leave the toy out of his crew. the obvious or did they kind of lunge for the weapon once missed and then when it happened on tree swung at the officers hands didn't hit them i never saw any contact between the two and any kind of went back to where they were so the officers back here there try again fifteen feet apart at this point and that's when the officer pulled out his gun and aimed it on tree. fears around defense forces there about thirty rockets have been fired at israel from gaza the same day her months claims it agreed to an egyptian brokered cease fire. and then washington donald trump signed the presidential proclamation recognizing the golan heights fees from syria and nine hundred sixty seven as part of israel massive has already lost the us me as an act of aggression. two years of digging and one conclusion there was no collusion between donald trump

and russia during the twenty sixteen us presidential election but that's not stopping the president's rivals from digging deeper. if there is a complete and total exoneration there's so much that needs to be you know taken a look at this point and so it's not the end of everything when you take out r.t. dot com for more on the latest headlines coming up next so if you ask the senior adviser to china's government about the prospects for a trade deal with the u.s. . sophie shevardnadze the future of the here is china trade deal remains uncertain differences persist. the regime burned to washington's pressure well we asked our

senior advisor at economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry. the world's two leading super girls are on a collision course the united states and china reluctant to trade dispute and join those rising money just challenging america's influence in the pacific but with the two powerhouse economies intertwined will the threat of bankruptcy be anough to stop both sides. floating further into conflict. or showdown. chandan sours siniora adviser on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry welcome to the show it is great to have you with us so the recent announcement that they meeting between president trump and presidency has been postponed sort of in this parallel where they had no choice summit or a triumph basically walked away from a done deal is this a hint that the u.s. china tog south progressed about as much as those between washington and pyongyang

. the biggest difference is that. both beijing and washington at walking level the there has to be a very substantial. very solid discussions almost every detail of those deal. including a lot of the controversial issues so i think that at least at the. level both sides will come even much more substantial into reach a very substantial progress so in that regard i think that there are some still there are some leave some room for the uncertainty but i think that it is reason for the optimistic that the both sides would reach deal finally so does having a deal agreed that trump can support mean that american tariffs and threat of more terrorists and a trade war actually worked and the president has forced beijing into backing out of this stand up standoff. well if i understand

a question correctly i think that the from the u.s. perspective they think that. the biggest incentive for both sides come to the negotiation table is the tariff and from beijing suppose specked if i think the biggest incentive for reach a negotiated to come to the negotiation table is that both sides have the incentive to settle down their differences to iron out of their differences and to remove those tit for tat a tariff so that both sides kim were not suffer from american products at the same time to us measures may remain in place tail twenty twenty even if that your country's clencher dale anytime soon that's according to god and sex and i can say such a prayer which is designed to make sure china delivers on to obligations under the deal as washington basically is seeking to establish its oversight in china where

the right to slap terrorist whenever it wants to and one of the most contentious issues and i do not know exactly what those kind of differences will be out finally but i think that from chinese perspective. the trade in negotiation and i think in a final deal would be accepted by both sides if we're it can be called a creative deal so in a kind of a. unilateral actions taken by one side to to to to have the leverage to try to have the penalties on the other side i think that that may be one of the most difficult issues to be accepted by the others so what you value god i think that it will be the most contentious issues and i tend to believe that maybe we could find out a some more mutually acceptable terms that will make the in-force meant likely they would not be decided by only by one side. so washington has accused the

chinese high tech giant weiwei spying on behalf of beijing these accusations are pretty serious and though the company's leadership has denied them do you see that this issue could actually aggravate chata tensions even more. well you see i think that the most the chinese will believe that the case of the hallway is very much politically motivated it is much more to do with the fact that the united states even more increasingly concerned about a competitive edge of those high tech industry and particularly those the flagship . companies like wow way so they try to take some pretty empty if measures to prevent huawei to be continue to have increasing presence in large market the shia and i think that this is what those very highly political motivated actually those so-called the chargers very accomplished so are you saying that the

americans are basically trying to get rid of competition in this very lucrative field well this whole affair because why away is one of the leading giants in. industry. yes definitely i think in terms of the budget investment in the past few decades always has already coupled with some other leading china's high tech communication companies they have already. been taking quite a leadership in that regard so i think that what the washington want to do is to try to to try to impede a such kind of a competitive edge by blocking the hallway or some other chinese leading companies continue to have their presence in advanced economies the united states europe or even japan and some other countries so jim political strategists and actually even elected officials and the white house are saying that the u.s.

china tensions are here to stay america wants to china's economy to conform to what washington wants and china as a rising power is bound to try and roll back you know it says influence in the world so is there any kind of a win win scenario of the two countries relationship or is it zero sum game. well see i think that in a kind of a win win prospect to well be largely determined by the but whether both sides would accept the fact that china to its political or economic institutions were not be changed fundamentally as washington want to be so it will not be a kind of a mirror image of the united states want and you see that the when we refer to those a market economy for instance there's no so-called a a one size fits all models for the market economy and

a china of course where you believe that we have being engaged with our opening up and reform and the china's model for economic development in the past few decades has proved that it is successful and work for for china and we believe that those small those with with its china's cut the risk takes work for china so if united states try to through those kind of a negotiation or pressure try to change fundamentally and based upon china's constitution that where china should change its political economic system it is impossible so if you know as they finally live with this reality it is likely for both sides to reach consent and reach agreement but if if the united states continue to believe that through a continued press and to try to transform china to a kind of systems which is totally unlike what the united states want that is a kind of a rush so any european and what we have right now this us channel standard as it

more about economics or geopolitics at its foundation. both i think both because i think that the front page you suppose backed if china's approach to the u.s. or china's understanding of a bilateral relationship is quite a stable in the past four decades beijing always regarded by like a relationship is a very complex it has elements of cooperation it also contains elements of competition and even some conflicts but the. bottom line is that both sides need to find a good way to manage those differences and to prevent them from being escalated into a. head on confrontation but from the united states perspective i think that there is a growing consensus i would say the bipartisan consensus that they saying that their so-called past decades of engagement with china. just doesn't work and they hope

that they are going to. through their you know much more tougher or even some people call it a cut new containment policy or a new cold war strategy towards china they would press china to kowtow to washington's needs that is another kind of a i think kind of a reasonable assessment of the situation so in that regard from washington post back to those competition is not only on the front of economic specs they also look at china as a rising competitor or even a rivalry from a strategic perspective residence our going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking chandan sours center advisor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry discussing china's growing economic influence stay with us.

finally robert mueller has completed his investigation into so-called trump collusion with russia there are no additional indictments the report is finished but the fallout continues. what politicians do. they put themselves on the line. to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and. want to. have to go on to the press that's what before three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters about how. this city. is a tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela

is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but that socialism has been faced only implement from the inside venezuela things through different we're going to announce sanctions against petroleum's to venezuela associate the famous would have a son of a moment goes. down person that put it that it assume that the people who come up to the moment the focus of the whose story is a new nixon hold in henry kissinger to tell him that it would not be tolerated that in latin america an alternative economic and social system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make the chilean economy scream so wants and making the economy of venezuela screed.

the reffing of the mother investigation may have cleared the american president of treason and collusion but it has not got rid of critics determination to get rid of him is the american system. and we're back with chandan tsawwassen eric visor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry talking about china's well in today's global economy some as it does sound the world bank says that china's growth will slow down to six point two in two thousand and nineteen when india is set to overtake it if the trend will be over before we got a chance to actually really begin. i think that you are right on one side economic

growth rate in china has relatively down compared with the past decade but i said at same time as i think that if compared with some other advanced economy considering the fact that china has already be done the but to. the biggest economy in the world the growth rate of china is still very impressive this is the first point the second point i believe that the more important thing is china is now more focus on how to improve its economic structure and by shifting from what we call a. quantity of oriented. only to a mode of development to a quality for. growth model so i think that in the past year in the past few years chinese government as well as the business community has a hope leave that nowadays it is more important for china to invest more on those

high tech innovative industries and as well as the service industry and also to improve the consumption side export related one to a more a consumption one and a with regard to that of india and i think that india is still in a case of also in the in the in the face of. transformation and it also takes a long time to for indian economy to transform from those very early to. low income towards a relatively. middle income economy with focus on those and manufacturing as well as the high tech industries so i think that the both china and india in their new god i.e. it's a transitional period with that different a level of different a degree. so china is a major donor to the world bank but also the largest borrower for a bit now the bank is to get new leadership various aaron and trumps take for their

position has said that chair shouldn't get any more funds from this situation if the american candidate gets to had their situation will china because of from its well. see that this is a quite the steward debatable issues i think that. china included in some large number of their own countries they will graduate from the so-called a low income or least developed a commie to a more middle or even upper. middle income status so i think this is a kind of achievements that the world economy have made in the past few decades and the world bank as well as other multilateral financials to shoes should reconsider their strategy how to shift their focus from those traditional supporting those least developed economy to more larger a number of economy which have gradually from those traditions combination know to

find a low income status and how to deal with those a large number of middle income economies economic advantage demands so china has launched its own launch by the brics nations and both the situations are in some sense competitors for the world bank why is china silliman boring from everywhere makes sense to direct those funds to the nations that are at the bottom of the list of world's largest economists not at the top well i think that in terms of those. funding including those funding supported a family supported by the world bank i think there gradually the world bank will contribute. increasingly. the proportion of the found support in china's development or will be smaller they in the past so in that regard i think that. china. will not think

the world bank will be the biggest fund raiser for china's development but the same time the world bank for its past decades of a. knowledge as well as expertise supporting the global development issues to stew it has an important function and the role to play for the global development strategy and its expertise in our region are more important nowadays than those found money to self so i think that in the past few years during. the presidency of the world bank it has actually quite successfully transformed from world bank from the money. only money bank towards a more like a knowledgeable and so in that regard i think china's to appreciate a lot of expertise and a knowledge of those world bank. though the u.s.

and north korean summit in hanoi that way mentioned earlier failed to bring any results present transair that present being was very helpful in dealing with north korea only a year ago washington was accusing beijing of sabotaging the talks how do you explain this change of tone from washington well i think. i think a previous. it's been quite a grand that it's because the beijing has for the past a few years has been. playing a very stabilizing row to try to calm down the tension over the korean peninsula and always play a very active row to try to bring all the parties including united states and north korea to come to the negotiation or dialogue table so when proto truong.

two years ago in this he tried to beijing of tried to sabotage to talk i think that it is a. reasonable accusation it's going to secure station now he said that the beijing has been more help for i think that. a couple of reasons one i think that maybe he tried to continue to try to you know appreciate beijing support in his to further negotiation with pain young and also he himself tried to maintain his a very good friendship with print a she and same time i think that it's also his conviction that without beijing support it is impossible for a for washington and the p. to reach any. agreement to which will be sustainable so trump has been saying that good things will happen to the north korean economy if it chooses to do nuclear rise so let's assume for

a second there appears dale has finally been great could that allow washington and track of the chinese are what three investment i mean how much of a threat was that before china's national security well i think the. support and also appreciate. the dialogue between washington opinion and we believe that the dialogue on the denuclearization plus the. down piece of. long peace. negotiation of for the long piece of this area is is in the interest of all parties and china in young. united states or russia or some other countries and so i think that. in that regard beijing is seen syrup leave that as long as those negotiation could

continue and as long as. the pin young could through those are there when you go and also the track of denuclearization and to continue its economic reform and opening up to a bit of good news for all parties and i think that beijing would it do its utmost to sort of to continue to support. the. opening up and the reform strategy if they me if they meet at the same time i think that beijing would also try to walk very closely with both young and washington to make those negotiation a sustainable track so which means that we know those kind of negotiation would be very very complex and the long term and that these up and down is almost a. inevitable so even if there are some difficulties ahead of us i think that

beijing would continue to support both sides to be a patient to try to to try to add a most to bring these two parties on the table as beijing could. so china is not very happy about it u.s. national security adviser john bolton says china uses bribes and shady deals for its expansion and huge loans to hold african countries captive to its demands a china seeking to establish itself as a string puller in africa. well i think that china's relationship with africa has been maintained on a very somber foundation for many decades and i think that oppose the africa country as a whole as well as. a china we have appreciated such kind of very good economic politico relationship i think that nowadays the swedish about much more comprehensive include the even wider spectrum of the people to people dialogue

as well as many other cooperation on those. sustainable economic development of climate change as well as i think both sides also agree that they should china would help africa as a whole too we can mess more into those a sustainable security capacity beauty so in that regard i think that this relationship is based upon that quality and based upon the now going to innovation into those at the mass to go into an office of each others and. in this kind of relationship is also carried out in a spirit of what we so i think that those washington's accusation and it's a very ridiculous because if they tried to if washington tried to check those what isn't really main street thinking main street stream thinking in african continent they were found out to have a computer in general they are very supportive to those in the ever growing

strengthen ties with beijing. thank you very much for this interview you were talking to chandan saoirse an air advisor on economic diplomacy for china's foreign ministry discuss army that's it for this edition of self and co i'll see you next.

that's geysers financial survival guide liquid those that you can convert into cash quite easily. to keep in mind though as to take me into a place to watch because the board. is an officer of the road to get up off the ground begin to pay him down. and then freeze on the sounds of. grown man like wrestling essentially. through his. twisted away from the officer. of his crew. the officer did they kind of lunge for the weapon once missed and then when it happened on three swung at the observations didn't hit him i never saw any contact with. any kind of went back to where they were so the officers back here there try again fifteen feet apart at this point and that's when the officer pulled out his gun and he bit down tree.

i'm going to come up with. readings will sell you take. by now i'm sure that most of you have heard the news that russia gate is officially no more hashtag resistant savior robert hughes own

hands no less but they are not collusion fans because of team trump shenanigans with controversial foreign leaders seeking to destabilize regions who murdered journalist and protesters as recently as last year is what you see then may i present to you israeli president benjamin netanyahu in the early apac conference currently taking place here in washington d.c. and the best part is it's not just trump who you will be able to catch colluding the serious speakers list includes vice president mike pence senator ted cruz speaker of the house nancy pelosi and democratic senate leader charles schumer who yes the big time and there is a whole host of political drama and controversy awaiting it as politico reports the annual gathering comes in an extraordinarily turbulent moment in u.s. and israel relations israel's become a partisan football with trump's republican party on one side and a new generation of democrats including the first palestinian american woman in congress on the other u.s. president donald trump added to the combusted drama last thursday after he got to

proclamation and signed a proclamation officially granting u.s. recognition of the golan heights israeli territory in a dramatic shift from decades old u.s. policy to which israeli president benjamin netanyahu wonderfully.