interactions to have and enjoy the ocean now we have. an american t.v. networks one of m s n b c's top post for describing them as paid russian propaganda . when it comes to making claims about the kremlin. group of independent us jim this hit back after being criticised for visiting parts of syria controlled by the country's government. any time does anybody visit a government or the syrian government side and offers a realistic perspective they can expect to be attacked what we've been able to see and report already has threatened the narrative that's been conveyed by western corporate media and artie's video agency ruptly launches a special project 3 which you can explore the mystery surrounding the deaths of 9 hikers in the you were mounted 60 years ago which spawned the race still being

debated today. hello there good afternoon you're watching the international match senior u.s. cheerless once again fighting over russia with one t.v. network now suing the host of another for describing them as paid russian propaganda. has more details. here comes a familiar voice which becomes even more familiar if we hear words like russia or russian the most obsequiously approach trump right wing news outlet in america really it literally is page correction propaganda for those who still didn't recognize that that was really literally rachel maddow speaking about the one american news network on her and this n.b.c.

show i'll get to the point of reminding you how she keeps seeing russia everywhere in a moment but don't you think there must be someone out there who won't just swallow what the m s n b c star anchor says without hitting back with a decent jab well oh a ed is filing a defamation lawsuit they want 10000000 bucks one america is wholly operated and financed by the herring family in san diego they are as american as apple pie they are not paid by russia and have nothing to do with the russian government this is a false and malicious libel and they're going to answer for it in a court of law to tell you about the reason for when rachel maddow said really literally which is supposed to mean definitely no doubt shares staff with the kremlin that's another thing she said it's just that a one america journalist freelance work for a russian based news agency sputnik she got him busted so bad

but as i've said earlier the number of times rachel maddow turned her show into a grand russian paranoia episode is just difficult to carry out. are about to find out if the new president of our country is going to do what russia wants. is under attack from the president and the presidents republican supporters in congress and the president conservative media supporters and also from the ongoing russian influence operation that a stay. around. what would happen if russia killed the power in fargo today and what would happen to all the natural gas lines that that surface and falls just on the coldest day in recent memory and it wasn't in our power whether or not to turn them back on no wonder that when some folks decided to put the m s n b c hosts russia gate obsession into a mathematical perspective they found she spent more time talking about russia than

all other topics combined over a certain period. now you know what it takes to become the most watched hosts in all of cable news she got to that milestone last year but one step by step it gets revealed that a lot of what you were saying was just a flow of blah blah you make up to win views the consequences do start haunting you 1st the ratings gradually went down and then the actual conclusions of the more pro blood to wet is on air this is what the viewers saw when rachel maddow 1st realized the probe wasn't going the russia gaiters way and so we know the logistics of how we got the notification that it did and obviously right now we have mostly just a ton of questions as to what miller's report says how complete it is who gets to see it who gets to decide who gets to see it and when. now here comes the lawsuit the one i mentioned nothing's decided yet but probably even more people

will think twice next on the here really literally in that familiar voice. now more than a year after the u.s. pulled out of iran you could do president don't trump says that reaching an agreement with iran could actually be a good thing he also spoke about the recent sacking of his national security advisor john bolton. they are a much different country right now than they were 2 and a half years ago when i came into office which. you consider easing sanctions told what to make a meeting happen we'll see what happens we'll see what happens i think iran has a tremendous tremendous potential. incredible people that they have we're not looking for regime change. we hope. we can make a deal if we can make a deal this trying to johnny is somebody that i actually got along with very well. he made some very big mistakes and frankly he wanted to do things not

necessarily tough for the mayor of georgia not as a tough guy he so tough he got us into iraq john bolton was one thing his aggressive approach to foreign policy need to can particularly hardline with iran as well as with syria north korea and venezuela iran's president has reacted to the . young boy americans have to realize that and not to the benefits they should not only abandon but also abandon their maximum pressure policy john bolton's exit from the white house is a positive sign it's also a sign that u.s. policy towards iran is not working the idea behind maximal pressure was to do whatever they can to damage iran's economy with the aim of overthrowing the iranian government that was something that bolton wanted and other people. who would like my pump or who are also interested in regime change in iraq trump may need meeting

for his 20 twentieth's actions he doesn't have any even. in foreign policy his policy with china is not really working out policy with north korea not working he couldn't get the venezuelan government overthrown and this was one of what science projects rouhani doesn't need that money need sanctions lifted and. so is meeting with trump doesn't. have any benefits for him personally or for. as long as the sanctions are over so it's not. something that the sanctions would be lifted off the me. now a visit by independent american journalists to syria has sparked outrage in some parts of the media after they traveled to government held areas to assess the country's recovery they spoke with neil harvey i'm staying in the old city of

damascus by the eastern gate sharky and i walked across the street across the highway into a neighborhood about a few 100 meters away that had been controlled for 4 months by jaish al islam the wahhabi militia backed by saudi arabia and met residents who had actually lived under their fear craddick rule who described kidnappings rape of women people being executed in the street for violating the theocratic rule and how happy they were to be finally freed from this gang what i was observing was a city and outside of the city that is much much safer since i last was there last and i was in syria was 2 years ago there were still fighting it was still on save there were checkpoints everywhere now that the government has taken back many areas especially around to back the baskets outside of damascus you can travel to the suburbs and beyond the suburbs without going through a 1000000 checkpoints not being worried about being kidnapped or being sniped

moreover our life has gone to a reasonable degree back to normal for a lot of people. to travel to the capital damascus with the aim of speaking to locals in the acing series recovery from i still and they say they did not receive funding from the country's government and among those angered by the visit were journalists from c.n.n. and the intercept who accused them of whitewashing and also government support is some of their reactions. this is sam goebbels prancing around syria in a government luxury tour posting tourist photos near torture centers and maki syrian refugees who can never return to their country with their frisking being tortured to death started to read a certain journalist's thread from inside damascus this am then found myself getting palpitations which progressed into spasms of rage how can anyone be so blindly credulous on a cot exam volved it is such a disgrace. l m a o ron and mark's are in damascus neither of them speak arabic

yet they claim to be talking to many syrians there why aren't they disclosing who's translating for them and helping them mount. this is to be expected and so they're trying to intimidate americans or europeans and people from the west from coming here they're trying to break off cultural exchange between us and average people who just happen to live in the area controlled by the syrian government where most syrians live and what we've been able to see and report already has threatened the narrative that's been conveyed by western corporate media and a pack of kind of dime a dozen correspondents acting as state department i mean i think the people attacking us have an agenda they're either convinced that they're right or they're working on behalf of somebody else or both this isn't something we're we're that's new to us we're used to it i think it's why we can recognize an operation when we see one and this is if it's very quantitative you know these people are talking in

some d.m. group and coordinating against us and it's quite obvious and it's not surprising we expected it and i you know i think it's something that happens particularly any time does anybody visit a government or the syrian government side. of syria and offers a realistic perspective they can expect to be attacked but more importantly i think the reason there are so outraged by me and max is because me and max tend to be quite effective in offering a different perspective an offering a reality on the ground kind of perspective. the war on terror launched in response to the 911 attacks 18 years ago changed not just america but the whole world to at least that's according to pakistan's prime minister imran khan who spoke exclusively with us here at r.t. here's some of what he said. were heard nor participated in the american war. you

know after 911 we would not have been the words to risk a tree participating in the war and i repeat i was against it because you see. we were trading these people to do a job against the soviet when they occupied of understand so these people were trained by pakistan funded by the americans. and now. a decade later when the americans are going to have understand these same groups all in pakistan are supposed to say that no not because the americans are there it's no longer job it's terrorism you know it was a big contradiction and i strongly felt that you know pakistan should have been neutral because by joining in these groups turn against us so we you know we lost 70000 people we lost. over $100000000000.00 to the economy and in the end we were blamed for the for the the americans don't see succeeding in

afghanistan i felt it was very unfair on pakistan the full interview there does touch on a wide variety of topics from a potential nuclear war between india and pakistan to the prime minister's past as a successful cricketer what aspects of that actually helped him in politics you can watch the interview in full on friday here on r.t. and also on our website at r.t. dot com. now the mystery of what happened to a group of soviet high kids in the ural mountains back in 1959 is still vexing minds today and now you too you can explore the various the research founding the past incident it is thanks to a special project that's been launched by artie's video agency rapley.

well the project does allow you to follow that 10 day trek and for each day you can explore what the greeks did why the photographs the maps and also what they wrote to you can also learn what their state their bodies were found in and the various theories as to what happened to be you can also get interactive as well you can put yourself into the shoes of one of the team members as they walk along the route and then you want your preferred of what happened course weighing up all the.

worth a look now still to come few fis our experts are warning germany's push for more renewable energy could actually threaten the country's power supply we'll have a look at that in more detail in a couple of. the world is driven by shaped by those with. no dairy thinks. we dare to ask.

so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy confrontation let it be an arms race in. spearing dramatic development only closely i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical time to sit down and talk. welcome back now and for a magic reduction in carbon emissions more energy from renewable sources and that's what angela merkel wants for the future and she's outlined germany's targets in front of bosses at a major. listen yes we must reduce transport produce c o 2 emissions by 40 percent

that's out 2030 target human electrum ability though is just as a trust for the future because cars will only be genuinely climate friendly once a look trysted it comes from renewable sources but we want 65 percent of our electricity supply to come from renewables by 2030 well the chancellor speech there did come a day after she used to keep budget debate to call for more action on climate change but some experts do say that stricture stricter regulations could put europe's biggest economy into reverse gear one quarter has more. if there's any country that could be the poster child of a green political agenda it's most certainly germany it's a noble pursuit no doubt but the green vanguard is learning the hard way that everything has a price that's induced is industrialized countries also need to be on the front line in terms of doing something to overcome our carbon footprint and stop changes in the climate or reverse the rise in temperature if we push for climate protection

it will cost money this money's well spent if we are going or if i think it will cost us more money that's the truth doing nothing is no alternative the fact is that we will then pay more. the captains of germany's car industry responded to merkel's request with a resounding they unveiled their latest most futuristic electric cars in frankfurt after billions of euros of investment of course perhaps they were trying to take a step towards the flying cars of science fiction at any rate many are saying that paying for the future is only leading to the destruction of the present and i can include the green socialist ideology is running our country and taking away any chance we have for the future your so called climate protection is nothing else than a monstrous steam industrialization program combined with variable job destruction you waste billions to avert imaginary doomsdays in the distant future we're not just hearing this kind of talk from politicians though a new report says that renewables are threatening shortages in germany's energy

supply and the country hasn't even come close to its energy transition goals germany is missing most of its self-imposed targets for the energy transition by 2020 at the same time energy supply security is being jeopardized in the medium term by the decision to phase out nuclear and coal emissions germany's over reliance on wind and solar energy has created a big deficit at times of little wind or sun the government has imported energy from neighboring countries to avoid blackouts and just to balance 2900. energy budget germany had to foot a bill that skyrocketed to $38000.00 euros for a megawatt of power per hour as compared to just $64.00 euros in 2017 not to mention that every day germans pay the highest energy prices in all of europe we have to highest energy costs in the world the price for energy is the highest in the world because of this change of to supply system the situation is very

ridiculous i mean they made a big fos last year for 20200 hectares of forest for a coal mine at the same time they're cutting thousands of hectares of forest for wind mails killing hundreds of thousands of animals i mean this is no green policy i mean right now the situation what we have in germany is that the green party started as an environmental party but now they change. their climate used climate paranoia party which sacrifice everything for the climate situation and you know it doesn't matter human beings nature animals no losses are all losses are justified this energy crisis may have germany teetering on the brink of recession and to stay afloat it's going to need that world renowned powerhouse of an auto industry it's built instead carmakers are being pressured to produce expensive electric cars that don't even sell that well folks like and chief already

warned that perhaps this is all going to for the current campaign against individual mobility and conventional cars is reaching and threatening level instead of using petrol or diesel will basically use coal even if we're literally powered and in the worst case we'll even use lead night but the idea of electric mobility to absurdity nevertheless environmental organizations are marching en masse on saturday joining them will be a brigade of cyclists calling for an end to the combustion engine hopefully it won't translate to an end to the german economy germany was a. very safe on energy supply and everything everybody's used to energy is always available but with getting more and more of it. into the system the system gets more and more in stable and we have seen in the last month several times to. energy supply system we passed by only very slightly governmental policy in germany is destructing our debate but one of our industry which is the car industry of

course from germany and for example works they announced already beginning of this year that they want to reduce 20000 people just because of the mobility only in germany it's a big economic game for all competitors i mean plants are closing down here in germany because of regulations and reopen in china where they can produce unlimited. one quarter without reports now top u.s. lawmakers are set to vote on a key element of the impeachment investigations surrounding the us president the $41.00 c panel is not voting on impeachment itself but on the promise is off the investigation supporters though of the probe do hope it will strengthen their chances of gathering key evidence against trump on allegations of corruption and also obstruction of justice however democrats have been sending mixed signals over this is explains. democrats seem to be rolling ahead with their efforts to

remove donald trump from office the house judiciary committee has just called for procedures related to its investigation of the president's wrong doing now for a lot of people that seems to put the smell of impeachment into the air their records on the house judiciary committee are expected to vote on expanding that impeachment inquiry into president trump democrats taking formal steps towards impeachment this is an impeachment inquiry in search of softly do impeach president trump over so we've got 134 democrats voting to begin an impeachment inquiry but do they really mean it at this point the democrats can't even seem to agree on what's going on with the house judiciary investigation who has been in the midst of an impeachment investigation no we're not in an impeachment investigation. the house is investigating to determine whether or not there should be an impeachment investigation so why might the democrats seem to be

a little bit reluctant well in 2020 it's not just the presidential race but there's also some local elections and it seems like impeaching trump isn't the best vote getter polls show that 72 percent of democrats favor impeaching donald trump but for the country overall 59 percent oppose and that seems like bad news for the new progressive socialist wing of the democrats that seem to have that their entire house on it remember this we're going to go in there we're going to be some of them from would love it if the different democrats tried to impeach him that's the kind of battle he loves the public is totally turned off it's not following this ready controversy at all so i think it would definitely play into trump's hands it will do the democrats very little good in the 2020 alexion and probably will actually wind up backfiring virtually impossible if he could be convicted in the senate and removed from office so it's just a it's a lot of hot air over nothing now the problem for the democrats in removing donald

trump is that according to the u.s. constitution once the proceedings begin it would be the u.s. senate that would then vote to convict and remove the president the constitution requires a 2 thirds vote among the senators and the democrats don't come anywhere near that so what would the charges be and all the most common answer you'll get is obstruction of justice but there's a little bit of a problem with that we did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime so obstructing an investigation into something that you did not do now you could certainly lock up an average joe for that but it's a pretty weak case for driving a president from office some democrats even think that it would be bad for the country to impeach donald trump it's important for us to think about what is in the best interest of the country and the american people. will and continuing to pursue impeachment is something that i think will only further tear our country apart speaker of the house nancy pelosi seems to be pouring cold water on the idea as

well but she chooses her words very carefully take a listen when you go down a path like impeachment which is very defined so they could divide the country whatever decision we made in that regard would have to be done with our strongest possible hand the democrats have accused donald trump of being a criminal a traitor and a fascist they've got their supporters out for his blood but it looks like if they actually go for it this might backfire in the long term caleb mop and ard see new york and that is the news for now thanks for watching our programs continue after the break. please.

please. play. lists lists lists. clicked. and very well might continue watching us until last. this is this is a stick from the water bottle phone in the stomach of the fish the brand is spawns of the coca-cola company which sells millions of bottles of soda every day the idea

was that let's tell consumers there are the bad ones there the litter bugs are throwing this away industry should be blamed for all this waste the company has long promised to reuse the plastic. that seems cool such. session projects funding me. on i'm your best bet is the end of a footy team fun no the mountains of waste only grow. what politicians do. they put themselves on the line and they get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president and you. somehow want to. have to go right to the press this is like them before 3 in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters in the house. this should.

live. think think think think think think. i think s. a. sentence yeah i gotta go i was the article.