the prime of the second world war nineteen fifties when the system is aging. like a human being or any system it starts falling apart. and what is happening in america is that we are getting busy degree in the manifestation of the does integration is a high pitch very emotional feelings and aggressiveness and the left against the right there is the can of course but if you look at the poor many of the trans trungpa exemplifies polarization and economic grievances they were present in the american society long before him for example polarization started growing in the midnight the whitest polarization politically it started really intensifying. almost three decades ago in two thousand it was clear that they can all make system was structurally flawed and yet it took another decade for trying to come on stage and to kind of galvanize all that resentment with the

system why did it take so long in the lifecycle you cannot predict how long something it takes but what we do know and i suggest he's not because of the polarization. he's a manifestation of course i have to do and is accelerating it and what i have against is not so much what is doing is what what is the how is he doing it he's causing fruit this integration of society and that is very dangerous for america because what america had as an asset there is a sort of the america was not the chronology others have it not money that have it not size other have it it was a culture the culture of being american can be german american jewish american polish american russian american and working together with mutual trust or respect

that he's destroying he's drawing the most important asset american that is destroyed not just by trying by men. i think it's very common for many countries to blame your mistakes of failures on somebody else and for him there is but the whole miller probe shows that the liberal liberal establishment misses lucidly externalized. his integrity is not the cause is the one accelerating it look let me give you something is not in your questions when bush won by a decision of the supreme court. the other guy conceded no problem if trump loses the election next year going to be riots in the streets is not going to go easily it's going to further the break down the country but he are focusing on trying but i find it a little bit unfair because he won more than t. here is ago and for the last two years we had this investigation which. you know

centered around absolutely improbable charges and yet it took two years for him just to clear his name is he at the end entitle to a little bit of. grievance and emotional reaction to. the president. to be emotional instability saying i'm probably the miller report on the fairness of the. what did you say. it is a shame that was put under the. president had to go through this difficult time is making the breakdown of the society if i are kuzio of something that you're not guilty and i accuse you for two years every day every minute on national television i'm sure you would also feel a little bit of a justification and i'm saying is it truly that gets above it ok now that the miller report the stablish that he is indeed not

a russian agent do you think the liberal community. will find it easier accepting that it was that whole lost two thousand and sixty in the lead. that it was that trump indeed is a grassroots american response to their policies over the last couple of years i don't think the liberals will accept anything. i mean politics you don't accept because important because it's a losing relationship now i just came across an interesting american poll by usa today which suggested that over fifty percent of americans agree with trying statement that miller was a we chant and i think it's an interesting number because it's much larger than his core base which to me suggests that even those who dislike him a tired and fatigued by this constant drama do you think that's right conclusion do you think that americans are ready they're american public now that american political class the american public is ready to. think the american public

is the continuous fighting from the left and right and. back and forth using the democrats over the senate is the democrats accusing him of being corrupt. people. it's not only in america over the world democratic systems people in the politicians period they're looking for somebody to be a leader who's not a politician and that's what's happened he has no other politician that's why they're electing people that are not politicians that they want that are coming out and there's danger too because you don't know what you're buying you said in one interview that the success of any system is determined by how little is wasted on internal fighting backstabbing and by that measure the united states is clearly more dysfunctional than a member of the question is can you walk back from that degree of polarization and party partisanship. think so because. of political

power political will does not exist and so much. that i don't i don't see who is going to be able to unite it to make the change who the change is much more structural. i think it's much bigger than what we see because we live in a society today where materialistic goals model can only grow one economy growth is causing the destruction of the environment. i'm claiming that our standards of living are going up our quality of life is going down. for some yes for others. i'm not quite sure by the i agree that the american model economic model is based not up to a large degree on over consumption so whatever try talking about that to change that to change the society of quality of life and to change. not the

competitive environment but the collaborative environment you're talking about the major change which i don't see happening. from what i read that level of political polarization was also present after the vietnam war and yet both parties in the united states found enough strength in themselves to move towards bipartisanship partially because they had the soviet union as a call common enemy and it was only after the soviet collapse in the mid ninety's that the rates of polarization started growing up invariably do you think the united states can be united without an external threat. i think it will be because united even was an external threat no but seriously how it wouldn't go it was that honor because i think you have to understand two things which i don't think that russians understand. for the world most of the americans don't know the

difference between soviet union and russia for them russia so that you know that that is simplified most of america's never left america never traveled outside the one that they don't know and that is one of the calls that russia is considered to be an enemy although if you come to russia the market ever spoke market there the private privately what is it always make english reread american communism but evan it american does not know that the celt of united states don't know russia is soviet union so that you know it's going to them by the finish and then i mean the next thing is that we have to understand then i'd say that eisenhower said that he called him a very bad names it's called the industrial military complex they invest in military complex needs to have and to me to be able to get budgets to build their own place to be there at a moment's and they have the minute they need they need to have an enemy and not

american history than the industrial military complex that's been advanced and you're correctly that you believe that regardless of whatever findings. they relationship between our military complex is that i think foreign policy because the real enemy for me is not russia and china but china is a big market big market we will make a deal because it's that business is driving the decision like that well mr jesus we have to take a short break now but we'll be back in just a few moments stay tuned. i do think the numbers mean something they matter the u.s. has over one trillion dollars of debt more than ten white collar crime families

each day. eighty five percent of global wealth he longs to be ultra rich eight point six percent in the world markets close to thirty percent some with four hundred to five hundred three per second per second and this one rose to twenty thousand dollars. china's building two point one billion dollars a i industrial park but don't let the numbers over. the only number you need to remember one one business show you know bored to miss one and only boom box. after the previous stage of my career was over everyone wondered what i was going to do next the ball different clubs on one hand it is logical to say the home fields where everything is familiar on the other i wanted a new challenge and the fresh perspective i'm used to surprising us all why not

seriously. i'm going to talk about football not the or else you can think i was going to go. by the way ways of the fly here. because i was going on the phone lines smoke i don't like an impediment in muslim on muslim couple i'm going to offend those. some of photosystem. was a lot of fun but. she was human. there's room.

to go. i mean you got. to take. the money is dead right so the money velocity would measure money is being long from bank to bank to bank bank bank which is a measure of economic health is dead and if the money printing continues to increase some sort of asking the question why is the money not getting into the economy they're printing more of it.

welcome back to worlds apart with a cock i d's as a bestselling author and management consultant. says just before the break we were talking about the crisis of american democracy and i remember that a few years back people like to talk about the invisible hand of the market that's all who had us to the global financial crisis back in two thousand and eight do you think that maybe this idea that democracy has self correcting property also needs to be reconsidered because generally speaking when american politicians talk about. they presume that because you have a diversity of opinions. differences you know that the system may be slow but ultimately it will produce the best result now it seems to be totally paralyzed by partisanship i think the idea of the hidden and. the market corrects itself

is already discredited nobody believes in it anymore because the market thinks it time to correct itself by the time. varying on the one front he is failing on another kind of people are more imperfect than others so that's also true i'm i'm worried because is this drawing in my judgment the major asset of america which is its culture would we do changes from president to president as long as you don't destroy the platform the. platform still delivering for the americans wasn't that the reason why he got elected in the first place because from. bush to obama one of comes to the you know ordinary americans they they they didn't question is why it was elected you know that's a different question i was alluding to jim a previous answer to. the problems are becoming more and more complex people are looking for big was going to say let the story for you. and he comes across

as very self-confident. seldom right but never a doubt you know he knows everything and some people who are simple minded and there are a lot of simple minded people in the world they love that they feel confident the american economy is growing isn't that what ultimately matters he's capable of delivering i mean he delivered on some of his campaign but the expense. is destroying the environment be pulled out of the control of the environment he's pulling out the protection of the workers at the work at the workplace he is making in making a lot of money but at what price to society we will see in one of your articles your road that he is going to be reckless he will skirt the law he will violate the constitution i'm sure of that didn't the miller reports prove you're wrong because not only they found him free on not only they cleared him of the collusion charges

but they also did not find him guilty of the obstruction of justice is trying to push the envelope and see how far it goes he doesn't accept the end of the law he doesn't accept the. personality type which i recognize from executives that they know and he was an executive before they don't accept boundaries always try to push the boundaries to see what the limit is so only question is when is it going to look. every week he has another crisis the war of the world china of the china russia of the russia the guy doesn't stop he likes to say i called him an incendiary you know is that if you would like to start files all the time i don't do them live reports exonerates him at all he just survived one. there are going to be more but don't you think that he is reelection in two thousand and twenty is

a little bit more likely they than it was last week yes. because they don't have a good competitor they don't even buy then there isn't then or gee trample it in for breakfast a very small body on the other side that can stand up to him because he also lives and capable of saying things which have no basis whatsoever in reality but he says it is such a confident voice that the possible people accepted now you're a little too that you have your own classification of letter ship and you're described as the beak eat. dance for interpreting ers an arsonist or arsonists it starts fires all the time what does it mean in broader terms the personality of what they call a big he is very creative and he likes to takes risks he likes energy like the excitement. and he's very self-confident to the point issue around himself

that different words in different languages. if you don't clip that's your fire and people don't challenge you look how many people resign from the white house how many people can work with him you can only work with him. yes yes. and that way and because of that because the legs excitement in this book is all the time he's still running for reelection they go to lengths that is going to feel big meetings because he always talks about how many people were in the crowd the guys. but that's in itself is not the disqualification for presidents i mean there is nothing in the american founding documents that preclude a person like this from being a letter. as long as this control is good to have and i just wrote a letter open letter to lopez obrador the new president of mexico who is

a calling the left leftist trump tremendous they see other than sixty priorities blah blah or as yeltsin i mean who opened fire at the parliament with almost two hundred people killed and the american president bill clinton called him the next day and said nothing about you know the victims and supported him next presidential election so i mean the real russians know how it feels but we also know that sometimes it's good to have what americans call humble piety the humble pie dissing that merican need that moment of humility when they are humiliated by their own leadership and. by the leadership i think we need a leader that integrates us obama was such but it totally good discredited by trump and this was his opposite personality total wasn't he also discredited by his own policies for example he's only been. intervention and the. destruction of the whole country meaning that it isn't about

a mistake and others think no question about it but that doesn't mistake is much bigger than anything trump has done we'll see. i think we will need that but i don't think we're going to get it because look. this system calls for his leader. when the company is when the system is going to lead that leads the people. the people lead the leaders of this to make the big society get the lead that it deserves because we are here we are going to lead then they are going to get it has done for them well this is another very inspiring note but we have to leave it there really appreciate it. well let's hope for the best thank you thank you very much for your time i encourage our viewers to keep this conversation going and our social media pages add up to here again same place same time here on the part.

of the. to get up off the ground to serve begins. on the sounds of. twisted away from the officer. the officer did kind of lunge for the weapon once missed and then what happened on. i never saw any contact with.

any kind of went back to where they were back here again fifteen feet apart at this point and. the tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but that socialism has been only temperament from the inside venezuela things look different we're going to announce sanctions against the troll to venezuela so if you. have a son of a moment to. get out of that political battle. to keep. focus the whose story isn't new makes him cold in henry kissinger to tell him it would not be tolerated in latin america. an alternative economic and social system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make.

a call on me scream so wants to make the common the venezuelan screed. was. the headlines and he is ready tanks lined up along the gaza border after the jets pounding palestinian territory in response to rocket fire. it comes as the u.s.

officially recognizes israeli sovereignty over the golan heights and syria move that's being condemned by the un and also the arab league also to come despite no felician found between donald trump and russian media hysteria isn't dying down with news outlets trying to understand why this saga has blown that portion. i would like to congratulate the house for taking control of security its approach has been an abject failure on this house.