well hope you enjoyed that episode of going underground will continue showing your favorite episodes from this season until we're back for a brand new season on wednesday the 11th of september until then keep it up via social media and over get all you tube channel says. today there are good and bad the bad news in yemen the united states. the good. war in syria the cia and u.s. military were engaged in covert actions really throughout the world. where they were assassinating populist leaders they were backing up the right way military funding an army. there's no any more because there's always a small. really good. profit.

the temperatures are rising sea levels are rising. and there's a lot there's a few ways to play it if you want to make money on the clubs of course there's a couple of great trades on the table but without a doubt this is as we said the last generation. right and especially at mit and i think. getting more headlines as we were activities for the last few years. noam chomsky has made to international reputation. is one of the national leaders of american resistance to the vietnam war the deepish this is a professor of linguistics who before he was 40 years wrote to transform the nature of his subject. you are identified with the new level whatever that is you

certainly have been an activist as well as a writer. and is listed in anybody's catalog monday. girls of the new law. is standing. by robin over the past 2 or 3 years a series of adamant. rejecting at least american. budgets this notion anti american is quite an interesting one sashes to tell tarion notion it is used in free societies so if someone and say italy is criticizing berlusconi for the corruption of the italian state and soon then a cold area 16 they were called india today and people would collapse and laughter

in the streets of rome or milan. in totalitarian states the notions used so in the old soviet union dissidents were cold and he says via that was the worst condemnation. of the brazilian military dictatorship they were gold in any brazilian. it's true that in just about every society the critics are malign. or mistreated different ways depending on the nature of the society like in soviet union say the old imprisoned. in the us dependency like el salvador at the same time this counterfeit accident their brains blown away the us are a state terrorist worse. than others is it just condemned their vilified zone in the united states or one of the terms of abuse is anti american version. couple of

others like you know more cases there's an array of terms of abuse. of in the united states you have a very high degree of freedom and so if you're vilified by some commas or who cares to go on to your work anyway at least concepts only arise in a culture where if you criticize state power and when i state i mean. we're generally not just government but state corporate power if you criticize concentrated power you're against the society you're against the b. it's quite strange in that it's used in the united states and it's for another the only democratic society where the concept isn't just ridicule and it's a sign of. elements of the elite culture which are the great ugly.

american dream my many ideals was partly symbolic but partly real so in the 1950 s. and sixty's there was a the biggest growth period in. american economic history. gold made. it was pretty kalak area and growth so the the lowest 5th of the population was improving about. not as much as the

upper 5th. and there were some welfare state measures which improved life for much of the population it was for example possible for a. black worker to get a decent job in an auto plant. get a core of children go to school and so on and the same across the board. when the us was. primarily a manufacturing center it had to be concerned with its own consumers here famously henry ford raise the salary of his workers so they'd be able to buy cars. when you're moving into an international tunnel me as the banks like to call it a little small percentage of the world's population that's a gathering increasing wealth what happens to american consumers that have much

less concern because most of them aren't going to be consuming your products anyway at least on a major basis. your goals or profit in next quarter even it if it's based on financial manipulation. high salary high bonuses produced overseas if you have to and produce for the wealthy classes here and their counterparts abroad what about the rest well there's a term coming into use for them too and they're called the precariat. precarious proletariat the working people of the world who live increasingly precarious lives . and it's related to the attitude toward the country all together. during the period of great growth of the economy fifty's and sixty's but in fact earlier taxes on the wealthy were far. or corporate taxes were much

higher taxes on dividends are much higher simply taxes on wealthier much air the tax system has been redesigned so that the taxes that are paid by the very wealthy are reduced and correspondingly the tax burden on the rest of the population's increased. now the shift is towards trying to keep taxes just done and wages are not consumption which everyone has to do not say and dividends which i go to the ridge . the numbers are pretty striking.

now there's a pretext of course there's always a pretext the pretext in this case is well that increases investment in increases jobs but there isn't any evidence for that if you want to increase investment give money to the poor and the working people they have to keep alive so they spend their incomes that stimulates production and stimulates investment that leads to job growth and so much. if you're an ideologist for the masters you have a different line and in fact right now it's almost absurd the corporations have money coming out of their pocket. so in fact general electric are paying 0 taxes and they have enormous profits let's take the profits somewhere else or go for it but not pay taxes and this is common. the major american corporations shift the burden of sustaining the society on to the rest of the population.

solidarity is quite dangerous from the point of view of the masters you're only supposed to care about yourself and not about other people this is quite different from the people they claim are their heroes like adam smith who based is whole approach to the economy on the principle that sympathy is a fundamental human trait but that has to be driven out of people's heads gotta be for yourself father while maxon don't care about others which is ok for the rich and powerful but is devastating for everyone else. going to take a whole lot of effort to try to drive these basic human emotions out of people's

heads. and we see it today in policy for measure for example in the attack on social security. social security is based on a principle it's based on a principle of solidarity saw bury it in caring for others. a social security means i pay payroll taxes so that the widow across town can get something to live on. for much of the population that's what they survive. it's of no use to the very rich so therefore there's a concerted attempt to destroy it. one of the ways is defunding it you want to destroy some system 1st the fund. then it will work people be angry they want something else that's a standard technique for. privatizing some system. we

see it in the attack on public schools and public schools are based on the principle of solidarity. i no longer have children in school they're grown up but the principle of solidarity says i happily pay taxes so that the kid across the street can go to school that's normal human emotion and it drives it out of people's heads i don't have kids in school why should i pay taxes privatized it so on. the public education system all the way from kindergarten to higher education is under severe attack i mean that's one of the jewels of american society. go back to the golden age again the great chris period in the fifty's and sixty's

a lot of that is based on free public education. and one of the results of the 2nd world war was the g.i. bill right which enabled the veterans remember that's a large part of the but elation and to go to college they would have been able to do otherwise with a century gun free education where a community's date or nation regularly invest substantial share of it resources in education the investment invariably returned and better business and a higher standard of living u.s. was way in the lead in developing. extensive mass public education at every level. but now more than half the states most of the funding for the colleges comes from 2 issues not from the state it's a radical change that's a terrible burden on students it means that students if they don't come from very wealthy families they're going to leave college with big debt and if you would think that you're trapped i mean maybe you wanted to become

a public interest lawyer but you could have to go into a corporate law firm to pay off those dead by the time you're part of the culture you know you're not going to get out of it again and that's true cross the board. brought from. the big 10 years and crosstalk started and 10 years i think it's time to shake things up maybe change the branding maybe the format and here's what i've been

thinking about next season related episodes filmed on an island 10 experts fight it out for a trophy what do you think ok a more affordable option $25.00 text birds. and one red rose another suggestion geo political jeopardy parody no political cookout where we will literally. be only it's. late night show it's a rare format these days and it's chief on. it is an old microphone in a printed banner if i actually play with one of my guests i can do this campbell after politics gone wild like music. ok crosstalk is not about hype it's about meaning 10 years of talk and still going strong. peter if you want to change something why don't we get rid of the bow tie you know

that is too much. in the 1950 s. it was a much poorer society today than there were the us could easily handle centrally free mass higher education today a much richer society doesn't have the resources for. that just what's going on right before. it's the general attack on the principles that i mean not only are they humane they're the basis of the prosperity and health of this society.

if you look over the history of regulation say the railroad regulation financial regulation and so on and you find that quite commonly it's it's either initiated by the economic. concentrations that are being regulated or it's supported by them and the reason is because they know that sooner or later they can take over the regulators. and it ends up with what's called regulatory capture. the business being regulated is in fact running the regulators. bank lobbyists are actually writing the laws of financial regulation gets to that

extreme. and that's been happening through history and again it's a pretty natural tendency when you just look at the distribution of power. one of the things that expanded enormously in the 1970 s. is lobbying as the business world moved sharply to try to control legislation. business world was pretty upset by the advances in a public welfare in the sixty's and in particular by richard nixon it's not to will understand that but he was the last new deal president and they regarded that as class treachery. and nixon's administration you get the consumer safety legislation safety and health regulations in the workplace the e.p.a. the environmental protection agency. business didn't like it of course they didn't like that taxes. they didn't like the regulation and they began

a coordinated effort to try to overcome a. lobbying sharply to increase deregulation began with the rule ferocity. there were no financial crashes in the fifty's and the sixty's because the regulatory apparatus of the new deal was still in place. as a pm to be dismantled under business pressure and political pressure. to get more and more pressures. and it goes on through the years. seventy's sort of starts begin. eighty's really takes off congress was asked to approve federal loan guarantees to the auto companies about the want and want to have a $1000000000.00 and all of this is quite safe as long as you know the government's going to come to your rescue so take say reagan instead of letting them pay the

cost break and build out the banks like continental the biggest bail out of american history at the time that she ended his term with so the huge financial crisis the savings and loan crisis and the government moved in and build it out for a kind of $300.00 in a diary saving affair later they are and $999.00 regulation with us dismantled to separate commercial banks from investment banks. then come see bush and obama bill and bear stearns is running to the feds to stay afloat president bush today defended the decision to bail out citi group that in may and freddie macin ask for a total i mean $1000000.00 more to sail out could get much bigger than billing even in troubles for the u.s. economy. and they're building up the next term.

b. each time the taxpayer is called on to bail out of those who created the crisis increasingly the major financial institutions. in a capitalist economy you would do that in a capitalist system that would worry about the investors who made risky investments but the rich and powerful they don't want a capitalist system they want to be able to run to the nanny state as soon as they're in trouble and get billed a taxpayer it's called the too big to fail. i mean there are no will or it's an economics who significantly disagree with the course that we're following people like just stiglitz paul krugman others none of them were even approached the people picked to fix the crisis were those who created the robert rubin crowd the goldman sachs croak they created the crisis are no more powerful than before is that

accident well not when you pick those people to create an economic plan and then what do you expect to happen. meanwhile for the poor let market principles prevail don't expect any help from the government the government's the problem not the solution and so on that's essentially neo liberalism and it's has this dual character which goes right back in economic history one set of rules for the rich opposite set of rules for the poor. and nothing surprising about this exactly the dynamics you expect if the population allows it to proceed she's going to go on and on like this until the next crash which is so much expected that credit agencies which kind of evaluate the. status of firms are now counting into their calculations the taxpayer bailout that they

expect to come in after the next crash which means that the beneficiaries of these credit ratings like the big banks they can borrow money more cheaply they can push out smaller competitors and you get more and more concentration everywhere you look policies are done this way which should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that's what happens when you put power into the hands of a narrow sector of will which will is dedicated to increasing power for itself just as you'd expect. be. concentration of wealth yields concentration of political power. particularly so as

the cost of elections skyrockets which kind of forces the political parties into the pockets of major corporations. the citizens united this was january 2009 i guess that's a very important decisions prim court decision but it has a history and you got to think about the history. of 14th amendment has a provision that says no person's rights can be infringed without due process of law. and the intent clearly was to protect freed slaves said ok they have got the protection of the law i don't think it's ever been used for freed slaves if ever marginally almost immediately it was used for businesses corporations their rights can't be infringed without due process of law so they gradually became persons under the law.

corporations or state created legal fictions. maybe they're good maybe they're bed but to call them persons is kind of rages so they get got personal rights back about a century ago and that extended through the 20th century. as they give corporations rights way beyond what persons have so if say general motors invests in mexico they get national rights the rights of the mexican business well the notion of person was expanded to include corporations it was also restricted if you take the 14th amendment literally that no undocumented alien can be deprived of rights if they're persons. undocumented aliens who are living here and building your buildings clear lawns and so on they're not persons.

but general electric is a person. an immortal a super powerful person this perversion of the young elementary morality and the obvious meaning of the law is quite incredible. in the 1970 s. the courts decided that money is a form of speech. but the 1st well and the new one through the years to citizens united which says that the right of free speech of corporations namely spend as much money they want can't be curtailed. take a look what that means it means that corporations which anyway have been pretty much buying elections are now free to do it with virtually no constraint as tremendous attack on the residue of democracy. very interesting to read the rulings like justice kennedy's swing vote his ruling

said we'll look after all the c.b.s. is given freedom of speech there are corp why shouldn't general electric be free to spend as much when is that one. i mean it's true that c.b.s. has given freedom of speech but they're supposed to be performing a public service that's why that's what the press is supposed to be a general electorate is just trying to make money for the chief executive some of the shareholders. city critical decisions and it puts the country in a position where business power is greatly extended beyond what it always was this is part of that vicious cycle the supreme court justices are put in by reactionary presidents who get in there because they're funded by business and that's the way the cycle works.

said she stressed to make sure that the british and the bill of voted out. to. stop the show was so here she didn't taste it this shit is she's a c.e.o. which quite a shock. to which she definitely planned the look which is deep in the investments dittrich a moment in their fortunes she didn't. want to talk to me short of my it's your bonus for c.b.s. to give. it to mr ellsworth support of. spirit over 4 years you seem to be arguable that it's a studio actually the person to revoke or should still go and spin it. expressed.

well you know the fire thing we've kind of adopted because we were called pirates for so long. i mean they're in the smaller boats and if they don't harp on ships and it's very. common and. the limited self to make cold fish already 90 percent of it are not and it won't recover and. you conduct 15 scoops 75 tonnes through and they do it several times a day with a big fleets you know you get an idea on why ocean is over which. we have to understand we can all stay still and just. be witness of the deal going to the hours. i'm doing this because i want the for the future world to the future can generations to have and enjoy the ocean we have.

the u.s. government allows immigration services to use fake social media accounts to monitor people seeking to enter the country pool so in the headlines on. the alternative for germany party celebrates 2 of its best local election results yet with the anti immigration euro skeptics coming 2nd in both brandenburg and saxony. 2 days of vigils and commemorations of the most deadly terror attack in modern russian history we speak to survivors and relatives of the victims. and iran's foreign minister why it's vital to save the new.