after the chance you were at the presidential palace in damascus welcome to the international world exclusive i'm with the president of syria. as your president thanks for granting as an interviewer but it was to start off with why i granted interview now when you haven't done for a year and. you're most welcome the theory of. events in the woods in the region and you think after the invasion has brought syria front and center. once again this is one reason the 2nd one i think the public opinion would in

the way it has been shifting during the last 3 years. they know that. they know there. but they know what the truth so i think it's time to talk about this truth 3rd i mean so many interviews with the with the media outlets they don't try to get the information they try to get the scoop. they don't try to object have to do to bring the audience what's happening in the world that's why i stopped doing interviews for 4 youth will get will be journey from damascus to reconstruction but how many civilians how many soldiers have been killed wounded or displaced from your country. just 2011 this tablet that you so. during the last 24 hours in damascus you see you arrive to

to damascus is the result of the sacrifice of more than 100000 syrian soldiers who are martyred who warned so many lives of course it along the 1000 or maybe tens of thousands of civilians or innocence who'd been killed by mortars by excused by being. kidnapped and killed later or disappeared we their families still waiting for theirs there was a lot of fight in the faith of those terrorists that's why you see these stability and reconstruction countries that have supported you include iran of course russia . i mean i want to get on in a bit do the british and american defacto backing for isis al-qaeda in your country

but how would you what would you say to a russian family that had lost a russian soldier who had risked and that sacrificed their life. for for a dictator for release dictator what would you say to them as to why. glad to be uprooted and should be sending in soldiers to help your government you mention very important point even in theory no one would die for a person people would die especially. for cause and this cause the defending of their country think in their existence of their future. little somebody coming from another country to die for 3rd person whether he's a dictator or whatever you want to call it so this is not realistic this is again delusion that somebody would come from because the president put his name to die for another person or even. president put him put to put all the interest of his

country. for one person this is against the logic actually of russia according to what they said i mean president putin level and the others they are defending their interest in different ways one aspect you defend or if the fight terrorism in another country with a serial in any other country in the region that we defend the russian people because terrorism and least i do it is he has no borders they don't see political borders it's one. it's the one hearing. the whole world is one in a for the terrorism secondly the implement in the door the international law. according to their point of view with this international law if it's implemented it's in correlation with the interest with the national interest

so implementing the international law around the wood will help the interests of the russian people for what they've been doing in accordance with their national interest with the global therapeutic and with the syrian interest in syria stop it now you know that in media and nato countries this country your government you personally sit on them is with chemical weapons attacks let's just go back to one in 21st of august 23rd team. in good did your government drop chemical weapons on. on that date 21st august really 30 the funny thing about the identity of the same date where the 1st delegation that wants to investigate international litigation that came to syria to investigate the youth it didn't arrive to damascus which is only a few kilometers from this police. logically the syrian army

if. if we support that he has chemical plant he wants to do that he would into the bed this for a 2nd. they talk about 200 civilian killed if you use chemical weapons you me you me kill tens of 1000 in such an area with people living very close to each other i mean it's crowded area 3rd that if it only existed in the mind of the with and often it's the narrative that was that the pretext to attack syria the best for them and they didn't offer any tangible evidence to prove that there was such attacks and they are there were many reports that that refute. that has refuted that report all those allegations so it was only the allegation never ever see an army use chemical weapons before he handed

over all his arsenal to the international committee of course of the decision then to invade the o p c w him to remove chemical weapons or to actually win when there were such allegations about the syrian army during 40 so really you ought to raise it o.p.c. w. wanted you drive 40 m. to go here we invited them to come we did it of we invited them to come because we told them you could come and should investigate because we were short 100 percent who this is already geishas but of course the delegation not always on by is as you know they are mostly biased well i mean the present job you see w. had for them to arrive as he may have his own problems with whistle blowers. there is no doubt though that. he was the director general of the obesity i believe the board should the destruction here he said there were gaps of certainties discrepancies in europe b.t.w.

wanted to destruction of chemical weapons here in this culture gap in our reports why don't they show it now it's been since 2013 we've been hearing the same allegations could in the prove it after 60 years and every time they see syria has used chemical weapons is it possible to do to be under this. supervision by the whole western world and we're going through that again and again this is not rational i mean the whole story we do we don't need it we are advancing i mean every time we talk about using chemical weapons it was when we advise not when we lose i mean even militarily you may use if you want to use such a weapon about the syrian army because we don't have it anymore but really logically you can use it when you are. losing ground not when your advancing so you didn't use in job or shake was. in the area of aleppo.

you presumably deny 4th of april 270 all of these you deny the use of chemical weapons by the syrian go every story worth nothing more than a geisha the one who said there was use of chemical weapons he the one who should prove his story he'd want to should offer evidence is that you speak with the c.w. did. lead britain and the united states and for us to believe. they needed to bomb your country on the basis of they really do believe both believe is one thing and bringing evidence is another think so we are talking about evidence what the evidence that they have. to prove their story nothing they have nothing that can be any truth in the room was arguably on your side saying video evidence has been manipulated in that rebels were using chemical weapons via the saudi arabian government and chemical weapons were indeed used but

by the so-called rebels. on the you tube you can see it i mean. fully with somebody. play the role of the victim in many incidents not only with chemical weapons even with bombardments they still. believe that somebody has been the victim and at the end of the shooting his normal person here stand up. and you can see it on youtube it's very clear we can offer you would be evidence for this but there's no other evidence beyond that because the white helmet supported by the british foreign office government recently been given extra funding by the trumpet ministration. they claim their videos are absolutely true and that in fact the people who are making those videos saved 150000 lives in your country which 180 again is very simple to see the same faces of those angels.

the white had met the same face had the same one in the white helmet was a fighter with clyde. you can see him in the image of a clear the same one who always been behaving. or. cutting hate and one of them with a bean eating the heart of a soldier i mean this is very common to see on the internet the evidence i mean no one in the in this region believe the stunt the of the whitehead myth they are offshoot of. well the u.k. state mandated b.b.c. amnesty international their religion your government killed 11000 people using so-called barrel bombs from 12 that would be a violation of the un security council resolution you want 3000000 and indeed human

rights watch is pointing to satellite imagery you're talking about you tube videos saying there are fake videos these are some of the major nations as biggest n.g.o.s and broadcasters no war is a good war. this is self-evident truth you always. victims in any war but the talk about an army or state to go in killed 3000000000 and its own people this is not realistic for the simple reason the war in syria was about capturing the hearts of the people and you cannot capture the heart of the people by bombarding. the syrian army was fighting the terrorists. whether there is a. fire that affected from tyranny and that could have happened and you can have investigations but how could the syrian people support their state and their president and they're all me if they are killing them. was the only

way. to regain the east aleppo. the duke of wonders will you personally authorize the only way to get rid of al qaeda. arguably backed by britain and the united states the only way to get rid of them was aerial bombardment we definitely and we succeeded in some area through we we captured without war we made negotiations with those groups and they left they left that area and then we need to produce in the pictures and presumably say those pictures are true of the destruction in east aleppo because that really the only way to defeat al qaeda is the groups. those groups in eastern alipore used to bombard the civilians on daily basis and kill. hundreds of thousands of people in aleppo so the mission of the army and the mission of the street is to protect the civilians

from those terrorist how can we do that without attacking the terrorists that's not true and on media or in major nations they should it in your defense but what about the use of double tap strikes by the syrian government and the russian air force where you bomb parties to lead and then emergency workers go in when you bomb again there are a lot of. negative misleading narrative in there with your to show that the syrian army is intentionally killing this event without no reason and to show that those that they called them. like a y. tell me any other hospital which is paid a quarter for the terrorists the theory that the syrian army is only attacking the humanitarian facilities in order for the civilians to suffer actually what happened you drop of the those civilians fled both area and came to the government side in

every place not only just in aleppo. those people if you go to pull this deal even be in those areas under the supervision of the government why didn't we kill them why didn't they fled to turkey. this is the new theory if you would. the worst are not of but as i said. they had of the british backed way tell me spoke on my program and said they are just a humanitarian organization not terrorists at all despite what you and the russian government allege but you bet you have pictures you have to do you have proof so it's not that we don't have any of the allegations how do we know through their images we can offer you all the evidence we have evidence mr president i'll stop you there more from president bashar al assad of syria after this break.

join me every thursday on the alex simon still and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics or business i'm show business i'll see you then. you know world of big part of a lot of things and conspiracy it's time to wait to dig deeper to hit the stories that made stream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smart we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks.

welcome back you're watching an international exclusive with president bashar al assad of syria i'm going back a little to the 1st demonstrations in. damascus and there is a famous again we see state mandated british media program in which they interviewed of all people well the druze in beirut who said to camera do you authorize the killing of the year old. is that true and that they then interviewed a succession of people saying the mistakes you made led to what happened it wasn't the british and american backing of al-qaeda and isis dyess in your country at the very beginning. in the 1st few days we lost 5

policemen. by shooting by bullets how could we talk about peaceful. while you have. listening kid. but how could i want to raise the killing of a 13 year old yeah i'm just starting from very good from for the very beginning i mean the word peaceful demonstrations wasn't correct there was hooting and you cannot there who is hooting at the police and who the one was hooting at the civilians because in most of the incidents the police didn't have even machine gun or except this child was tortured no that's not true he's not we never had a cigarette burn there was one of the he was killed no no he was killed he was kid and the other legation but he was tortured he wasn't tortured he was killed and was taken to the hospital and i met with his parents they have been all the read story this is only in the with the in the west and in the with

a media outlet that is not the story syria so that's why i'm so proud of all those the 3 that are completely disconnected from our reality he's somebody who died how did he die who shot but you know it was killed when you have a chaotic demonstrations. could be infiltrated that demonstration and start shooting in different directions and kill police in order to retaliate. or vice versa to have you heard who. have been arrested in germany the germans alleging something called broadchurch 2511 of your torture units to torture demonstrators we don't have torture unit we don't have for torture policy in syria what why do you use the torture for but the question why is this a call if you can situation you just want to torture people of this kind of them

where to torture you need information f.b.i. or the information to measure it all the ceiling people supported their government that's why we've been here for 9 years in. by all of this aggression by the with and by the petrodollar in the. that's why the sword on your teeth and so why do you talk to the people but the question is not policy if you talk about individual it is it is this is only individual incident that could happen by anyone for revenge for any other reason that could happen anywhere and board but we don't have such policy we never believe in that torture could make your situation better as a state very simple so we don't we don't you know what did you make of it when the british government sent the royal navy to intercept in the rain the universal. they said the iranian government said it was with heating oil for syria and the sections from the european union going to hit the poorest people of syria. this winter.

exactly 1st of all this is by recy. the biography by the united kingdom of jean and this is the core meaning of the word regime called regime in polythene gang of youth something similar. yes they wanted to effect the people in syria why because those people expected to rule to rule with against their government during the difference to just over the war but they did and they were supposed to be supporting the terrorists the moderate rebels with the angels of white helmet but the people didn't this with their government so they have to suffer they have to pay the price 1st for they have to learn the lesson that you should to do with their agenda 2nd this is maybe the last ditch attempt in order to push them to be against big government but they tried to try to before and they didn't work because

the people knew the whole story and they know where their interests lie. people in the global south you and your government ministers may think it's natural to accuse major governments of supporting al qaeda bases but view is watching this interview in those major countries may think this is ridiculous why would the british government say or the obama government because i suppose don't trump arguably has suddenly realised what may have been going on why do you think they wanted to support al qaeda and i says why because of the fact this started with the fact that the american officers before anyone else said virtually with their dog like john kerry like hillary clinton and many others when they talked about their role in supporting of clyde in afghanistan in order to be

a tool against the soviet union that this is this is their modus operandi is not something we invented they are not on $911.00 why would they make the same mistake again. american policy in general. depends on trial of. the invaded of against they got nothing to invade big got nothing and they started to invade other countries but in different way they change the way the problem the left is now the the fighters survival war from their point of view they are losing losing their hegemony so they want to fight the russians and the iranian dissident whoever said no even their allies of this ignore like that with some government they will fight with them they need dude they noticed that in iraq it didn't work by sending the army bit lost a lot and they paid the price even when inside the united states so it's much easier for them to send a proxy so al qaeda is a proxy again the syrian government again the russian government and the government

best buy they've been using this but you have evidence the ice is how did i says rise suddenly in 2014 out of nowhere of course nothing. in iraq and syria at the same time with american armament. the be physically how could they smuggle millions of barrels of oil to turkey under the supervision of the american aircraft how could the american wanted to use them against the syrian army so it's more thumping with it the american said that and the fact that the same story. but while this has been going on you have been talking with international bodies and different into locators what do you make of the u.n. envoy stefan de mistura saying in quotations in the 1st few days having really

fought against what happened in aleppo it libyan dariya i could not be the one that is shaking us and and saying my ledge these are the people you were talking to as neutral observers looking back on it were any of these people neutral he cannot be in that position if is neutral because the united states will will only accept poppets they said their behavior but you did shake hands with them handy a n d have asked later to meet with me and i said no but so he he wanted to shake my hand if you want to do he was biased that's why he felt he was implementing the american agenda maybe in a little bit smarter way but it didn't work because he wasn't he was biased that's why and what is this geneva process there have been some reports that the syrian delegation was backed by your government but not representing the syrian government

what exactly is the geneva process post conflict i'm not even sure it's called that if the american. ploy it's about gaining in politics what you couldn't get. through demonstration 1st and through the terrorist leader so we can get it through but it is a political process that's way in he didn't tell you that's why you never fail because it was top and it was about operating the government through interim. interim body with the my to what is it. then change the government peacefully and control syria like they did in many other. countries that's why you never fade and that's why you went to sochi with the russian press why you know he's working we had this delegation last month and they started last week negotiating the constitution so when donald trump announces well you asked me about

this you never really read this geneva if you talk about this really avert this you know if it's only the venue the place you're get a few but i mean the political process if he thought she does matter where we we convene or where we thought the negotiation but of course the mainstream western media in media age relations are geneva north ritual and do you believe that this. curious story that the russians are saying that the u.s. is stealing $30000000.00 of oil a month from northern syria is this a trump while getting chipped in the geneva talks why would net oil export or like the usa be interested in $30000000.00 of oil a month no things i says the started spiking syrian oil and oil in 2014 they had 2 partners had a guy and his coterie and the american with the cia or others so what trump

did is just announced that he had the truth he didn't do it he didn't he's not talking about something new even when some of the kurds thought of looting the syrian oil the american will. partner so it's about money in this pot or it and that what trumps it recently but is not in yet or is not related to to the talks at all. but arguably way not more angry because obviously that would be a violation of the 4th geneva convention on pillaging of countries resources of course we are in queue everything in is is very definitely this is looting but there is no international order i should and there is no international law. but this is nothing new to be frank not only during the war the american always try to loot other countries in in different ways in different ways regarding thir not

only oil or money or financial resources they do their rights their rights political rights every every other right to the historical role at least after world war 2 so it's not something new it's not strange. all disconnected from their previous party but it from time to time it takes to friendship and this cheap good thing but all this talk asst. way of american policy looting the rights of other people was a big part of the war fossil fuel pipeline access to europe from the middle east that would cut rusher biplane access to the european union this is very realistic but some say that. the president to open

the c.d.r. for a pipeline is self north and he said no for the ocean actually that didn't happen this is not true but there was a pipeline that's coming east to east from iran through dark 30 to the mediterranean if this one was the reason it could be the war is of all the oil as a factor yes this is likely to be but this is not the only factor don't forget the war between the united states and the rest of the war do you have know you are talking about turning shifting earthquakes because the word order after world war 2. has been expired especially after the collapse of the soviet union and one polar would doesn't work anymore so you have rising powers like russia and china and india and other countries the us doesn't accept any partner in leading

the war even uki even from even other. become pretty i wouldn't call them great power call this is another meaning they're not to create any more. they don't accept partners that's why the are fighting now so the war in syria is the microcosm of the world war lists a world war 3 but without armament through proxies you have different factors the oil is one factor of the or not because of the war i don't think i don't believe just because of our stop you there for a moment president more from president bashar al assad of syria after this short break.

with the ever present cost and. the free money. we would have a day of reckoning. and prices would revert back to reflect supply and demand. and there would be. a catastrophic trap door opening underneath the u.s. economy because the u.s. won't do it for itself china will do it for the in the form of announcing as a surprise $20000.00 tons of gold and the introduction of a gold back of the currency this will kill the u.s. dollar better than adorning.

welcome back you're watching an international exclusive with president bashar al assad off syria. of course some might say that syria historically and yourself have always supported the palestinians and the u.n. resolutions governing the both judeans do you see israel which after all many believe to be a nuclear weapons of mass destruction. as influencing policy in the european commission in the state department in the pentagon. israelis or enemy. lent. evidence intuitive to be part of any thing that could happen again any plan any. through with. through their relation with the terrorist. was visiting

a terrorist who had been treated in the hospitals do you believe those pictures are true the israeli government was directing a lot of courting al qaeda linked and isis day shooting militants trying to destroy your government these radio published these photos formally as a news it wasn't or indications thicken the support in every time or every time the syrian army advanced again those. terrorists in the south user aid used to bombard our troops and whenever we adverse somewhere else in syria the airplane started committing airstrikes against our army but what and so the link is very clear there was correlation between the. israeli operations and the terrorist operations so that 1st through the terrorists thinking through the americans

through the europeans they have one. and one interest and before the war not only do during the war so it's very normal in be expected in likely that the user id should be part of all of these of course well britain the united states european powers may have stop trying to. aerially bombard your country to destroy a government the big news in the major nation media was the al baghdadi assassination by the 75th ranger regiment in the province is it your understanding going on from what you just said that al baghdadi is essentially. jane by the united states under torture in abu ghraib prison in iraq. he was in their prison under this a provision that miracles were the one who released by the ed so they wouldn't release him without any at all and suddenly by the day he became all the muslims in

the world as he signed himself. he was prepared by the americans to plea they're told and we don't believe the. recent story of maybe he's killed but there's not a bottle at the mention the whole story was about white washing. from being and grover the terrorist during the last not only few years but during the last decade this is like in the fiction movies when they are easy or memory they want to do with the memory of the of the. public opinion that we were over there were in direct link with the with terrorists. when obama sr was captured visually him. when he was executed they showed the event of exclusion when his children killed they showed their body the same

would of god why didn't they show us the body of bin laden why didn't the the body of. a dead. just fake story about being against terrorists and this very sophisticated operation maybe his kid because his his expired a person being needed somebody and maybe they wanted to change the whole name of isis into another name to bring isis as a moderate organization to be used again in the market. you know a little governor i get out of the media will react that the drumbeat ministration your government when it came to the nation of bill not that hard we're not part of any operation you're not in that order there's an order to between any institution in syria and in an institution from norway the representatives at these recent

geneva talks i want it or no one at all we don't have in addition with most of the with some countries who play a direct road against c i know you're antagonistic with nato nation turkey but with dirty and arguably yourself must be aware that western policy is liable for blowback into the european union would have you made of a european union government's response to the possible. outflow of british ices day his fighters back into the european union how dangerous is it to be in london today or paris or berlin. actually the relation between. the e.u. is to ease the hate him but they want him. they don't debate him to know that he is

fanatic islamist they know this and they're the bin or that is going to send them both. extremist or maybe terrorists egypt in many refugees from your country of many of them from syria and some of them know they're coming from different areas in the world not only syria actually but the majority are syrian up all of them are extremist not the measure 2 of them are actually muscled the turkey they'd have to because all the terrorism in syria because of the bombardment of the terrorists and so on. so they don't want him but the same time the fear him but from the other side let's hear that thing doing those. syria and other. is danger with the most dangerous on europe is to support the terrorists in syria this is the most dangerous part so this is hypocrisy how can you fear those few medias the majority of them are moderates and they have few to while you but you

support those theories there to clean 100 in tens of thousands at least and maybe hundreds of thousands in syria and you don't fear that they're going to go back to to a country where the british government takes away the citizenship of british just as arguably ok but then presently the fighting in the ad lib russian warplanes in action there how far away are we from reintegrating it live will there be an amnesty for these people that have tried to overthrow you through your government militarily it will not take long if we start to liberate it but actually what what we do is to give chance for the civilians to leave and that's what's happening but they've been actually not prevented freely toward the government they've been smuggled they've been coming they click each few for

a few families every every weekly 30 because they could be killed if they want to leave southwards or westward towards not all told to or the government should hisself. this is this is a very important for us to give chance for the through to even older not to be hard strikes backed by russia and your military forces reports in the last few days of civilians. know how easy it is it looks great to be reintegrated those air strikes again the terrorists facilities. very simply but in the west area an organization exactly in the me in with the narrative in the western media of an oddity of during the 9 years or the war that every syrian or lithium russian air strike should be again the civilian and humanitarian facility

unfortunately according to them our bullets. and bombs big can only kill civilians they don't kill militants all with as you see so no this is against part of the with narrative and i think just discussing this not even just with with. again. this is against our interest or into this lies in killing the terrorists in order to protect the civilians not leaving those 3000000000 innocents under the supervision of the terrorist and being killed by the ok but then what is the nature of your agreement with the syrian defense forces there's so many different names of organizations in your country many of them are the white had good guys in nature in nation media what is their power sharing going on who are the syrian differences is the if you know it's about. regaining the control full

control of the territory whatever the syrian army moved in to bring with it the visit of the government so it has done so for sovereignty on those territories but this agreement is bald though the bit is the if they're withdrawing 30 kilometers south would in order to. do remove the pretext of the turkish or the turks to invade syria so it's we are in transition period because they're going to give the army now but we invited them to go and the syrian army. some of the them said no the lot who do some of them said yes we are ready to join the army so we don't know what's going to happen yet but we invited been going the army in order to to have a normal situation as it used to be before the before the war when when the law prevail and the state prevailed nobody else and as for the girlish forces are they just tired after so many years i mean your understanding is they took money

from. the united states the cia i know you're welcoming them back you're worth 1st of all there is this is not only kurds it's mix of kurds and of and others 2nd when we talk about that is the of because in the to prevent part of the measured it was because they had good relation of the government and the measured it all because support that support the government but this which is called the people id is the one who is being supported by the americans publicly they armament their money they smuggled altogether. there are american. agents to be with most of them i wouldn't hold in 30 all of them i don't know all of them but their party policy during the last few years is to invite the american interest to be angry when the american wants to leave. and to say we don't want to join the

syrian army simply had you saying exactly what mr herder one would say to me of what the s.g. of all them actually they had to go and has his own agenda which is to part his own agenda as muslim brotherhood and the american agenda as a puppet so it's to pot but they were intended to usher in death. but at the same time though those group. oh dear why did i give him the excuse and the reason to invite syria that doesn't mean invasion is legal if the illegal in every thing is all the work but they give him the pretext because he's been announcing for year that he wanted to invade the northern part of syria and he wanted to clean that area from the terrorists and he mean the people id dictate give him the. excuse but what happened that's why they were to blame but erdogan has invaded ok but don't you see el nato some people in nato powers may

think the one thing we do not want is peace between and and damascus wealth and you are participating in that divide and rule system that will have been designed in western capitals you no chance of any meetings with mr herder one. with him is not free standing to to to meet with him and i don't think while somebody is occupying your land would be the preferred want to go to meet with we had some. meeting you negotiate with your enemies not your friends you know we are but not with not me with him no it's on the security level it happened through the russians i mean it was a tripod. meeting it happened 2 or 3 times it didn't include you know if they were not against the principle to negotiate with the move especially when we don't

consider the enemy the turks people our own neighbors and we have a common history because you cannot make them any the enemy is their gun in his policy in his country. so. the to be against those 3 groups. in turkey and in syria that doesn't mean that we see eye to eye fixed especially after he invaded syria publicly and forment mr president i'll stop you there more from president bashar al assad of syria after this break. the. big tank in the political left tonight the age of the gag order is underway and is

boris johnson said to win in win big in the general election briggs it would seem is changed everything. what politicians do. they put themselves on the line they get accepted or rejected . so when you want to be president and she. wanted. to go right to be this is what the 3 of them all can't be good. interested always in the logs in the house. they're sitting. welcome back you're watching an international exclusive with president bashar al

assad off syria you see countries that have taken policy decisions like syria and i mentioned about those 2 things i mentioned. historic support for what is he was liberation movements in the global south. they tend not to take up neo liberal economics the last time i was here all the talk in damascus amongst your ministers in damascus they were talking about privatization they were talking about elites in syrian society educated in business schools in it in the west. is that not the start of the syrian conflict when used to implement near liberal privatization plans destroying the fabric of this. actually there was a debate about privatization and the government and the state in going to refuse that even the unions in syria the measure that if you had been your liberal.

policies because you know that is going to destroy the poor that was before everyone was talking about it here you know. we moved estates toward liberation but we still have public sector to this moment actually who protected the economy and sealed with the services is the public sector without the public sector wouldn't have survived this war the role of the public sector because we are all socialist government anyway so we have an a no actually we still have public sector and with you support the poor with you have subsidies of braid or fall of schools of the merely nearly free education is free and so we haven't changed that policy but we opened the doors more for the private sector so you cannot call it lip arrive asian you cannot call it through a coincidence the conflict hit that just after you were opening up opening up the markets no it was arguably corruption more corruption no there was. there

was that if the explanation for that even of the conflict it doesn't have anything to do with this it doesn't have anything with it because there was a 4 year old drought of a drought and the people become poor no no no no this is not the reason this is not the this is not go to the explanation just theoretical in reality the problem started when the money of came to syria and we had contact with many of the neighbors and told them why don't you come to your workshop and this is in one. we take as we take in one week it was very simple if you paid them $50.00 at the very beginning then later $100.00 a week which has enough for him to leave without her so it was much easier for him to joint the thracian after that it was much easier for them to take them toward. having a moment in the end it hooting and before that we had very important the governor

would deny that of course different definitely i mean because it is with was presented that i am somewhat bizarrely for many women a good lunatic but the arab world is a continuation of the arab spring from the self-immolation of brazee in tunisia. that is connected to this conflict the arab spring or is that. of course there is there's interaction in this region of being or the same culture the same background the system the same circumstances somehow not not not completely. some of the demonstration of the very beginning were peaceful to fight every demonstration were infiltrated by militants in some areas yes some some people wanted to go could they want the to improve their situation some people they have the own ideas about improving the political system more freedom or different

flow growth. be used in those demonstrations so that was made by the influence of what happened in other countries like in your train but there's not what that continue this way the same people that i'm talking about this stop participating in the demonstration where the shooting started and the extremist thought infiltrating special divorce from both of you started reading to demonstrate why with a lower quality and using religious slogans in order to give this religious and sometimes sectarian. mantle to give it my tutu to work put this matter on that it was for a something like that could be happening in lebanon. you think that in country all of that because that they have. a. constitution in syria would not have sectarians constitution so it didn't work but i mean the outside influences they should. of course the one we believe spontaneous demonstration to be spontaneous

but where will it go that depends on the awareness of the people. i've got to ask you a reconstruction from people saying you're going to be too dependent on china on iran the estimate is worth 230000000000 dollars i don't know how they relate these things. you expect now the desperate are richer and there's going to be massive reconstruction is that what's going to happen. not very soon because you know there's embargo in syria and the american tried hard during the last 2 years to not the individual not only companies who was to invest in syria they said to you on the embargo right away so many capitals fear coming to syria because of their team in bargo but this is not the biggest problem for the human as we have enough to get all come through we don't need any human resources we can build it gradually so i wouldn't worry about the somebody who are definitely friendly country like china

or russia and the we have priority in this rebuilding not european union every country who would against syria would not have chance to be part of this is written where it is no british rain will definitely. do you think actually and there has been raised that the return of. terrorists as you call them. mass immigration good to after the libya war after the syria war they affected breaks it because of illegal immigration in europe. of course the far right have been influenced by this to his own interests of course talk about the far right but most important thing. not the political aspect of it the the change in the society how much europe is ready or cane or able to integrate those

immigrants in this society even before that immigration during the last 10 years to europe they had a problem in the integrating the immigrants in this society now you have this problem and you have the fear of them that inflicted france. u.k. and other countries. there would be affected because part of both immigrants are the extremists and the terrorists. and the people who doesn't want to integrate they want to go there just because they want to leave the region for different reasons security economy and although we know security collaboration to help these countries. there's no way through no government no we're not ready and we said. very clearly that we're not going to help any country and security while they work against syria and every aspect economy security and in their politics the loss of m i 6 on his opening speech alex younger he said. you putin

you make a desert and call it peace and human tragedy is heartbreaking any british official that. is not but in no position to talk about the humanitarian aspect anywhere in the word they've been part of the invasion in iraq they've been partner in killing more than 100 and a half 1000000 you know ickes. they've been in attacking syria with. and the embargo in syria and killing hundreds of thousands of syrians. and have been they are american puppet they are not independent because so they are in no position to talk about the humanitarian issues anywhere in the world let alone the history in india in the past forget about that could only help here i'm not talking about their current in modern history in up in a position well just finally then what about the election here is there going to be a general election in 2021 in syria in italy and will there be more than one person on the ballot last time we were 3 and this time of course we're going to have as

much as they want to know me they're going to be numerous nominees mr president thank you thank thank for you. that's all i'm saying to my hardest to a dash or sticker but if that's. the design you need to be. at a regular ricky. the

same kind of show because he must come to life is yelling make us tell us your face your body has suddenly become one thing my mother 100 a bunch who. sent. him on the hook it to move the whole thing as opposed to how funny thing with the quote is is you guys just have come since. you know so he dumped the last young man who's young they have. by so much smoke the soup i mean he chews still so not to sing on. me simply couldn't see.

it. as the beginning just from hong kong web protesters are so the mom on fire apparently food being pro-choice means. welcomes the resignation of the believe you president he could apparently under pressure from the other 34 weeks or so. violet's the same time several countries denounce events in the latin american countries a crude. syrian president bashar al assad shares his thoughts in an exclusive interview with r.t. is the 1st time he's spoken to an international channel for more than a year. the american war with other countries in in different ways in different ways regarding fear not only always or money or.