3 forces of the islamic jihad organization your reaction to the renewed violence in gaza and the occupied territories and israel this is a pure cold blooded murder this is an assassination i mean this is this is not this is not warfare this is a deliberate assassination of of people in their homes. killed with them their wives the brothers their children. this is the specialty of this israelis who. and his wife were they not terrorists as the israeli says and whether or not therefore justifiably killed by the israeli government there is no justification for a cold blooded murder of somebody in his home and his wife they did they if if if he if he were to be caught in israel the red handed he would have

gotten a maximum of 20 years of prison not a and neck as an asian a murderer with his wife were you surprised israel also shot missiles into damascus to kill. son jury as well yes this is the sense the nation continues i mean that it goes to. to gaza and then from gaza to damascus and vice versa and you really don't see the international community out roused by this by this murder you don't see a quick a condemnation and some sanctions imposed upon israel this killing really has taken some highlight because it hits leadership but daily this israelis are killing individuals are killing people and killing brothers sisters wives husbands. and continuing it there are keep illegal occupation of our

land and. building colonial settlements on our villages maybe you don't see that international condemnation because european governments and the united states believe that islamic jihad is a terrorist movement dedicated to destroying the state of israel the reality is that israel is a terrorist government that is that they catered to destroying the palestinian homes rights people you wonder who by a i mean really who is the murderer and who is the victim they are the occupiers we are not occupying their country they're occupying ours will britain and the united states continues to arm israel of course the idea for twitter says that rockets that hit including the one that hit gaza's palestinian independent commission for human rights they were actually misfired rockets from palestinians in gaza nothing

to do with israel at all. that that's possible the question is that israelis do not account for the murder of palestinians to anybody i mean at best you get a united nations resolution but you don't get any real sanctions you don't read you don't get action that stop america from providing even weapons that the israelis can use to kill our people you don't see really punishment for what they're doing with our country and the colonial settlements they are building this is the problem of course that does not apply to russia that don't apply to china that one does not apply to india that does not apply to many countries but the united states particularly with mr trump and and its leadership has gone all the way to arm and to encourage mr netanyahu to continue his murder and his murderous campaign against palestinians but you say it is. possible that it is indeed palestinians wrongly

firing rockets that's why palestinians the palestinian independent commission for human rights may have been hit because amnesty international has condemned the attack apparently by israel could it be palestinian misfiring i don't know i doubt it in fact at the time when the israelis are saying we have attempted to murder to assassinate these 2 political leaders in. gaza strip and in damascus at a time like this it's very difficult to really say that it's possible that another rock rocket hits a target was was misfired rather than intended to be fired by the israelis media in nature nations is showing attacks on israel for instance in store rot rather than ghibli to have

a steroid to because is it actually israeli illegally occupied land under security council resolution 446 an area that used to be called knowledge this is colonial acquisition by force by a country that is equipped with atomic weapons and whipped with. the highest technology the murderous weapons by the united states we're not really talking here about. a national liberation movement we're talking about a colonial country that is occupying all our land nuclear whistleblower mordechai vanunu can no longer talk to the media and of course israel has never admitted to having nuclear weapons i should stay but your new prime minister dr mohammed. construction and economic development of the palestinian territories as much as more economic independence from. the israeli

colonial economy across our borders was anyone looking at the palestinian media pictures of crying children and dead bodies would say is not effective at all what are you telling at advising president abbas when it comes to the latest violence the latest killing of civilians in gaza while i'm in he is a man dedicated to nonviolent struggle there are precedents like in south africa many other places in which nonviolent action. was able to turn around colonial powers and. it has led sometimes to international support. and i think that's what president abbas. really intends to do he he thinks that. responding with more violence

will bring in a cycle of violence that will cause a lot of harm and we are no match for the arsenal of the military capability of israel well some people would say the cycle of violence has been getting for years and your prime minister now saying he is conducting intensive regional and international context to deter this aggression can you don't see why the entire arab world shrugs its shoulders when president abbas of the palestinian authority says things like well look we are living in a in an era in which international balance of power is totally tilted towards the united states we are living in a mono polar world. compared to the the world before 1901 it was a bipolar world that was the soviet union who stood up against.

and supported national liberation movements but today. we are probably at the end of a period in which the united states has the. highest capability of controlling and of using its power in the whole world and you have arab governments a matter of leaderships having really suffered from american occupation of iraq and syria from lots of problems involving the die and other organizations that have been financed by the united states in fact. i think this balance of power rune will change eventually and the world will move towards a multi-polar world in which europe russia china and others can provide a balance to this overwhelming american power which has led to gross misuse of power in our part of the world while the united states and britain still continue

to deny they aid. despite arguable evidence to the contrary just finally while the killing of your people continues are you pleased that the european union . court of justice verdict they may labeling fruit correctly and begin identifying products made in israel israel's illegal settlements are real and that's correct that we think that's a step in the right direction we would have very much like to see a total boycott of products produced on occupied. territory. in colonial settlements but at least the european union at one time took the position that it would at least differentiate between products produced in occupied territory and products produced in israel proper and this labor. thing was

instituted but it was not implemented in the very few european countries that didn't prevent it and now we have a supreme court ruling that it's illegal to sell products that are not labeled i think it's a step in the right direction i'll give it a real shot thank you thank you after the break we ask a former u.k. home office minister and privy council to the queen to woman baker about the british monarchy is royal robbery of the public purse as netflix is arguably sanitized the crown it's a video streaming devices around the world all this more coming up about 2 of going on the ground. i'm going to fulfill the repeated promises possibly to the people and promise to be

you know we've all but the. 3. o'clock. hour you want to. know how. long. i can link up my time after time corporations repeat the same mantra sustainability it's very important it's accelerating transition sustainable transport

sustainability stay number man the more equitable and sustainable well. they claim their production is completely hama's. because. companies want us to feel good about buying their products while the damage is being done far away and this is something i'll just want any minute i need much. since i moved in unison we didn't dream and i. understood. in the united states presidential candidates debate the future of the us and the world. max kaiser and stacy her but dig into the burning questions of this election cycle one. every week. student trade was money.

welcome back within 24 hours of the crown's season 3 is during a live in coleman and helena bonham carter hitting video streaming devices around the world but how true or sanitized is the netflix series other need the glitz and glam of the crown is a myriad arguable royal robberies from a nazi sympathising juke and tax avoiding princes to relationships with alleged sex traffickers they are stories the british queen has tried to conceal from the public which pays away but joining me now is former u.k. arm of his minister and privy councillor to the queen the woman baker who exposes the british want to pay for what it is in his new book and what do you do what the

royal family don't $22.00 know normal welcome back they're going underground so and what do you do it's not a job you do what the queen would say companion volume to the new netflix crown season 3 that is doing such a good business can you really understand any of these things without reading the book. i think reading the book will offer to give you a greater insight and it is a sensible piece of work to some but you will work and in contrast to the way that the media often deals with the royals which is a kind of rather pathetic way of wondering what traits wearing today or what toy prince george's playing with you this is part of our constitution but entitled to have a serious analysis of what it does why does what it does so much it costs us and when people are talking about the general election campaign whoever wins the general election m.p.'s will have to give an oath in parliament 2 of the monarchy explain the curious meaning of serving the monarch and the importance of that of

well we are all subjects in this country allegedly not citizens and to we owe our allegiance to the queen. in person and successors whoever they are glued ng people at prince andrew apparently this is not sensible for a mature democracy when an m.p. like yourself future minister takes an oath i understand the way you did the oath was slightly different hand the official recording of parliament will it raise the truth over the yes i mean many people are elected to parliament hill republican by nature and they adopted from tactics i think actually by it's a former labor m.p. used to cross his fingers when he was given the oath. others will gobble through it's. others for example in my case i gave my own oath which i believed in which was to uphold democracy and marketed to its best of my ability and when hand sought appeared the next day my own always had was not there but gobbled it was if even

the official recording of proceedings erases the truth of what happens when it comes to the monarchy had difficult was it to read a book about the monarchy as regards papers that were kept secret by the government who thought well i mean obviously i did write a book and i'm still here to tell the tale but they didn't make it very easy for me and my privy council luthern the privy council so as i can access the queen and prince charles if i wish to do so will i try to act as prince charles was fobbed off i did get into the royal archives which was some major challenge in windsor castle where they allow i think it's 6 researchers at most any one time and there's no access automatically there it's a matter of privilege what i went to no there's no there's no there's no list of files no index as to what you can see so it's a question of sticking a pin into the piece of paper and see what comes out and the thing about the present monarchy present monarch and her right is accessible at all so that effectively the throat in $152.00 there is

a $6070.00 abaddon all material being released from there all kinds there's an absolute ban all material from other the queen print. charles or prince william being released even if it's in the public interest there's no public interest test even for those for you individuals now we can get a public interest test applied to the rest of the royal family but it's still quite hard to get the thing out and you know the answer to your family always where there's a problem which is arises is not to deal with the problem is to paint over the rotten wood cover it all up that's what they've been doing for 100 years well i want to get on to the members of the royal family today in a 2nd bit why it is important in this book you draw some pretty terrifying not the counterfactuals if. if the royal family hadn't gone the way way it has how their support for hitler against could've changed the history of this country could well absolutely well look i mean the fact is that before the war

the aristocracy in this country including of course the royal family and most of the conservative party that was in government wanted to do a deal with hitler because they saw communism as a bigger threat than us years and they didn't like hitler to be fair well i think nobody is like hitler at most and didn't but they were bred to tolerate hitler and the deal they wanted to do was that. hitler left the british nation and the british empire alone i went eastwards in terms of his labor that was a deal they wanted to do and after the 2nd world war the royal family led on the government here at the at the government labor government who put a shooter much political pressure on the americans not to release information but whatever gates had been doing with the nazi regime we spent we used up a whole lot of political power and influence trying to prevent matters to do with the royal family being released after the war that was not the priority in my view

for this government to 945 the priority was to rebuild the country rather protect whatever the 8th had been doing and when it comes. hiding history perhaps predictable because rupert murdoch is known as a republican but it was the sun that exposed the picture of the young queen in the queen mother giving nazi salutes you say probably at the behest of anybody it was there and the queen was about 7 or 8 so it was early thirty's so it was before the whole of the full horrors of naziism were apparent i don't blame the queen for that she was a young girl she was 7 and she was with influential adults on collision between mother was an adult was the queen mother was are living in a sicilian so the queen is entirely innocent of that just know her from all of that i feel rather angry on behalf. but the queen mother jolly well knew didn't she she was not old she knew what was going on and she give a nazi salute now how would have appeared in the war we were told about the queen

mother in a war histories b.-o. brushed she would take the stand and she showed her face and everything else how would east end the reacted had it in the photograph of the queen mother give me a nazi salute b.b.c. i.t.v. the mainstream channels here loathe to talk about the nazi connections netflix's the crown they do mention it a little tony benn gave his last television interview for this program and in these us interview he was going on about this royal prerogative why do you think that when i turn events or that is so important when it comes to secrecy and britain going to war with other countries well there are 2 issues here that the 1st one is is one where the queen's name is taken in vain if you like the royal prerogative which implies that the queen or someone in the family has stopped things it isn't it's a prime minister today who says there's a role per always a royal prerogative is a prime minister's prerogative and the queen is no alternative but to accede to

these requests from her ministers we saw that with the purgation quite recently when the queen whatever she was about it personally was obliged to take advice of ministers and perot politics of 5 weeks a little. for the cause of lawfully she had no alternative but to do that however the other issue i raised my book is something which people have not heard of by a large coal queens consent and in the prince of wales consent now that action 2 ways one a proper member's bill is brought to parliament. has to be queen's consent for any bill actually before proceeds now of course the government bills is never an issue because the government a says the queen let this proceed but queen's consents been used sometimes by politicians to stop a bill for what it's all about iraq in 1009 that was stopped from going forward by queen's consent because of the ministers said to the queen don't give consent that's completely undemocratic but the other issue for the royal family personally and it's a queen could be refused when it affects them personally and what happens is as the

between the palace and ministers and that has a lot of course happens and legislation is changed to do with the personal circumstances of the monic and her family that's quite outrageous what is the scale of housing benefit that the queen in the royal family get because you talk about the stored some of the money the taxpayer pays look it's not just what they pay it's also what the queen and i found we've accumulated over many years nobody of the queen prince philip her family her sons and daughters sons and daughters is worth less than $20000000.00 the queen under the direction of winston churchill the prime minister's sign decided that the queen has a new one i would not pay tax on investment income. that's a gigantic handout is probably cost attached is a death threat from the mail on sunday i think. it probably cost taxpayers close to

a 1000000000 pounds in lost type sink i'm just not one change leave it in the mail on sunday load or the mia because in this book one of the road rhythm is there a line. with hitler today people have been talking about why newspaper like that is more interested in meghan markle the american actress married to prince harry than say prince andrew the queen's. i mean. the mail the telegraph before the war or all cheerleaders for hitler. and it's embarrassing for them to admit to the fact that prince george likes giraffes or something i mean who cares and why is that it's their business it's not our business to know that what is our business is the fact that buckingham palace is being rebuilt effectively 3 to 7000000 pounds of public money when a batter of 3 or 4 years ago we were told you to 50000000 that's our business but

you won't find the papers very much or we need all programs will go up prince andrew and geoffrey epstein yet actually of the new report leg ations of. a nation in a us prison and so forth but you can understand why prince charles wouldn't want the fact that he sought the advice on his marriage to diana from jimmy savile even the stanway things like that would want to be kept secret. because they would be seen in a bad bad light when in fact they were presumably the it's a completely innocent well i don't think there's no way to know what responsible for what jimmy savile to eat and there's intolerance to in that sort of ghastly behavior that jimmy savile been indulged in but the fact is he should have bad judgment this is our future king he should bad judgment in relying on jimmy savile for marriage advice and being very close to him and being a star at the fed drove him even when it was known to other people that jimmy

savile was a bad lot well obviously there are also allegations about how the queen hides her wealth in tax havens but when it comes to the remove. level of the monarchy in this country rather than the barricades or anything you just finally you talk about the national anthem and a slight change that is good in recent years about the national anthem itself and british life is that is that what may be the bonjour at least that there's a sign that the monarchy is on the wane in the over that i think body is happening as people no longer have the option of a difference which of all family wants to have the national anthem is no. going out of fashion no other country is product in town has an anthem that relates to the monarch in person but have got many about one occasion but if you go to sweden or you go to belgium when you go to poland the national anthem is not about the person and a national anthem should be there to unify the country that's what national anthem

should do we should make every single person not country proud of their country but it sure like our national anthem you have to be both someone who believes in god and someone who wants to monitor you know you know many people do want those 2 things but not what he does why should you have to subscribe to do to beliefs in order to enjoy and support a national anthem that's your favorite shows of the season we will be with a brand new cd going underground on the 8 until regularly oppositional social media interview. on the grounds you future how good you. this idea as you point out the anecdotally cheney fired all the cia agents in the field because they were too sympathetic to the locals and he felt that was

a liability in the major media spheres of washington d.c. they don't want those reporters those stars to rub elbows in the grate on the washed of the flyover states because they may become sympathetic to the working class they may become sympathetic to the to the disenfranchised of america. who use drones to the leaks. and when you. look at the distance was most of the book but.

still it's. mean there's. just too little. on. the campaign.

multiple rocket attacks in iraq missiles hit the air base where u.s. troops are stationed in baghdad a residential area and a highly secured green zone in a region close to the american embassy. thousands wrong the streets of the iraqi capital holding a funeral perceptions of those killed in friday's u.s. air raid including iran's top general protest against american airstrikes erupt in more than 70 cities across the u.s. demanding u.s. get out of the middle east. and in the scandal in our media as

a criminal scheme is revealed which helped foreigners illegally adopt youngsters for over 2 decades.