two countries relationship or is it a zero sum game. well see i think that in a kind of a win win prospect of will be largely determined by the but whether both sides

would accept the fact that china to its political or economic institutions were not be changed fundamentally as washington want to be so it will not be a kind of a mirror image of the united states want and you see that the when we refer to those a market economy for instance there's no so-called a a one size fits all models for the market economy and the china of course is where you believe that we have being engaged with our opening up and reform and in china's model for economic development in the past few decades has proved that it is successful and work for for china and we believe that those small those with with its china's cut the risk takes work for china so if united states try to through those kind of a negotiation or pressure try to change fundamentally and based upon china's constitution that we are china should change its political economic system it is

impossible so if you know if they finally live with this reality it is likely for both sides to reach consent and reach but if if the united states continue to believe that through a continued press and to try to transform china to a kind of systems which is totally unlike what the united states want that is a kind of a mere rush so in your opinion what we have right now this us channel stand of as it more about economics or geopolitics at its foundation. both i think both the u.s. or china's understanding of a bilateral relationship is quite stable in the past four decades beijing always look at the bilateral relationship is a very core of competition and even some conflicts but the. bottom line is that both sides need to find a good way to manage those differences and to prevent them from being escalated

into a. head on confrontation but from the united states perspective i think that there's a growing consensus i would say the bipartisan consensus that they saying that their so-called past decades of engagement with china. just doesn't work and they hope that they are going to. through their you know much more tougher or even some people call it a cut new containment policy or a new cold war strategy towards china they would press china to kowtow to washington's needs that is another kind of a i think kind of a reasonable assessment of the situation so in that regard from washington's perspective those competition is not only on the front of economic specs they also look at china as a rising competitor or even a rivalry from a joseph still strategic perspective i rested and so we're going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking to chandan sauer

center advisor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry discussing china's growing economic influence stay with us. break said. what politicians do. they put themselves on the line and they get accepted or

rejected. so when you want to be president. i want to. have to go right to the press as a white woman for three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters in the. first city. in a world of big partisan groovy lot and conspiracies it's time. to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smart we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's taught for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks.

the money philosophy is dead right so the money velocity would measure of how money is being long down from bank to bank to bank bank bank which is a measure of economic health is dead and if the money printing continues to increase sunset i'm asking the question why is the money not getting into the economy they're printing more of it. because i was going on there for months smoke if i don't make an incident maybe mark the one who's been brought up on bloomfield demos done a lot of photos of stuff to get a. lot of thought up was on the ball but they're just nothing new. she

was you make them. more serious ram. john barr from the sun no my book you go to the british course there's enough of them but. i mean the god of that and of course that doesn't want any of the. fifth amendment. to take a. child's seemed wrong. on all quotes just don't hold. me to that he's yet to shape out these days he comes to educate and in detroit because betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground.

the tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but that socialism has been great only implement inside venezuela different we're going to announce sanctions against the truest of venezuela so if you. have a son of the moment you. get out. to the. moment. the whose story you make called henry kissinger to tell him that it would not be tolerated system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make. the chilean economy scream so wants to make the economy of venezuela scream.

and we're back with chandan tsawwassen eric visor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry talking about china as well in today's global economy some as it does sound the world bank says that china's growth will slow down to six point two in two thousand and nineteen when india is set to overtake it if they try and continues i mean does this mean that they are out of china's economic domination will be over before we got a chance to actually really begin. i think that you are right on one side economic growth rate in china has to lay down compared with the past decade by the same time as i think that if compared with some other advanced economy

considering the fact that china has already be done the but to. the biggest economy the world the growth rate of china is still very impressive this is the first point the second point i believe that the more important thing is china is now more focus on how to improve its economic structure and by shifting from what we called a. quantity of oriented. only to a mode of development to a quality for. growth model so i think that in the past year in the past few years chinese government as well as the business community has a hope leave that nowadays it is more important for china to invest in the service industry and also to improve the consumption side of china so that to shift to china's economy from traditionally exports relate to one to a more a consumption relate to one and a with regard to that of india and i think that

india is still in a case of also india in the in the face of. transformation and it also take a long time to for indian economy to transform from those very a relatively low income towards a relatively. middle income economy with focus on those and manufacturing as well as the high tech industry so i think that the both china and india in their god i.e. it's a transitional period with that different a level of different a degree. so china is a major donor to the world bank but also the largest borrower from it now the bank is to get new leadership very soon and trump's take for their position has that that chair shouldn't get any more funds from this situation if the american candidate gets to had their situation while china big cut off from its well. see

that this is a quite the stuart debate will issues i think that. china included in some large number of what their own countries they will graduate from the so called a low income or least developed khana me to a more middle or even. middle income status so i think this is a kind of achievements that the world economy made in the past few decades and the world bank as well as other multilateral financials to shoes should reconsider their strategy how to shift their focus from those traditional supporting those least developed economy to a more larger number of economy which have gradually from those traditions commission know to find a low income status and how to deal with those a large number of middle income economies economic advantage demands so china has launched its own asian infrastructure development bank it is also

a member of the new development bank launched by the brics nations and both the situations are in some sense competitors for the world bank why is china silliman boring from everywhere makes sense to direct those funds to the nations that are at the bottom of the list of world's largest economists not at the top well i think that in terms of those. the funding including those funding supported a family supported by the world bank i think they're gradually the world bank will contribute. increasingly. the proportion of the found supporting china's development or will be smaller they in the past so in that regard i think that. china. will not think the world bank will be the biggest fund raiser for china's development but the same

time the world bank for its past a decade of a. knowledge as well as expertise supporting the global development issues to stew it has an important function in the role to play for the global development strategy and its expertise in the region are more important nowadays than those found a money to self so i think that in the past few years during. the presidency of the world bank it has actually quite successfully transformed from world bank from the money. only money bank towards a more like a knowledgeable and so in that regard i think china's to appreciate a lot of expertise and a knowledge of those world bank. though the u.s. and north korean summit in hanoi that way mentioned earlier failed to bring any results present transair that presence age of being was very helpful in dealing

with north korea only a year ago washington was accusing beijing of sabotaging the talks how do you explain this change of tone from washington. well i think. i think a previous. it's been quite a randomness because beijing has for the past a few years has been. playing a very stabilizing row to try to calm down the tension over the korean peninsula and always play a very active row to try to bring all the parties including united states and north korea to come to the negotiation or dialogue table so when proto truong. two years ago in this he tried to beijing of tried to stop tart to talk i think that it is a. reasonable. station now he said that the beijing has been more

help for i think that. couple of reasons one i think that maybe he tried to continue to try to you know appreciate. try to maintain his a very good friendship with printer she and same time i think that it's also his conviction that without beijing support it is impossible for a for washington and the p. to reach any. agreement to which will be sustainable said has been saying that good things will happen to the north korean economy if it chooses to do nuclear rise so let's assume for a second there appears dale has finally been great could there allow washington and track of the chinese are three investment i mean how much of a threat that pay for china's national security well i think the.

support and also appreciate. the dialogue between washington the p.r. and we believe that the dialogue on the denuclearization plus the. down piece of. long piece. negotiation of for the long piece of this area is is in the interest of all parties and china in young. united states or russia or some other countries concerned so i think that . in that regard beijing is seen sirup believe that as long as those negotiation could continue and as long as. the pin young could through those are there when you go and also the track of denuclearization and to continue it in that beijing would it do its utmost to sort of to continue to

support. the. opening up in the reform strategy if they me if they meet the same time i think that beijing would also try to walk very closely with both young and washington to make those negotiation a sustainable track so which means that we know those kind of negotiation would be very very complex and the long term and that these up and down is almost a. inevitable so even if there are sides to be a patient to try to to try to at a most to bring these two parties on the table as beijing could. so china is investing tens of billions of dollars in africa and washington is obviously not very happy about it u.s. national security advisor john bolton says china uses bribes and shady deals for

its expansion and huge loans to hold african countries captive to its timmins china seeking to establish itself as a string puller in africa. well i think that china's relationship with africa has been maintained on a very somber foundation for many decades and i think that oppose the africa country as a whole as well as. a china we have appreciated such kind of very good economic politico relationship i think that nowadays the swedish about much more comprehensive include the even wider spectrum of the people to people dialogue as well as many other cooperation on those. sustainable economic development of climate change as well as i think both sides also agree that they should china would help africa as a whole to invest more into those a sustainable security capacity beauty so in that regard i think that this really

should be based upon the quality and based upon the nomination innovation into those at the mess to go into an office of each others and. in this kind of relationship is also carried out in a spirit of that we so i think that those washington's accusation and it's a very ridiculous because if they tried to if washington tried to check those what isn't really main street thinking main street stream thinking in african continent they were found that have a computer in general their eyes are with beijing. thank you very much for this interview you were talking to chandan tsawwassen air advisor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry discussing their work economic relations between us and china and their potential impact on the global economy that's it for this edition of surfing and co i'll see you next.

join me every thursday on the alec simon show and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business i'm showbusiness i'll see of that. with all make this manufacture come sentenced him to public wealth. when the ruling class isn't protect themselves. when the financial merry go round certainly the one percent.

going the whole middle of the room six. going around i mean real names. i've been saying the numbers mean something they've matter the u.s. has over one trillion dollars in debt more than ten white collar crime families each day. eighty five percent of global wealth he longs to be ultra rich eight point six percent of the world market goes thirty percent some with four hundred to five hundred three first second first second and fifth when rose to twenty thousand dollars. china's building two point one billion dollars a i industrial park but don't let the numbers overwhelm. the only number you need to remember in one one business shows you know bored to miss the one and only boom box.

office are. going to get up off the ground serve began to. i heard them pranks on the sounds of kind of fighting into i mean a grown man like wrestling essentially in your office or hurling. through his window. through which to away from the office or the toilet of his crew. the obvious or did they kind of lunge for the weapon once missed and then when it happened on three swung at the officers hands didn't hit him i never saw any contact between the two at any kind of went back to where they were so the officers back here there try again fifteen feet apart at this point and that's when the officer pulled out his gun and he bit on tree. finally robert mueller has completed his investigation into so-called trump collusion with russia there are no additional indictments the report is finished

but the follow continue. only coming from the middle of the muslim on muslim world one whom you know demos have done a lot of photos of stuff to get a. lot of. i think. she was even. more of the i just. don't want. to go to the british. family. i mean.

if you. take. a presidential proclamation that recognizes the golan heights cease from syria and nine hundred sixty seven is being israeli damascus has already blasted the u.s. move as an act of aggression. two years of digging in conclusion that there was no collusion between russia during the twenty sixteen us presidential election but the president's rivals from digging a little deeper. it was a complete and total exoneration.