why is human consciousness cosmically in comprehensible and his free will just a manmade construct in a reality based on probability all this more coming up in today's going underground let's not go straight to professor brian greene of columbia university whose book until the end of time mind matter enough search for meaning in an evolving universe is out brian welcome to going underground we don't have until the end of time obviously to talk about his book but we could talk for ages i know every individual say that they may have read the elegant universe the fabric the cause mostly in reality. this may consolidate some of those ideas but it is very different only about why death and should be is the beginning of the book yes i'm a previous books are really about explaining cutting edge science and bring it out in an accessible language this book is more about trying to take the ideas of cutting edge science and show how they are relevant to our understanding of who we are where we came from what we might be doing the motivation for our behavior and what may happen in the very far future and you say that death is

a very specific and all empowering. for you and for all of us and for quantum mechanics we have well certainly when you realize that we are the singular species on the planet that knows about our own impermanence knows about our own mortality you recognize that it is a powerful force in driving the behaviors that we humans execute and what i do in the book is i'd juxtapose that realization of our own impermanence with the realization of science that the universe is impermanent so there's a wonderful interplay and reflection between the cosmic version of this idea and the human version of this idea that people may think they know what entropy is maybe maybe some of yours wouldn't you seem to say entropy is a key to our and it is of daily life and the unit absolutely is i try to lay out

the entire history of the universe from the beginning to the closest that we can get to the end there are 2 principles that govern that unfolding one principle is evolution which is familiar to many people but the other is entropy which is this notion that the universe has a tendency to go from order to disorder from structure to disintegration things tend to wither away and we're talking about the very end of the universe that kind of disintegration that withering away. is a dominant force in the far future and yet there is order out of the disorder in there are pockets of order that can momentarily form on the cosmic timeline and that's what you and i and this on the earth that's all that the structures are there momentary way stations in the evolution from the orderly beginning at the big bang to the disorderly future what we will see as the universe unfolds and we are in the middle we ourselves pockets of that order out we are

a momentary pockets of order we exist by taking in orderly structures from the environment you know i'm the ginsu i eat plants nuts fruit my body processes those orderly structures allowing me to maintain my order for a small period of time as my body then releases disorder through heat and waste to the environment we are conduits that the universe uses to create disorder in the environment allowing us to persist for a short period of time they've written a lot about the probabilistic new science i don't know whether that's the correct term i want to make to yours just when distance is so much history of science in the here as well as history of a hot history of religion whether you're reflecting the times we live in because it surrounds it newton was a product of protestantism trinitarianism in the nigeria 5 russian revolution whether you or your the reaganomics have a probability right a market it's

a marketplace of things well yes and so i think metaphorically absolutely and there is a deep interplay between our scientific understanding of the world and the way that that seeps into the cultural understanding of the world but quantum mechanics which is the proper name for this probabilistic look at reality emerged from experiments and observations in the early part of the 20th century when we tried to take newton's ideas and apply them to atoms. newton failed newton was unable to describe the data he wasn't aware of it of course that emerged in the early part of the 20th century so we physicists were forced to develop a new understanding of the micro world the small things and that understanding is quantum physics and you're right at its heart is a probabilistic description of the world newton would have said this is what will happen in the future based on our knowledge of how things are today quantum theory says that that's not actually how reality of volves quantum theory says the best

you can ever do is predict the probability of one or another outcome happening in the future and our observations confirm that idea there was a program the other day here about paul dirac asking why this great british scientists will build a new new people said it's because quantum mechanics is so difficult to explain his relativity which is pretty difficult. i don't let the heart of the occult i mean you're known for being able to communicate these complicated idea you know direct was a man who was very short on words and i think that's part of why he wasn't as well known but yes quantum mechanics is stranger than any theory that came before because it is so counter to our experience we look out at the world and it seems to have a single definite disposition you are sitting right there that seems to be the reality that i am experiencing but according to quantum mechanics when i look away the reality actually devolves into a probabilistic haze of many possibilities and only when i look back and measure

the world does it snap to attention have the definite disposition that we're all familiar with that is a radically strange description of how the world actually is our observations confirm it even though our experience seems to be at odds with the latest version you might have to explain a very very briefly but the 2 slit experiment do you think it still terrifies everyone as it did when it was 1st committed about the way the observed and yeah. by observation well you know what happens in science is an idea is brought forward because it's required by the data everybody scrambles to understand it it can be terrifying because the old order is ripped out from under us and we're forced to have a new view of how the world actually works but then you know 80 or 100 years later students are brought up in these ideas and they seem almost 2nd nature so the idea is that confounded albert einstein in the 1930 s.

students now learn about it say my quantum mechanics course not yeah of course that's how the world works so it's a change not only in our understanding of the math and the equations it's a change in mindset that naturally happens as physics changes and evolves to give or take all the un solved problems right now in physics and there are a lot of. it is the current belief and theory and i knew these different terms theory believe all these are different ideas in the book that observations are changed by the activities of ation yes so the idea is that the world has a disposition that is influenced by interactions and when we observe something we are interacting with it and that interaction affects it and this is an idea that was pretty far in to say isaac newton because the observations and the things that we were looking at were not affected much for and all of us always leave you would

get new has right that's true too but but on the large scale of every day interactions our observations don't really affect things because they're so big but if you're talking about observing an electron or an atom that active observation can have a radical impact on it and that is a new idea that comes from quantum physics and what are the implications that you explore in the book about information for information out of this you know well we are basically information processing machines and that's an unfamiliar way of thinking. about human life in human consciousness but your brain and mind are nothing but collections of particles governed by physical law that have such an exquisite organization that we can take in information from the world we can process it and that's conscious awareness and that conscious reflection can affect how we then subsequently behave so in a way we are again conduits for information we take in from external world we process it and we give back information based upon our behaviors you said that you

don't talk that much about cutting edge physics but you do mention recent work and you compared to a swing yeah and should be i was there within the context of information again that may be described in so people have very unusual phenomenon in the universe or whether it is an every day run of the mill phenomenon that we should expect to happen far out on distant planets as well as we know about it here on planet earth and one idea is that in a situation where you have a source of energy like a star and you have a planet like the earth in which there are wrong and greedy and smaller kills an atom is floating around it may be the case that those atoms naturally change of volved in a manner that allows them to take in the energy from the star in a more effective way and we are very effective at taking energy from the environment that's what we do for a living that's what human beings are and so it could be according to this theory that life is the natural outcome of a star bathing

a planet with heat and light and therefore if this theory is true it may be that life is quite commonplace throughout the cosmos ok well while life whether it be corona virus or anything else may be easier to understand tell me about how you've changed as you explain in the book about your ideas of consciousness you said that you used to think it was conscious experiences what it feels like doing is going to be information processing in the brain you know when you change it so i've changed and i've actually. returned so it's an interesting journey that i have been on i had a kind of flippant response in the early days when people would talk about consciousness and the reason it asked me is i was working on string theory that was called the theory of everything and the just strings in the brain that's right to everyone everything should include the brain and consciousness of people would ask me about and my response to that point was it's just information processing that's why we have those inner experiences that we all know about you know we can love and grieve

and feel and respond and reflect and it's just particle motion in the brain i still feel that way but now it looks like a computer it well and now i feel it in a somewhat more refined version of a computer when you think about the brain and its internal workings there is a puzzle why would particles that themselves don't have conscious awareness be able in aggregate to create conscious awareness that is a very strange state of affairs and people scientists neuroscientist philosophers still struggle with this idea we've not resolved it but i have certainly come to the perspective that the resolution when it comes will show that we are nothing more than particles governed by physical law and that a byproduct of having a certain kind of organization of choreography of motion of those particles is the sensations of everyday human life and therefore i do not think that you need anything external to the particles in the physical forces to account for the inner

world of conscious awareness that you and i and everybody else experiences because you do mention in the book how big multinational soft drink manufacturer how is it you think well given actual companies are so quick to be able to evade this call just this which we haven't even read explained through signs of subliminal level well you know when you've got a bottom line to me it can be a very powerful motivating force. do you think that one reason there are. so many competing theories at the moment is that the physicists who had. on the day job or the mathematicians realize everything is so probabilistic well i think it's part of it i think the other thing is we're talking about extraordinarily deep and profound questions we're talking about what is it that makes us humans what is it that makes us special and there are so many ideas that people have kicked around for this my own feeling is that a 1000 years from now or maybe even a 100 years or maybe 10 years depending on the rate of progress we're going to look

back at this era and kind of smile and say how quaint that so many ideas were put forward to describe this mysterious experience of consciousness when all it was was physics acting on particles and that's all we need president green i'll stop you there more from professor brian greene after this short break. as the democrats gear up to officially start their 2020 presidential primary it is fitting to assess donald trump's performance in office a report card of sorts where is he kept his promises and where has he come up short will any of this really matter no. one else seems wrong but i. just don't.

get to see. this day become educated and it gains from an equal betrayal. when something find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground. trade and investment to become magic spells to come to economic development. most people think about trade they think about goods and services being exchanged between countries and the invest the chapter of a trade agreement as opposed to something very different but won't when investment leads to toxic manufacturing that destroys secrets of the environment. that means local communities that are being poisoned if they have jacked if they do anything

that the company feels is interrupting their profits they can be serious. multinationals are taking on the whole nation philip morris is trying to use i guess d.s. to stop oracle buying from implementing new tobacco regulations aimed at cutting domestic smoking rates a french company sued egypt because egypt resists minimum wage and democratic choice of a trunk. joining us as we try to find one of the 2. welcome back i'm still here with professor brian greene very little about the multiverse in this book that's true was that well i was trying to be conservative and i was trying to focus on a story a big story but a limited story the story of our universe from the beginning to end and that's a big enough merit if you will to occupy me throughout the course of this entire

book but you're right an earlier burks i have wondered if it might be the case that our universe is not the totality of reality what if there are other universes out there or distant and far flung locations in this wider landscape of reality and that's an interesting idea in its own right but here i wanted to focus on our universe its evolution and how life began. how consciousness emerge and what's going to happen when we look in our universe into the distant future but it's a mission doesn't signal the fact that your a bad day how do you hear a lot of people absolutely not dinosaurs walking among snow there are many interesting stories to tell and this is a very focused one even though the palette of experience there has many colors because you use language to write the book obviously. this just take us up to where we are after about language because it goes you're using language rather than mathematics which underlies the words in this book and i consider mathematics

itself to be another language a very highly specialized language but you're right people have wondered where did language come from and noam chomsky has some interesting ideas for the origin of language there are others who have a different approach a more darwinian approach that language gives a survival advantage when we can't communicate we can coordinate our actions we can function as a more effective group and that's really why we humans prevailed we are highly social as a species allowing us to do things that the individual would not be able to accomplish on his or who know and therefore the language has been vital to that and therefore i am pretty convinced as many evolutionary psychologists who study this as a professional undertaking that language emerged because it helped us survive implications for free will which i know you also explore in the book again i have very strong perspective on that perspective that many people require all add i do not think

that we have free will in the sense that i do not feel that we are the ultimate authors of our actions we are not the place in which our decisions fundamentally originate why do i say that again you and i just collections of particles governed fully by physical law and therefore there is no opportunity for us to intercede in that. unfolding and everything you do every decision you make every action you undertake is the motion of your particles there probably is to distribute a ballistic is true but here's the thing probability doesn't really help because if your particles are moving in a manner dictated by probabilistic rules then what actually happens is determined by chance random chance governed by those probabilistic rules and if i'm flipping a coin and that's determining how you behave and the choices you make i don't think you would consider that to be free will randomness is not foolish and choice and

therefore i don't think quantum mechanics on this issue helps us at all even really macroscopic even on the macroscopic level i don't think it helps us because our intuition about free will is that we make the choice not some random process makes the choice and that is where the 2 ideas come into tension with each other while the muxes out there will be agreeing with you saying it's cluster actually no wonder there's no freewill. game there why death is pervading no to be the language death pervades the free will death pervades the book yes itself in religion in literature you know why why is this such a theme in this book take religion as a good example if you look at any religion and you follow it further back in time you can trace its origin to our recognition that we're going to die milledge and emerges as a means of making us feel more comfortable coping with this idea of the possibility

of an afterlife the possibility of resurrection the possibility that in the say a buddhist perspective that life is not even something that we want to hold onto if we can get out of the cycle of birth and rebirth then will reach another domain in which we are one with the larger reality so you see right there that one of the dominant forces in the world religion emerged. is from the human recognition that we are mortal and that kind of pattern you can see playing out in so many domains of human experience and using the correlation suggests there is something deeper there in terms of a where affliction of quantum mechanics well you know i feel that at the level of the particles in the fundamental laws these ideas of death and meaning and value and purpose don't emerge so fundamentally there's no purpose there's no meaning but when you have accurate gets particles that can have conscious self reflection then

these ideas matter and we begin to ask ourselves why are we here why do we die why is life finite and these considerations then drive us to develop religion and to develop art and to develop narrative and storytelling and myth making and so the richness of human culture is driven by this recognition that we have this finite existence within a universe that itself doesn't actually care about us the notion of caring and morality and values something that we impose on the external world and to me that makes it all the more wondrous that collections of particles governed by physical law can begin to worry and wonder and create and in that manner allow beauty and wonder to permeate reality only get to the end of the universe a 2nd as a ruining the end of the book it's more than not it's lawyer but why do you think that what you just said doesn't go through in math teaching if you teach major cities it's guy was saying the other day that he would teach the applications or

matrices can relate to what you were just saying why is it the math teaching doesn't seem to reflect well i can give you a 1st hand reaction to that question which i consider to be a very important one when i teach mathematics when i teach quantum mechanics i'm giving my students a technical education i'm just trying to give them the tools for solving problems and carrying on. in the research that they may want to do as they carry on in their careers it's important to do that but when i teach for instance this book as i have been doing recently i reach the students in a different way i'm not just giving them technical training i'm allowing them to think about their own lives within the unfolding of the universe so it's science together with philosophy and psychology and understanding what it means to be a conscious being in this universe that we can have that believe in a relatively simple equation can reflect some of these ideas that you're giving me

but when we teach this stuff our goal is that the students can use it to solve problems right so we give them problem sets do for homework we give them problems on an exam and we grade the ball and say exactly so we are assessing them based on whether they can use these tools in a very limited way solve these problems give us insight into this particular technical issue and what we don't do in the math class or the physics largely for lack of time and often lack of expertise on the part of the instructor we do not connect these ideas up with life itself and that's what i do in the book and that's what he doing a course that i teach students on this book and i got to tell you when the students come in to talk to me during office hours they are emotionally engaged with the ideas as opposed to just cognitively engaged with the ideas it's a completely different educational experience for them and i have to say for me ok we're just. finally obviously just as the getting all excited last consciousness is

going to everything is going to just take us through the death of the universe really reflects on the question that you asked early on about entropy so entropy is the tendency toward things falling apart for a while evolution can interplay with entropy and interesting structures like human beings walking on this planet but ultimately in the far future entropy wins and that means that in this early in the future well in that even though it's called until the end of yes so you're referring no doubt to the extraordinarily far future when things might be able to begin a new but en route to that resurrection if you will there is a probability good and it could end i sense that the burden of living in a quantum universe any weirdness that has non-zero chance of happening could happen at any moment even with. us is that it's right that that's right so would that be a desirable outcome if he's going to win in 2028 perhaps it would be better if the universe ended but if you don't take those unlikely scenarios but rather look at

the more likely ones and more likely one is that and roughly 5000000000 years the sun will swell of the gulf the inner planets and roughly a trillion years the distant galaxies were rushing away in roughly 100 trillion years stars will use up their nuclear fuel and if you go all the way to say 10 to the 100 years that's a long time or only 10 to 10 years since the big bang even black holes will disintegrate into a bath of particles everything will fall apart if you wait long enough and then we know if must be even go to if there is there will be any multiverse is any being that even tries to undertake the process of thought will burn up in the end tropic waste that that thought generates so everything will go and therefore that's the future far far future that we're all facing because in your country there's been little debate about with the sky. even exists unfortunately your vice president who's in charge of

a virus what is the status of scientific discussion and debate in policy circles in washington yeah well being invited in well i've had some conversations and look science is not respected at the highest levels of government in america and that is utterly disgraceful it is tragic because science is our opportunity to transform the future the challenges we face and the opportunities that we have they're all scientific at their core and i'm talking about everything from climate change to alternate energy sources to personalized medicine to nanotechnology to artificial intelligence everything is science at its core and so to have individuals that don't respect science who are at the top level of decision making is tragic you don't think the evangelical right will leap on elements of this book quoted out of context and say brian greene he's the one he's he's showing us that science is just doing what we knew years ago well if they're saying it with

knowledge and forethought fantastic if they're saying it i fear them i feel that they aren't and that would be my concern i mean that is a serious idea within americans as universe this was didn't believe in multi-verse was with us they lived at the same time as human beings yes so there are crazy things that people say and you have to realize that in this world of ours there are facts science does give us actual insights into the true nature of the world and the problem we come to a place where expertise is not respected everybody can have an opinion but here's the thing some opinions are wrong when you talk about certain qualities of the world there is right and wrong it's not a matter of what you think or what you feel no probability distribution no probability distribution of that's already happened the probabilities were already worked out and they were resolved by the virtue of what happened in the past. professor brian greene thank you thank you. professor brian greene of columbia

university there speaking to me about until the end of time mind matter and i will search for meaning in an evolving universe will be back on wednesday broke a sting from the heart of the global coronavirus pandemic on the 45th anniversary of the assassination of feisal abdul aziz. the british backed saudi dictator of a country involved in what is still the worst humanitarian crisis in the world yemen more on that on wednesday in the meantime for all the news north covered by the mainstream media join the underground by following us on you tube twitter facebook instagram and. it's all a little bit messed up by our d.n.a. and something we're not over look at i'm not sure this isn't such a great thing you know i'm sure you look better now than when you had. to say so

but i do when. you're right. dark industry comes to life in los angeles every night. dozens of women sells their bodies on the streets many of them underage. police reveal a taste of their daily challenge you know if you're going to exploit for a child here in los angeles we're going to. see officers going undercover as 6 workers and customers to fight 6 trade. thieves i.

think most of the time with all the fog. headlines from russia this monday the 23rd of march moscow region leaders tell the elderly and the sick now to stay at home as preventative measures to keep coronavirus in russia says there are a fewer than 500 cases nationwide. medical experts and vital equipment to italy to help its fight against the disease which has claimed more than 5400 lives. and france passes of much measures to tackle the health choices but there is a wave of anger among medics who accuse leaders of responding with too little too late.