is a very good sign of the strength of the american system because in spite of all the pressures for him to make. trump the routine as much as possible he gave a real honest report i thought it was also a very interesting window into the american psyche. because i mean to as russians the idea that we could somehow not just influence but put in an american president into the white house it was absolutely unimaginable is the united states really still emotionally volatile as it as it come comes across on the cable channels i don't know whether this is a special for america in any quote unquote free country as. emotionally volatile look at this that i mean this. number leo. i think what we have experience is something else i think that united states.

is on the decline in part of the life cycle curve. all systems born grow a church and. i think united states was at the prime of the second world war i think fifty's when the system is aging. like a human being or any system starts falling apart and what is happening in america is that we are getting dizzy degrees and the manifestation of that is integration is a high pitch very emotional feelings and aggressiveness and the left the gays are right there is the can of course but if you look at the poor many of the trans trungpa exemplifies polarization and economic grievances they were present in the american society long before him for example polarization started growing in the midnight the whitest polarization politically it started really intensifying.

almost three decades ago in two thousand it was clear that they can all make system was structurally flawed and yet it took another decade for trying to come on stage and to kind of galvanize all that resentment with the system why did it take so long in a life cycle you cannot predict how long something it takes but what we do know and i suggest he's live to tell it is accelerating it and what i have against is not so much what is doing is what what is the how is he doing it he's causing fruit this integration of society and that is very dangerous for america because what america had as an asset. a set of the america was not the chronology others have it not money that have it other have it it was

a culture the culture of being american can be german american jewish american polish american russian american and working together with mutual trust and respect that he's destroying he's drawing the most important asset american that is destroyed not just by trying by men. i think it's very. among so many countries to blame your mistakes of failures on somebody else and for him there is but the whole miller probe shows that the liberal liberal establishment mrs newsome we externalize. his integrity is not the cause. when bush won by a decision of the supreme court. the other guy conceded no problem if trump loses the election next year going to be riots on the streets is not going to go easily it's going to further break down the country but he are focusing on

trying but i find it a little bit unfair because he won more than t. here is ago and for the last two years we had this investigation which. you know centered around absolutely improbable charges and yet it took two years for him just to clear his name is he at the end entitle to a little bit of. grievance and the emotional reaction isn't that the president. to be emotional instability saying i'm probably the miller report on the fairness of the. integrated this is what did you say. it is a shame that was put under the. president had to go through this difficult but is making. the breakdown of the society if i argue national television i'm sure you would also feel a little bit of a justification and i'm saying is it truly that gets above it ok now that the miller report the stablished that he is indeed not

a russian agent do you think the liberal community. will find it easier accepting that it was the whole last two thousand and sixty in the elections that it was that trump indeed is a grassroots american respond to their policies over the last couple of years i don't think the liberals will accept anything. i mean politics you don't accept because important because it's a losing relationship now i just came across an interesting american poll by usa today which suggested that over fifty percent of americans agree with trying statement that miller was a we chant and i think it's an interesting number because it's much larger than his core base which to me suggests that even those who dislike him a tired and fatigued by this constant drama do you think that's right conclusion do you think the americans are ready they're merican public now that american political class but the american public is ready. i think the american

public is the continuous fighting from the left and right in the considerations back and forth using the democrats over the semitism the democrats accusing him of being corrupt. people. it's not only in america over the world democratic systems people in the politicians period they're looking for somebody to be a leader who's not a politician and that's what's happened he's not a politician that's why they're electing people that are not politicians that they want that they're. coming out and there's dangerous too because you don't know what you're buying you said in one interview that the success of any system is determined by how little is wasted on internal fighting and backstabbing and by that measure the united states is clearly more dysfunctional than a member of the question is can you walk back from degree of polarization and party

partisanship. i don't think so because to reverse it it requires a political power political will doesn't exist and so much polarized that i don't i don't see who is going to be able to unite it to make the change who the change is much more structural. i think it's much bigger than what we see because we live in a society today where materialistic goals model can only grow one economy growth is causing the destruction of the environment. i'm claiming that our standard of living are going up our quality of life is going down. for some yes for others. i'm not quite sure but i agree that the american model economic model is based not to a large degree on over consumption so whatever trying to talk about that to change that to change the society of quality of life. change.

from what i read that level of political polarization was also present after the vietnam war and yet both parties in the united states found enough strength in themselves to move towards bipartisanship partially because they had the soviet union as a call common enemy and it was only after the soviet collapse in the mid one nine ninety s that the rates of polarization started growing up invariably do you think the united states can be united without an external threat. i thought but seriously how i wouldn't go out and watch that honor because i think you have to understand two things which i don't think that assures understand. first the world most of the americans don't know the difference between soviet union and russia for them russia

so that you know that that is simplified most of america's never left america never traveled outside the home that they don't know and that is one of the calls that russia is considered to be an enemy although if you come to russia the market ever spoke monica they have a private privately what is it always make english reread american. but evan it american does not know that the celts of united states don't know russia is soviet union soviet union is going to them by the finnish and then to me the next thing is that we have to understand then i'd say that eisenhower say that he called him very bad names it's called the industrial military complex the invest in military complex needs to have and me to be able to get budgets to build they have a place to be this moment and that of the many things they need they need to have an enemy not american history that set the industrial military complex they spend

an agenda standard correctly that you believe that regardless of whatever findings . they relationship between our military complex is that i think foreign policy because the real enemy for me is not russia and china but china is a big market big market we will make a deal because it's the business is driving the decision like that well mr jesus we have to take a short break now but we'll be back in just a few moments stay tuned. this . is going on the

phone lines smoke why don't they come in suddenly made in the muslim on muslim couple in bloomfield demos send us photos and stuff to get a. lot of buzz on the ball but i just i think that i think. she was you make a. choice i just. don't bombard from the sun on my last book to go to the british course that's enough i've been brought up. i mean they got. to. take. a thing the numbers mean something they've mastered us with over one trillion

dollars in debt more than ten white collar crime happens each day. eighty five percent of global wealth he longs to be old rich eight point six percent old market those thirty percent some with one hundred five hundred three first second first second and fifth when rose to twenty thousand dollars. china's building two point one billion dollars a i industrial park but don't let the numbers over. the only number you need to remember is one one business shows you know ford commits one in only boom but. welcome back to worlds apart from a cock eyed peas as a best selling author and management consultant. says just before the break we were

talking about the crisis of american democracy and i remember that a few years back people like to talk about the in the visible hand of the market that all who had us to the global financial crisis back in two thousand and eight do you think that maybe this idea that democracy has self correcting property also needs to be reconsidered because generally speaking when american politicians talk about democracy they presumed because you have a diversity of opinions. differences you know that the system may be slow but ultimately it will produce the best result now it seems to be totally paralyzed by partisanship i think the idea of the hidden and. the market correct itself is going to be discredited nobody believes in them because the market thinks it time to correct itself by the time the change is so big there is another change it

is enough to change i think that the hidden hand today is very clear with this it's called government the government involvement in the economy so visible. in the boat. market economy is the question mark was it really is. democracy the same thing is it's not so of course you can get something more either but it's not self correcting itself in the united states and in the u.k. which is another major western democracy which is paralyzed by partisanship but in other countries in other western countries i think it's working pretty well. in germany for example in the nordic states it's still functioning pretty well i mean they have their disagreements but they question to you is whether there is something special about the united states and the u.k. maybe their historic trajectory there and the standing of democracy that led them to to the point when they are unable to govern. the rate of change is accel it is

not just excel everything too many problems come in one of the it's all to becoming more what's called. it's multidisciplinary so changes in technology have an immediate response impact on the economy and economy social activities to look to your legal legal and political it's or be very complex who is going to solve it it needs something that can be about the military discipline is the soul of them and it's a government and the government is paralyzed it's a big bureaucracy and who is making the laws you know they're making more and more laws so what's happening is they believe by a legal environment they can regulate but it's becoming more and more bureaucratic more and more part of life that's what's causing what we really need is to learn how to decentralize self governing bodies not governed by the center because the center is paralyzing everything now i know that you and other big fan of donald trump but since he's having such a big day today he seems to be

a lot of celebrations in the white house let me ask you how would you handle this major victory that he just got in the report and bloomberg described. the publication of that report as as a major achievement of his presidency so far i'll go on the program is a lot of what he does. a program with how it does it but nobody's perfect them and . delivering on the one front he is failing on another kind of people are more imperfect than others you know so that's also true i'm i'm i'm worried because is this drawing in my judgment the major asset of america which is its culture would probably do changes from president to president as long as you don't destroy the platform base there you know that the platform still delivering for the americans wasn't that the reason why he got elected in the first place because from. bush to

obama when it comes to the you know ordinary americans i was one of the alluding to jim a previous answer to that as the problems are becoming more and more complex people are looking for big bob was going to say let me sort of it for you. and he comes across as very self-confident i called him seldom right but never a doubt you know he's knows everything and some people who are simple minded and there are a lot of simple minded people in the world they love that they feel confident the american economy is growing isn't that what ultimately matters he's capable of delivering i mean he delivered on some of his campaign and what expense is destroying the environment and pulled out of the control of the environment is pulling out the protection of the workers at the work at the workplace he is making in one of your articles your fraud that he is going to be reckless he will skirt

the law he will violate the constitution i'm sure of that didn't the miller reports prove you're wrong because not only they found him free on not only they cleared him of the collusion charges but they also did not find him guilty of the obstruction of justice it is trying to push the envelope and see how far it goes he doesn't accept the end of the law he doesn't accept me that personality type which i recognize from executives that they know and he was an executive before they don't accept boundaries always try to push the boundaries to see what the limit is so only question is when is he going to look. every week he has another crisis the war of the world china of the china russia of the russia the guy doesn't stop he likes to say i called him an incendiary you know is that. we were like started files all the time i don't do the reports exonerates him at all he just

survived one. they're going to be more but don't you think that he is reelection in two thousand and twenty is a little bit more likely a day than it was last week yes because they don't have a good competitor they don't even by then the. and then are g.'s trample it in for breakfast a very small body on the other side that can stand up to him because he also lies and capable of saying things which have no basis whatsoever in reality but he says it is such a confident voice that the people people accept it now you're loaded to that you have your own classification of letter ship and you're described as the big eight where he stands for interpreting earth an arsonist or arsonists started fires all the time what does it mean in broader terms the personality of what i call a big is very self-confident to the point is sure around himself that different

words in different languages people clap hands up if you don't clap hands you're fired and people don't challenge you look how many people resign from the white house how many people can not work with him you can only work with him it's called yes yes. and you lost it that way and because of that because the legs excitement in this book is all the time going he's still running for reelection for they got the legs that is going to bring still big meetings and loves big crowds those documents that preclude a person like this running and. as long as it's controlled it's good to have an engine i just wrote a letter open letter to lopez obrador the new president of mexico who is a calling the left leftist trump tremendous idea three other than sixty priorities blah blah no. no holding back no focusing no it's

like a car with a stronger engine good willing steering wheel but no brakes that's what i'm afraid of i'm afraid of stump no brakes we began this conversation by you stressing the strength of the american institutions. you know americans usually pride themselves on having institutions that serve not the political leadership but actually the country can they still take that for granted especially again in the aftermath of the investigating the intelligence community to be free of. all these guys. because these are the breaks and they don't like breaks down when the central bank he went after the of the he didn't go off to the central bank he was frustrated and here fired off a couple of tweets but that's not the closing of the central bank i mean. you are

very forgiving. as a president you have to move to speak to speak. in the hierarchy this small it should be the most and the biggest should be you is he is big mouth and small this is not good mr jesus i'm not by any means defending trump what i'm trying to ask is that sometimes when you have such a polarizing personality people may think that subverting the normal procedure is justified you know and i think that's a particular quality on the left i mean i think there are many studies academic studies that show that people on the left are particularly intolerant of. a political difference and they they may be more prone to defending the system and violating the law in the process don't you think that the american institutions for example the american intelligence have been subverted by the by their own efforts you protect american beauty. is like. your style and if you're

not for me you're against me but come on stalin killed people in. the personalities that you're either for me or against me the danger is. that is not saying it is ok to disagree with me let's have a look what do you disagree about what they can learn from disagreement that's not his style not only him all these people that have that was the knowledge the style as they say the very convincing in their own legend in their own opinion seldom right but never in doubt and that's one of the difficulties when you go after the. sick and the secretary of justice and the central bank and. who who is left that is not that's not healthy is absolutely the regime

of the medical society that's my problem how do you thing it all i don't want to say and what do you think it will all lead to what kind of flattish style will be americans looking towards after trying to leave the scene whether it's in two thousand and twenty or two thousand and twenty four this is very difficult to predict but this is going to be reelected if we reelected it to twenty i believe and if he doesn't get reelected we're going to have riots going to be a difficult time in american to twenty twenty twenty because i'm not going to accept it he's not the type to walk and lose he's not a loser he says i will accept the vote as long as they win the world i will accept the vote the slogans and win which means if i don't win i don't use of the vote well mr davis we had a little like that boris yeltsin i mean who opened fire at the parliament with almost two hundred people killed and the american president bill clinton called him the next day and said nothing about you know the victims and supported him next

presidential election so i mean the real russians know how it feels but we also know that sometimes it's good to have what americans call a humble piety the humble pie do you think that merican need that moment of humility when they're. related by their own leadership and. by the leaders you know i think we need a leader that integrates us obama was such but it totally good discredited by the trumpets and this was his opposite personality total wasn't he also discredited by his own policies for example he's only been intervention and they should. know the whole country i mean they. made a mistake no question about it but that doesn't mistake is much bigger than anything trump has done yet we'll see. we'll see i think we will need that but i don't think we are going to get it because look. this system calls for his leader.

people. of this. they spoke. because. well this is another very inspiring. really appreciate. well let's hope for the best thank you thank you very much for your time. to keep this conversation going in our social media. time here and a part. of

the tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but that socialism has been fully implement inside venezuela things are different we're going to announce sanctions against the venezuela socio. political moment those. that. move to keep the. focus of the who story is a new nixon henry kissinger. not be tolerated in latin america. an alternative economic and social system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make. the economy scream so

once an economy of venezuela screed. you know world of big. lot and conspiracies it's time to wake up to dig deeper to get the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smart we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the troops the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks. survival guide let's face it you're going to start simply. the certain. issues there are you going to get it back. after. all it's no good this

is a repatriation scheme look at the rest the seventy. bill of the seven treasury board . russia's foreign ministry accuses the us of treating latin america as its colony the comments come in response to washington's claims of bosco's military interference in venezuela. despite no collusion found between donald trump and russia by the investigation media hysteria is that dying down without this now blaming trump for making them suspicious in the first place. the un security council meets over the escalation on the gaza border is ready tanks have down the i.d.f. jets have also attacked palestinian territory and retaliating for alleged rocket fire it comes as the u.s. officially recognizes radio sovereignty over the golan heights the dispute.