5. germany's the solution to expel 2 russian embassy stuff 1st calling the move on friendly justified berlin claims there is evidence to link russia to the murder of a georgian national which happened in the german capital in the summer. but elections looming the leader of britain's labor party is smeared by accusations of spreading so-called russian dissin from ation but the main accuser the telegraph newspaper has apparently used the same dog for itself. and a u.k. university is under fire for guidelines it said 1st traveling to its campus in dubai which suggests they should there are sexuality.

people who work in the united arab emirates. for many many years this is simply a money making exercise. has put profits before human rights. over your tuning in from across the globe today welcome to international my names you know neal good company. russia's foreign ministry say's the expulsion of 2 embassy employees from germany is on friendly unjustified berlin claims there is evidence to link moscow to the murder of a georgian national in the german capital several months ago chancellor angela merkel has also accused russia of not sufficiently cooperating with an

investigation into the shooting. we took this measure because we did not see russia supporting us in clarifying this murder and in biological context of course he also talked about this with allies we consider this move unjustified and unfriendly politicized approach to the end of us to geisha is unacceptable we are forced to implement an integrated response. the 40 year old victim was an asylum seeker of chechen descent he was targeted in a berlin park on the way to a mosque with witnesses saying he was shot in the head chest by a man on a bicycle with more details on the case here sir berlin correspondent of onslow success. initially the 2nd screwball case in the media less attention was given to the victim himself who has sought asylum here in germany his name is a cynic on concourse fi who some course has been described as a political point of lead in the report and he is an ethnic chechen who later became a georgian citizen

a right hand man to terrorists during the 2nd chechen war his role to lead extremists groups in the caucasus and recruit spies kind of those meetings reported paramilitary career continued into 2012 when he said to have assisted a georgian operation like it says former comrades considered a terrorist by the russian authorities he was also put on a list of potential islamist threat here in germany as well but they you can definitely see that there are certain interests who want to poison the relationship between russia and germany and this is a for more than 100 years on going straight to g. at certain hours and it seems that there is some cleaning up we're. going on isis and everything around and this high profile terrorist who might be the nuclear related to all these had been nice in there with isis and syria and so on

so i think there can be many more reasons why this was done and who did this apart from russia now various media outlets this medium the name cat that those here center and the insider have published their own conclusions to is that their evidence includes for comparisons and killing patterns of a man who had been on a hiding lists from interpol and russia and suggests they wanted him or her was hired by moscow to then do the same thing he did murder but the federal investigation in germany is just beginning now there is. not nor has there ever been any evidence that russian governmental structures have anything to do with this incident but back in august the speculation and media hysteria had already squarely blamed russia so perhaps reports of this type of nature are not coming as a surprise the problem is that we cannot trust any of those explanations from

german governments at all it was already was this creep out it was with iraq all these so-called big evidences turned out to be just nothing and in this case to make such a big thing like sending 2 people home is without any proven fact it is just a disgrace i'm feeling very ashamed of the federal bureau of foreign affairs. coming elections in britain seem to be the next to russia links on their rise in the u.k. labor party leader has been accused by the country's telegraph newspaper of helping the spread russian descent from ation that's after he exposed leaked documents on u.s. u.k. trade talks but it also comes just months after the very same paper itself published a story partly based on a leak of the very same document. it's crunch time ahead of the u.k.'s general

election meaning it's now or never to smear anyone and everyone in red in other words link them to russia this week it's mostly comrades jeremy corbett as we can see from this headline bounce off the corp and produced a leaked cache of documents part of which he says reveals how pm boris johnson put the n.h.s. up for sale during trade talks with the us q damage control from mr prime minister the n.h.s. is not for sale and under no circumstances will this government or any conservative government do anything to put the n.h.s. up for negotiation in trade talks or probably as an interviewer that those documents represent meetings that took place between a british minister and officials in the usa i think it's time they gave us the shorts that they will not sign off our n.h.s. that they will not sell off our public services as part of a trade deal with the us and i just garage sales aside it's the least dossier

that's grabbing attention if not from the russians when i could corbin's documents have possibly come from corbin calls it nonsense but among the pack of those demanding the labor party come clean it seems the daily telegraph knows better independent researchers said the documents carried the specter of foreign influence as they had been published online using methods that directly mirror earlier russian descent from asian campaign the daily telegraph tools that conclusion from a social media a little exposure that works with nato's atlantica council's think tank guaranteed impartiality then all maybe the guise of the telegraph are looking for answers in all the wrong places it seems the outlet got its hands on a strikingly similar dossier let's take a closer look here's an excerpt from the dossier corbin out there was much talk which printed do you commission as the bad guys it is easier to change your regulation before it's finalized ok again that was from the leak obtained by the

opposition leader and this from the dossier published by the telegraph 4 months ago see the difference. british negotiators said washington had repeatedly painted the e.u. commission as the bad guy american officials said it was easier to change a regulation before it is finalized there was march talk which created the u. commission as the bad guys it is easier to change your regulation before it's finalized well maybe we should ask the authors of the july report who their source was did they have a new russian friends who might have provided the documents also here's a tip keep a close eye on the online comments section some of it's really worth a look like this one posted more than 2 weeks ago with links to the very scandalous documents at the center of it all available for anyone and everyone to enjoy however it would seem that the people most concerned about the origins of the

dossier happen to be those at the telegraph the u.s. u.k. trade talk minutes found their way onto the internet the cabinet office to investigate and if not do you think they should be. the answer is no. well the telegraph is here to reply to a request for comment. from foreign intervention in the breaks and of course nations has been welcomed the leader of an irish briggs a party sais that comments by the us speaker of the house was a game changer because more enough later in the program. a leading british university has been branded shameful and appalling over its advisory guidelines for stuff travelling to its campus and by its suggest people should hide their sexuality. this is so deeply humiliating for l.g.b. t.q. staff be prepared to answer questions about your relationship statues what the hell is this meant to mean make sure you take the time to prepare convincing lies about

your partner's last family. highly transphobia essentially trans people should put themselves through mental torment for the pleasure of going to the bride. university of birmingham we value diversity and as long as it doesn't get in the way of profit the university of birmingham opened its campus in the united arab emirates last year offering a range of course is set to u.k. standards it's currently expanding with plans to accommodate more than $4000.00 students some lecturers have refused to take up positions in the nation over human rights concerns there are some of the advice that the university offered it ses to protect students and staff. do not do anything that may be perceived as a public display of affection by the same sex or opposite sex even if it's intended to be innocent try to avoid dressing in a way which is not traditionally associated with your perceived gender if you are

in public do not wear any clothes or accessories which could be considered to be a form of the l g b t q advocacy earlier we discussed whether an educational institution should be offering the kind of advice at all. there are thousands of. people who work in the united arab emirates and do saw for many many years i have friends there who work there so i don't think it is that much of an issue from the point of the. university it's about protecting students and it's about having the right guidance and support in place to protect students as they study in the country of the university of birmingham has a very clear and very good equal opportunities policy a very strong policy around human rights diversity and inclusion and by going to dubai it is violating its very own rules and principles i think quite clearly this is simply a money making exercise the university of birmingham has put profit before human

rights i can't is to be with anything peter said about the regime in the u.a.e. or saudi arabia or some of the other despot regimes in the middle east where there is no human rights and there is no freedom but i think it's important for individuals to know the expectation of you know now that the universities there how they should behave in terms of protecting themselves let me rephrase that how they should conduct themselves how they should protect themselves their own safety and the safety of their peoples and i think that's what the university was trying to do try to get a balance in terms of security and in terms of safety carrot have one law for people in britain and then a different law for people in dubai that smacks of arrogance it's next of western privilege it smacks of disrespecting the human rights of the people of dubai and i want to say that this is not just about the human rights of the lecturers and staff

of university it's also about the human rights of the people in dubai itself who live under a very very oppressive regime reality is the university is there and they've got. a moral duty to make sure that the safeguard and protection of their staff and their peoples. and they've done it in that way which i think is most responsible giving advice to people. husband journalist from bloomberg news from his election campaign events after the media company announced it won't be investigating any democratic candidates including its owner michael bloomberg the decision by bloomberg news to formalize preferential reporting policies is troubling and wrong since they have declared their bias openly the trump campaign will no longer credential representatives of bloomberg news for rallies or other campaign events michael bloomberg is an american multi billionaire the founder of

financial media company bloomberg lp he also served as a mayor of new york for 11 years till 2013 the 77 year old entered the presidential race last month and is one of more than a dozen democratic candidates up for nomination well bloomberg news he's their owner will not be investigated in any way they they very same rule goes for michael bloomberg democratic party rivals as the move would have been unfair but investigations into president trump whoever will proceed on deterred the u.s. president has called out the move as biased while political and social commentator and for me brian logan believes the trump on bloomberg journalists is justified. they put out a statement saying they were going to be biased and the upcoming election coverage so they put themselves into weird situation so that shot came pants of choice but

to retaliate in kind i mean since chops been in office since john was running to become the president has been very aggressive because the left and much to deliver politicians on their side are connected with people in the media so they work together to try and make this whole thing about impeachment as we close it to the election especially if the liberal candidate is floundering you're going to see much more aggressive and negative coverage towards a president not so much on the opposing side because they are one and the same the opposing side the left it is a much of the mainstream media they're all going to same. still ahead with deadly protests underway in iran israel calls on washington to turn the screws even tighter on iran the story and more after this break.

so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy confrontation let it be an arms race on all fronts very dramatic development the only thing i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical of time time to sit down and talk. my feeling with this world is right now as we're so confused and. and this certain generation that's controlling all the politics around the world when that generation. and children are brought to this new. movie are less materialistic. i don't really care about these things don't even more automobiles want to leave right beside job want to ride a bicycle this movement it's global and it's going the world is going to has to go

with this direction and it's going to change. and. 17 minutes into the program welcome back israel's prime minister has urged america to exert even more pressure on iran saying sanctions have sparked protests against tehran across the middle east. president trumpet player. from endless pressures and sanctions on iran i think we're seeing we're seeing the iranian empire tarter we see demonstrations in the. demonstrations and by the demonstrations in the roots and i think it's important to increase its pressure. while unrest in iran was triggered last month by a decision to hike petrol prices amid ongoing economic hardships caused by mounting

u.s. on the u.s. has acknowledged that that was the plan all along it course it out of scope for. the u.s. has had its sights on a run for a while and now with protests engulfing the nation washington is sinking its claws in iran is killing perhaps thousands of thousands of people right now as we speak that's where they go into so they're going to be here to see what's going on not just of numbers which are there bigger issues which are really really big but i. think the world has to be watching. true with reports of more than 200 people killed in the unrest there is plenty of reason for the condemnation except while the u.s. is quick and eager to destroy tehran over its handling of the unrest washington is conveniently a meting what has led to the unrest in the 1st place each. situation with

sanctions is not our fault the sanctions are stimulating instability in the region they are cruel moves by the white house we have no choice other than resistance and standing against those who are opposing at least sanctions. and there's a lot of truth to that to iran's economy flatlined after the u.s. imposed sanctions pulled the plug on the country's oil industry and speaking of health care america's economic blockade also. durans medical imports living to run literally begging the world to lead the life saving medication and instead of arrogant threats or hollow popov promises asked health center to sell products a new tool in iranian kids with to cover their wounds us economic terrorism on iran is designed to starve and in the case of medical supplies kill innocent citizens with the economic backbone splintered iran has seen its inflation skyrocket g.d.p.

dive and people gradually lose their jobs this domino effect has now erupted into a full blown revolt essentially kickstarted by the renewal of sanctions. and while some may accuse the us of being 2 faced for exploiting the unrest they helped create in their geopolitical game the us does not the sanctions have incredible effect and we're simply simply doing this to keep america safe to keep the middle east more stable and to enable the right of people to. convince the regime that it needs to change its ways in the most fundamental and basic way to just ask iran to be a normal country another argument proving these sanctions ignited the unrest is a pall from last year when the vital signs of to iran's economy were within the norm 80 percent of a rainy and didn't want any changes to the political system but now the u.s.

is willing to parade riots of their own making all over the internet even creating a channel rallying a rainy institution where their footage from the streets what the heck why not just how to run into submission altogether how grow every turkey in the world is really arabs iranians americans europeans and everyone else united for one purpose hope the long suffering a reunion people gain open access to all. a worldwide. call up your most brilliant. go through the night to do passable the times when you needed a vial of anthrax at the u.n. to take down a country over it seems the times when you needed the u.n. to approve of anything further star over all together a few cans of energy drink will do us rhetorical that says that we support the

reigning people such as what trump is saying or secretary powell i would say is ludicrous because you cannot support a people and sanction them at the same time a lot of the pressure the iranian people are under is because of u.s. sanctions i mean cancer patients are finding it very difficult to for example find their medicine because of u.s. sanctions the iranian currency has lost over 70 percent of its value because of u.s. sanctions so the uranium people have been highly affected by u.s. sanctions much more than the rein in government so all when something as the recent protests in iran happen in any kind of these events you see the u.s. administrations they come out and support these protests only because they want to topple the iranian government nor any real or sincere support of democracy in iran. there's apparently been some actual foreign

intervention in those long drawn out breaks that negotiations the leader of. a party has called the u.s. host speaker nancy pelosi again changer in the talks after she warned a trade deal with the u.k. might not happen if a hard border in our own becomes a greater possibility. the biggest game changer actually in the whole bragg's a conversation didn't happen on this salant or neighboring island it happened in the united states and happened when nancy pelosi said listen up folks there's no tree deal if you mess with ireland or if the good friday agreement is undermined. to washington to pressure britain all open border between northern aren't on the republic of ireland the reintroduction of border controls could complicate the free movement of people and goods and possibly jeopardize the good friday peace agreement which was introduced to end decades of sectarian strife in northern ireland known as the troubles. under sin believes there's nothing wrong with

outside interference if it saves the peace. making no apologies nor colleges for being an american nor apology for the work that we have done across the room making sure that we have garnered to the international solidarity it's only right and appropriate that any responsible person and we applaud the work that nancy and all those have done in america to protect the good fraidy agreement and the 7 m.p.'s who do not take their seats but they have influence they have a voice and they have used that lie and clear and they've used it in america they've used it in europe and thankfully they have done that and now this why we have the good friday agreement protected night from this savvich that it was going to be attacked and on to mind if there had been a harder border on the island of ireland if the breach government had had its way

us disjoin at peace and political process. but northern irish political activist fry hughes says he thinks the situation runs contrary to america stands and other countries are 1st. the heart will break to express some foreign policy in the different theaters through the word war when they call on other countries and the legals politicians and governments not to interfere or choose a particular candidate in the elections or to be involved somehow swing the american i think it's quite a critical for the end to dictate from halfway across the border what happens on european compliment between britain and ireland and what of ireland and the other 27 countries and when you consider that just home what's america and diffuse more than just an electoral process in many countries and i think it's

a definite case of double standards and as american policy seems to stick to it do as we say not as we do. all right a sobering look out a harling sign of a multibillion dollar pet industry next dog by dog starts and moments. right after that. i.

join me every thursday on the alex i'm unsure and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see that. in this community there are people who believe that it's ok. it's really hard there are no jobs and you see that i've got kids and ask and as a parent. i can come up with arguments there's a lot of conflict in the game between the 2 most of the conflict i would say over balls around money and most of them money has made. us want you know the children cosimo each other this could be just the state of california alone to make $6000000000.00 a year of prison complex just to get some 20

a life where. you don't care and cares about your so you don't care might anything . there are a lot of lawmakers in the state of missouri that we know huge financial contributions from agricultural industry groups those are the groups that opposed proposition b. and there is no doubt in our minds that those same groups pressured lawmakers to overturn proposition and before the session even started there were bills that were pretty filed just that you feel bad because it was repealed but you know all of your work. has made a dramatic difference for this i mean just the fact that almost half of these facilities are business who could have envisioned that things are definitely much

improved with many of the worst operations but you still have chronic while leaders who are operating you still have treatment. and you still have. some folks believe they can do whatever they want there are so many issues are so many porton issues and everybody is struggling in their own way that we don't necessarily want to pick up the other guy struggle eventually i have to go back. and face this neighbor and face the other neighbors and i will meet them a church at the grocery store a meeting at the restroom at the sale barn and i'm responsible. and i think this is where the buck ends we individually have to take responsibility as producers and as consumers but i mean i think for the public very clearly you know you have

a choice in the product that you buy at the store. when you hear of a problem in your own backyard if you're going to try to fix it. if you can't defend the rights of all dogs if you're going to ignore the problem down the street . at 1st there was i wanted to educate people who had no idea like i did and so i knew that it's somehow i was educated by one story that other people would be. the protests and black friday of 2011 and the reason we did because that's when people started buying christmas copies placing orders for christmas copies and we wanted that to stop so when they 1st started we were there to close every single shot.