really those are the things that cause overweight diabetes arthritis chronic skin infections allergies things like that that's the precursor for a lot of that if you're feeling point attrition and they're eating a lot of those things that mess with the body they just don't stay healthy economy as it is that there are those the things that you find in dog food or you're talking to people who are giving table food to know it's and on food. during the war there was a moratorium on using the metal cans for canned food so they said you can't use metal cans for dog food anymore you have to use that for ammunition. as somebody said we need to make the dog food something we could put in a paper bag and that's how they did it and nobody thought at that time that making a camel and eventually the way that we process it now could ever be a help detriment to the dogs. now because of the way that the world is

corn and wheat have become so subsidized and so chain it's a super cheap way to make a food for somebody who can't say no it's a good thing there's definitely an epidemic of problems now in animals that i don't think we've seen anything like it in in history every animal that comes in to see me they'll say oh they're basically healthy but the list of problems is immense so it's not that they're healthy they're actually suffering from sed many many maladies a lot of the same maladies that we see in people we have animals that have you know diabetes in arthritis they have auto immune disorders they've got allergies and part of the reason for that is because we are actually creating these problems it's a huge epidemic of problems all of them i believe can be linked to very simple problem of diet. and.

i have heard for the top 10. to 12 years old you know you don't know a 12 year old you know why you know the 12 years old because your parents feel extra food if you put this down have you think arrows just write on it absolutely the best and i can imagine they're so excited about it and it's gone. and i worry about them eating raw food and then liking me now i do not know this but if because the fact is. there aren't any happening. here. i think raw food is is weird to a lot of people when i 1st mentioned it to people they sort of say raw food i have to feed raw food to make my diet healthy like are you crazy and i well you know you don't have to do it it'll make a difference in make a huge difference. and one of my hobbies and passions is wildlife rehabilitation.

this is her did. you see. i have been fascinated with nature and life something can remember. i became a license to wildlife rehabilitator when i was 14 and i knew that i would have a life long career helping animals all when i was 14 i heard about a woman that had tremendous success with wildlife rehabilitation name is barbara harvey and she was in a hurry kind of concent and i called her and i said barbara my name is karen bakker and 14 years old and i want to know how you became so successful long story short she invited me to her home in her account wisconsin she lives in a beautiful log cabin during the winter months and she lives in a teach me on 3rd. makers during the summer months she invited me to live. on her

13 acres and see how she rehabilitates cox eagles i was and. barbara has the best success rate in the country with the raptors and the reason she has such success she feeds biologically appropriate all. living mice rabbits rodents to those animals to be able to help the body recover from injury. so when i went to veterinarian school years later and i sat to these nutrition courses and when they gave me the laminated chart that told me what food i should feed with what disease process things did not add up. before i went to vet school i worked for years in zoo medicine. the most important thing i think i learned from that is every species has its own requirement to teach species must eat what it is supposed to eat it's developed evolved to have

a specific diet that keeps it healthy. each animal has its own biologic requirement for certain nutrients a species appropriate diet for worms is dirt and a species appropriate diet let's say for hummingbirds would be nectar if you can't feed earthworms nectar and you can feed hummingbirds sturt both of those animals would simply die it gets pretty confusing with dogs and cats however because dogs and cats are nutritionally much more resilient than other species and what that means is that we can nutritionally abuse them for lack of a better term and they don't die immediately they just have the overall vitality decline and overall degenerative changes take place in their bodies from feeding them food that are not biologically appropriate cats being obligate carnivores have to consume meat to be able to thrive they do not have a biologic requirement for any type of carbohydrate have a very high protein require a very high moisture requirement and a moderate fat requirement. cats originally we were domesticated to guard the grain

race because cats don't consume green cats consume ice that consume the grain and so by domesticated cats we assume that there was a mutually beneficial relationship we do know in the last 100 years since we have produced cat foods on the market that cats have experienced significantly more kidney disease and we know that they have experienced obesity. failure and diabetes at a much higher rate and certainly we need to begin evaluating what role nutrition has in some of those degenerative diseases kidney disease is the number one killer of cats and we know that asking cats to process and entirely do you hate rated food such as kibble can be very detrimental to kidney health dogs evolved from the gray wolf and we know that dogs came. out of the order carnivora which means they're carnivores in 1903 the international society as a logic nomenclature redefined. familial laris as just these are the

people that define what category what taxonomy animals fit into and why this society concluded that dogs were genetically identical to wolves they shared 99.9 percent of the d.n.a. we know that geno typically the genome type the d.n.a. is identical to what has changed over the last 2 to 3400 years is the phenotype phenotype is the jacket which is what looked like we have dogs dogs of blue eyes dogs with crazy types of here in the body and no hair anywhere else dogs short legged dogs double coated dogs we've created these fantastic varieties of breeds because we like diversity in what we see despite the fact that we have bred dogs to have certain characteristics we have not bred out of their cane as lupus d.n.a. so yes just as you can have brown hair. or you can have blue eyes green eyes brown

eyes your nutritional requirements as a human being remain the same despite the fact that you look past the different depending on what your d.n.a. dictates. as we speak large organized. are on the march to the united states. and a player coming out for carrying. those forms remains slaughtering. this

is a virtual invasion of our country. so far. in the form of. you know it's going to fit in. a nice powerful. as you do is you know we're going to see a more. noticed. the . the. i don't want to talk to a communist news agency forgive me we'll have to find someone to.

well with the trying to stay with this one stick. of the going to be just like the jews this is exactly when my father. died. so i. see him through that which.

we have to do the best. i think i acknowledge the time to come to this fight. it's an indication of how important most movements are. so that it's also good because we have a move towards we are definitively winning it because we have the people they have people in power but we are in the month. that's geysers financial survival guide liquid out those that you can convert that's quite easily. to keep in mind though as a team into a place of. record. it's hard to take so from. somebody if you know have something to replace it. they

want to do this interview today at our dues market and that may take me. 4 years ago there. so i'm going to use dot selling drugs if we'll have some to put the money in it back. then just me all the way in life with all my skin basically my colors fisa for an hour. do you guys know what sickened me security systems i've been in that day or jack me again. you see people get all their cars and i'll see you coming in the heart and it seems like they'll hurry up and run into the house like they don't want to they don't want to talk to your get your mail or anything like that. i just want to go. and then. ride just try

renaming. me now and now it's chance someone give me. the major companies criticize raw diets morning consumers against the hazards of feeding romita pets claiming it can make your animal sick. however those companies who repeatedly criticize feeding raw diet have yet to produce a single study to provide any substantial evidence to support their claims. the problem with the types of research studies that you are describing they would go at least 7 day to 10 years in length before you would get a definitive answer within our. legal requirements and framework said it's not f.d.a. is responsibility to do such studies the research has not been done on raw foods not because there is an interest but because the $1000000.00 it takes to fund that part. the research simply isn't there the integrated veterinarians are working on

that but trisha veterinarians will say and how we see the research we're not interested in recommending this particular food for dog and cat owners we just don't believe it's safe and healthy the frustration is is that we don't have clinically proven research demonstrating that dry and canned foods are wildly healthier for pets as well. the larger corporations are not very interested in proving or disproving the value of their food because they're already making a $1000000000.00 on it and there's no reason to do that research since major companies are involved with and have influence over vet student lack of education surrounding role diets ready exist heavily among traditional vets when clients come to veterinarians who have not been educated about raw foods at all and say i'm considering feeding my pets raw meat of course the logical conclusion is why there's a lot of bacteria in the raw diet and it's kind of a ticking time clock if you could harm them or why would you do that or it's risky

i think we're all food as too much of the potential for negative side effects that it's just not worth it people's biggest question is there could be. pathogens or bacteria parasites within the food that could cause illness to pets when dogs eat raw diets their feces their poop has a lot of bacteria. let's talk about. dogs if given the opportunity will eat. dogs and cats being carnivores are equipped to be able to process their evolutionary food source which is raw meat. all of their digestion has acclimated and has evolved to be able to process whole living unadulterated protein so from ripping and tearing their dentition is set up to be able to process meat their stomach acid is very acidic. in fact

a ph of water which is highly acidic that stomach acid is in place to be able to neutralize pathogens or potential harmful bacteria that could be present in the food coming outside the pet food industry looks like the perfect industry there are beautiful packaging there are diets for every disease in disorder there's all kinds of different colors and futile pictures and if you look a little deeper unfortunately it isn't the pet food industry it's all about. i've collected a few examples here and we're going to go over some labels but 1st example is the food that on the front says be strong meals fully prepared bursting with flavor who doesn't want that in a pet food 1st a previous corn 2nd ingredient is soybean meal 30 mg reading is beast and bone meal for think gradient is growing wheat followed by animal fat preserve ha we can see they are the ha is the toxic preservative that should not be found in any human or pet foods despite the fact that it is the 1st 3 ingredients are carbohydrates that

are totally unnecessary followed by a totally toxic preservatives so cute back now to our. next we have a food that has one actually several packaging awards because it's so beautiful there are chunks of meat falling from the sky and i believe that your core here we have a nice array of radioactive colors that have been added in for you the consumer dogs and cats cannot see all these different colors this is added in because you get my cash it looks beautiful my pet would love it but the amazing buzzwords like a full light. one doesn't want their pet to have a playful life this is just entirely a marketing 1st thing greeting it around yellow for totally biologically unnecessary getting greedy and you can buy products meal totally rendered inappropriate in terms of quality to be nourishing your dog with turning green corn gluten meal very allergenic totally unnecessary for think the whole wheat. flower

and then animal fat although this really looks to be beautiful and something you'd be interested in nursing your cat well my recommendation is to avoid it over here and they have a special latte right to help with prebiotic fiber there's a lot of these patented words that are trademark words that companies will use to how kind of distorted their products will be something special included as a means of you coming back and buying it because other brands you're comparing it to doesn't have to help it's so good marketing on that because this particular food is below us quality if you are a goat. when you add up organic from rice organic oats organic millet organic barley or get a grain storage forget it peas organic potatoes. portion of the ingredients in this particular food doesn't outweigh the organic chicken or the chicken me i'm healthy i'm really what are you supposed to say unhealthy the worst possible food

in my opinion you could feature doggy. number one ingredient beef byproducts. a fruit toast corn syrup what is byproduct byproduct is what's left over after an animal has been slaughtered and all the edible parts have been removed the criticism was in the ministry of the meat being used. what is quality quality is a term used when discussing how good or bad the world material that goes into the food actually is whether this protein comes from diseased animals euthanize animals kill human food waste processing the industry doesn't have to disclose the source of being green yet. that doesn't prevent them from easily proclaiming that every ounce of their pet food is of the highest quality. the issue is on the back of the dog and cat food bank it doesn't say render terrible quality protein it doesn't say that it also we also can't list legally grow. a u.s.d.a.

inspected me so this leaves this giant gap for the consumer to have to fill in that void and it's wildly confusing the controversy with kibble exist because dry food is 4 weeks of moisture. when your animal eats tried food they're put in a permanent state of dehydration the quality insourcing of where the ingredients came from is kept secret even if the ingredients were perfect the manufacturing process to make any product shelf stable for extended periods is performed at extraordinary high temperatures. this creates 2 potent carcinogens that are cyclical means in acrylic mind however most companies do not disclose to the consumer what temperature their foods are cooked at and they act as if the trace amounts of carcinogens pose no threat it was a real 948 when veterinarian mark morris decided to create the 1st person correction pet food still recognizable today at the time it was critical of pet

foods for lacking quality ingredients and he wanted to make a superior product backed by scientific research he teamed up with canning manufacturer burton hill to fulfill his vision. the result became what we know today is science diet sold in that meringue offices all across the country. but in 2013 the wall street journal reported hills was starting to see its profits decline because consumers no longer identified with their ingredients. science diet has since refocused on rebranding their image as more natural creating new product lines and shying away from controversial in rendered ingredients the national renders association argues that they're providing a necessary role when it comes to the recycling of animal carcasses. if there wasn't anywhere to put the animal waste from the human food industry where would it go in the earth in the air. in the ocean. it

all has to go somewhere. we have a huge quality control problem meaning the quality of ingredients coming into the industry anything from potentially fabulous u.s.d.a. inspected human grade all the way down to entirely rendered which is every piece and part you could ever imagine actually probably don't even want to think about the final result is used to manufacture hundreds of products everything from so few channels and the foods to cosmetics that the companies blend those recital their gradients together with synthetic by them and then arose to create a profitable quote complete and balanced diet that is then marketed to tell and in 100 years time we have successfully convinced an entire generation of pet lovers that why would you feed anything but dog food for cats looking at the rules that guide the pet food industry it's easy to see how they are set up to benefit the

corporations over the consumer. the regulators have created special terminology for packages assuming that consumers would be able to guess what they mean any product containing the words dinner no good or formula only have to contain 25 percent actual meat any product labeled with only has to contain 3 percent me furthermore the so-called slaver rule a levels for any protein to be listed on the back it may be flavored as me but in reality the back that contains the word flavor may contain little to no meat by using the key word slavery on the package the pet food could but does not have to contain any meat at all but it's acceptable for the package to contain an image of a fresh state in green panels to display a percentage of the protein percentages do not represent actual meat content in the product as protein can come from a multitude of sources. this raises the question if the average consumer knows that

the terminology used on packages reveal the exact amounts of meat used in food trying to understand who exactly makes these rules and what their actual legal authority is leads to many different organizations the association of american feed control officials is a non-governmental organization they have a model bill that that sets the standards in terms of ingredients nutrient levels package labeling in terms of ingredients as well for pet food companies to abide by each year members of africa come together to update their official publication which defines each ingredient that's allowed to go into pet food. members of the major pet to companies attend the meetings as well allowing their voice to be heard when it comes to what goes into pet food. so who is apt. i think if you look at our web sites we have some very clear statements about the fact that after 0 is not a regulatory organization itself that's one thing important the 2nd is that code

doesn't approve products well we do is we deal with the ingredients in the scientific validation if you will of the ingredients that go into the food and then the actual claim that a manufacturer makes it is after all approved is probably not representing what but asco itself would say f.d.a. has worked closely with after 0 on the regulation of all animal feeds not just pet food i think the important thing to remember is f.d.a. is a true regulatory authority were after 0 is an association of state feed controls or shills when you look at the aft coal manual i think you really begin to see how the interests of africa and the pet food industry alive actually putting together a list of ingredients that you would want to see and that was that you would want your pets to eat and then forcing that on the industry they've done it in reverse and basically just accepted the standards that the industry has been using for years and i'm quoting now use of the term work. claim natural and pet food labels

so if i want to use the word natural on my dog food labels sure are the rules and i'm quoting this forbade him a feed or ingredient drives solely from plant animal or mind source either and it's unprocessed state or having been subject to physical process heat process rendering sure if acacia extraction except it goes on and essential e these are all definitions of the antithesis of natural. my 7 years doing drugs my nephews was still in drugs my system just with doing

drugs it was like an epidemic of drug abuse america's public enemy number one in the united states is drug abuse is sort of going after the users in the prison population who are we started treating sick people people who are addicted to these drugs like criminals while i was on the hill. with the war on drugs. with numbers of people who are in prison for. its citizens for war owner or offenders in the drug trade it's a lot watching your children grow up and miss you in wave and say by day as you're walking out of a business it's just it doesn't get easier. during the great depression which i'm old enough to remember that it was and most of my family were unemployed working pushed there wasn't it was bed you know much worse subject to listen today but there was. an expectation of the things are going to get better. there was

a real sense of hopefulness there isn't today today's america where shade by the turn principles of concentration of wealth and power. reduced democracy attack solo do no engineer elections manufacture consent and other principles according to no on. one set of rules for the rich officer said. that's what happens when you put her into the. narrows of wilf which will is dedicated to increasing power for chills just as you'd expect one of the most influential intellectuals of our time speaks about the modern civilization of america. i think the reason that they have not attacked iran so far it's not that they

didn't want but i would say that they couldn't do it top as thinking of a short and quick war with iraq but i would say that that would not be the case tom said that if they wanted to they would have killed about $150.00 people in the brain and sides but the question comes to me is that americans a time a country in the past by nuclear bombs do they really care about killing 150 feet. ideally. of a bus but. you see close. you

know when you're either going to. give me a little to make you feel weak you're. going to trump becomes the 1st u.s. president to enter north korea meeting came to the moon demilitarized zone but sanctions against pyongyang are set to continue. i'm looking forward to taking them off i don't like the sanctions being on this country and i'm looking forward but the sanctions remain you're still. i mean the stories that shake the week russia and the united states seek to overcome their differences as putin and trump sit down for talks at the g 20 summit in japan. the meeting was good and businesslike we discussed a whole range of issues that are of interest to russia and the united states and we had a discussion we had a great actually we had a great discussion president.