the headlines this hour the taliban moons of more american deaths doubled from cancer pace talks on u.s. soil we take a look at how the u.s. and gauged with the isn't this minutes and. also to come london's mass city councilors the world's largest arms are being hosted in his city branding it apparent and america's special envoy for middle east peace resigns leaving current israeli palestinian plans in the hands of a less experienced successor we assess what that means for the region. time for the palestinian authority to pony up and get with the program so that they can achieve the type of independence that israel can have the type of rights and security that

the jewish people so much deserve in this part of the world so it's a win win win win situation in the middle east is quite simple and it starts by putting the occupation in the historic waste bin. out of that good morning just to talk here in moscow you watching the international now the u.s. president donald trump has pulled the plug on afghan peace talks with the taliban which it was hoped would bring america's longest war to an end he blamed the terrorist group's recent attack on kabul in which an american soldier was killed the taliban mourns that scrapping talks will result in more u.s. losses. they admitted to an attack in kabul that killed one of our great great soldiers and 11 other people if they cannot agree to a ceasefire during these very important peace talks then they probably don't have

the power to negotiate a meaningful agreement anyway the us president called off the peace dialogue this will lead to more losses to the us his credibility will be affected his anti peace stance will be exposed to the world losses to lives and assets will increase or the taliban's attack on the afghan capital left 12 people dead when the peace talks were still active the taliban never committed to halting attacks in the country in fact the group stepped up its campaign of terror we got reaction to trump's decision to abandon peace talks from people in kabul. because one of their soldiers presumably their general was killed in a suicide attack or abdul haq square he called off the peace talks while so many afghan army forces and civilians are killed on a daily basis they do not think about. since the peace talks began the suicide bombings and attacks have increased and our people have been killed they had

accepted peace they should have announced a ceasefire and then the talks moved forward well the u.s. and the taliban had been in negotiations for almost a year the talks didn't involve the afghan government the taliban wants the draw of all foreign troops from afghanistan and america wants guarantees that the group won't assist international terrorism a draft accord had been reached last week the taliban now controls more afghan territory than any point since the us invasion in 2001 america targeted the green for giving shelter to al qaida but he west relations with the taliban were rather different before the invasion. now reports. after almost 2 decades of war this could have been the big break but no back to the war as luck would have it peace in the go she weren't on the media's mind when they found out they were outraged that trump should dare talk to the enemy it was murderous

villains who their fight against the us occupation. the problem with the council of afghanistan talks was not the timing or recent taliban violence it was the reality that the talks were designed to provide a cover for u.s. troop withdrawal rather than peace and would help the taliban while undermining the afghan government never should lead is a terrorist organization that hasn't renounced kind 11 and continues an evil be allowed in a great country never full stop for the us to meet with the taliban and not have the leader of afghanistan to make meet with the taliban is something that's doomed to failure the whole thing doesn't quite make sense i mean it's just another example of the president truly treating our foreign policy like it's some kind of game show this isn't a game show these are terrorists listening to them you'd never know that by the late ninety's the taliban which was already hosting asama bin laden were invited to

the us is on the guests the business by us energy company talks and laying pipelines talks supported by the government it was very you know they have this shadow we image i guess you call it that i found a very straightforward and. i think the clinton administration was really committed to helping you know american business be successful. we enjoyed. really strong support. never mind them stoning people marginalizing woman and doing all the stuff radicals do and i really mean never mind former military analyst julie sir's went to report for the defense intelligence agency pointing out that there were alternatives to the taliban we didn't go down well with her superiors. the state department didn't want to have anything to do with the afghan resistance war even politically to reveal that there was any viable option to

taliban she was apparently forced out soon after i heard that some people at the state department were people among those more sympathetic with the taliban at that time so there might have been some political reasons as well but ultimately i was forced to leave a year later bin laden and al qaida orchestrated 2 attacks on us embassies in africa $224.00 people killed and yet still the us entertained the taliban the same taliban then governing of gotta start and which tolerated al qaida on its soil was invited back to the us in 2001 on the fischel state visit during which jihadism dignitaries explained their virtuous treatment of woman and now in the. security organ are. over there working. it's right

there a woman who work in the ministry of defense. it's very bad we don't use them as of this placement. it's that they're not for you or. for many other things women shouldn't be 4 months before $911.00 the u.s. sent $43000000.00 to the taliban a reward for fighting narcotics trafficking who would have known that just months later america would invade to start a war that would last for almost 2 decades the united states have been cooperated with dean in afghanistan for a long time they didn't see them as that dangerous they saw them as people who would stay over there and and they thought they could use them this changed on 911 today inviting the taliban to the united states to try to to to arrange what they call a peace deal is

a very difficult optics for the president especially as we get close to the anniversary of the september bombing the one hand it does seem hypocritical for the united states to meet with the taliban today after promising to destroy them on the other hand it's the necessity of defeat the united states has been fighting for 18 years and it is the american public is tired of it so the president's in a dilemma he wants to look strong and he wants to help american allies but the same time the cost has gotten bigger and bigger and the american public are fed up there you have it the u.s. wouldn't hear a bad word about the taliban why did the mover is on a guest plan to build pipelines together but peace talks in 2019 that all be asleep is something america just current and paid.

now the mayor of london city karna spoken out against a major arms they're being held in his city describing the event a supporter and and saying he strongly opposes it. london is a global city which is home to individuals who fled conflict and suffered as a consequence of arms and weapons exhibited. in order to represent londoners interests and will take any opportunity available to prevent this event from taking place at the world talks in future years while the defense and security equipment international fair is the world's largest arms exhibition and has been mired in controversy back in 2013 for example torture equipment was found on sale at the fair critics also point to the fact that those doing the shopping among them are iraq and also saudi arabia human rights activists who say that the u.k. is facilitating atrocities with the u.k. is the 2nd largest exporter to saudi arabia despite

a court of appeal to clare in the sales to be unlawful since 2015 riyadh has led military intervention in yemen with its coalition accused of war crimes meanwhile hundreds of protesters took to the streets of london ahead of the fair antiwar activists campaign to highlight the deadly consequences of the weapon straight are reports now on why the arms fire is getting so much negative attention. this is a british with a twist held only every 2 years there's no candyfloss teacups or soft toys no the largest weapons in the wild is in town. d s e i attract armed companies and military delegations from the world backed by the ministry of to fads it's the kind of that you'd expect the media to be keen to

get involved in who it's not so easy to pass the security checks take in a faction war correspondent that's what alongside the pretty. military he said that the bill each application in the information submitted is assessed on the case by case basis after reviewing europe location we are unable to establish that you are a journalist and editor a production team member in a role in field mr cobain try to convince them with his reports for the likes of the guardian in times newspapers covering everything from northern ireland to bosnia and saudi arabia no luck though and it's a decision that's provoked a strong reaction. ian cobain is an award winning journalist and it is absurd that the security team for the arms for have taken it upon themselves to decide he is on suitable to attend the event it is totally unacceptable for a journalist to be refused access in this way and it is

a sinister breach of press freedom the arms spec comes at a time of increased scrutiny over the u.k.'s weapons sales back in june westminster was forced to freeze any deals with saudi arabia after a court ruled the unlawful amid allegations that british arms were being used in the yemen conflict now the u.n. says arms tennis could be complicit in alleged war crimes though galatea of arms transfers by france the united kingdom to united states and other states remains questionable it is clear that a continuous supply of weapons to parties to the conflict is perpetuating the conflict and prolonging the suffering of the yemeni people that is why we are urging member states to no longer supply weapons to parties to the conflict still it's perhaps no surprise that riyadh is a guest of honor at this is d.s.c. i an even less of a surprise that antiwar activist a step up that charge when considering subjects the ts cia arms fear could be used

for decades to come in atrocities and looking particularly of this destruction of yemen we have to remember that the soviet regime is by far the world's largest buyer if you keep weapons and we know that these are being used to commit atrocities christine atrocity after chastity after atrocity and my traces would not be possible if it were weapons which had been licensed by boris johnson and his colleagues but with the weapons market what $14000000000.00 pounds a year to missile control policy to be on the safe side though curious an experience would correspondence a probably but a cat in the d.s.e. eye dog south to take it off to london. now the u.s. special envoy. middle east peace is resigned to casting doubt on existing israeli palestinian resolution plans green blatt was a key figure in the trumpet ministrations efforts in the region and its son played with his successor will now be able to put his plans into practice with a man taking over. he graduated from law school 3 years ago and according to

reports is no middle east experience to now he's worked as an aide to trump's son in law. meanwhile the former envoy green blatt received criticism from popular decisions in the arab world in the past after advocating for the relocation of the u.s. embassy and recognizing israeli sovereignty over the golan heights but his decision to leave the job is now raising questions over what happens next the terms peace plan for israel and palestine is sometimes referred to as the ultimate deal details were set to come out after israeli elections in september but there's been speculation about the possibility of handing west bank settlements to israel and creating conditions unfavorable for palestinians we've got expert analysis on what he could make. first of all let's agree that the there might be a plan that the u.s.

administration is working on but that peace is not part of it and the palestinians are not part of it then that's why the palestinians have taken the very logical approach in forming the international committee that so long as this administration does not recognize palestinian rights for international law there's really not much to talk about if the palestinians are going to simply boycott mr greenberg boycott mr trump boycott the saudis boycott anything before they've even seen the play and then there's no opportunity for a gauge of it this is the time for in gauge midnight for a boycott when you start to boycott the arab world and the united states you're going down a very slippery slope going back to the rear of orals or miss. no but is well i can tell the audience have with palestine is an integral part of the arab world mr greenblatt is someone who has is not only committed ideologically to the settler movement he is

a contributor to the entrancement of the supplement regime which is illegal under international law in the heart of the occupied west bank so there was never. a moment where this administration even made a slight effort to give the impression that it has any inclination or any interest in being balanced in being objective it's the palestinian authority that have got to get with the program they live in the middle east that they essentially believe they are the center of the middle east and they're really they've really become a footnote and they're about to throw the throw themselves excuse me into the waste basket of history of unless they begin to engage with the greatest superpower on earth which is the troubled ministration who truly wants the best for the palestinian people and is trying yet again after 25 years of failures to help the palestinian people and their israeli neighbors come to a diplomatic political and economic solution and the palestinians throughout the

past years with successive american administrations have bent over backwards to try and reach a solution that would guarantee a real 2 state formula now if you're talking about formulas that were presented that would give the palestinians far less than a state then naturally the palestinian leadership which is accountable to the palestinian people cannot accept something that is not acceptable less than a palestinian state it's time for the palestinian authority to pony up and get with the program so that they can achieve the type of independence that israel can have the type of the rights and security that the jewish people so much deserve in this part of the world so it's a win win recognizing israel's illegal annexation of tourists. it's been rejected worldwide recognizing israel's illegal annexation of the syrian golan has been rejected worldwide when when situation in the middle east is quite simple and it starts by putting the occupation in the historic waste bin. what's not

international going to take a quick break we'll be back with more into. you know world a big part of the law and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks. what politicians do something. to put themselves on the line to get accepted or

rejected. so when you want to be president. or somehow want to. let you go right to be close this is what the 3 of them all can't be good. interested always in the waters in the. city. now and then you'll really just performance in a gym and time has come under fire from the animal rights organization according to the don't cage to be removed from the show depicting the last days of jesus christ and suggest to you then that rides in on a nice instead. these

days jesus would no longer travel by don't key he would presumably move in and some other electric vehicle that is kind to animals and the environment and a spokesperson for peta told reporters that a modern day jesus would likely no longer travel on a donkey she had there a model for an alternative transport kind of animals and the environment the demand has been met with criticism from the performers though the actor playing jesus says the play supposed to represent a specific moment in time and then he quotes doesn't quite fit the play depicts the

last days of jesus christ is being performed in size jim the state of bavaria since the 17th century and has undergone few changes since then well it's not just people involved in the performance of criticize the suggested updates made by peter. jesus is supposed to ride on these couture instead of a donkey it could not be more idiotic. i was in jerusalem and there is a ban on the use of electric vehicles in the old town i understand the criticism itself but seriously jews are on a nice scooter while everything around is historically correct oh. animal welfare is taking a lot in germany and europe in countries in many countries throughout the world animal welfare is well taken and what is not taking account of patiently is human welfare peta has had essence mission to divert attention away from human suffering and focus attention on less important issues and peta as probably no

knowledge of the german loss but a lot of that is very strict and it has its limits but it also has privileges and certain privileged organizations can as long as they follow the strict procedures that the law provides use animals in their performances. so the british prime minister will have another go today getting parliament to grant him an election after a bill forcing boris johnson to seek in extension for the u.k. central from the e.u. was passed last week however france's foreign minister has cast doubt on whether the bloc would be willing to grant one. but those who don't as things stand it's a no the british say they want to propose other solutions alternative arrangements to ensure the withdrawal we have not seen them so it's a no we can't keep restarting this every 3 months let the british tell us what they want last week johnson's do or die approach breaks it suffered

a major defeat not only did m.p.'s back a bill lame duck blocking a no deal breaks it parliament also rejected his attempt to force a snap election the prime minister needs the support of 2 thirds of all m.p.'s to hold an early election but that hasn't deterred boris johnson from trying again today well event pays do supporters motion an early election will be held in october before the $900.00 tell you but breaks it deadline this could give the prime minister a window of opportunity to avoid asking the european union for a delay which is required by the bill passed by the parliament last week if you're following well however if he fails to gather a major majority in the house there will be a legal obligation to seek an extension if needed which he categorically said that he will not. what on earth is the point of a further delay and that's what they want. to force us to pay for yet another

part of this delay i would everybody to know there are no circumstances in which i ask brussels to do that we're leaving on the 31st of october no gifts or bots we're going to fulfill the repeated promises of parliament to the people and come out of the e.u. a lot tobler 31st no ifs or buts well regardless of the prime minister facing a string of the fates in parliament and m.p.'s blocking his no deal breaks it strategy does appear that the conservative party has extended their lead dave a labor of the latest polls the suggests that 37 percent of posters voters do support johnson's breaks it strategy while only 17 percent approve colvin's journalist john whiten professor of your pain european law francesco to share their vision of the current events and the french foreign minister is needed nor does he

just doesn't not supporting it in extension this week just listen to boris johnson could also be all we buy all we know we all think the french potential leverage even more pressure on opposition parties to get rid of this man i don't think it's any secret that they don't want to deal with boris johnson he is equally mean if you see this about negotiating a deal with this kid that he is not sure he would rather deal with i mean to start a government that is serious about trying to come to the deal for a manager to actually to to police he may well resign as a tactic and claim to be a victim of the whole column and to want to stop him delivering the will of the people. and played from there and he would be out of power clearly a new government the coalition would come in and try and negotiate a deal they would have to fight an election without a doubt unless that. coalition held together there's no way that a coalition to hold together so long in a 3 or 4 months and then he could charge. again after that but but frankly you know

i don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility i think to boris's really a very very tight corner rezoned made. washing out international that's how the news is looking so far this morning we're back again at the top of the. 30 there are good terrorists and bad evidence the bad news in yemen the united states deems to be a threat the good those who work in syria the cia and the u.s. military were engaged in covert actions really throughout the world. where they were assassinating populist leaders they were backing up right wing military juntas funding an army of death squads there's no any more because there's always

a small call for really good. profit. when lawmakers manufacture can be sentenced to the public wealth. when the ruling classes have protect themselves. with the crime and merry go round to be the one percent. we can all middle of the room sick. i mean real news real world. thousands of american men and women choose to serve in the country's military and the decision that has shattered lives. every thing came to a complete. the day that i was raped to be instructed here you know told to shut up

or they'd kill me and i see how it destroyed my life any screamed at me and he made me come in and he grabbed my arm and he write me with his birthing curia if you take into account that women don't report because of the extreme retaliation and it's probably somewhere near about half a 1000000 women have now been sexually assaulted in the us military rape is a very very traumatizing thing tat happen but i've never seen trauma like i've seen from women who are veterans who have suffered military sexual trauma reporting rape is more likely to get the victim punished than the offender i had an almost 10 year career or chose very invested in and i gave that up to report a sex offender who was not even put to justice or put on the registry this is simply an issue of power and violence male sexual predators for the large part of target whoever is there to prey upon whether that's a man or women. you know world of big partisan through

a lot for years and conspiracy it's time to wake to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smart or we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's a target for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for washington closely watching the hawks.

there is one organized force which traditionally plenty of fluids but with all its flaws it's been in the forefront of. efforts to improve the lives of the general population and it's organized labor it's also a barrier to corporate tyranny so it's the one barrier to this vicious cycle going on which does lead to corporate tyranny. for a major reason for the concentrated on us fanatic attack on unions and organized labor as they are a democratizing force. to provide a barrier that defends workers' rights but also popular rights generally.