well. president trump warns iran to be careful as it plans to further boost its uranium enrichment program potentially breaking the 2050 nuclear deal for a 2nd time drawing condemnation from e.u. nations and the united states. the reigning foreign minister though blames europe for failing to secure the agreement or stop washington's unilateral withdrawal. to the stories that shaped the week russia pays tribute to the 14 sailors who were killed in a fire on a nuclear submarine in the barents sea on monday. and tanks rolled through the streets of washington on fighter jets zoomed through the skies on july 4th continues to come under fire for militarizing u.s.

independence day celebrations. and i welcome the weekly here on r.t. international i'm daniel hawkins rev you are this morning thanks for being with us on the program. president trump is warning iran to be careful after announced plans to accelerate its uranium enrichment program and pass the $3.00 percentage cap stipulated in the 2050 nuclear agreement for energy reasons. 3.3. iran is already considered to be in breach of the deal after it supports the 300 kilogram. limit officials there also recently ruled out further dialogue with washington unless sanctions are lifted. for the past few. it was only able to

provide limited relief from the effects of the financial penalties as part of that deal signed a few years ago iran curb its nuclear program in return for a number of sanctions being removed because but on the brink of collapse since the u.s. unilaterally withdrew from it last year and reimposed devastating penalties on to iran is collating crisis has triggered serious concern in the region and in europe as well arty's donald quarter has been following the reaction for us in berlin. eva's leaders are not exactly happy about iran's new plans for uranium enrichment germany's foreign ministry has already urged the islamic republic to stop any actions that might lead it into a violation of the nuclear deal germany like her a 3 in new partners is extremely concerned by the rance announcement that it has begun enriching uranium beyond the concentration of 3.67 percent we have repeatedly called on rand to take further measures that further undermine the nuclear deal now

berlin's already said that it's also been in close contact with other parties involved in the agreement and that they're discussing the possibility of a joint meeting as a step forward in ensuring compliance with the nuclear deal now other evil states have also reacted as well the u.k. foreign office called on iran to immediately stop what it was doing accusing them of being in violation of the treaty across the channel you have french president emanuel macron who warned of consequences that would come out of the potential weakening of the nuclear deal and on the flip side iran's foreign minister mohammad jahvid zarif is saying that iran is pursuing these further enrichment plans within the confines of the nuclear deal and that they would reverse this decision if the e.u. holds up its end of the bargain having failed to implement their obligations under the j c p o a including after the u.s. withdrawal the e.u. in $83.00 should at the very minimum politically support iran's remedial measures

on the paragraph $36.00 including the i.a.e.a. the a 3 have no pretext to avoid a firm political systems to preserve the j c p o a and council the us you know naturalism nazareth also sent a letter to the e.u.'s foreign policy chief outlining the steps iran has already taken and the foreign ministry is in to supporting meetings with european powers to take place later this month so if it looks at least like the e.u. and iran are open to see. some sort of resolution to this issue israel on the other hand has had some pretty inflammatory words iran is violated its solemn promise under the un security council not to enrich uranium beyond a certain level the enrichment of uranium is meant for one reason and one reason only it's for the creation of atomic bombs. the leaders of the p 5 plus one promised and committed themselves to snap back sanctions the minute iran did it just did where you are and who is staying out of the negotiations well that's the

u.s. of course with washington still withdrawn iran's latest expansion of its nuclear program will lead to further isolation and sanctions nations should restore the longstanding standard of no enrichment for iran's nuclear program iran's regime armed with nuclear weapons would pose an even greater danger to the world's 1st pretty amazing when you pull out of the deal when you break a deal and you're cute is that the side that remains in the deal of breaking the deal it was the west to broker a deal by unilaterally pulling out last year to get on on on what planet do you get to continue taking the terms of the fuel eve already broken out of the fact of the matter is if you do study the j c p a way very closely the main import foreign minister is right there is article 36 which says if the other signatories to the deal do not fulfill their obligations under the deal and they have it neither side have neither the us know the europeans then iran can't take certain measures within the deal remaining in the deal so the

reporting that iran has broken the deal is just not accurate the whole idea when when iran exceeded the 300 kilograms they exceeded that because the us on may 6th suspended the waivers allowing them to sell her excess enrich the uranium so they couldn't sell it in the u.s. said ah ha you got too much of it so the whole thing is rigged the neo cause around from what the war they're pushing it forward the pushing it further and the pushing the same propaganda they push when they wanted their war with iraq. that blow to the pact comes as tensions also continue to rise between iran and the u.k. the latest dispute was triggered when british royal marines seized the iranian super tanker off the coast of gibraltar on thursday britain believes the vessel was transporting the world to syria in violation of e.u. sanctions iran in turn claims the vessel didn't enter the u.k. 3rd tauriel waters and it was traveling to a permitted destination demanding its immediate release. an iranian foreign

ministry official described the u.k. move was unacceptable and called for the immediate release of the oil tanker given that has been seized at the request of the u.s. the u.k. navy's measure is tantamount to maritime piracy britain has no right to impose its own unilateral sanctions or those of the european union in an extra territorial manner against the other countries this is the very bullying policy of the u.s. the broader says there were any and tanker was carrying 2000000 barrels of oil the british overseas territories attorney general said the ship can be impounded for 14 days what its crew is question the series has been praised by washington which according to spain was behind the move. is telling korean to stop we have been aware of the operation civil guard petrols have been watching the area but were investigating the circumstances under which the u.s. had its petition to the u.k. to excell news uki has detained the supertanker grace one laden with a reigning oriel ban for syria in violation of you sanctions american our allies

will continue to prevent regimes in turan in damascus from profiting off the illicit trade every few weeks we are seeing major provocations by the americans but they are sending drones or warship towards iran and now this incident where the british are actually acting on behalf of the americans what gives the british the right to seize any iranian share based on european laws iran is not a member of the e.u. just the trump government decided to leave the nuclear accord the americans have been pressuring iran putting significant pressure on iran and iran has actually been acting in a very relatively cautious manner and we have to understand that you want to not sure we strained forever and we knew such as this where you raining ships are being seized in the equally and they cannot it actually want you want to do nothing in.

if you want does nothing in return then they will put more pressure and more pressure. russia's been remembering the 14 sailors who were killed in a fire on a research submarine in the barents your monday 7 of the victims were high ranking navy officers to have been posthumously decorated with the country's highest on a hero of the russian federation with a closer look at the tragedy his morag as the. on the 1st of july deep below russia's barren see the unthinkable happened 5 a russian scientific research vessel mapping the sea floor was suddenly a death trap alarms bled hatches was shut and locked and the crew in the burning compartments sacrificed their lives to put out the blaze they succeeded the vessel and their colleagues were saved but 14 men all decorated veterans suffocated and they did more than save the submersible here. on the nuclear power unit on this

vessel is completely isolated now and no people are being allowed there plus the crew implemented all necessary activities to protect this unit and it is in full working order the investigation stablish in what happened how it happened is being led by russia's navy head with the president personally being kept informed the dead will all be on a post you mostly the northeast a harsh place people are afraid to ask. the difficulty of hardship so it's no surprise that it's traditionally the new day when you come up to this memorial dedicated cooled sailors perished that scene during peacetime. put it back to the barracks it's earlier this week for 3 to see who it is. one of the crew is the blaze began i should

a civilian through an open hatch shutting it behind him to prevent the inferno from spreading that was the caliber of men abroad that vessel was all those who knew them a test me that it will play with the cost of coaching for 10 years we were studying in the same school with dimitri he was an example of a true friend a classmate he was self motivate. always in the thick of events that's how we will remember him and even his final act characterized just who he was me and my classmates were not surprised he didn't hesitate for a moment he did everything possible and saved someone's life. dimitri was a good man a good friend knowing him and his human qualities i think he would never have acted differently he simply couldn't. he as he was a very responsible person so it was no surprise for us that he too the heat condolences poured in from all over the world from the pope to britons theresa may

russians in the thousands lit candles and held commemorative ceremonies the government has done its duty the widows and families of those killed will be compensated not that money could replace their loss but you see of the $14.00 dead and 7 are top ranking captains 2 are heroes of russia this is a big loss for the fleet i offer sincere condolences to the families of the deceased everything must be done to help and support them and the good men perished on that day veterans courageous and noble the best of the best as they say in the navy and there must be justice the public wants answers which the investigation should provide so that this never happens again. you know it is that celebrated independence day on thursday marking 243 years since that cost off

the yoke of british rule with the u.s. continuing to struggle with deep divisions this year's 4th of july didn't pass without controversy. they began with clashes in washington d.c. yes left wing protesters faced off against the president's supporters ahead of his address donald trump so. called salute to america then saw a show of military might in the u.s. capitol and what a former reality t.v. t.v. star called the show of a lifetime. when many in the media and political world condemned the decision to involve tanks and jets in the annual celebrations mr trump of wasting huge amounts of money and using the event for political gain ahead of next year's election. we're going to have planes going over is the best fighter jets in the world and other planes too and we could have some tanks stationed outside.

to make it into what seems to be kind for a combination from. storrow military parade of hardware and equipment it's just obscene. c.n.n. has learned that some military chiefs have expressed reservations about politicizing the july 4th celebration concerned about the tanks and armored vehicles on displaying. the. sites you will. want to.

force them a sense. that . this is the marine main battle tank good for combat. q. many were upset about the time for aid on independence day concerns about america's military spending seem to be somewhat more muted the us has been involved in 7 conflicts since the. $1001.00 and has army bases in over 30 countries last year alone the pentagon splurge the jaw dropping $649000000000.00 on its operations now despite washington's attempts to inspire patriotism particularly under the

current administration it seems national pride is on the decrease according to gallup polls recently that's been a trend since 2003 this year the number of people who say they're proud to be american dropped to 70 percent sara flounders head of the antiwar international action center says that's the theme of this year's parade reflects washington's hawkishness. everyone knows this and why it's right and it's also what casting more than $800.00 u.s. military bases around the world outside and threaten countries one you have to kill and me an artist costs more than 65 percent of all of all u.s. expenditures u.s. expenditures a bedrock of 0 the military machine i don't very time went into structure health care education is all declining and when the gap between rich and or higher

than it any time in u.s. history. the u.n. security council's call for a cease fire in libya following a deadly airstrike on a migrant detention center near the capital tripoli on tuesday night the attack which the un's envoy to libya has said may amount to a war crime killed 53 people including 6 children 130 others were wounded. compounding that devastation some reports also suggest the guards at the facility opened fire on the surviving migrants and refugees as they fled the time of the assault some $600.00 people were being held in the facility the un's also called for an event independent investigation into the incident the air raid has led to protests over the conditions in libya's government run facilities which house around 6000 people the shelters have been sharply criticized by rights groups the refugees are also calling on the un to relocate them to safety and libya's u.n.

backed government which is based in tripoli has blamed the attack on forces loyal to the self-styled libyan national army commander by the warlords a leaf or have to name has denied any responsibility un's refugee agency meanwhile has said it's warned of the dangers to people house in that particular center. this is a tragedy that was very much preventable just a couple of months ago we called for the urgent evacuation of people from this specific detention center after a similar airstrike into 2 of the people inside. no action was taken in that regard and people have tragically paid the consequence with their lives today warden it's of this detention center well known to both sides a of the conflict was known but there were 600 people living inside so there can be no excuse for this and to having been here we heard from a senior member of the un refugee rights office for libya who says the focus needs

to now be on those who remain in the sentence. we are deeply shocked by what happened saddened and now the priority is to actually take the people who remain in this tension center to a safer location as the other 3800 refugees and migrants who are men trapped in these areas refugees are coming from conflict from countries in conflict they have suffered in their home countries they have traveled through the desert under the sun and they have been the hands of smugglers tortured abuse along the journey then trying to reach me trying to cross the desert to the mediterranean and then send back and it tainted schematically you any opposes the detention of refugees this is why it's important that we move past that we that we find solutions and then we have the head of the international community to help us make this a reality to discuss and to find a way forward. and not yet appointed but already in the firing line germany.

is the nomination to become the next head of the e.u. polls in a native country though don't point to her being a popular choice for the powerful role going to girls who says he regrets the way the bloc selected his potential successor. look there were transcript. booked to prove. to my movie in addition to those unfolded was very because we had little to do. with if this. would be the shortest path to do people and the tradition to come book. unfortunately. become a tradition. the current german defense minister has at least got the backing of e.u. nation leaders it seems but it sort of on the land still leaves the approval of a hefty 376 m. e p's and look more about she's known for being a federalist support the creation of a single european sovereign nation e.u.

army if elected she'd become the 1st woman to head the commission which has also helped her gain support as mentioned though not everyone is sold on her candidacy after the traditional domination system was scrapped to push her closer to being the next e.u. chief. doesn't have the right to ignore all the candidates that have been voted for by european citizens the future of europe can no longer be decided behind closed doors bonder lame is our weakest minister that's apparently enough to become commission president in the if wonderingly in fails to be elected as head of the commission by the parliament europe risks a possible constitutional crisis so i find it a very charming idea to the peace of europe it will be female in the future that's what i think we have 2 problems one problem on our democracy. leading how to do. it different to use her becoming the. most but what. the

president was the european commission and not something completely different kmart's. second thing is. also about follow my disquiet. and the more once there is that investigation comment. on her are backed up by our external units. people from outside the ministry in the summer of 200000000 euro political decisions can be regarded as. democratic if one of 2 conditions are is met population has to be involved in the actual decision making is. meaningful way or 2nd. political decisions must reflect popular preferences now funded lines nomination doesn't need either cried personally.

so yes it's undemocratic by both standards. business and else that's live action remake of the children's classic little mermaid will star black actress halle bailey in the lead role that casting sparked a big debate after an extensive search it was abundantly clear that halle possesses that rare combination of spirit heart youth innocence and substance plus a glorious singing voice all intrinsic qualities necessary to play this iconic role you know to me it's annoying disney released its animated adaptation of the famous fairy tale written by hans christian andersen in that version ariel was pretty wide red haired and white some argue the new version should stay true to the night in its own film others though say having a black lead is a win for diversity. the actress cast is areal can sing act dance and is

beautiful but racists yes that extreme irritation you feel is racism or like mermaids can be black will crabs can talk so we're all stretching here shut up fat box the little mermaid lives on a tropical coral reef with a calypso signal with a strong jamaican accent when you think about it it's bizarre she was white the fast time around there goes my favorite princess can't believe the just 3 my favorite princess she has a beautiful voice but if she's playing aereo i'm going to be she doesn't fit the look at all could you imagine the uproar of the cast a white actress to play tiana in a live action remake i just don't understand why is this necessary we're opposing opinion on whether modern diversity should trump original cinema when it comes to race. well that what people are trying to do is trying to bring people to a certain kind of reality that we live in a very diverse society and to try and present if you like to try and normalize 1st because what happened before was that we had

a society which those people were excluded or as they were presented they were presented as before they were prevented in of course in the translation that which was derogatory to them we bring race to the forefront and make it an issue when it really isn't an issue i think it's a very dangerous precedent and i think it is think it really is not i think it's really not about the inclusive idea that your other guest discussed discusses i think it's really a leftist agenda to divide us and keep us from working together and i think the people are overly concerned about his presentation are trying to as they said they want something they're used to but in the challenge. challenge is if you challenge is why something think they think they should be like a princess can be black and what we want to do where it is not a lie not that so every every single hollywood movie made from now on must have a gay person a jewish person a black person a hispanic person and all we probably better represent all that you know population

so let's say a puerto rican person a cuban person and i don't know there are people here from from our other countries too should we should we just make sure now that every single group has every single race religion color size socio economic level where do you draw the lying if you look at the history of hollywood birth of a nation it started off really badly with the original 1st feature film been a racist film which used skin color in a negative way of course they should be a good story line but also a film can do mark positive things and i think we have to move beyond being obsessed by the fact that we live in a society that is proud to support diversity we do live in a society that does have problems around racism in american society has that and i think that the people who are denying. people are not willing to begin to really talk about challenging it we had some because dylan rufe to walk into a blood shot of the body i'm sorry there's been a number of shootings in on the basis he's

a tragic tragic things we had black president black billionaires all over the place all sorts of hispanic people and in positions of power i would hope that no one would not like this character based on that they might not like the idea of it being imposed they might feel that it's a little bit racist to say oh well we have to have a princess be a certain color i don't think that makes them a racist i think that makes them somebody that just wants the best person for the job to be chosen whether it's a movie or a corporate venture i think the best person should always be chosen regardless of their skin color or anything else. programming from the documentary channel now i will be here and often i'll take you through today's top global headlines. join me every 1st day on the alex simon show and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then.

but if you will not obey the voice of the lord your god will be careful to do all these commandments and the statutes. then all these.

people. and. people. will go away. from all. and you shall not use the 3 different people. express. in the. theater good morning. will produce. 2000. great things in symmetry. your books shall be slain before your eyes and you shall not eat of it. shall be

file and taken away before your face and told to you. and. all. of. the. principal face in this country. if you have. him and you have a slave wife. in a perfect place to go sheep shall be given to your enemies and they shall be none to help you your sons and your daughters shall be given to another people while your eyes look on and filed with longing for them all the day civil war in south africa is inevitable. it will happen sooner than most people think it is the rise but just. because he was.