noam chomsky. noam chomsky am i on the faculty at mit and i've been getting more headway in b.m.i. on the faculty at mit and i've been getting more more heavily involved in a war activities for the last few years. as a war activities for the last few years. the you know the noam chomsky has made to international reputation but why does does one of the national jobs cases made to international reputation why does does one of the national leaders of american resistance to the vietnam war the deep this is a professor leaders of american resistance to the vietnam war the deep this is a professor of linguistics who before he was 40 is owed to transform the nature of

his self privileges we stick to before he was 40 is owed to transform the nature of his subject. the you are identified with a new level whatever that. the you are identified with a new level whatever that is you certainly have been an activist as well as a writer the is certainly has been an activist as well as a writer the professor noam chomsky or any of those didn't anybody. has a theory on the time scale of any of this didn't anybody catalogue among the half dozen top heroes of the new leg of catalogues among the half dozen top heroes of the new left. standing he achieved by adopting over the past 2 or 3 years a series of the standard he achieved by adopting over the past 2 or 3 years a series of. adamant there's. at least american evidence.

at least american. barges. barge in this notion anti american is quite an interesting one sashes to tell this notion anti american is quite an interesting one sashes to tell tearing the ocean it is used in free societies so some will tear in the ocean it is used in free societies so if someone and say italy is criticizing berlusconi and say italy is criticizing berlusconi or the corruption of the italian state and so on than

a cold italian or the corruption of the italian state and so on than a cold area 16 they were called india today and people would collapse and laughter of the 6 they were called india today and people would collapse and laughter in the streets of rome or milan. in totalitarian state streets of rome or milan. in totalitarian states the notions used so in the old soviet union dissidents were called the notions used so in the old soviet union dissidents were cold and he said that was the worst condemnation in the n.t. soviet that was the worst condemnation. of the brazilian military dictatorship they were gold in any brazilian. brazilian military dictatorship they were gold in any brazilian. no it's true that in just about every society the critics are.

no it's true that in just about every society the critics are maligned. mistreated different ways depending on the nature maligned. or mistreated different ways depending on the nature of the society like them so it unions say well would improve the society like them so it unions they will be imprisoned. in a us dependency like el salvador a prison. in the us dependency like el salvador at same time is counterforce it either brains blown out by the us or in the same time his counterparts have their brains blown out by a us run state terrorist worse than others is it just condemned their villain state terrorist worse than others is it just condemn their villa for the so on and in the

united states or one of the terms of abuse from the so on that in the united states or one of the terms of abuse is anti american and there's a couple of others like you know more cases there's an array is anti american and there's a couple of others like you know more cases there's an array of terms of abuse. of in the united states of a very high degree of fear of terms of abuse. of in the united states of a very high degree of freedom and so if you're vilified by some comments or who cares to go read them and so if you're vilified by some commas or who cares to go on to your work anyway these concepts only arise in the cold and do your work anyway these concepts only arise in a culture where if you criticize state power and when i state i mean where if you criticize state power and when i state i mean. we're generally not just government

but state corporate power if you could were generally not just government but state corporate power if you criticize concentrated power you're against the society you're against the be its words traitors as concentrated power you're against the society you're against the b. it's quite strange in that it's used in the united states and it's for another the only thing that is used in the united states and it's for another the only democratic society where the concert isn't just ridicule and it's a sign of democratic society with the concert isn't just ridicule and it's a sign of. elements of the elite culture which are the great. elements of the elite culture which are the great ugly. ugly.

the american dream my many ideas. the american dream my many ideals was partly symbolic but partly real so in the 1000 bills was partly symbolic but partly real so in the 1950 s. and sixty's there was a the biggest growth period in the fifty's and sixty's it was. the biggest growth period in. american economic history. that american economic history. gold made. the gold paint. it was pretty go

a tarion growth so the lowest it was pretty go a tarion growth so the lowest 5th of the population was improving about as much as the upper 5th. if the population was improving about as much as the upper 50. and there were some welfare state measures which improved life for and there were some welfare state measures which improved life for much of the population it was for example possible for a. much the population it was for example possible for a. black worker to get a decent job in an auto plant. black worker to get a decent job in an auto plant. get a core of children go to school and so on and then. get a core of children go to school and so on. the same across the board.

when the same across the board. when the u.s. was. primarily a manufacturing center it had to be the us was. primarily a manufacturing center and it had to be concerned with its own consumers here famously concerned with its own consumers here famously henry ford raised the salary of his workers who would be able to henry ford raise the salary of his workers who would be able to buy cars. when you're moving into my cars. when you're moving into an international tunnel me as the mag would international plutonic me is the max like to call it

a little small percentage of the world's population that's a guess like call it a little small percentage of the world's population that's a gathering increasing wealth what happens to american consumers of much less considering increasing wealth what happens to american consumers of much less concern because most of them aren't going to be consuming your products anyway at least on a major base term because most of them aren't going to be consuming your product anyway at least on a major basis. your goals or profit in next quarter or even it if it's. your goals or profit in next quarter even it if it's based on financial manipulation and. high salary high bonuses based on financial manipulation and. high salary high bonuses produce overseas if you have to and produce for the wealthy because produce overseas if you have to and produce for the it will. see

classes here and their counterparts abroad what about the rest well there's a term classes here and their counterparts abroad what about the rest well there's a term coming in to use for them to as they're called the precariat. coming in to use for them to as they're called the precariat. precarious proletariat the working people of the world who live in precarious proletariat the working people of the world who live increasingly precarious lives. and it's related to increasingly precarious lives. and it's related to the attitude toward the country altogether. the attitude toward the country altogether. during the period of great growth of the. during the period of great growth of the economy fifty's and sixty's but in fact earlier taxes khana

made fifty's and sixty's but in fact earlier taxes on the wealthy were far higher corporate taxes were much higher on the wealthy were far higher corporate taxes were much higher taxes on dividends are much higher simply taxes on wealthy or much of a tax on dividends are much higher that simply taxes on wealthier much higher the tax system has been redesigned so that the tax ire the tax system has been redesigned so that the taxes that are paid by the very wealthy are reduced and cursed but is that are paid by the very wealthy are reduced and correspondingly the tax burden on the rest of the populations increased. and leave the tax burden on the rest of the populations increased.

no the shift is towards trying to keep tech. now the shift is towards trying to keep taxes just done and wages are not consumption which everyone has to do next is just done and wages are not consumption which everyone has to do not say and dividends which i go to the ridge. say and dividends which i go to the ridge. the numbers are pretty striking. the numbers are pretty striking.

now there's a pretext of course there's always a pretty. know there's a pretext of course there's always a pretext the pretext in this case is well that increases investment in increases jobs but there isn't any evidence for that if you want to increase investment give money to the poor in the world to x. the pretext in this case is well that increases investment in increases jobs but there isn't any evidence for that if you want to increase investment give money to the poor and the working people if people live so they spend their incomes that stimulates production during people if people live so they spend their incomes that stimulates production and stimulates investment that leads to job growth and so much. stimulates investment that leads to job growth and so much.

if you're an ideologist for the masters you have a different line and in fact if you're an ideologist for the masters you have a different line and in fact right now it's almost absurd and corporations have money coming out of their pocket right now it's almost absurd and corporations have money coming out of their pocket. so in fact general electric are paying 0 taxes and they are not. so in fact general electric are paying 0 taxes and have enormous profits let them take the profits somewhere else or defer it but not pay taxes or much profit let them take the profit somewhere else or defer it but not pay taxes and this is common. and this is. the major american corporations shift the burden of sustaining a society on the other major american corporations shift the burden of sustaining a society on to the rest of the population. the rest of the

population. solidarity is quite dangerous from the point of view of the masters you're only supposed to care about yourself solidarity is quite dangerous from the point of view of the masters you're only supposed to care about yourself and not about other

people this is quite different from the people they are not about other people this is quite different from the people they claim are their heroes like adam smith who based is whole approach to the claim part of their heroes like adam smith who based is whole approach to the economy on the principle that sympathy is a fundamental human trait but economy on the principle that sympathy is a fundamental human trait but that has to be driven out of people's heads got to be for yourself for the wound that has to be driven out of people's heads got to be for yourself father while maxon don't care about others which is ok for the rich and powerful maxon don't care about others which is ok for the rich and powerful but is devastating for everyone else. but is devastating for everyone else. going to take

a whole lot of effort to try to derive these basic going to take a whole lot of effort to try to drive these basic human emotions out of people's heads. and we see it today in policy formation for example human emotions out of people's heads. and we see it today in. how is he for a measure for example in the attack on social security. social security attack on social security. social security is based on a a principle it's based on a principle of solidarity is based on a a principle it's based on a principle of solidarity so a very caring for others. so very caring for others.

a social security means i pay payroll taxes. social security means i pay payroll taxes so that the widow across town can get something to live on a so that the widow across town can get something to live on. much of the population that's what they survive. it's of no use for much of the population that's what they survive. it's of no use to the very rich so therefore there's a concerted attempt to destroy it used to the very rich so therefore there's a concerted attempt to destroy it. one of the ways is defunding it you want to destroy it. one of the ways is defunding it you want to destroy some system 1st the fund. then it will work people be angry by some system 1st the fund. then it will work people be angry they want something else that's

a standard technique for. privatizing they want something else that's a standard technique for. private eyes exam system. we see exam system. we see it in the attack on public schools and public schools are based on the pretty in the attack on public schools and public schools are based on the principle of solidarity. i no longer have children school they're grown up and simple of solidarity. i no longer have children in school they're grown up but the principle of solidarity says i happily pay taxes but the principle of solidarity says i happily pay taxes so that the kid across the street can go to school that normal so that the kid across the street can go to school that normal human emotion at

a drive that out of people's heads i don't have kids in school human emotion that it drives that out of people's heads i don't have kids in school why should i pay taxes private eyes or so on. why should i pay taxes private eyes or so on. the public education system all the way from. the public education system all the way from kindergarten to higher education is under severe attack i mean that kindergarten to higher education is under severe attack i mean that's one of the jewels of american society. one of the jewels of american society.

go back to the golden age again. go back to the golden age again the great chris period the fifty's and sixty's a lot of that is based on free public great growth period the fifty's and sixty's a lot of that is based on free public education. one of the results of the 2nd world war was the g.i. bill right look at education. one of the results of the 2nd world war was the g.i. bill of rights which enabled veterans remember that's a large part of the cuts which enabled veterans remember that's a large part of the population and to go to college they would have been able to do otherwise of the century got free education elation and to go to college they would have been able to do otherwise of the century got free education where a community a state or nation regularly invest substantial vision where a community a state or nation regularly and best substantial share of it resources in education

the investment invariably it we turned into share of it resources in education the investment invariably we turned in better business and a higher standard of living u.s. was way in the lead in developing better business and a higher standard of living u.s. was way in the lead in developing. extensive mass public education at every level. extensive mass public education at every level. but now more than half the states most of the funding for the colleges comes from twitter but now more than half the states most of the funding for the colleges comes from tuitions not from the state that's or radical change that's a terrible burden not from the state it's a radical change that's a terrible burden on student and it means that students if they don't come from very wealthy finance student it means that students if they don't come from very wealthy families they're going to leave college with big debt and if you have the

dead you're trapped employees they're going to leave college with big debt and if you would think that you're trapped i mean maybe you wanted to become a public interest lawyer but you i mean maybe you wanted to become a public interest lawyer but you're going to have to go into a corporate law firm to pay off those dead by the time you're part of the cold enough to go into a corporate law firm to pay off those dead by the time you're part of the culture you know you're not going to get out of it again and that's true cross the border sure you know you're not going to get out of it again and that's true cross the border. and we're going to fulfill the repeated promises of politics. and we're going to fulfill the repeated promises of politics to the people on the you know we've all got. to the people on the you know we've all

been. grieving. for a. dream. for a rough. one . all the. little. scripts. pretty good. now you want to work. pretty good. now you want to work. no. no. no.

no. ball be cut cut a hole. cut cut cut. cut cut cut coming. up. quick to dismiss supposed to know what was an answer to linger some it's just a. note of what was an answer to linger some it's just a bullet you're looking it's not in the. least you're. looking it's not the. least you want to. see him do

you see him if you can also oppose me. see him do you see him if you can also oppose me. look with the showing of the study when i. looked with the showing of the plan to ship a study on the chin. he think it'll show. you the sleep study. he think it'll show. you the sleep study. both of shipping. yup and most of those. quotes of shipping. you up and most of the book is the work of the person you are still missing you know i don't know what the book is the woman for the person you are still missing no i do know what the war. on the war. was the

latest news in the press. was the latest news in the press. boys and he writes so you have put this list of those. worries in the right so you have put this list of those a. list of students are in the store oh yeah the social. minister students are in the store oh yeah the social. joint. join me every thursday on the alex simon show and i'll be speaking to guest on the wall the following me every thursday on the alex simon show and i'll be speaking to guest on the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then fix small business i'm show business i'll see you then.

well. let it. be 50. 50. in the 1950 s. . in the 1950 s. it was a much poorer society today but no the us could easily handle centers a much poorer society today but no the us could easily handle centrally free mass higher education today a much richer fully free mass higher education today a much richer society claims dozen of the resources for. society claims dozen of the resources for. that just what's going on right before our eyes

it's the a general attack that just what's going on right before our eyes it's the a general attack. the principles that and that i mean not only are they sick on. principles that and that i mean not only are they humane and they're the basis of the prosperity and help you make they're the basis of the prosperity and health of this society. both of this society.

if you look over the history of regulation say the railroad regulation of financial river the history of regulation say the railroad regulation financial regulation and so on and you find that quite commonly it's it regulation and so on and you find that quite commonly it's it's either initiated by the economic is either initiated by the economic.

concentrations that are being regulated or it's supported by them. concentrations that are being regulated or it's supported by them and the reason is because they know that and sooner or later they can take over and the reason is because they know that and sooner or later they can take over the regulators. or the regulators. and it ends up with what's called regulatory capture. the business being rate and it ends up with what's called regulatory capture. the business being regulated is in fact running the regulators . elated is in fact running the regulators.

bank lobbyists are actually writing the laws of financial regulator. ank lobbyist are actually writing the laws of financial regulation gets to that extreme. and that's been happening through history and i get it ation gets to that extreme. and that's been happening through history and again it's a pretty natural tendency when you just look at the distribution of power it's a pretty natural tendency when you just look at the distribution of power. one of the. one of the things that expanded enormously in the 1970 s. is lobby things that expanded enormously in the 1970 s. as lobby as the business world moved sharply to try to control legislation as the business world moved sharply to try to control legislation. business world was

pretty upset by the advances in public welfare and business world was pretty upset by the advances in public welfare in the sixty's and in particular by richard nixon and it's not to will understand that but he was a sixty's and in particular by richard nixon it's not too will understand that but he was the last new deal president and they regarded that as class treachery the last new deal president and they regarded that as class treachery. and nixon's administration to get the consumer safety legislation and nixon's administration to get the consumer safety legislation safety and health regulations in the workplace the e.p.a. the and where safety and health regulations in the workplace the e.p.a. the environmental protection agency. business didn't like it of course they were mental protection agency. business didn't like it of course they didn't like the

taxes they didn't like the regulation and they began a coordinated effort did like the taxes. they didn't like the regulation and they began a coordinated effort to try to overcome it. lobbying sharply increase the regulation try to overcome it. lobbying sharply increase the regulation and begin with a rule ferocity. began with the rule ferocity. there were no financial crashes in the fifty's and the sixty's because the greater the story i've heard there were no financial crashes in the fifty's and the sixty's because the greater the story apparatus of the new deal was still in place. better so the new deal was still in place. as a pm to be dismantled under business pressure and political pressure. as a pm to be dismantled under business pressure and political pressure. to get more

and more crashes. sure. to get more and more crashes. and it goes on right through the years. and it goes on right through the years. seventy's sort of start speaking in. 80. 7 he sort of starts begin. eighty's really takes off congress was asked to approve federal loan guarantees that the auto companies really takes off congress was asked to approve federal loan guarantees to the auto companies about the want and want to have a young dollar and all of this is quite safe as well about the want and want to have the young dollars and all of this is quite safe as long as you know the

government's going to come to rescue so it takes a break and instead of letting go you know the government's going to. nearest you so take say reagan instead of letting them pay the cost break and build out the banks like continental begin to pay the cost break and bailed out the banks like continental the biggest bailout of american history at the time that she ended his term with so that you spill out of american history at the time that she ended his term with so the huge financial crisis the savings and loan crisis and the government moved in and build it out to try natural crisis the savings and loan crisis and the government moved in and build it out for a kind of $300.00 favorite and it. kind of 300 or got a favorite and it may i think the 99 regulation worse dismantled to separate commercial the 99 regulation worse dismantled to separate commercial banks from investment

banks. then come see banks from investment banks. and then come see bush and obama build on bear stearns is running to the feds to stay afloat bush then obama bill in bear stearns is running to the feds to stay afloat president bush today defended the decision to bail out citigroup fannie mae and freddie macas in the bush today defended the decision to bail out citigroup fannie mae and freddie macin asked for a total of being $1000000.00 more to sail out could get much bigger and ask for a total f. being $1000000.00 more to sail out could get much bigger the billing even in troubles for the u.s. economy. the billing even in troubles for the u.s. economy. and they're building up to the next room. and they're building up the next term.

b. each time the. beach time the taxpayer is called on to bail out of those who created the crisis increasingly taxpayers called on to bail out those who created the crisis increasingly the major financial instability to be made bigger and beneficial insects to tattoo should listen to us to come on a in a capitalist economy you would do that but you would listen to this to me that it would work but energy in the testers elucidates to him that would wipe out the investors who made risky scheme investments and. but there was

a rich rich and powerful will that they don't want to try to have political assistance as they want to be able to run brun to the net nanny steady state take it as soon as there are in trouble this will go under there and get burned troubled and get billed as a taxpayer it's called the too big to fail. i mean there are taxpayer it's called the too big to fail. i mean there are no will or it's an economics who significantly disagree with the course that we're following her no will or it's an economics who significantly disagree with the course that we're following people who just stiglitz paul krugman others none of them were even people who just stiglitz paul krugman others and none of them were even approached the people picked to fix the crisis were those who created approached the people picked to fix the crisis were those who created the robert rubin crowd the goldman sachs croak

they created the crazed the robert rubin crowd the goldman sachs. they created the crisis are no more powerful than before. accident. or no more powerful than before the accident well not when you pick those people to create an economic plan. when you pick those people to create an economic plan and then what do you expect to happen. what do you expect to happen. for the poor let market principles prevail don't. for the poor let market principles prevail don't expect any help from the government the government the problem not the solution expect any help from the government the government the problem not the solution and that's essentially neo liberalism. has this dual

carriage that's essentially neo liberalism. has this dual character which goods were right back in economic history one set of rules for the rich there which goes right back in economic history one set of rules for the rich. for the poor. for the poor. and nothing surprising about this exactly the dynamics you expect populating surprising about this exactly the dynamics you expect if the population allows it to proceed she's going to go on and on like this until the next rational as it proceed she's going to go on and on like this until the next crash which is so much expected that credit agencies which is so much expected that credit agencies which kind of evaluate the status of firms are

now counting into their calculation of evaluate the status of firms are now. counting into their calculations the taxpayer bailout that they expect to come in after the things the taxpayer bail out that they expect to come in after the next crash which means that the beneficiaries of these credit ratings like this crash which means that the beneficiaries of these credit ratings like the big banks they can borrow money more cheaply they can push out smaller complete big banks they can borrow money more cheaply they can push out smaller competitors and you get more and more concentration everywhere you look policies are done this way editors and you get more and more concentration everywhere you look policies are done this way which should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that's what happens when you put it which should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that's what happens when you put power into the hands of

a narrow sector of will power into the hands of a narrow sector of will which will is dedicated to increasing power for itself just as you'd expect. which will is dedicated to increasing power for itself just as you'd expect. be. a. concentration of wealth. concentration of wealth yields concentration of political power. particularly so as you will to concentration of

political power. particularly so as the cost of elections skyrockets which kind of forces the eats the cost of elections skyrockets which kind of forces the political parties into the pockets of major corporations. political parties into the pockets of major corporations. the citizens united this was january. the citizens united this was january 2009 i guess that's a very important decisions print court decisions as 9 i guess that's a very important decisions prim court decision but it has a history and you've got to think about the history. of ford i bet it has a history and you got to think about the history. of 14th amendment has

a provision that says no person's rights can be and into amendment has a provision that says no person's rights can be infringed without due process of law. and the intent fringed without due process of law. and the intent clearly was to protect freed slaves said ok they got the protection to look clearly it was to protect freed slaves said ok they have got the protection of the law i don't think it's ever been used for freed slaves if ever marginally book i don't think it's ever been used for freed slaves if ever marginally almost immediately it was used for businesses corporations there are almost immediately it was used for businesses corporations their rights can't be infringed without due process of law so they gradually became rights can't be infringed without due process of law so they gradually became persons under the law.

persons under the law. corporations are state created legal. corporations are state created legal fictions. maybe they're good maybe they're battle fictions. maybe they're good maybe they're bed but to call them persons is kind of rages so they get got personal or a head but to call them persons is kind of rages so they get got personal rights back about a century ago and that extended through the 20th century. back about a century ago and that extended through the 20th century. as they give corporations rights way beyond with persons. as they give corporations rights way beyond what persons have so if say general motors invests in mexico they give so if

say general motors invests in mexico they get national rights the rights of the mexican business while the notion of percinet national rights the rights of the mexican business while the notion of person was expanded to include corporations it was also restricted was expanded to include corporations it was also restricted if you take the 14th amendment literally the no undocumented if you take the 14th amendment literally that no undocumented alien can be deprived of her rights if they're persons. in can be deprived of her rights if they're persons. undocumented aliens who are living here and building you're building. undocumented aliens who are living here and building your buildings clear lawns and so on

they're not persons. as clear lawns and so on they're not persons. but general electric is a person. an immortal super but general electric is a person. an immortal a super powerful person this perversion of the. l. of our full person this perversion of the. elementary morality and the obvious meaning of the law it's quite incredible entry morality is the obvious meaning of the law it's quite incredible. in the 1970 s. the courts decided that. in the 1970 s. the courts decided that money is a form of speech. but the person money is a form of speech. but we were swell and then you won through the years to citizens

united which says that the rebellion led you on through the years to citizens united which says that the right of free speech of corporations members spend as much money they want can't be curtailed to free speech of corporations namely spend as much money they want can't be curtailed. take a look at that mean. take a look what that means it means that corporations which anyway have been pretty much buying elections and it means that corporations which anyway have been pretty much buying elections are now free to do it with virtually no constraint as tremendous attack on the ground free to do it with virtually no constraint as tremendous attack on the residue of democracy. and a residue of democracy. very interesting to read

the rulings like justice kennedy's. very interesting to read the room. rulings like justice kennedy's swing vote his ruling said well look after all the c.p.s. is given freezing food his ruling said well look after all the c.p.s. is given freedom of speech there are corp why shouldn't general electric be free to spend as much when is that woman speech there or corporation why shouldn't general electric be free to spend as much when is they want. i mean it's true that c.b.s. has given freedom of speech what. i mean it's true that c.b.s. is given freedom of speech but they're supposed to be performing a public service that's why and that's what the pitch but they're supposed to be performing a public service that's why and that's what the press is supposed to be a general electorate is just trying to make money for the chief executive some of the press is supposed to be a general electorate is just trying to make money for the chief executive some of the shareholders. sit in critical decisions and it shareholders.

sit in critical decisions and it puts the country in a position where business power is great puts the country in a position where business power is greatly extended beyond what it always was this is part of that vicious cycle really extended beyond what it always was this is part of that vicious cycle the supreme court justices are put in by reactionary presidents who get in there because the supreme court justices are put in by reactionary presidents who get in there because they're funded by business and that's the way the cycle works. they're funded by business and that's the way the cycle works.

that i would get. today there are good dentists and bad at it it's the bad news in yemen the united states and bad that it's the bad news in yemen the united states deems to be a threat the good. lord in syria the cia seems to be the good. word in syria the cia and the u.s. military were engaged in covert actions really throughout the world. and the us military were engaged in covert actions really throughout the world. where they were assassinating populist leaders they were backing up right with military where they were assassinating populist leaders they were backing up right wing military funding an army was there's no posts anymore composed funding an army death squads there's no posts anymore because there's always a small. one really good that's because there's always

a small. one really good that's. a profit. for profit. during the dot com bubble there was a lot of. during the dot com bubble there was a lot of problems with c.e.o.'s an insider dumping stock right after problems with c.e.o.'s an insider dumping stock right after the i.p.o. there should be a lockup period to force people key people for the i.p.o. there should be a lockup period to force people key people to stay on for at least 6 months or a year to make sure this thing gets out of the call to stay on for at least 6 months or a year to make sure this thing gets out of the gate without too many problems here

in this era of the we work gate without too many problems here. in this era of the we work being a primary example the founder insider was able to dump almost being a primary example the founder insider was able to dump almost a $1000000000.00 before you're the i.p.o. . customer $1000000000.00 before your the i.p.o. . and this us. and this us.

and. for unions. and yearn for union. rational. rational. design a lot of need a thief to. design a lot of need a thief to. get the new. people in the. bull's.

eye. possess a small fortune indeed again to your. small fortune in the beginning to your good. fortune for the outnumber a lot about this more than a. fortune for the outnumber a lot about this morning after such financial. and natural. law.

the u.k. prime minister and the leader of the opposition clash in parliament. the u.k. prime minister and the leader of the opposition clash in parliament for the 1st time since an election. again the 1st time since an election was set. again despite your strong do or die promise to be. do or die promise to be. meanwhile the race to become the us democrats 2020

presidential candidates is getting meanwhile the race to become the u.s. democrats 2020 presidential candidates is getting tighter number of democrats who are undecided he's tied to a number of democrats who are undecided he's. there's such a big push to just get donald trump out of office because there's a lot there's such a big push to just get donald trump out of office because there's a lot of confusion with the democrats and they're not really you know i need to gather give me one more confusion with the democrats and they're not really like you know i need to gather to make one strong candidate and in the u.s. what is causing the biggest fright strong candidate and in the u.s. what is causing the biggest fright appears to be the fear of causing offense. appears to be the fear of causing offense.