a meeting between the chief of nato and france's president fails to resolve tensions within the alliance for the. purpose. of libya in the grip of political instability we've talked to a local. public ulead. president. and i want people to see. and germany's highest court rules in favor of a man convicted of murder over 30 years ago who was his name removed from.

the debate. but the problem is when you. mention this person themselves not trying to raise the past but trying to be given a. way of thinking you know what clean slate start again. and i welcome the international live from. welcomes the progress. meeting between the french president and the nato chief has apparently failed to resolve lingering tensions within the game casting doubt on the current agenda of the. military alliance. looks at the roots of the tensions. one of the 1st symptoms of irrelevance is when you find yourself having to remind people that you're all relevant successful and someone's got off in a bit of

a verbal self-congratulatory blitzkrieg nato is the most successful lines in history. and alliance that all those strive to join showing the historic suspects of natal and liberal in it and it has been the most successful alliance in the history there is more much more the star machine amount of a standing valid stake a step back look at it objectively almost 30 years since the cold war ended and nato hasn't changed almost nothing about it just as they were then they're still expanding eastward towards russia just as they were then they're still standing up to russia now also in the cybersphere afghanistan a lot of evolution there 18 years of stagnant stalemate what they've really

adapted to is pumping out glamorous videos no argument there stella stuff nato is brain dead and those aren't my words their own from the lips of the french president. of the different school nato is a collective defense alliance against who and what it is organizing to accuse our common enemy what are our common issues and these are questions that deserve clarification magic or has a vision a united european army a europe protected by europeans not americans no hard feelings i mean how did american feel if the us was protected in the garrison by hundreds of thousands of foreign troops a european military that decides on its own who its enemies are its little definitely knew is our enemy now russia or china is it the goal of nato to designate them as enemies i don't believe so our common enemy today in nato is

terrorism which has hit each of our countries. but nato is nothing if not adaptable we heard many tod's now they're evolving to adapt to the fact that the u.s. is tired of paying for everyone because everyone else's so successful that no one wants to foot the bill we work together and getting some of our allies to pay their fair share it's called burden sharing and as you know when i came it wasn't so good the united states pays for a very big share of nato a disproportionate share but in all seriousness there is something that has changed in the last 30 years it'll countries a buying russian weapons turkey spending billions on russian s 400 air defense systems and refusing to go and march up and down on russia's borders until nato acknowledges that its members have actual problems. if some countries

object another country's security concerns are being interest in there will be no unity with the natives. are nato the galaxy's greatest military alliance since the big bang it isn't gentleman all since the moment of creation probably arguing about it is well nato was created. to face the communist threat at the time and the way in u.s.s.r. was dissolved. normally need to shoot had been dissolved too because it was the only and only target of need to. so today the nato members are wondering what is the use of nato and the european countries.

we are very quiet very tightly to be in there at the command of the united states or america because nato is. really commanded by the united states. the mayor of a small town in bolivia who was brutally assaulted by protesters made an arrest triggered by the country's political crisis is refusing to resign patricia auditors now left hospital images of the attack on her emerged on social media revealing the violence towards politicians of the party of ousted leader was quick warning you may find the following scenes up setting at the start of november after setting. fire. to her bare foot cut her hair in public and read during a 4 hour ordeal she was moved and sign a resignation letter. still being treated for damage sustained from the closest she

received. when what happened was disgusting i am now recovering from bri no damage that i suffered during the assault and i am still in pain the also cut off my hair they beat me out but they didn't change my view that everything was so confusing at that moment many of them covered their faces but we recognize some of them it was sad to see all those people attacking me it's been a difficult time for my children to see their mother in such a condition i don't want this to happen again. i believe is now facing political uncertainty the self-appointed right wing government of senator johnny unitas has already been accused of abuses ever more as resigned after the country's military suggested he step down. this was on the way on the back of a wave of protests following october's election and that occasions a vote fraud his supporters see it as a coup and during the address 34 people were killed and more than $800.00 injured

but again says that the violence must end. did not quote that if you're going to be i can't betray my people those who believe in me i would like to express my gratitude to the staff who have stayed with me and are dedicated to improving the cd we will keep working to achieve our goals it was very difficult to return here after everything the deed to me and it was terrible to see the city hall in such a state after all the work that was done to improve it after everything that's happened how can it get any worse people need to reflect and stop harming each other we need to restore unity i've never hurt anybody i've always worked for my city and i want people to take a step back and think you know they believe in people cannot live like this. and like friday shopping extravaganza gets underway in shops around the world today americans alone will spend there are $87000000000.00 this time around chasing the best deal there is

a darker side to this retail festival that quarter explains. black friday is coming up big box retailers are gearing up for their annual mega sales super profits and consumer stampedes that will probably result in more than a few injuries in a georgia wal-mart to have been fighting over pots and pans one refusing to let god . that wasn't brutal enough for you there is an even darker shade of black friday the kind that takes place on a darker shade of the internet called the dark web it's a place where black marketeers pursue huge profits with alluringly low prices just as much as the legitimate guys probably more so and there are plenty of consumers looking to buy those contraband goods society has become more digital and i don't without so his crime despite their activities being on rule from an illegal

criminals all returned in surprise in a sense i'm not looking to maximize the opportunities it's no small enterprise either last week the european union published a report about online narcotics sales in the u.k. it said 24000000 pounds sterling worth of the stuff was sold in 20172018 alone and on black friday everything from credit cards fake passports and illegal drugs are for sale at bargain bin prices and marketplaces that are specifically designed to be completely untraceable and while buying illegal items puts you at risk with the law you should also be aware of the very vendors you're buying from security experts are sounding the alarm and how you can avoid a black friday. as we head into the holiday shopping season notice there is a new online scam that involves fake retail websites that look real but they are not scams come in many forms one popping up more and more is fraudulent websites

that look exactly like the real thing no doubt the a thorough. yes will be hard at work trying to stop these dark web deals but what about the consequences that come with legal black friday consumerism for so long 'd the overproduction and overconsumption that characterizes the holiday have been cordially accepted as the norm no matter the frenzy that overtakes many or the damage it wreaks on the environment the latter has become so bad the french government is debating on banning black friday altogether but for now expect the usual frenzy for anybody who takes part in a black friday so who wants to be part of this when ever there is a chance fraudulent activities especially with what we know about the dark web in certain facets of the internet and with all of the hacking capabilities firewall breakings and all this other stuff we need to be taking personal responsibility individual responsibility and being sure that we are in charge of what happens to our finances and where we're putting our finances that it really takes advantage of

the narrative that people have to shop on black friday that that is the only time you can get presents for your children for your family for your loved ones and your friends and so it really gives the some of these hackers or these dark web or some of these false sites an opportunity really to to prey on these on these shopping sentiments and to try to find people who are going to be likely to give in to any deal that looks too good to be true b. and because we don't take the time to look into that especially on black friday when it went in and so it's not only a frenzy but there's a time constraint we have one hour we have a certain amount of time or it's going to be over and you'll miss it forever and that's what gets people in these modes where they're not going to look it up they're not going to research to see which sites are legitimate which sites aren't and that's where they might be able to be taken advantage of. germany's the court has ruled that a man convicted of a double mudroom the eighty's has the right to have his name and all the details removed from search engines he was sent to the 982 and serve 20 years in jail and

the case was widely reported in the media and his full. name appears in online searches as part of archived articles he claims his right to privacy and ability to develop his personality have been violated where the right to be forgotten is a controversial subject that's resulted in disputes between google and the european union now what does the law state if any european citizen can ask for links containing sensitive information to be raised from search engines now in 2014 the court ruled that they could force search engines to do this since then google says more than 800000 requests have been made to remove over 3000000 web addresses of critics though say it's dangerous removing information on former criminals earlier our guests debated the issue. well they certainly deserve a 2nd chance but what they don't deserve is to have the historic crimes of they've gone wiped off that no one can find them this is clearly an attack on free speech

freedom of information and it's international censorship because the rights of those that he killed the families their victims should never be forgotten but what he wants to do he wants his past to be completely wiped clean but once you start to we erase historic events then you're. rewriting what historic what history was this person should have a slave why clean on the fact that the still showing up is going to be discriminated against or it could push him back into a life of crime if he's not given the right to leave his old life but a lot behind if you go for a job you still got suits you still got to give your past previous convictions which will discriminate against you anyway but the thing is there's no point releasing the individual from prison if you still going to lie if you still want to live in the past i'm all for giving a 2nd chance and like say the rehabilitation of offenders should should help but sometimes it's down to employers having confidence in the judicial system to corrective behavior for people to come out

a changed person and sometimes you need that confidence in businesses to give them a chance but the problem is when you start to hide your historic events then that adds another dimension to the people will look into employer if he's trying to hide this what else is he trying to hide this person trying to better themselves the trying not trying to raise the past the trying to be given a fair shot of the way of thinking you know what clean slate start again this is me now not then did you want to raise the posse could change names always off the internet could just change the name if they want to eventually like let me. now i do want to repeat myself but the fact is you can change your name and you can just do exactly that anywhere if. i change my name for example when your gold mine is called you can have a go at the opera not with. no if you if you actually go for jobs where they need to do certain disclosures because of the certain criteria you have to say if you change your name or you know by other names so that they can do

a proper search yet serve you serve you that society you released as a new person with a with hopefully with a new mindset you should be given every opportunity so that your past is stricken from the record like ability to go in for jobs it will always come up so there's no getting away from it just about. being a new person pretty produce project yourself in a different lie and try to become a productive member of society the criminal may have served their time they may want to move on the families can't move on it's still there and they should never try and wipe it because if this try and hide their past what else are they going to try and hide in the future. palestinian journalists spoken to was after allegedly being shot in the eye by israeli forces this happened as he was covering clashes in the west bank. we covered a demonstration by people from serif here is the confiscation of land by israel the rally was suppressed and there was some clashes while we were covering the clashes so i was shot in the eye by an israeli sniper i was wearing

a reporter uniform and anyone can identify me as a journalist from far away up by god only lost my eye not my life when i was shot i thought i was about to die i felt like my head was going to explode i thought i was breathing my last and then my colleagues came to carry me away. has received an outpouring of support after the story went viral palestinian activists and journalists held demonstrations in bethlehem in solidarity with beams of colleague a couple of days after the incident meanwhile the palestinian journalist syndicate says 60 journalists have been hit by a lie about munitions this year the majority of them in gaza. the israeli police though maintain they use only non-lethal force which was not directed at the photographer but also say his injury could have been caused by violent rioters model both thinks what happened to him was no accident. it is really occupiers do not want the rest of the world to see the repression

palestinian journalists are showing the world what the occupation is doing to our people the disregard for human rights palestinian journalists are exposing these crimes and palestinian journalists are being killed summers have muslims your patient does not care or respect any of the contrary the suppression of journalism with the collusion of some of the countries is enabling israel to escalate its crimes against the palestinians. police in the u.s. state of massachusetts have a new kind of canine colleague a highly advanced robotic one the machines were built by boston dynamics who creations have already gone viral. all of austin dynamics robot is equipped with 360 degree cameras prompting fears

over its possible high surveillance capabilities it can reach speeds of almost 2 meters a 2nd and its body has crashed and water resistant civil rights groups warn there's a lack of transparency regarding just how such technologies are used so the police defend their use of new tech. robot technology is a valuable tool for law enforcement because of its ability to provide situational awareness of potentially dangerous environments we just really don't know enough about how the state police are used in this and the technology that can be used in concert with a robotic system like this is almost limitless in terms of what kinds of surveillance and potentially even weaponization operations may be allowed and we discussed earlier the robot controversy with the radio and t.v. host catherine turk and former member of the f.b.i.'s joint terrorism task force steven rogers. what concerns me and i think what's concerning a lot of the public about this is this is something that was done pretty secretive

way and not only that there really aren't the provisions in place for the public to really know what's happening with these robots i think this technology it's sort of the great unknown with a lot of this artificial intelligence that's kind of scary it's almost side 5 movie when you see this spot this boston scientific robot dog if they're using i mean it's a little terrifying looking it reminds me of something you know straight out of terminator and i think that there needs to be some things in rules and and provisions in place before we introduce these new types of technology these concerns are nothing new. u.s. law enforcement has used robots for the past 10 or 15 years robots go into situations that give police the ability to look around corners to look through walls the motive is not to be secretive the motive is not to be utopian the motive is to save the lives of law enforcement officers. victims and even

criminal suspects when a very serious criminal act is being committed. and u.s. president donald trump has said that is a ministration and will begin designating mexican drug cartels as terrorist organizations you saw it in their old and knock on people trafficking and refused to rule out military action. picks up the story. for years the united states has been working to curb the narco gang and chaos in mexico without much success. but now efforts against the drug gangs are taking

a new twist are you going to designate those cartels in mexico as terror groups and start hitting them with drones and things like that but i don't want to say what i'm going to do but they will be designated words aren't meaningless we've seen quickfire designations before the war on terror has included drone strikes military invasions and much more targets have included al qaida isis and boko harami in africa and the latest addition from trump the islamic revolutionary guard corps of iran the sum precedented step led by the departments of state recognizes the reality that's iran is not so new a state sponsor of terrorism without the i.r.g.c. actively participate in finances and promotes terrorism as a tool of statecraft the legal designation of state sponsor of terrorism has been used to target entire countries today the united states is designating north korea

as a state sponsor of terrorists the iranian regime is the leading state sponsor of terror calls have been issued for white supremacy groups to be outlawed and labeled as terrorists do we need to consider designating some of these entities as foreign terrorist organizations or is the current policy of the united states of america that we only designate muslim organizations as f t o's if a white nationalist organization fits the criteria of n f t o trump even suggested that anti-fascist also join the list major consideration is being given tsunami on t. for an organization of terra poland is being watched very closely hoofy the mayor will be able to properly do his job now donald trump seems to be applying a label to organized crime organizations operating south of the us. border and as he said you sometimes need an army to defeat an army so perhaps it's not really

a descriptive term after all it's just a legal one that opens the door to all kinds of new possibilities september the 11th crimes in the united states were crimes of terrorism for sure. but then after the us invaded afghanistan and iraq it started calling the rockies who were trying to defend their country against the us and british invasion terrorists that really does not meet any objective definition of terrorism but that is precisely the way the us has used it the way israel uses it when palestinians try to defend their selves and their territories that is unfortunately the way the term has now come to be used as thing with the us president told trump has shared

a picture of himself with the buff body of fictional books so rocky balboa that incidents been rife with speculation about what they intended message may have been . thank you for ian. thank you i was. trying to photo of his head and sylvester stallone's unclear who was who. for. without evidence donald trump should the go through focal length crew. i see both posted to social media around the same time today the chancellor went

with a clip from a tall comfy speech in the digital age the president when with his head on the body of. leadership really does take many forms for a few. groups this is all wrong defeated russia continues to have treaties thank you. thank you thank. you thank her thank you. well as a pot with getting away just a few moments time the tea when i was back there with another global news rundown so that.

we thank you. lead. you know world's big partisan movie lot and conspiracy it's time to wait

to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks. their.

own welcome to worlds apart the u.s. house of representatives may have wrapped up the 1st round the fit between hearings against president trump but it's certainly not done with trying to oust him there already plans for a new impeachment proceedings in connection with the miller report and possibly dotson's of leads chums opponents hope to leverage is that a viable strategy against the 45th president of the united states or is it playing directly into his hands well to discuss that i'm now joined by at the word. president of the world russia forum and the frequent commentator on the u.s. russia relations. it's good to talk to you think you very much for your time and my pleasure now. we russians are no strangers to acrimony and rethink we know that americans while but i have to say i'm constantly surprised sometimes even

shocked at what i see play out in the american politics the fact that a simple phone call between 2 halves of state and a pretty big now phone call of doc could trigger impeachment proceedings that's pretty mind boggling to me is it the same to you absolutely and to not only to me actually it was congressman steve scully's. a republican that compared to what's what's going on. is reminding him you're ceasar. i slightly disagree with him because in the u.s.s.r. . and all leaders were saying something no one believed a single wart and actually people who said it also didn't believe what they were saying but no you see there half of the country believe it or just. people who say those things they don't do.