2 pm can as your presiding says a critic. you have to. use the prime minister in one hand yesterday we discussed the issue of kashmir to the brits and we were produced. firmly on the need for a direct dialogue between india and pakistan and it was very useful in the seventy's eighty's they. signed number of documents and their horror and similar these declarations the treaties are still in force today. as many other countries we believe these documents should be foundation of the 2 countries to seek solutions which was sued by. thank you very much mr foreign minister this is most difficult. working for just because we are the bangladeshi news outlet my question on bangladesh from growing a shoes bangladeshis in difficult situation with media and running the country

itself is in problematic secure position in terms of economic social and democratic rights can you meet with the board to send them back with proper dignity as both. close allies of russia. at the new. this question. is not really. be solved possibly immediately as soon as the russia starts mediating. this issue there is genuine this standing which is supposed to emerge that on the other from the outcomes of the article because this election of this people need to be. sure that we need to create the atmosphere the environment for that and that can be done with the u.n. . agency for a few g.'s we need to. make sure that the. technical issues are resolved

and i mean the places where these issues can should go faster. for those their security should be guaranteed. and there. is. any other kind of business here we should. you. trust. your money they should be no with. too much publicity as such efforts to you from your position in the direction it would go to. only flare up of tensions the 2 sides become less prone to die a local and these things are the most you get when you walk or when your commitments are made into headlines so there is dialogue and dialogue should be pursued there is no alternative to that. turkish news agency and although turkey has been negotiating the creation of a safe zone with the united states for some time can you tell us what russia's position is on there and a follow up in part if i may the u.s.

special envoy for syria our james jeffrey said that the syrian government was trying to be a military victory and then he said the constitutional committee at this stage was symbolic what is your response to think you really are welcoming to those cannot grammont on water medical school james jeffrey so you know we do you maintain dialogue with our u.s. government there carman from syria another can't fix the change all the time they're never to be changed they were doing on their current mood or political goals immediate political policies and everything he used to blame the government of syria for not implementing the 2254 resolution then they started just plain syrian government clearly called the results of the syrian national dialogue conjurers we should rush earlier was there i don't do it you conducted in january

28th seen in sochi and that was the. who turn even point in this crisis we laid the foundation for real practical work on political settlement with you it was the congress in sochi without it in the basement of the wave for the establishing the guy situational committee it helped to have and so on the committee stablish all the modalities it was the 1st time when the very term the constitutional committee was called in response to. this when government did not want to support the document and as it did not want allegedly support the resolution all that was not true your use of rules of the world damascus supported the 2254 resolution it's supposed to work on this so it's a declaration you see a possibility and it's supported every other action which was made for the start of the meal in accordance with the age and of the. troika with. and these issues

mature on the ball not some actions huge scope of man to advance the political process so that it would start working in geneva where if you were to use as a coordinator what is it that the syrian government refuses to do today mr geoffrey says that the syrian government or your move by bill to believe that they can win the military will put 2 of those as well the syrian government has this is the new again was this one expresses a commitment to every obligation in youth you are including you the obligations related to this crisis many in the us now well you. say it's the government to spanking are the military solution but what they mean is that the syrian forces with russia's help will be eliminating the last remnants of the terrorists including yet to her a show moves which some say that again try to portray modded oppositions would send

these really beautiful when you folk efforts are nothing but a distortion of facts no one. ever by the boys to you or your member to show you can draw any opposites of a room or put harold's between fight against terrorism on the winning of the worth of the u.s. capitol sort of in such a situation where you can so syria agreed to step which the committee. was blue and the 1st question could you might be please about the 1st good question it's going to take on school to go all of the talks that it's going to go between the u.s. and turkey well that's up for bashir and them to have those dialogues but we did you discuss these issues with turkey and with the u.s. and there is one reason because we always do that because of the crisis is in syria both turkey and the united states use of this solemnly signed as a number of documents. voted for numerous reasons. which we all need to respect

the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the syria and your sins and from that point of view we do care about how they settle this issue but also some 20 years ago on this group of course there was the darned treaty between syria and turkey also was which reflected the arrangements which was made to the mechanism which would allow the countries to ensure the security on their border. problem and there is no problem as far as i see to use the same to your agreement which this year that both countries the go it's all to agree again on the how security of the puzzle in turkey would be insured now on your and when to stand but they want him why they wanted. they do you suffer for. your because of the terrorists will infiltrate from the territories now controlled

by the united states and deferred aspect of the problems with is also tied to syria's sovereignty or process or do so with a large degree that's because of the kurdish population and the way that it goes the us uses that. because it's. we assure you we see some screws to it if to. preserve losses then you've got more going to probably covered actions to create a local to our forward structures on the terraces where as a kurdish population level they do nothing else in the territories to the west of the freighters when they say that with all of the residents see. them going to continue this notion of housing should be established they say no shirzad a political process yes the story 1st let's wait and see about all that it is up and running it we will most likely deal with other pieces additional profitable horsemen but as for the east of the a freighter synonymous with the political brawl. monies ejected into these

territories and every. service is now being provided in clearly a shin senate a ship in a little tree city and dead people in a quest to trouble you for the arab tribes who used to inhabit the didn't you care . to use all the predation of the and some of the territories have been seized by 0 it's an obvious sort of does something which the arab tribes do not like and that is quite an explosive situation that we believe that the kurdish issue should be settled within the framework of the respect towards the shit all day rooted sovereignty of syria that issue should be discussed during negotiations which need to involve syria as well. and the moment that accounts of you cook for us in turkey should again confirm their respect of digital they wanted sovereignty

of syria and we will use this as a criteria for assessing all the actions carried out to the east of the euphrates. he says there is a lot of. these here is that over thank you for it's my question we thank you very much. they are clearly and could so happy. mr minister you spoke today about the popular stand and using the international law with. their countries you also your country is now supporting israel and you know it is in population of international law you know it's taking the palestinians and you know it's building settlements and building a wall and palestinian land grabs and people in prison and you have warm relations with israel and mr wanted. expand on those mediators not only with the

us you as it has lost its role as a mediator why you don't step forward and there was something about the question of palestine using this leverage on the in the war because of the warm relations with those or it can use that to really step in and the peace process. because the worst of all like i said before the fags with. all of the what you could probably dancing around the palestinian problem. the promises of the deal of the century they call it the deal for over 50000000000 or something your sense of it was very shared reduced you know or not having refugees return to palestine. and 1st trying to. have arab countries calm allies those relations with israel and then address the palestinian issue all of these. but he still

makes. the list seanie an israeli. settlement. come to a deadlock and this is not in the interests of either of your people or israel because there was only the creation of the palestinian state as promised 70 years ago can lead to peace and stability in the region and remove. this extremist of deescalate the situation and also allow extremists to rush this also lead to extremists. stopping in to recruit young people from the street so most of the new but. the american line to deal with this problem which you know actually seems to be stealing to manned. on and he was. dealing haven't

heard of the processes. that russia is not doing enough for this issue to be resolved before the palestinian issue to be resolved and if we take all of this problems. as a whole all of the problems that defined the current stage of israeli palestinian issue on process is clear that's the products and mission of the 1st one and the most basic staff would be to reach palestinian unity to restore palestinian unity and whether. or not a man or other organization they feel they have their outside allies which are different countries. but all of those people are palestinian. authority and reaching unity restoring unity of the palestinian i ministration of governance

holding elections but it's something that would strengthen palestinians dance and position in the negotiations and this is something that is up to the palestinians and to the arabs themselves this is not something that anyone else can do and the fact that they cannot do this they are doing this only plays in the hands of those who don't want you to resolve this problem who don't want to unity. you're going to this may sound politically incorrect but this is how people who don't want the settlement see this issue and russia held interposed senior in meetings on many occasions including. the islamic jihad organization and they have been over 15 organizations that are looking to negotiate we provided a platform for them to have dialogue to agree with one another how to restore unity . within palestine they had to clear asians issued statements. but they

never moved past that i believe this is a very important aspect of the work along those lines and. support all countries that support these issues and i'd like to specially know the role of egypt and other countries and on the final question i have questions for you before your meeting with such as yourself as carolyn with c.n.n. before your meeting with secretary powell it was reported that you had said to the press that there would be a surprise response because members of your delegation were not given visas is that still stand and secondly. in a phone call with the press this morning and a spokesperson from your office said that russia would not want transcripts of phone calls between president putin and president trump release is a concern of yours and are there any other concerns you have in the fall from the

domestic turmoil going on in the u.s. currently. there's no single national well you know. your 1st question i. publicly today is before you go order your friendships a bunch of your the. youth program you'll be comprehensive for that and on the testing of chemical weapons who was announced over and i talked about this with my comp. on and like i said i have with them i am absolutely sure that neither mr pombo neither going to go with mr trump. has made any something because that is something new for made it happen made it so that your russian delegation did not sure that received their visas was not a bit of good and of course when the. other friends you've got the wall there you do use. caliber was taking the place where will always be very

vigilant that. all members of the u.s. state department receive their visas. and your mortgage problems and atika unfortunately we have many problems with the u.s. many issues with the u.s. because or because we don't want to act in a. manner in the eye for an eye manner of. remembering what the obama administration used to do people how they basically seized our diplomatic property within the us just as we simply had to respond in a similar as the rain and we did the same 2 parters american little. property in russia. the us constitution says that private property is sacred and. i think that it is very un-american to do that on your part and i think it goes against your democratic principles and traditions you should work with your

just simply to prospective all disrespectful to their group and also the yahoo web site. recently recalled that. mr obama seized our property and made a story that those darn chairs outside washington and new york were somehow. people who should spy nests this is this is really with a series of acts for another one little we would like these relations to go back to normal especially when it comes to our diplomats. communicating with russian and american. doesn't all depend on us but we will try to normalize the situation now as for this transcript of telephone conversations you know there was but you know my mom used to tell me when i was young that it is very inappropriate to read other people's letters and you know i still. think

a lot of this wave so when there are 2 people who were elected by 2 nations there are traditions there are diplomatic manners diplomatic principles that. guarantee you could be a certain kind of toy you've got privacy and confidentiality so. i don't know who made the decisions about. publishing this transcript of the conversation between presidents of the u.s. and ukraine but there is diplomatic practice there are diplomatic norms. and pushing some issue to the outside to be discussed. because the by the media or elsewhere and say if the administration doesn't show us some kind of a note if you do so you may read some private note to someone's parents maybe it's

. something else some document is this really democracy what can you really work for in such an environment of the us. we will go you know to act in accordance with the vienna convention for diplomatic relations for months and i advise and all and all of the media especially us media that are trying to find out whether they can have some other transcripts published i think they should remember and keep in mind that these norms of diplomatic relations thank you. and leave. russian foreign minister there spending about an hour talking to reporters following his address at the u.n. general assembly covering the gallus of just about every country an issue that russian foreign policy is involved in right now finishing off there on a question from c.n.n. regarding a comment about having conversations between leaders reveals to the media that was

blasted back to say you should really listen into other people's conversations and besides leaders should have some sort of guarantee of diplomatic privacy he did touch upon early on he was questioned regarding the talks before he gave his address at the u.n. general assembly with secretary of state my pompei are not giving away a great deal to be perfectly honest but again going through all the conflicts issues that the u.s. and russia have between them at the moment and certainly where the u.s. is butting heads against anybody who doesn't agree with it didn't seem to be too optimistic very moving further forward on any of those but new communication channels were being opened plenty in there there's also plenty in his address which is about 90 minutes ago now on our correspondent in new york we have crossed that for you and bring you all the highlights a little bit later in the program. this is r.t. for a moscow next for you then an impeachment inquiry into donald trump is gaining momentum as democratic party leaders claim the u.s. president has betrayed his country and is no longer fit for office. this occupant

occupant of the oval office poses a clear and present danger to our future to our democracy he's endangered by putting his personal and political interests ahead of the interests of the american people place that i hoped we would never be and never thought we would see a president take the actions that he has it's not about politics it's not about partisanship it's about patriotism. on tuesday the house of representatives launched a formal impeachment inquiry into donald trump it came out after a whistleblower claimed wrongdoing during a phone call between the president and his ukrainian counterpart that he made selenski it's the latest in a slew of impeachment attempts mr trump's face since he took office in january 27th saying. the walls feel like they're closing in on the truth ministration right now and i'm not sure they can hold them off for much longer the walls are closing in and everyone is freaking out the walls are closing the wheels are coming off. the

walls are closing in on president trump walls are closing it with trump on the walls are closing in on the trump white house. all of the walls are closing in at this point the walls are closing in fast on baghdad as you'll remember the democrats was mostly dominated by russian commission probe senior correspondent takes a closer look at the moves against president. if you're a democrat the hard cool liberal type you knew in your heart the trump would be brought down the only question was how long it would take just needed a reason and come on there were plenty no people put their money on the trump russia collusion story treason collusion between the trunk team and the russians and trump knew about it that would truly be impeachable it's miss prison of treason and so far his response has been exploding and unfortunately proved entirely

fabricated but to hell with it obstruction of justice federal seen in the united states that ought to do it to president trump trying to block the f.b.i.'s rush investigation committed impeachable offense are we getting closer and closer to the possibility of yet another impeachment process no dodges that to come on let's go in on the guy slept with the porn star media told us and paid a hush money to keep it silent no way he'd survive that bicycle you see the trump team stepping into every trap that she and her lawyer set for them having a president knowledge that he was actually meant to be a party to the nondisclosure agreement and now of course she's got a an avenue and a way to fire back at it cohen what is going on how many get out of jail

free cards does trump have you can keep this up surely every excuse to get rid of trump was brought up the sky just dissected in this guarded nothing would steak until now it seems like ukraine is the 1st nail in trump's political coffin bloodhounds democrats smell blood weakness at long last. trump is vulnerable i think focusing on the c. crean scandal singularly is important i think we have to act quickly but not with haste of the more able to speak with one voice on that subject than on some of the other we've got to go narrow no question about it i would hope within a 6 week frame we could get the evidence on the table so the american people can see it just one phone conversation and trump signed his political death warrant and if you thought it was about russia you thought wrong even

a russia was discussed in that very call i would like to find out what happened with this whole situation with the ukraine they say crowd strike i guess you have one of your wealthy people the server they say ukraine has it that sounds crazy democrat servers hacked by the russians allegedly somehow ending up in ukraine what these things are so secure crowd strike the d.n.c. as computer security squad warden let the f.b.i. look at them would threaten their security if the f.b.i. investigated they claimed all that the agents received were redacted draft reports all the information about russian hacking was pushed amongst others by crowd strike and the f.b.i. putting him politely said this isn't how things easily done it's not the way we would prefer to do the investigation 2 years have passed and trump still

hasn't been able to find those servers from may or may not have reason to think that the servers are in ukraine and is trumbo after all whatever they know in washington it's clear that the democrats won't let go of this whole ukraine business if finally got solid ground for their long awaited impeachment oh and russia. forget it the wind cares anymore the democrats are desperate. they're terrified of losing the election joe biden. is a disaster as a candidate if if he is the nominee he will i'm almost certain he will lose to trump and the democrats are hoping to bring trump down through this whole impeachment process this idea of. finding a scandal and running around hysterically where there really is no criminal offense

so they're hoping to bring trump down but i just can't imagine it will work. court in the u.k. says it's unable to prevent the home office from deporting a 10 year old girl at risk of female genital mutilation after her sudanese mother's asylum application with rejected he said he has the story. putting aside his enthusiasm for war and its cozy relationships with despots and dictators the british government self other staunch defender of human rights around the world the latest crusade they've taken up is the fight against of g.m. in other countries they've pledged 50000000 pounds by 20 to combat the issue. the bible at least 3 days into any requirement it doesn't make. sense in the state of god but the british home office is pushing ahead with supporting a woman and her 10 year old daughter to bahrain where lawyers fear then be deported

on to the done but the mother is originally from the country has one of the highest rates of conducting f g i mean the world and the risks being another victim they are happy to prosecute female genital mutilation they're happy to give money abroad to stamp it out but they're failing to protect women who are at risk if deported a british family court earlier ruled that the coal face the risk of being concise against will if sense of border. it was overruled by the home office which said immigration issues are none of the court's business perhaps the most hard for by the u.k. to deport someone it was the case of abu qatada a radical cleric the u.k. accused of having ties to al qaida it's a 12 years and 1700000 'd pounds to remove him and was a victory for the british government since is the britain who spent almost 200000 pounds protecting his wealth in jordan and the question now is whether the mother and her little girl would also get that much protection from u.k.

authorities if she ends up back in sudan is really reporting what we've asked the u.k. home office for comment on the coast we're still awaiting a response to the meantime a lawyer for the girl's mother told us that the british government isn't doing enough to protect young women at risk of after. her mother says that her little girl is a high risk if she and so her mother was cut and she suffered type 3 f.p.m. which is the most physically severe type of f.p.m. that any woman or child can undergo and in fact the mother says her sisters also died whilst enjoying this most brutal practice so she certainly says it's a high risk of f.e.m. and we know from the social services who took this application to court to stop this little girl from being deported that they also believe there is a high risk of f.g. and and also the national center here an expert organization working with families in this country who are at risk if she can also believe that this little girl is at risk so there's a wealth of expertise here.