stray bullet kills a young girl in the streets. what happens to her family and daughters and. the mother. is buried in a cemetery. this is your what happens to the community the public was screaming for a scapegoat the police need is a scapegoat so why not choose a 19 year old black kid with a criminal record who better to pin this on than him and what happens in courts be . shot after shot as far our society we feel. we don't know still just for the. end of this unfortunately you. will still not know childress.

greetings and sal you take. in the dirty saying that is the current state of united states foreign policy it appears hawk watchers that writing time for summer we've added yet busy another big dish of potential conflict to our already rising pile of potential conflict this is smelly sick this week the u.s. state department announced that the syrian government may allegedly be using chemical weapons once again as attempts to recap recapture at least the last outpost of rebel and terrorist groups the country has been fighting since march of 2011 u.s. state department spokeswoman morgan ortega's told the media quote we are still gathering information on this incident but we repeat our warning that if the assad regime uses chemical weapons the united states and our allies will respond quickly and appropriately she was then quick to add that assad's regime has culpability in

horrific chemical weapons attacks is undeniable. is that though this deniable you speak of i say this because just last week a newly leaked engineering report out of the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons actually disputes the organization's official conclusion that the syrian government was worse was supposedly behind the chlorine attack and back in april of 2018 officially you see the story goes that the chlorine canisters were dropped by air helicopters which would naturally point to the syrian military since they control the skies above syria however the newly league documents reveal that the dimensions characteristics and appearance of the cylinders on the surrounding scene of the incidents were inconsistent with what would have been expected in the case of either cylinder being delivered from an aircraft the documents go on to claim that in each case the alternative hypothesis that the cylinders were manually placed in the location produced the only plausible explanation for observations at

the scene. my friends the information war over syria by all sides is a messy one so with old official tales falling apart and new official tales being formed i think it's a good time to start watching us. but if you treat it like a real victory it's what you see. as a part of. what they like you but i got. to. take. one of them on the watching the hawks i am sorry for the time to happen. so we're back where bashevis and i know they can't even remember when they might be in class and i find that very strange we're still looking at it but we know 1st are

well then you wouldn't still be investigating that's like saying why i found what i was looking for but i kept looking it's that weird thing these documents that have come out because it's like. and to be clear i received nobody at that organization has said that these are false that they're made out that they've been altered just that they're looking into how they were of the essentially yes that's what confirm that was the mischler when these documents at the internet a lot of people myself included were like ok range document hits the internet you know is there a reality to it and i believe it was. actually peter hitchens the journalist and then asked about the legitimacy of the leaked report the o.p.c. w. didn't refute the legitimacy of the documents they're fired they nor the findings in them what they did tell reporters is that the o.p.c. w. technical secretariat is conducting an internal investigation about the authorized release of the document in question now you know look they might not have used this

particular document we don't know when this document was written. ordination it was when they released the official findings it's going to be really a response to no one knows about there's a 1000000 questions right now surrounding this document that needs to be answered any good journalist should be saying let's find the answers to these questions because you know if if there's this proper investigation because look this document now calls into question the official justification that was used by u.s. elected officials to drop bombs on syria to the right back in april let's not forget it was a really major. donald did that and that speaks to the reputation of the o.p.c. they need that you know they need to come forward and say look here's why this was written this is why we didn't use these findings in the final report and there could be good explanations for that but right now we're getting. right but i think the thing that kind of bothers me is this well we this is about one incident and if

you can't have a conversation about one disputed incident then. then what's the point what's the point about any of it if you're just going to say whatever it is it is and that means every single time these things have happened this is this is who did it it was the assad regime it was you know this group it was the taliban it was something i mean i think the obvious the obvious reason you have to be really careful about saying that it might not be the assad regime is because of who we were army you know the u.s. was arming and other countries are arming in that area that suddenly there could be culpability one of the things i said so the head of russian military reconciliation center in syria. they had claims that they captured militants that admitted to having plans and making the plans of being part of the plans to stage chemical weapons attacks to make it look like you know which is you know just war that's that's what i mean there are those who have all my gosh it's a conspiracy there that you would even think that these things well but it

literally aspens on every war every. or somebody is making something up to point out something somebody actually did but maybe we didn't see them do it so there is always this like maybe they went too far to try to make sure it was him. the russian military head of the russian military is reconciliation southern syria also claimed that he admitted that the use of these militants 2 admitted to creating a special chemical waiting. to produce a stockpile toxic agents would make sense again if that's where they got them because as far as we know everything was was cleaned up everything was done but the state department of course contests that this is telling the media that the russian allegations are part of a continuing disinform a should campaign by the assad regime in russia to create the false narrative that others are to blame for chemical weapons attacks and that assad regime itself is conducting you know with all the narratives coming out of syria from every different side it's impossible to tell what is the truth so that's why it's important when you see these documents like this come out that people actually pay

attention to them and start asking important question which matters there's so much buzz that comes out of all different corners of the war exactly don't forget to let us know what you think of the prospects for the coverage of facebook and twitter and you tube and see our poll shows that are to dot com coming up in cutting edge d.n.a. technology helps solve the current immigration crisis at its worst so i just want to find out next we're joined by immigration attorney alan moore jewel staite to watch. this lake says and see if it's of

a high altitude nature or. it's one of the famous chito room indonesia's principal waterway starts its journey. but if you can be summed up to the top to bottom i've got a septic tank up. it runs 300 kilometers from source to mouth and there are over $200.00 industrial facilities ranged along as bangs. i'm out on your muscle. to do 3 things. i might get out of them and to be with. the room again scuba 4000 rice fields and supplies drinking water to 25000000 people. that the one point gets up to. so many of us about us from have a power. answering

and. the end of flag money no money with flags on it or a forger to tate or royal person good day. is a tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but that socialism has been faithfully implemented for inside venezuela things move different we're going to announce sanctions against the troll to venezuela associate. in the school have a son of the moment who flew down to something political data to say on a movie at the people of the moment the focus of the whose story isn't new nixon called in henry kissinger to tell him that it would not be tolerated in latin

america. an alternative economic and social system could take hold and therefore the policy would be to make. the chilean economy scream so wants to make the economy of venezuela screed. what holds. the shelves up. they get accepted or rejected. so when you want to express. something want to. watch it right. it's like. we did. just that all those are.

the issues between the united states federal government and the thousands of families from central american countries seeking asylum on the u.s. southern border are legion hawk watchers according to the department of homeland security one of the biggest difficulty is along the border is telling the difference between a legitimate family whatever that means seeking asylum and human traffickers pretending to be those families this is led to the d h s implementing new and controversial pilot program using rapid d.n.a. testing technology according to the washington post the standard methods for confirming kinship like interviewing applicants are obtaining official documents such as birth certificates are time consuming and imperfect rapid d.n.a. testing instead quote provides an objective expedient and failsafe method for

verifying family claims however many immigrant rights and the privacy advocates are concerned about the danger of the u.s. government using d.n.a. to help solve this particular border issue and the future ramifications it could have joining us now from new york to discuss is immigration attorney alan or jr thank you so much for joining us alan thank you for. ellen many are raising objections to using this kind of quick method of d.n.a. testing at the border i'm curious what what are the main objections and as an immigration attorney attorney do these do these objections hold water to you. absolutely the very 1st objects than is the family cannot be determined just by d.n.a. in many cases people have been adopted family units have been separated you might be with your and or your own goal because your parents have been murdered in these war torn areas so the conversation surrounding d.n.a. is the determiner of someone is the rightful heir of a child that's at the border with them is not really determined is most importantly

the d.n.a. test does not solve the solution of these people coming to the border what it does is just sort of people who are at the border and cause a bigger dilemma right and what our government has shown is that they can't even match 17000 kids they separated from families anymore that work every member so i really wouldn't trust them it's really determine if these people are families or not families that's not really addressing the issue in the testimony to congress we have known that people showing up the border has switched from individual males to women and their children so in most cases just like the other ports of entry we should determine that the immigrants we should take based on their analysis based on their just saying so that their family members because we're not testing in any other areas which is a civil rights violation number one and number 2 sort of testing these individuals and keeping the state information from children and from people who are not nationals of this country is an international coalition so it's very problematic. now this level of technology for d.n.a. testing is it's new to us immigration authorities you know genetic testing though

is not. and that leads me to the question that has come up over the last few years about the history of genetic testing immigrants and how this idea of your blood will tell us whether or not you are to be here or not can you tell me a little bit about that has straight and the problems it's caused in previous situations. well tons of promises that the tests were never actually correct right one thing is the expense of doing it that's not really the best use of our time and personal information of doing it so therefore that's why there are international laws against taking a person's d.n.a. because that's the very basis of that person's being and sort of sharing that as well as it's been used for other purposes and that's really the main concern from the civil rights that we don't know what they're using this testing for they claim that they're going to destroy it as soon as they determine who these family members are but that's problematic and in the united states history not with immigrants that came here voluntarily but with african-americans that. sticks out very rapidly of saying you were saying you were testing for one thing but these tests cost

something else in the african-american community and that's the major problem here we're not sure exactly what they're doing they're doing it with the contractor and we've seen time and time again that contractors fail us in these situations even with keeping the individuals and the children safe because they're being molested and raped so it's not the appropriate action for the federal government to take they should take the money that they're using for these d.n.a. testing and give it back to these communities to stop individuals from coming here to stop the push for that if it was coming here and then address it from that angle and then if someone's coming with a young child they should not violate that child's right or that parent's right by saying you know what let me d.n.a. test you and specifically when you're only doing it at the southern border not at the northern border or at the airplane you know it's interesting you know the main argument for the look we need to stop human trafficking you know we could you know if a family comes in a group of people come in and they all claim their family they could be lying they could they could actually be human traffickers and not going to what do you say to that argument you know what do what about that argument do you disagree with.

everything so if it's true about that at the at the southern border that it should be true about that of the northern border and at airports and at seaports right we're not doing that anywhere else but at the southern border but child trafficking happens everywhere it's not just at the southern border so if we're only concerned about one group of people is the real issue traffic smuggling i mean charles my. going or is it really something else and to me it has always been really something else when you treat one group of people or one couple of ports of entry different then you're treating the other ports and that's problematic just to give people a sense of idea of what happens let's say you know someone gets tested and there are a lot of these kids are coming from places like you mentioned earlier their foster kids there you know that might not be their parents bringing could be the one goal they could be adoptions i mean there's a 1000000 different things but they get their grandparents exactly to be their grandparents what what what happens the just so people have an idea what happens then of suddenly they decide ok your d.n.a.

doesn't match up you know we're just going to leave you in the desert like what is that how does this but then they separate those individuals and then the person the adult is as a smuggler that's just deemed in the wrong back then right we don't do that even in our country right somebody could adopt a child it's unheard of in any family court that this would be that sort of method that is used in determining a relationship or determining what a family means in a society if you want to say that this is science that's great but science is in determining what a family should it is so therefore it is irrational and very much not addressing the problem at the southern border if they are concerned about smuggling children and the welfare of children they will address the issues in the home country not at the port of entry and then after kids have been traumatized even if they are smuggled here then separating them again from some person that they're linked to becomes very problematic because that would be sorted in a very just system if there was a system at the border they were able to adjudicate these cases very rapidly and very simple things like you might not have your birth certificate you might not

have your passport that's very clear in areas that have been war torn or drugs or you have to flee in the middle of night you might not have those documents but the assessment is all of these people are criminals and that's the problem that the assessment of people showing up at the southern border who are illegally applying for asylum or criminals are valid in the law and that is wrong yeah i think it's really upsetting i think to a lot of people is the it's not. technology the d.n.a. testing technology can be wonderful it's you know we've seen of even the last month probably be 2 or 3 at least 2 possibly 3 or 4 you know 20 and 30 year old murder cases solved by using dan i we've seen you know families brought back together through d.n.a. tests but like you said i mean there are those there are those of us who if we were d.n.a. tested with who are say our parents are i mean every story from 23 and me tells you might be surprised with your real family your biological family and i think it's upsetting to a lot of people to this idea that we don't have money to test rape kits that are

going on tested in this country we don't know when to actually use it program models that you're saying you're trying to keep out but we're going to traumatize a bunch of kids now alan you've been in the immigration game for a long time are there but what are better methods for proving a familial relation and other than d.n.a. and how do we rethink that familial idea moving for about 2 minutes so here's the problem everybody thinks you need something new and different because they're making a situation that doesn't exist people are not rushing the border people are coming to the border and turning themselves over for the last 10 years since i've been practicing immigration for 25 years this is never been an issue so we have made an issue of saying there's the smuggler there's the super criminal so it's the criminalization of asylum at the southern border that is the problem so it really isn't that we need to do anything different we just need to continue to do things that we have done in the past such as interviewing the child and looking for the ship and then if you sort of work the system in

a race that's how systems and you sort of check it but most importantly what we should not do is say that this is just an issue at these ports if we really care about children everywhere we should do it across all the courts i couldn't agree more because it let you serve it if this is really about child trafficking at the end of the bay then you would be doing this with all the ports you would be would be saying you know we're going to implement d.n.a. testing on the northern border that used to be west of all the major airport international airports perimeter. given that you would see this being put into place but when you don't see it and then you see this words it's just those folks down so it's just those folks coming up from central and south of mexico and the americas there because you know as someone coming from sweden you are not worried if you're from sweden that's mexico isn't exactly you know central america so yeah i do so like i one thing that the bothers me about using this d.n.a. stuff it really goes back to there's a bad history in this country you know with native americans and people this idea of one blood and with african-americans this idea of one drop then you're this or

you have to be a certain percentage it's very problematic to favor leave it is very problematic and plus at the end of the day i'm sorry but i can't for all of the missteps that homeland security and i use and all that we've seen commit over the last you know 1015 years i do not trust as you mentioned earlier with this d.n.a. database because these agencies share information when they're not supposed to be for every one of these people now getting tested that d.n.a. could end up being used against them something that they never even. wanted to give their d.n.a. to to begin with it's absolutely ridiculous you know i got to say thank you so much for coming today it's it's always wonderful to hear your perspective on these issues and keep up the great work. thank you for having me. well it will be some time before humans step foot on mars you could have your name there with a little help from nasa that's right the u.s. space agency is launching its next to mars rover in 2020 which will represent the

1st leg officially in the ultimate goal of putting earthlings on the red planet to commemorate the mission nasa is opening submissions to the public to have their name engraved on silicon chips inside the 20 $300.00 pound rover which will be studying the geology and climate of mars as well as looking for signs of past alien life each coin sized chip will be able to hold. 1000000 names with each name about $1000.00 the width of a human hair in addition you will get a souvenir boarding pass. so don't delay because you know later the deborah 30 had to be a part of this momentous journey which is expected to land with my name on it on mars in 5 area of 20th. i'm go and you're going to go my name your name was there that's the stuff that's the step to have of you told me time and again that you would like to be a bars one day that you'd like to do to. give the opera the moon space there's an

army of a as i'm open to anywhere in the space general retired and here are so she is ready to go to america i'm ready to start everybody not out of our growth for the best remember ever whatever this world we are about told you about that up so i tell you all right well i am tired rolled on top a lot of people are watching all those hawks out there and over a great big. dish you will not obey the voice. and the statutes. in all these courses shall come upon you and oh thank you. and then the white people. and the point must be returned to black people if they get rid of whites

only. the. presence of the. white farmers in south africa will be a day every single day. to what you did expect. in the. mania somebody if somebody. in the. white horse will find themselves affected by credit and. means in greens it's all sweat and blood of. what are you going to have for dinner should they be doing it they need to be asking for a. bad. civil war in south africa. roger federer. was there any chong not be in the toyota and to get to.

facebook and google started with a great idea and great ideals unfortunately there was also a very dark side. they are constructing a profile of you and that profile is real it's detailed and it never goes away turns out that google is manipulating your opinions from the very 1st character that you type into the search bar it will always favor one dog food over another one comparative shopping service over another and one candidate over another they can suppress certain types of results on what they think you should be seen if they have this kind of power then democracy is it an illusion the free and fair election

doesn't exist for the more growth we give the sooner we are all pain. clinics and others financial survival jobs today with all the money laundering 1st to visit this business in the 3 different. oh good this is a good start well we have our 3 banks all set up here maybe. something to do something in america something overseas in the cayman islands or do we do all these banks are complicit in the. poll and say hey i'm ready to do some serious money laundering ok let's see how we did while we've got home got a nice watch for max and for stacy oh beautiful jewelry and how about. luxury automobile again from that you know what money laundering is highly illegal for a bunch of guys of course.

live. leg. live. live. live. live. oh. please.

live. live. live. and very well welcome to you you're watching us inside. i. found out that said there was a lie here. this just simply didn't i was

a. little it didn't sound so. simple. geodes attack syrian army positions in the province using tanks and vehicles filled with explosives get a simple rebranding exercise is apparently absolved from the west sides. also this hour a new study reveals that hundreds of widely sold the e.u. products from clothes and makeup to children's toys. food chemicals. counting is underway in the world's biggest election with india's prime minister the opposition what's being billed of battle between a man of the people.