i. frustration and anger both in the u.k. and europe as prime minister to resign made tries for a 4th time to get a bricks at the all over the line at this time with a promise to peace the whole vote on a 2nd referendum if they choose to back and. leave you elections just around the corner tech giant say there's no sign of any russian interference the spotlight to much media and political hype to the contrary. as the race for the 2020 us democratic presidential nomination he saw. me of rivals are intensifying with hope for the branding she's been getting donations from kremlin stooges as fake news. the u.s.

state department says the syrian government is planning a chemical attack vowing a rapid response if so that as president trump claims she's under pressure from the military industrial complex to keep up american adventurism abroad. good morning you're watching out international life from. this review our thanks for being with us on the program. that's the reason why is that again if she makes a 4th bid to push through her brakes a deal this time around the british prime minister in the carrot of a vote on a 2nd referendum before him but as that another lost it's concessions have been derided from all sides. well if you. follow through you know you don't love the other or the culture because it's basically a rehash of what was discussed before the s. and p.

roots of food for the deals it does that teaches you a single market what she promised a bold new offer and here is to reason may's fault the incarnation of a brags that bell she needed something different enough to sell 2 m.p.'s and there are a number of concessions that she's made she's going to be making the case to the country over the next couple of weeks there are 10 main points too many to list but the 2 main headline grabbers are is that she will offer m.p.'s a vote on the option of a customs union and that big big carrot that she's offered m.p.'s will get to vote on a 2nd way friend but only if they pass the deal in the 1st place the government will therefore include in the withdrawal agreement bill introduction a requirement to vote on whether to hold a 2nd referendum and this must take place before the withdrawal agreement can be

rushed outside to reason mase never wanted it herself she's always said that she would just like to stick to implementing the results of the 1st one but she's trying everything she can to try her already dented political legacy she is after all a one issue prime minister she came to power almost 3 years ago promising to deliver on drags it out and she's still trying to salvage that take a listen to how grooming if a deal is rejected again some suggest leaving without a deal but whatever you think about outcome poland has been clear it will do all it can to stop it. if not no deal then it would have to be a general election or a 2nd referendum that could lead to revocation and no bricks it. to reason may said that this is the last chance for m.p.'s to vote her deal through after all the

default setting in october is for a no deal with drawl but it's also to reason may's last chance to save her political legacy and to deliver on the brags that she's promised throughout her leadership she's failed to pay a bill through parliament $3.00 times already she's failed to 6 weeks of cross party negotiations the u.k. was meant to leave the e.u. on the 29th of march that didn't happen and the u.k. wasn't supposed to be taking part in the parliamentary elections which is happening so naturally all the questions at the end of that big speech from journalists trying to make sense of it focused on one issue and that was when this she going to step down a former director of the institute of economic affairs jamie whyte says the reason why he's got little chance of getting her deal over the line. is 3 outcomes that are possible. unlikely in the 2nd referendum i think it's increasingly likely or

just continuing on until a full blown political crisis emerges which results in a general election on the assumption that theresa may doesn't get this through to the new leader of the conservative party soon enough. from scratch completely because there. is resistance in parliament to almost every possibility so that information is out no but made no material progress in 2 years and we'll have a new leader who can be starting from scratch. britain has left the e.u. just yet it will take part in the european elections on thursday a brics it is set to dominate the u.k. vote which some think shouldn't even be happening. i mean a supporter of the 2nd referendum for about 2 and a half years it's just gone on too long and i never once heard up what about this i think this is a turd trying. to get him bricks if. they had

a hearing about it he'll be voting in the european elections why is that well i'm having to leave european well it's like this we absolutely info ting is really important. or i think it's completely useless and a waste of time for the english and a waste of money for the european union it's going to cost us a lot and it is only enough i wanted on the english have never really been in the europe they always had the conditions in the surrealist in absurd. so i think it's important that they can vote they are still a part of europe at the moment. i think that the british like the french and all europeans leave and democratic countries and as long as democracy exists it is necessary that everyone can express their ideas and ideals so you'll see it seems

intuitive to me i can understand but it's difficult to motivate people to world to take part in an election that they should know this but separating. is giving some europeans a headache you had of the e.u. elections some appear more concerned about something else that's not happened and that's russian meddling are too peter all of our reports on how the criminals influence this white being much touted is as yet nowhere to be found. earlier this week finds were gripped by the series finale of game of thrones but there's also plenty of fun of a nother fantasy tale the story of meddling in a you elections winter isn't the only thing that's coming so is the risk of interference in our elections and guess who the suspect is we investigate the claims of russia's attempts to influence and undermine the democratic system in europe fears that russia is infiltrating the very heart of european democracy and we're starting to see the early signs of essential you kind of

a repeat of what we saw in the us elections in regard to russian hacking and russian tampering but just as some fans of the wranglings of west ross were left disappointed by the way their show ended a dragnet operated by social media companies looking for misinformation and propaganda has turned up well nothing nothing from google. so far we haven't seen any interference on the platforms. what about facebook there have been no published accounts of attacks specifically related to the e.u. election today twitter that's full of angry people already they must have turned up something we're always seeing a baseline level of it but nothing that has coalesced around a specific topic theme or group or even country but there was one area where it was said that there was evidence of russian interference the fact that we hear it r t the russian news service sputnik had been talking about the e.u.

elections they have been picking up the theme consistently over the past few months they do seem to be pushing slightly anti establishment messages. we've seen european politicians focus their attention on alleged russian meddling but what about real issues russia has been a very common scapegoat these past years i was in western democracies the narrative these past years must be careful there are russian does russian influence the russians are behind this russian is trying to just you're a democracy and now we don't have any proof for what the interests are asked what have you got they don't have any and the whole narrative just collapsed politicians today were for your party russia and moscow behind the rise in the populist movements don't have an argument anymore or they're using this argument every day and they're in a very bad situation once you prove that there is no more problem coming from russia then you have to face the fact that the problem is coming from yourself and the teams that you're chosen trying to country big corporations meanwhile have been

quite open about whom they support with some actively opposing the growing euro skeptic sentiment among those singing the praises of a united europe our german ally looked handsome as well as digital music streaming service spotify and german car manufacturer folks who are in the c.e.o. of our kind of subversive managers told us large corporations have their own vested interests. the attitude of the big corporations banks has always been the same of course they have 3 ved in this nice european environment it's not a surprise to me that they are actively and strongly supporting the pro european views they have a very large network network and they use they use it they leverage in it in order to bring up their policies the policies they like the most many of the issues as been underestimated or even ignored by europe and by these large corporations there are real issues that europe and this large corporation didn't got and didn't

respond to you know they come up with some ok europe is not is not perfect about you know there is something to fix where there is a lot to fix there is a lot to fix because they have moved too much forward into a project without taking into consideration legitimate issues raised by the population thanks. to the race to be picked as the democratic nomination for the 2020 us presidential election is what on the way hopefuls already are receiving at the receiving end rather apparent smear campaigns hawaii congresswoman tulsi gabbard has rubbished the report claiming she's getting donations from people described as putin apologists. it's a whole lot of news what i am focused on is what is in the best interest of the american people what is in the best interest of our national security keeping the american people safe the recent article claims that told to go but received donations from 3 individuals one

a russian studies professor at new york university another a vocal putin supporter who nonetheless was arrested in russia in 2016 and the 3rd a former employee at this channel who appears to have the needed to go abroad under the alias goofy grapes other subs in question however do seem quite minor at least filleted to the he's theory they're generating 2 of the 3 contributors reportedly provided god with a $1000.00 each drop in the ocean of course for a presidential campaign the size of the 3rd donation hasn't been revealed a former candidate for new york city councilman told us it's absurd to single out these 3 donors from the thousands. i don't think they're credible allegations at all. you know i guess i think this whole thing about russia is so completely overblown what the media is doing is making it that she's an essentially an agent of the kremlin which is so ridiculous so i think what she needs to do is essentially tell the world that lesson 3 people with. you know minimal ties to

russia not even ties to russia doesn't that's an independent opinion i've given to my campaign i did 65000 donors so you know you can't really make an argument that you know that my my candidacy is supported by russian propaganda machine you know it's silly and i think if she keeps on kind of promoting that message people will be able to see what's really going on. did us start to fall that says it's going intelligence suggesting the syrian government is front and chemical attack and vows a quick response so this comes as the trump claims he's being pressured by the u.s. arms industry to keep thousands of american soldiers in syria at more pain reports . so who sets u.s. foreign policy well when it comes to the projection of military force the constitution and common sense says that's the president your sound george w. bush put it but i'm the decider and i decide what is best but recent statements

from donald trump throw that into question here is what he said if you do have a military industrial complex they do like war you know in syria with the caliphate so i wipe out 100 percent of the caliphate i shall want to bring our troops back home to place one crazy they want to keep it there you have people here in wa she want it they never want to leave some day people will explain what this is and if you will do have you do have a group and they call it the military industrial complex so according to trump he wanted to bring troops back from syria but he was compelled to leave several 100 of them there why well according to him the usa has quite a powerful military industrial complex and if our president is fighting against it it seems that he's hiding this fight rather well recently donald trump appointed patrick shanahan as his new secretary of defense shanahan spent 30 years at boeing

which is one of the largest defense contractors in the united states and one of the world's biggest arms manufacturers and like many other companies contracted by the pentagon boeing is having a great year. folks in this industry have actually pointed to what they call the trump effect have you seen that in terms of our allies and our spending not only have i seen we think it's the best time we've ever seen in a long time for the defense industry but it's not just the truck presidency that has been a boon to the military industrial complex many different political leaders in the united states have campaigned on a platform of peace and then expanded wars once they've taken office. nations making progress toward freedom will find america is their friend. we're promoter of values will.

we've lost thousands of american lives spent nearly a trillion dollars. to the merge and all in the cause of fighting a war for well over 5 years in a country that had absolutely nothing to do with the 911 attacks. i will never send our finest into battle unless necessary and i mean absolutely miss and will only do so if we have a plan for victory with a capital. it's as if we've learned nothing from history the 34th us president dwight eisenhower warned the public about unwarranted influences when he left office over 60 years ago in the councils of government we must guard against the acquisition of

unwarranted influence whether sought or run. by the military industrial complex. the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. we must never let the weight of this combination in danger are limiting our democratic process we should take nothing for granted. in american people don't want war so presidents always run as the peace candidate and then you know we never did leave the starwars even richard nixon during the vietnam war was only elected because he was saying he had a secret plan for ending the vietnam war as it turned out his secret plan was to escalate the war and add more troops and enlarged to all of you know these large monopolistic companies wanting to get a huge bunch of money the light threats of war they like active war

they are you know they're the war mongers and they have an enormous amount of influence that commensurate with the amount of money that they put into campaigns. in the u.k. to give back to my son al capone to go in the indian ocean with the small master of a u.s. military base complicating the issue on that after the short break. are china in the u.s. in training and endgame the battle lines have been drawn and demands made in this trade war it appears both sides are preparing for the long haul what does it mean to win a trade war what does it mean to lose and how far could this test. what

politicians do something. they put themselves on the line they did accept or reject . so when you want to be president. or some want to. have to go right to be crossed. if you like the green the more people are. interested in the why. they should. join me every thursday on the alex salmond and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics or business i'm show business i'll see you then. back to the program britain's days as a colonial power may be long over but it's just a global power might get

a fresh blow on wednesday united nations is expected to vote overwhelmingly in favor overturning the u.k. controlled shankar silence in the indian ocean back to. other shows islands have been at the center of a decades long dispute between britain and. the $160.00 seat of the territories in exchange for independence plus $3000000.00 pounds move allowed the united states in $171.00 to build the military base on diego garcia the largest of the atolls britain a victim about $1500.00 islanders to make room for the u.s. base of diego garcia was an important launchpad for u.s. missions in iraq and afghanistan the u.s. lease runs until 2036 so washington will join britain in today's vote sabrina jean from the shakos refugees group says america's stopping islanders from returning.

my question has been always stayed why they don't out to return. british over again don't have too much power. this hour and then manage mostly by us saw me as a 2nd generation i think it's time told them to realise what they've done is roll earlier the international court of justice rule book written illegally split the islands and should return them back to mauritius written with checks about rolling and more issues to be issued to the general assembly in 2017 only 15 delegates opposed the decon as asian beds some in the u.k. also on happy about britain's ownership of the on it. i wish to express my concern that the government appears ready to disregard international law and ignore a ruling of the international court of justice and the right of chad gossoons to

return to their homes this is not a matter of degree or nice ation for the general assembly it's a bilateral sovereignty dispute between the united kingdom and more rich it is a complete case and double standards and in fact many african nations will have voted. in favor of the england giving it up right now the big occupier of this island is not the u.k. there are some you case that staffers from the military because it's our military but it's the united states that controls it a lot of them drones there have. got to stand over the past few years came from this base it's also the the there's also a prison there a kind of more isolated version of one time and i think at best what we can expect might be some kind of financial compensation for the living in marriages it's sad

to say but to keep quiet unless we see political change elsewhere and unless the united states decides that it wants to change its foreign policy for good. and all make is in the u.s. congress have been briefed by the trumpet ministration officials on threats coming from iran that have been averted thanks to washington's latest show of force in the middle east some knockout soever didn't buy what they heard. it deterred a tax base salary pasturing of assets deterred attacks against american forces it's been a worry from the beginning that this is blind escalation with the hope that the iranians will come to the table in the end or the hope of iranian people will rise up to topple the regime i do worry very much but intentionally or unintentionally we heard him create a situation in which a war will take place among its recent steps against the run the us to provide an

aircraft carrier and bombers in the persian gulf prior to the trauma ministration impose sanctions on a rainy an oil promising to expire them to countries which buy it their way and president has responded by saying u.s. pressure can't break the u.n. in people you claim strong is actually growing more resilient thanks to the sanctions auntie's after towns you spoke to former iranian negotiators who say must serve you and about the current situation between the 2 states and watch the full interview later on r.t. international. what are you see during president trump i have never seen such a conflict in confusing a strategy. from the u.s. side in regard to iran between all signatories of iran nuclear deal the u.s. has completely violated we draw from the d y elated that the united nations security council the europeans including u.k.

they have failed to deliver a clear commitments for normal trade and business with iran for 2 years i don't believe such a strategy president from conflicting to strategy. a strategy. strategy a president he's following at the current currently i don't believe iranians would ever be ready to negotiate with such administration except if presidents wrong. changes it strategy compromise with the nuclear deal approved by united nations security council and then respect iran. respect the principles of mutual respect and non interference then i believe there will be a chance. here knowing is calling on washington to return a cargo ship sees that impounded in america and some more of them on was made by north korea's a master to the un he gave a press conference on tuesday united states has

a committee unlawfully and to be just the earth's orbit is producing people why your nest by possibly taking 8 to the american summer and to the police tests of the unilateral sanctions and by evolution mystical earlier this month u.s. authorities said they'd arrest of the ship named the wise honest for violating international sanctions by loading coal at a north korean port but the 1st time a ship has been seized on suspicion of violating un sanctions which restricts north korea from exporting coal or importing oil among other commodities and washington explain the seizure is a move to enforce the sanctions imposed on north korea and its nuclear program human rights attorney eric sorkin thinks this case may spell the end for u.s. efforts to build relations with the reclusive country. it's overreaching on the part of the u.s.

it's seen as a leverage issue but arguably it's not this interdiction it's called of a ship this is denying the ability for the country to even feed itself and a lot of ways that resolution didn't allow the seizure of the ship some less they fail to cooperate with the inspection when they are examined and there's really no evidence of that i would suspect that it's going to scuttle progress between the united states and north korea it's going to get an excuse for the hardliners in the trumpet ministration who don't want negotiations to go forward and will be falling back to square one unfortunately. it's come up to $1130.00 here in russian capital join us at midday for the latest global news headlines.

this is a story about what happens auster a stray bullet kills a young girl in the street. what happens to her family and daughters in florida you know the mother daughter is buried in a cemetery in meaning this is your head what happens to the community the public was screaming for a scapegoat the police needed a scapegoat so why not choose a 19 year old black kid with a criminal record who better to pin this on than him and what happens in court the . shock shock is from our society we feel. we don't know killed just for. the end of this trial unfortunately you are. the soul love no churches.

truths seemed wrong in one old rule just all. the old beliefs yet to shape out these days you can get educated and in gain from it because betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground. facebook and google started with a great idea and great ideals unfortunately it was also a very dark so. they are constructing a profile of you and that profile is real it's detailed and it never goes away turns out that google is manipulating your opinions from the very 1st character

that you type into the search bar it will always favor one dog food over another one comparative shopping service over another and one candidate over another they can suppress certain types of results deiced on what they think you should be seeing if they have this kind of power then democracy is an illusion the free and fair election doesn't exist the more road we give them the sooner we are all. time after time so we're going underground as a president of the united states threatens the end of iran coming up with a show how would iran retaliate.