hello and welcome to cross talk where all things considered i'm peter lavelle our chime in the u.s. in training and game the battle lines have been drawn and demands made in this trade war it appears both sides are preparing for the long home what does it mean to win a trade war what does it mean to lose and how far could this have schooling. crosstalk in the trade war i'm joined by my guest fred tang in new york he is president of the american china public affairs institute and we cross to james bradley he is a new york times number one best selling author of among others flags of our fathers and the china mirage all right crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it when we go to fred 1st in new york well it's been months and months now we've been talking about

a trade war i don't know if that's the appropriate term i'm more concerned with something much more broader than that is a cold war. that pits the united states against china and when i mean cold war i mean all encompassing trade geopolitical and actually the balkanization into a bipolar world that that would be a cold war very different than the one we had after the 2nd world war so the question is is there a new a new cold war just with a new player this time china go ahead fred. well i think you're right you know with it this is a trade war and shots already been fired and right now the negotiations are really a cease fire that they're avoiding this happening as far as of coal goes i think yes in some way because this is such atmosphere i do think that this time. it's on the u.s. on the china side because china is working with the. any of the part of this all

over the world the united states is closing its doors on many of the countries it james says so to say the same question because fred brings up a very interesting point here because if it's we're going to get into this binary world here there's a lot of countries in the middle and a lot of these countries though they might be our allies of the united states they do far far more business with china this is creating this is creating a huge dilemma for many parts of the world go ahead james is a huge mess and i. think it's. more the intelligence assessment 2019 said china is a big threat and the united states government has to do every thing any day every day to push back on that threat and i think we're in a war a trade war this is not about soybeans this is a polarizing the economy of china. cyber war

a technological war against a while way this is not about one company walk away this is about crippling their technological advances in 1959 with split nic the united states decided to compete now with china we're trying to cripple ok well fred we react to that i mean. it depending on who you want to ask me china's economy is slightly smaller than the united states equal to the united states or larger than the united states i mean trying to cripple one of the biggest economies in the world with an upward trajectory is a tall order i think you need more than just tariffs if you want to cripple economy i think you know what i'm getting at go ahead fred. well i think james have the right in terms of some of the i think will be president trump and you know his close associates trying to start this confrontation with another country which is

china however you know all of the things between united's and china affects the whole world in terms of trade as well so you know they can try in terms of our way even while we goes bankrupt it will leave 100 over 180000 very capable employees and they will start up tents of companies like a hallway and will be competing again so i think you know we have to realize that this one is a very very complicated war it's not a very simple one just situation ok james i mean we're looking at western press reports see china walked away from the deal but if you look at the details of the deal that was being proposed by the trumpet ministration they were essentially saying china you have to change your form of governance you have to change the role of the of the communist party in china i mean the hubris of that the arrogance of that saying well you have to play by our rules in our rules only and you actually

have to change the way your country is governed i mean who in the chinese government would accept that i mean that that just on the face of it it's ridiculous to ask. that's true but it's that's look at the mainstream media. that's what they're saying that we want the system to change this is not regime change this is a system change. with the words he hear from the commentators is china must change their behavior this is a not about soybeans as i said this is about. to change the inner workings of the chinese not only system or regime but actually culture it's an unbelievable thing a. cornell university economics professor looked at the list of demands that the united states made to china riginal and he said this does not look

like negotiation you know it looks like the request for a surrender exactly you know fred reform reflects upon that because if the it the united states its preponderance its economic preponderance with every passing year diminishes as other countries rise up that's a perfectly natural thing to happen here but why should one country determine that determine the the terms and conditions of trade for example i mean trade is by its very nature of an exchange right i mean it has to be an exchange also on ideas on how to run the international system because that's essentially what's happening in the united states does not want to come if there's a reckoning coming there's a country called china that is on the way up with its economic reach around the world and and it and that's how it's going to make its presence known in the world as a trading country not it's a military country like the united states does go ahead for it. well i do think that the u.s.

negotiation team have gotten kerry away into so they think that they can't make a law that the ments because china frankly has a lot of the things that they have to to care of domestically so you know tree having a trail of united states is the last thing that they want to have so they were giving into the ments whatever united states wants i think it started with 70000000000 and now goes way over a trillion but the u.s. team thought they really have their way so that if they try the kosi a surrender terms which that was the really the deal killer because they were trying to send inspectors into china into provincial levels on inspecting china and monitoring china's activities and you know something like this it's just really no country would accept such such as such terms james i mean again i used the word hubris here i mean but i suppose it wouldn't be chinese and. investigating american

companies in economic behavior it's only a one way thing right right i mean you know when you look at trade war it's about money and if you look at the biggest pot of money in the war our own it's the military complex in the united states yesterday trump in an interview said there is a military industrial complex and they don't like war and the gravy train traditionally historically for this military industrial complex have been scary russia and china you know the vietnam war was not about vietnam it was about the domino theory the chinese were going to come down and eat up the it now and then malaysia and indonesia and the world was going to go to hell now they army needs a bad russia and we're surrounding russia with army units and the united states navy needs china as the building. bad and so you've got you've got

china being made out to be a bogeyman here and the propaganda i mean do you know there is a committee on the present danger in the united states committee on the present danger china and newt gingrich and c. band in an aisle bass in these guys are talking to the committee and getting applause and then they're rolled out and see n.b.c. washington post new york times a couple weeks later it's incredible again and. the cheating and stealing that china has supposedly done well it's incredible propaganda yeah but you know the thing is that china has never stolen at one job from the united states it was american companies that did that ok not china fred you know the belgian road initiative i think that's really at the core of what the united states really worries about because it doesn't want to participate in it it is been very forceful to have some of its allies not participate but they are it's goes all the way into europe right now this is see this is china creating an alternative to the west i

mean i've been talking about this on this program for a long time i mean if the united states says it want to cooperate then china has resources and the ability and the imagination to go elsewhere of course a trade war with the united states would not be something i would welcome but i would tend to believe it would be able to manage it fred. yes the bell a row initiative actually started off because china have a lot of surplus and they don't want to be dumping on him from so many countries all the way to europe so this becomes a very very big project and every 2 years about 37 leaders of the country go to china meet and talk and tell him go in the self as many local company that's with different countries and different agreements and so forth but i think in the long run it will really help the whole world especially the countries never benefited economically for centuries ok james same question to you about 40 seconds before we

go to the break own head. yeah. belton road is wonderful countries they just had a huge meeting in beijing so much enthusiasm but look at the united states response they don't go to the meetings they're trying to throw sand in the gears iran syria russia are critical to the belgium road the united states. at attacking you know every everywhere they can any try to intervene here and it progresses right as well exactly and in then that's one of the reasons why iran is in the crosshairs right now because a rand china need to have a stable a ran for the initiative to work right gentlemen i'm going to jump in here where we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on the trade war state with our team.

after the previous stage of my career was over everyone wondered what i was going to do next the multiple different clubs on one hand it is logical to start an open fields where everything is familiar on the other i wanted a new challenge and the fresh perspective i'm used to surprising us all to give you . i'm going to talk about football not for you or else you can sink i was going to the. by the way what is the flooding here. this is a story about what happens auster a stray bullet kills a young girl in the street. what happens to her family and daughters in florida. the mother daughter is buried in a cemetery it really messes with your head what happens to the community the public

was screaming for a scapegoat the police need is a scape. so why not choose a 19 year old black kid with a criminal record who better to pin this on than him and what happens in court to be. shocked shocked as far as society we feel. we don't know childress for the. end of this trial unfortunately you too will still not know what childress. kind of financial survival john today was all about money laundering 1st to visit this campus into 3 different. good is a good start well we have our 3 banks all set up here maybe something in your something in america something overseas in the cayman islands or do we do all these banks are complicit in their tough talker says we just have to give mccomas

a camera to do some serious money laundering ok let's see how we did while we've got a nice luxury watch for max and for stacy oh beautiful jewelry and how about. luxury on a bill again for a match you know what money laundering is highly illegal to watch keyser of course . welcome back to cross talk where all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing the trade war. ok let's go back to fred in new york there is a term being bandied about a lot now and we're going to hear it i think for a long time in that state consider the strap is it a political in this situation right now because the united states has options and tell our audience what that is. it comes back from ancient greece but you know it's

a rising power challenging a hedge of manpower and there is that there are some choices that hedge amman can allow it to happen in the case of allowing china to down its path that a way it's going you can negotiate with it which united states has shown with its last set of demands it doesn't want to and then there's the 3rd choice and that's a military conflict where are we fred when it comes to this is that a trap. well i think the 1st of the straps certainly between unite us and china it could apply to these 2 countries and since is a term of us i want to talk about another way it's a marathon united's this clearly is the front runner so the united states if it's the fun run the keep on keep on running not try to turn look at the 2nd person behind you and try to kick that person down because as soon as you do that the 3rd the 4th the 5th the 6 the 7th run that will be surpassing you so that is what the united states is trying to doing is very very shortsighted at this point it would

be hurting united states in the long run as far as military conflict goes i do think that the us generals the military those who have been through the war against the war unfortunately we have a few of the people who never been to a war and they've become very hawkish and itching for war and we just have to see hope that the reason the bomani from the military. rank and file would try to persuade the president and the administration not to do something like that yeah but james in this in ok so we have the facilities trap we have marathon excellent there but it will throw in a more common game it's called playing chicken here and it's a game of bluff here do you think that they have seriously we have different levels of games here but playing a game of chicken is extremely dangerous and it seems to me that the chinese are not going to. be bluffed by donald trump or any american president i mean if you

look at 5000 history years of chinese history they don't take well to outsiders telling them what telling them what to do or occupying them or telling them how to run their affairs it's very very clear somebody there's got to be an adult in the room in the oval office once a mile to explain these very basic facts go ahead james. yeah i don't know the adults i mean when secretary of defense patrick shanahan the current secretary of defense took over at his welcoming ceremony he said and i quote while we are focused upon ongoing operations remember this is china china china and so that gives you an idea of the focus of the biggest pot of money in the world we need china as an enemy and i think we're in a hot war right now i mean. look at the trade war the 2nd where there is

a war look at the demands you know you surrender you surrender your sovereignity you surrender your ability to do in your own industries we're trying to cripple and and other innovators in the chinese economy there is a there is a society labor war we're confronting in the south china sea so everything short of by moon and soldiers we are now terrain ok frank is it possible to separate geopolitics from trade i mean basically saying that there's puts a certain parameters on a conflict that there. are increasing in intensity because once the 1st missile fires it's always a law of unintended consequences all the plans you make for a conflict usually disco are blown out seconds after you start because you never know what the reaction is going to be can it can we get to a point where we say we're going to be we're going to be intense competitors we're

going to be you know him a mercenary when it comes to trade but we're going to we're going to have a hotline make sure we can talk or is it just was james was saying right there you know it's an enemy that the u.s. needs the military industrial complex is more than happy to take on a new enemy for its budgets and given the propaganda and then also want to throw in here to think it's really important is that there's an element of racism in. this is a civilizational is that you know this is a rise of a different kind of people here and i'm an american and in american history we did have you know yellow peril and whatnot and i see pinches of that coming into the media right here is that somehow the chinese are well they're just so different from us and that means you can't trust them and you know you you have doubts about their humanity and everything else i mean it's very very ugly ok china is a achieve some amazing success successes recently and the american public is not

given them the credit go ahead for it. peter you just made a lot of assertions but the let me just try to answer some of that i think that 1st of all china will not change a system because the system is working yet they do borrow from the west ideas and forms as structures when they need to so china say why should they change a system when it's proving to the world that they can live in a about 600000000 people other property within decades no countries have ever done that so if they have a system that's working why should they give up their system in terms of all of the . the pressure that's put on huawei specifically let's talk about that you know if enjoy system is not allowed to be on while we foam wow this puts a pressure on huawei you know there's a lot of constant quests because once why wait to cannot use the end to a system they go to develop their own city and i've absent from that point on exactly as. you keep going already i keep on then that and then china ok and then

china's china's all of the other laptops they might not use microsoft any more licensing is a very lucrative business for the united states because they practically have to do nothing and collect money and when you take the licensing away u.s. licensing away on the global market and you try to compete with china no other this i think it is very very short short sided in terms of really going to be hurting a lot of u.s. companies and by bending this and you know they talk about china stealing why would china want to buy a loan buying 44000000000 dollars worth of chips to install in their form if they're stealing all they need is buy one chip right now and you copied a no they're buying $44000000000.00 worth of chips from c.t. to put into full because they want to abide by the rules and regulations and not to

you know to. and to explore into other people's property rights exactly gets go back to james here you know it's very interesting is that if you look at the lecturing that china's been subject to over the years let's go back to 2008 in 2009 i have a hard time believing that chinese the chinese leadership in the chinese business world would really listen to people on wall street that blew up the world in 2008 and it still and the repercussions of that stay with us here why wouldn't why in the world are the chinese listening to those guys ok the you know you could certainly criticisms of the chinese model but the criticism of wall street is that they have financial allies the entire economy i mean you can make a lot of money without making anything anymore i mean that's not a real economy that's a goldilocks economy and what one country makes things build things and another one just does it through derivatives go ahead james. you know that's really true and as

i said the newscasters are saying that china's got to change their behaviors and i was thinking of some behaviors i was in shanghai when the 1st bombs dropped in george w. bush's war in iraq and i looked out my window in shanghai and there were building cranes they were investing money in their people in their city and while we were starting to send 7 trillion dollars overseas i think we should look at some behaviors here i mean the americans are spending the chinese are saving we have to borrow from the chinese. look at apple in wa way last year apple spent $80000000000.00 out of buybacks that's not invest in r. and d. that's not helping with technological moves in the wild way a private company is and the reason that they're leading that in 5 g. is because they are investing while we were spending so this behavioral thing i

think america just has to have a different view there's 300000000 americans there's 1300000000 chinese 4 times more chinese why can't the chinese economy before times larger than the american economy why can't america be a successful number 2 we don't have to go to war the american economy can grow but the idea that china's not going to be this fantastic power in the future. that america is imagining things the wrong way you know friend is error conditions a scenario for a win win maybe we're role of blowing this all out of proportion here i mean it is there a point where both sides will say look we we know what the future is and it's not good i mean for both it's not good initially i mean depending on their strategies to deal with it i mean i think the united states more and more isolating itself china has a lot of partners in the world a lot ok as long. lot of people made money because of the chinese economy they're

not going to turn their back on that they're i mean again it will be an adult in the room because if it has to be a 00 sum game i don't see the us coming out i mean it might win but it's going to be very very painful in the in probably destroy the agricultural sector in the process i'm going to go to fred 40 seconds before we finish up go ahead fred well i think it would take responsible and capable leaders on both parts of countries in order to reach something really meaningful i think that presently you know president finishes term he might you have a 2nd term 5 years is a very short history in china that ok i give a get the last word james about 20 seconds go ahead james. that's true china's got a long term plan plans you know 2049 under the anniversary of the chinese

revolution and they've got and they've got their eye on the prize ok now you know the chinese do have a very long. look at the history in a very long way and they look in the future in a long way as well like 2025 in that program there that's all the time we have gentlemen many thanks so my guess in new york and in city and thanks to our viewers for watching us here are to see you next time and remember. lake says and she forms part of a high altitude nature reserve. it's one of the famous chito room internees years principle which a way stunts its journey. but

it can be something to hope that i don't like i said and. it runs 300 kilometers from source to mount and there are over $200.00 industrial facilities ranged along its banks. a map and your muscle. to do 3 things. i don't like to tell someone to be in. the room with him against the 4000 rice fields and supplies drinking for such a 25000000 people. at the mall and yes i. want to so many of us about us to have a perfect me yet. you know world's big partners through law and conspiracy it's time to wake up to

dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks. facebook and google started with a great idea and great ideals unfortunately it was also a very dark side. they are constructing a profile of you and that profile is real it's detailed and it never goes away turns out that google is nipping your opinions from the very 1st character that you type into the search bar it will always favor one dog food over another one

comparative shopping service over another and one candidate over another they can suppress certain types of results diced on what they think you should be seeing if they have this kind of power then democracy is an illusion the free and fair election doesn't exist the more road we give them the sooner we are all hand. he does hardest by these your county alone are poor when. he will not be sent. now. it's not completely here in. florida but i can think.

prostration and go both in the u.k. and europe as prime minister the reason may try is for a 4th time to get a brooks a deal over the line sweetening it set this time with a promise to peace to hold a vote on a 2nd referendum should they choose to back it. would leave you elections just around the corner tech giants say there's no sign of any russian interference the sport much media and political hype to the contrary. u.s. state department says the syrian government is planning a chemical attack vowing a rapid response if so that is president from claims he's under pressure from the military industrial complex to keep up america adventurism abroad.