president trump warns iran to be careful as a plans a further boost of its you very much and program potentially breaking the 2015 nuclear deal for a 2nd time and drawn condemnation from e.u. nations and the u.s. . foreign minister blames europe for failing to secure the agreement or stop washington's unilateral withdrawal. of the stories that shaped the russia is a tribute to the 14 sailors who were killed in a fire on a nuclear submarine in the barents sea on monday. and as tanks rolled through the streets of washington and zoomed through the skies on july the 4th donald trump continues to come under fire for militarizing u.s.

independence day celebrations. live from moscow watching weekly on r.t. international i'm daniel hawkins review tonight welcome to the program. a president trump is warning iran to be careful after it announced plans to accelerate its uranium enrichment program and the $3.00 percentage gap stipulated in the 2050 nuclear agreement for energy reasons. i. think you. will want. to ron is already considered to be in breach of the deal after it's a passed the $300.00. limits officials there also recently ruled out further dialogue with washington and less sanctions are lifted iran's deadline for that

house now passed europe was only able to provide limited relief from the effects of the financial penalties as part of that agreement signed 4 years ago iran curb its nuclear program in return for a number of sanctions being removed the accord split on the brink of collapse since the u.s. unilaterally withdrew from it last year and reimposed devastating penalties on. your slate a crisis has triggered serious concern in the region in europe as well arty's donald quarter has been following the reaction for us in belin. eva's leaders are not exactly happy about iran's new plans for uranium enrichment germany's foreign ministry has already urged the islamic republic to stop any actions that might lead it into a violation of the nuclear deal germany like her a 3 in new partners is extremely concerned by the rance announcement that it has begun enriching uranium beyond the concentration of 3.67 percent we've repeatedly called and ran out to take further measures that further undermine the nuclear deal

now berlin's already said that it's also been in close contact with other parties involved in the agreement and that they're discussing the possibility of a joint meeting as a step forward in ensuring compliance with the nuclear deal now other evil states have also reacted as well the u.k. foreign office called on iran to immediately stop what it was doing accusing them of being in violation of the treaty across the channel you have french president emanuel macron who warned of consequences that would come out of the potential weakening of the nuclear deal and on the flip side iran's foreign minister mohammad is saying that iran is pursuing these further enrichment plans within the confines of the nuclear deal and that they would reverse this decision if the e.u. holds up its end of the bargain having failed to implement their obligations under the j c p o a including after the u.s. withdrawal the e.u. and a 3 should at the very minimum politically support iran's remedial measures on the

paragraph $36.00 including the i.a.e.a. the ether we have no pretext to avoid a firm political systems to preserve the j c p o a and council us you know naturalism nazareth also sent a letter to the e.u.'s foreign policy chief outlining the steps iran has already taken and the foreign ministry is in to supporting meetings with european powers to take place later this month so if it looks at least like the e.u. and iran are open to see. some sort of resolution to this issue israel on the other hand has had some pretty inflammatory words iran is violated its solemn promise under the un security council not to enrich uranium beyond a certain level the enrichment of uranium is made for one reason and one reason only it's for the creation of atomic bombs. the leaders of the p 5 plus one promised and committed themselves to snap back sanctions the minute iran did it just did where you are and who is staying out of the negotiations well that's the

u.s. of course with washington still withdrawn iran's latest expansion of its nuclear program will lead to further isolation and sanctions nations should restore the longstanding standard of know in richmond for iran's nuclear program iran's regime armed with nuclear weapons would pose an even greater danger to the world well it's pretty amazing when you pull out of the deal when you break a deal and you cue to the side that remains in the deal of breaking the deal it was the west to broker a deal by unilaterally pulling out last year and on what planet do you get to continue taking the terms of the deal that you've already broken out of the fact of the matter is if you do study the j c p a way very closely the main import foreign minister is right there is article 36 which says if the other signatories to the deal do not fulfill their obligations under the deal and they have it neither side have neither the us know the europeans then iran can't take certain measures within the deal remaining in the deal so the

reporting that iran has broken the deal is just not accurate the whole idea when when iran exceeded the 300 kilograms they exceeded that because the us on may 6th suspended the waivers allowing them to sell their excess enrich uranium so they couldn't sell it in the u.s. said ah ha you got too much of it so the whole thing is rigged the neo calls around trump the want of war they're pushing it forward to pushing it further and the pushed. same propaganda they pushed when they wanted their war with iraq. or the blow to the pact comes as tensions also rise between iran and the u.k. the latest dispute was triggered when british royal marines seize the iranian super tanker off the coast of jubran thursday britain believes the vessel was transporting oil to syria violating e.u. sanctions iran claims the vessel didn't enter u.k. territorial waters and it was traveling to a permitted destination it's the morning it's immediate release. an iranian foreign

ministry official described the u.k. move was unacceptable and called for the immediate release of the oil tanker given that has been seized at the request of the u.s. the u.k. navy's measure is tantamount to maritime piracy britain has no right to impose its own unilateral sanctions or those of the european union in an extra territorial manner against the other countries this is the very bullying policy of the u.s. gibraltar says they were in a tank it was carrying 2000000 barrels of oil the british overseas territories attorney general said on friday the ship can be compared impounded for 14 days what its crew is question the sieges been praised by washington though which according to spain was behind the move. it along was korean to stop we have been aware of the operation civil guard petrols have been watching the area but were investigating the circumstances under which the us said this petition to the u.k. to excell news uki has detained the supertanker greece one laden with the rain or

oil ban for syria in violation of e.u. sanctions american our allies will continue to prevent regimes in turan in damascus from profiting off this illicit trade every few weeks we are seeing major provocations by the americans but they're sending drones or warship towards iran and now this incident where the british are actually acting on behalf of the americans what gives the british the right to see any iranian share based on european laws iran is not a member of the e.u. it's the trump government decided to leave the nuclear accord the americans have been pressuring iran putting significant pressure on iran and iran has actually been acting in a very relatively cautious manner and we have to understand that you want to not shore we strained forever and we knew such as this where you raining ships are being seized illegally they cannot it actually want. you want to do nothing in

return if you want there's nothing in return then they will put more pressure and more pressure. russia has been remembering the 14 sailors who were killed in a fire on a research some marine in the barents sea on monday 7 of the victims were high ranking maybe officers to have been possibly decorated with the country's highest honor of the russian federation with a closer look at the tragedy here is what goes there. on the 1st of july deep below russia's barren see the unthinkable happened 5 a russian scientific research vessel mapping the sea floor was suddenly a death trap alarms bled hatcher's was shut and locked and the crew in the burning compartments sacrificed their lives to put out the blaze they succeeded the vessel and their colleagues were saved but 14 men all decorated veterans suffocated

and they did more than save the submersible you know. on the nuclear power unit on this vessel is completely isolated now and no people are being allowed there plus the crew implemented all necessary activities to protect this unit and it is in full working order the investigation stablish in what happened how it happened is being led by russia's navy head with the president personally being kept informed the dead will all be on a post you mostly the northeast a hostile place people afraid to ask the. difficulty of hardship the distance of her is that it's traditionally the new day when you come up to this memorial dedicated cooled sailors perished that see during peacetime. the food. and the battles earlier this week for 3 to see the movie it is.

one of the crew is the blaze began i should a civilian through an open hatch shutting it behind him to prevent the inferno from spreading that was the caliber of men abroad that vessel was all those who knew them attest that it will be with the course the coaching for 10 years we were studying in the same school with dimitri he was an example of a true friend a classmate he was self-motivated. always in the thick of events that's how we will remember him and even his final act characterized just who he was me and my classmates were not surprised he didn't hesitate for a moment he did everything possible and saved someone's life. dimitri was a good man a good friend knowing him and his human qualities i think he would never have acted differently he simply couldn't. he as he was a very responsible person so it was no surprise for us that he too the. condolences

poured in from all over the world from the pope to britons theresa may russians in the thousands lit candles and held commemorative ceremonies the government has done its duty the widows and families of those killed will be compensated not that money could replace their loss by the seat of the 14 dad and 7 our top ranking captains to our heroes of russia this is a big loss for the fleet i offer sincere condolences to the families of the deceased everything must be done to help and support them and the good men perished on that day veterans courageous and noble the best of the best as they say in the navy and there must be justice the public wants answers which the investigation should provide so that this never happens again. you

know it is that celebrated independence day on thursday marking 243 years since the cost of the ego of british rule over the u.s. continuing to struggle with deep divisions this year's 4th of july didn't pass without controversy. 6 well the day began with clashes in washington d.c.'s left wing protest this faced off against the president's supporters ahead of his address the nation donald trump so cool salute to america then saw a show of military might in the u.s. capital and what the former reality t.v. star called the show of a lifetime. and many in the media and politics condemned the decision to involve tanks and jets in the ideal celebrations they accuse trump of wasting huge amounts of money and using the event for political gain out of next year's election.

we're going to have planes going over as fighter jets in the world and other planes to. have some time stationed outside. to make it into work seems to be kind of a combination from. military. hardware and equipment. c.n.n. has learned that some military chiefs have expressed reservations about politicizing the july 4th celebration concerned about the tanks and armored vehicles on this plane.

that make sense. this is the marine major battle giant good for. our wall many were upset about the tank parade on independence day concerns about america's unparalleled military spending seem to be somewhat more muted as the u.s. has been involved in 7 conflicts since 2001 it's got all the bases in over 30

countries just last year the pentagon splurged the jaw dropping $649000000000.00 on its operations despite washington's attempts to inspire feelings of patriotism particularly under the current administration it seems the national pride could be on the decrease according to recent gallup polls that's been the trend since 2003 but this year the number of people who say they're proud to be american dropped to 70 percent sara flounders head of the antiwar international action center says the theme of this year's parade reflects washington's focus this. everyone know this and live right and it's also what casting more than $800.00 u.s. military bases around the world outside. threaten countries when you have to i mean an artist costs more than 65 percent of all knowledge of all u.s. expenditures u.s.

expenditures federal government low the military machine i don't very time went into structure health care education is all declining and when the gap between rich or higher than it any time in u.s. history. the u.n. security council's call for a cease fire in libya following a deadly airstrike on a migrant detention center near the capital tripoli on tuesday night the attack which the u.n. envoy to libya has said may amount to a war crime killed over 50 people including 6 children 130 others were wounded compounding the devastation some reports suggest the guard at the facility fired on surviving margarets refugees as they fled at the time of the assault some 600 people were being held there the u.n. has called for an independent investigation into the incident the air raid has led to protests over the conditions in libya's government run the tension centers which house around 6000 people the shelters have been sharply criticized by rights groups

refugees are also calling on the u.n. to relocate them to safety. libya's u.n. backed government which is based in tripoli has been blamed has blamed rather the attack on forces loyal to the self-styled libyan last alarm either come on the board warlords and even have to the other one has denied any responsibility for the un's refugee agency has said it warned of the dangers to people housed in that particular center. this is a tragedy that was very much preventable just a couple of months ago we called for the curation of people from this specific detention center after a similar strike to the people inside. the no action was taken in that regard and people have tragically paid the consequence with their lives today warden it's of this detention center. both sides a conflict. that there was 600 people living inside so there

can be no excuse for this to having been here. we heard from a senior member of the u.n. refugee rights office for libya who says the focus needs to now be on those who remain in the. show by what happened saddened and now the priority is to actually take the people who remain in this center to a safer location as the other 3800 refugees and migrants who are men trapped in this area refugees are coming from conflict from countries in conflict they have suffered in their home countries they have traveled through the desert under the sun and they have been in the hands of smugglers tortured abuse along the journey then trying to retrieve trying to cross the desert to the mediterranean and then send back and tainted schematically you any opposes detention of refugees this is why it's important that we move fast that we that we find solutions and that we

have the help of the international community to help us make this a reality to discuss and to find a way forward. not yet appointed already in the firing line germany. is the nomination to become the next head of the e.u. polls in her native country though don't point to her being a popular choice for the powerful role going to girls who says he regrets the way the block is selected his potential successor. there are transcript. but the prose. which led to my nomination in 2004 did was very transparent because we had looked at the dates everyone knew worked with it but if. the would be the shortest power to do a proponent it's a vision to come back to earth unfortunately didn't become a tradition and current german defense minister has at least got the backing of e.u. nation leaders it seems but all sort of on the land will need the approval of

a hefty $376.00 i mean pays a little bit on the nominee she's known for being a federalist supports the creation of a single european sovereign nation as an e.u. army if elected she'd become the 1st woman to head the commission which has also helped game supports as mentioned i don't everyone is sold on her candidacy after the traditional nomination system was scrapped to push closer to being the next e.u. chief. doesn't have the right to ignore all the candidates that have been voted for by european citizens the future of europe can no longer be decided behind closed doors border lame is our weakest minister that's apparently enough to become commission president. if wonderingly and fails to be elected as head of the commission by the parliamentary year of priests a possible constitutional crisis so i find it a very charming idea to the face of europe be female in the future that's what i think we have to grow what problem are not democracy. leading how do.

you see her becoming the. most but what. the president was the european commission and all. the different. second thing is. all about. the squire. and the mormons there is the investigation. on her art salt god. or external units. people from outside the ministry in the summer of 200000000 euro political decisions can be regarded as. democratic if one of 2 conditions are is met the population has to be involved in the actual decision making in some meaningful way or 2nd.

political decisions must reflect popular preferences now funded lines nomination doesn't lead to either cried personally. yes it's undemocratic by the standards. disney has a live action remake of the children's classic little mermaid will star black actress halle bailey in the lead role casting a spark some big debates. after an extensive search it was abundantly clear that halle possesses that rare combination of spirit heart youth innocence and substance plus a glorious singing voice all intrinsic qualities necessary to play this iconic role . in 989 disney released its animated adaptation of the famous fairy tale written by hans christian andersen and that version ariel was blue eyed red haired and white some argue the new version should stay true to that film but others say

having a black lead is a win for diversity. the actress cast is areal can sing act dance and is beautiful but racists yes that extreme irritation you feel is racism or like mermaids can be black will crabs can talk so we're all stretching here shut up fat box the little mermaid lives on a tropical coral reef with a calypso signal to the strong jamaican accent when you think about it it's bizarre she was white the 1st time around there goes my favorite princess can't believe the just 3 my favorite princess she has a beautiful voice but if she's playing aereo i'm going to be she doesn't fit the look at all could you imagine the uproar of the cast a white actress to play tiana in a live action remake i just don't understand why is this necessary we've got opposing opinions on whether modern diversity should trump original cinema when it comes to race. or that what people are trying to do is trying to bring people back

to a certain kind of reality that we live in a very diverse society and to try and present as if you like to try and normalize that because what happened before was that we had a society which those people were excluded or if they were presented they were presented as before they were prevented in of course in the translation that we can derogatory to them we bring race to the forefront and make it an issue when it really isn't an issue i think it's a very dangerous precedent and i think it is think it really is not. i think it's really not about the inclusive idiot that your other guest discussed discusses i think it's really a leftist agenda to divide us and keep us from working together and i think the people who are over concerned about his presentation are trying to as they said they want something they're used to but in the challenge i challenge is if you tell us why you think they think they think they should be like a princess can be black and what we want to do where is not the line on that so

every every single hollywood movie made from now on must have a gay person a jewish person a black person and hispanic person and all we're probably better represent all that population so let's say a puerto rican person a cuban person and i don't know there are people here from from our other countries too should we should we just make sure now that every single movie has every single race religion color size socio economic level where do you draw the lying if you look at the history of hollywood birth of a nation it started off really badly with the original 1st feature film been a racist film which used skin color in a negative way of course there should be a good story line but also a film can do most positive things and i think we have to move beyond being obsessed by the fact that we live in a society that is proud to support diversity we do live in a society that does have problems around racism in american society has that and i think that the people who are denying it are people who are not willing to begin to really talk about challenging it we had some be called dylan roof to walk into

a black church and short of a body i'm sorry there's been a number of shootings in on that basis these a tragic tragic things we had a black president black billionaires all over the place all sorts of hispanic people in positions of power i would hope that no one would not like this character based on that they might not like the idea of it being imposed they might feel that it's a little bit racist to say oh well we have to have a princess be a certain color. i don't think that makes them a racist i think that makes them somebody that just wants the best person for the job to be chosen whether it's a movie or a corporate venture i think the best person should always be chosen regardless of their skin color or anything else because of a half hour of news at 7 am most kids on right now those that shoot for crosstalk.

join me every thursday on the excitement chill and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sport i'm sure i'll see of that. if you will not obey the voice of the lord your god will be careful to do all the school long months and. then all these curses shall come upon you and overtake you. and then the white people. and the point must be returned to let. you get rid of whites only problems will go away. within the. presence of the.

people being tortured to death expression the elderly people in the. company. not being the case why of course will find themselves affected by a crime and. point to one of my means and dreams it's all sweat and a lot of. what are you going to have for dinner today we don't have anything i'm asking for a nice. civil war in south africa never to. run for a truck was there any chong not be in the code of your hand to prove it. hello

and welcome to crossfire where all things considered i'm peter lavelle as u.s. russia relations remain in the deep freeze europe is taking a different path when it comes to russia some are calling it the new thaw also china calls out the u.k. regarding hong kong indeed old colonial habits die hard. cross talking some real news i'm joined by my guest here in moscow and he is a professor of the higher school of economics as well as author of the decay of western civilization and the resurgence of russia and we're also joined by marcus papadopoulos in london he's the.