hello and welcome to cross talk where all things are considered i'm peter lavelle 30 years ago the berlin wall fell the cold war had essentially come to an end the fall of this cold war symbol was heralded as a new spring of nations and the end of communism decades on what is the legacy of this historic event the promises of 1989 been fulfilled.

in the fall of the berlin wall i'm joined by my guest john laughlin in paris he is a political scientist and historian in washington we have harold james he's a professor of history and international affairs at princeton university as well as author and editor of a number of books including when the wall came down reactions to german unification and in cork we cross to geoffrey roberts he is emeritus professor of history at university college cork and a member of the royal irish academy all right gentlemen crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciated let me go to john and paris 1st i mean 30 it's been 30 years now believe it or not because i remember it so vividly when it happened a few months before i had been living in poland for a number of years and an avid student of eastern european communist affairs at the time john 30 years on what is its meaning because i look at cursory reviews of you know that in commenting on it it is the people's power. the rise of the spring of

nations in eastern europe that's a kind of a narrative that is very western i suppose but i lived there it was you know i don't have that same kind of feel for it ok though having said that i'm very glad those communist regimes are gone and the war go ahead john. you know we're like you peter i lived through those events very directly like you i was studying eastern european studies at oxford at that point i spent that summer in 1909 in romania and in hungary and indeed in september 89 i was in west berlin and was there when the 1st east berlin as arrived in west berlin having driven through czechoslovakia hungry austria and and the whole of germany so i have a very strong memory of it as well i would make 2 points the 1st is that none of it would have happened without gorbachev decision to pull the rug on the eastern european communist regimes that was decision he took in june and which he announced to the german chancellor helmut kohl at the time and all the events that we

remember now the jangling of keys in wenceslas square in prague the the torch is the candlelight the songs and so on all that was nothing but operetta it was political operetta it was froth on the on the on the tidal wave of history but it was not the cause of the tidal wave of history the cause i'm afraid was much more basic and much more realistic it was the decision as i say of the soviet union no longer to support. those regimes and once the support of moscow had been withdrawn they collapsed so it was not the triumph of people in the streets of berlin or whatever it was instead of just 2 political decision taken by moscow which had the inevitable consequences that we know about ok like you i don't like human ism fell ok i mean i did notice that harold was disagreeing with you go ahead errol then washington you know i really do think it has much deeper roots it has roots that go back into the 1950 s. and 1960 s. but for me that grew. the transformational story was the papacy of john paul the

2nd and the mobilization you saw the demonstration of millions of pows yet. people really united against the against the regime and from that moment on the regime lacked any legitimacy in addition to that there's a systematic economic failure and it's not that gorbachev is dealing with stuff that gorbachev has to respond to the basic sentiment is there in the streets of force or it's a better in the streets of prague and it's very very clear i think i'm ok i think it's completely wrong i think of it as well how to write hereto ok but harold i agree i spent a lot of time in poland and one thing on jang on jeff hang on one thing is that i would tend to agree that maybe kind of split the difference with john here is that i think and i know that there was a lot of people were disgruntled with the political and economic system they had in poland many were that is true ok but the pappas the of john paul the 2nd united

people and what they didn't like it wasn't where they wanted to go that was very unclear that there wasn't even a glimmer in anyones eye of where they should go they just didn't know what they did they didn't know what they didn't like jeff uncorked jump in a lot a lot of different things he and again i think we got to we had a time delay go ahead jack i liked might be ok maybe yes go ahead well i think greeks agree to a certain extent with both john and with highroad yes i agree i agree with joe on that goal the child was a key factor in 98 and with the globe which of this is not people's revolution in 1800 in the senate i don't agree with you on that goal which will pull the rug from under the east coast european congress route regimes or at least that was the intention go to chelsea intention was to save the comic book to save comedies and to revitalize it and what he was trying to do was to encourage east european congress leaders to actually. to do the necessary reforms on the other hand it's

not just about gold which of the there was a kind of mass kind of popular uprising in various countries in eastern europe and that mass uprising that people's revolution was critical in pushing events in the in a particular direction such likes and i agree. with highroads yes i was 2 factors is to go which is the revolution from above is led by colwich off and is the revolution from below that comes from the street ok and you. had. thanks i mean obviously it's difficult to discuss such big issues in the short term needed for television the reason why i said what i said is that on the 13th of june 1909 gorbachev effectively told helmut kohl that he the soviet union would not oppose german reunification that the communication of that information to call in the gardens of the federal chancellor a says it all because once the soviet union let it be known to west germany that it

would not oppose east german reunification then the entire house of cards could only collapse of course they were popular discontent i would never dream of suggesting otherwise and i certainly didn't suggest otherwise what i would say though to harold james is that those previous expressions of popular discontent including in poland was suppressed by force they were suppressed by force in berlin in 1953 in prague in 1968 in budapest in 956 and in poland in 1901 we all know that the decision was taken by gorbachev to stop that policy to abandon the doctrine and once he did that the whole thing unraveled and that seems to me to be the cause of everything you hear all the want to respond to there go ahead. yes i mean i do think that is right there was a moment we know when the east german regime was considering using force and they had after all the example of chairman square behind them and they were explicitly

prohibited from doing by the by the soviet union by mr gorbachev and so that is indeed important but i do think you really have to think that by that stage it's really too late there is an enormous amount that's just going on on the street and actually i wanted to disagree a little bit peter with what you said before that there wasn't a plan for what to do in the middle of the 1980 s. and 185 solidarity office in brussels the summit office in brussels. a route to the international monetary fund but they want to plan for the reconstruction of programs along the lines proposed by the shrimp boats are over it's the discussion of the reform there's been well documented after 990 was already being discussed well ok well what i mean very important given harold with all due respect i mean solidarity wasn't a monolithic thing even in the 1980 s. there were a lot of different solidarity's for sure are ok absolutely ok absolutely of course

i mean any political party any political movement is a coalition of different things and you know there was a catholic element to it a very very strong for that absolutely as a liberal and i'm into that ok with this kind of easily dovetail so my question for jeff uncork i mean if given. a mindset in 1909 i think all of us probably at the time thought there would be some kind of reform communism because that would go to the child was talking about for the soviet union itself and i think that's what really caught all of us every single one of us off guard because you can't have a little bit of this a little bit of bad and it's either one or the other jeff. yeah i mean that was very much that was intention was reform congress and also it was the intention that a lot of the activists who were leading these mr must demonstrations in the g.d.r. in prague and other places that's the way they saw the future as well and it's where a lot of outside observers saw the future now we know what happened that you did

there was no reform comes and communism collapsed but you know because that happened doesn't mean to say that was inevitable at the time there were lots of all kinds of different possible political futures and so on and i don't accept that you know once you want to resolve the same motion and want to go but up to get it the only outcome was the outcome of that happened which is a complete collapse and the introduction of this neo liberal. i don't believe that all of it or all kinds of possibilities that what happened was a matter of political choices lots of different political choices including choices to a might but gorbachev by western leaders but you know the people on the ground in central eastern europe as well ok well johnny made my bed again the actual existing socialism our going back to graduate school here i mean it was very totalistic it's either one thing or another it's not like how do we you know it's like the further perfecting of communism all that kind of. language which has it really make any

sense ok and i didn't believe in breaking it through a reform reforming actual existing socialism was possible if you can you can't you can't reform it it has to go down. yes i think that's right i don't think you can be any more half communist than you can be half pregnant and the subsequent history of the soviet union itself of course showed this because as we know the forces which gorbachev unleashed ended up destroying the soviet the communist party of the soviet union in the soviet union itself so i agree with that i also think that today just as in a comment about russia in the today common to present day russia western commentators focus only on the liberal opposition they never focus on the nationalist opposition or of the communist opposition so they have a totally liberal interpretation of the coming down of the berlin wall the coming down of the berlin wall was of course the physical barrier which divided the german capital and therefore the german nation and so it did have an important national

content and the same applied to some extent for the other countries of eastern europe although of course as we know the iron curtain itself came again in june john really john crash john deed holding is to hold that thought we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on the fall of the berlin wall stay with me. i guess you know we're going to talk about more about. you know jobs are not really needed you know other part of this lockdown people millions and millions of people and their job would have something material impact on the fortunes of the economy as a whole but no it only affects the surface. as

a. matter of fact it's a great opportunity if you're in the banking only to see stocks trading higher and bank stocks will mean higher workers are needed taxes are needed when you can. money. thousands of american men and women choose to serve in the country's military and the decision. every song came to a complete. the day that i was right. you know told a shot to kill me and i see how would destroy. any screamed at me and he made me come in the gram my own and he write me with his birth thinking if you take into account that women don't report because of the extreme retaliation it's probably somewhere near about half a 1000000 women have now been sexually assaulted in the u.s. military is a very very traumatizing have happened but i've never seen trauma like i've seen

women who are veterans who suffered military sexual trauma is more likely to get the victim punished. and almost 10 year career which shows very invested in and i gave a sex offender who was not even put to justice or put on the registry this is simply an issue of our and violent male sexual predators for the large part of target whoever is there to prey upon whether that's men or women. the world is driven by shaped by one person. i dare you to think. we. ask.

welcome back to crossfire we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing the fall of the berlin wall 30 years ago. ok john i had to go to a hard break there are you would you like to finish your point go ahead so what i was saying was that the fall of the berlin wall obviously physically symbolized the reunification of germany and the liberation of the nations of central europe but what it really was if you like even more so than the collapse of a physical barrier was the collapse of communism itself as a governing ideology and as i said earlier we know that the collapse of that ideology ended up in golf in the soviet union itself what this collapse allowed western liberals to do is to do what trotsky originally did back in the in 1920 s.

which was to prevent soviet communism as purely an expression of russian imperialism and nothing else and to make an obstruction if you like of the whole communist ideology the whole marxist ideology which they the today's liberals the intellectuals who in the in the cold war in western europe and the united states had supported let's never forget that marxism was extremely alive and well in western universities throughout the entire period of the cold war still with a sort of revisionist leisure demo it's now presented it still is it's now print the berlin wall of the collapse of the berlin wall is now presented as nothing but the collapse of a russian empire when in fact it was the collapse of a marxist ideological empire and that to me is the is the most important thing that we must remember i think the critical years later errol do our reflect upon that that's very interesting. i'd like to say i mean i go ahead i agree. john. i agree that it was the collapse of the communist

idea and that's absolutely right i remember these discussions in east berlin in 199991 people discuss the 3rd way and whether the world turned up of their were formal tentative and then there was a very powerful mind that the 3rd way is just a way into the 3rd world it's a way to backwardness and you had a model of yugoslavia that which was obviously not so obvious started communism and in some ways it was held up as an example of how you can do to reform yugoslavia favor dismissed really is the soviet experiment failed but then it also was i think you have to think of that also historically that this is the result of $945.00 and so if you think of what happens in poland what happens in hungary what happens in czechoslovakia it's the result of soviet power and the story of communism in poland hungary is not simply a nature of movement this is taken over. because of the military presence of the

soviet union jeff we have a time delay i'm sorry for that let me let's go to jeff now we go to jeff. yeah. peter i'm a bit surprised the extent to which you buy into the western liberal triumphalist narrative is i'm not i'm a plot player not installed it is no no no no there's actually existing social well let me finish my but that's actually existing socialism it's either one thing or the other then you actually can't explain what happened in 1909 because the reform the impetus which i each kind from weaving coalminers mitsos of. from from from some from google and you know you talk about you know the end of the communist idea well people said that in relation to china i mean what they also signed in 1990 was that china will be next chinese commies and willful that's not the case we still have a communist regime in china don't we and we have a situation where the people are talking about china becoming the most powerful actor in the world so how does that fit in with this kind of like triumphalist you

know to try out the place where they listen and you have to like what are your common i think ok i would i would love i would love to add to that i have to say honey i hang on here i'd love to answer that but i want to hear my guess 1st because i have a bone to pick with you jeff but i'm going to go to harold 1st go ahead. so i mean i think if you think of what to what happened in china of course it's it's a communist party in china but what's happened is a completely different kind of evolution than the evolution of the soviet union and an adoption since the early 1980 s. of market principles. and so the really the creation of a tremendous dynamism that comes from the. liberation of people in the economic sphere so there's a lot of economic freedom obviously on the political side as a one party state but in in terms of economic dynamism that's where it comes from

it doesn't come from old style central planning and in the soviet model ok well let me go to john here and i kind of want to address what jeff had to say here because i hate you could just get very quick just get in here very quickly can i just get it very quickly peter one quick point one quick point yes what i'm trying to get away from here is just kind of what i could essentially is kind of feel of history what happened was a matter of. contingency more than me so all kinds of different outcomes are possible and we can see that not because of the time everyone's saying of strength of the west trying to liberalism democracy would we say that's the case now the i did not i am not i say me and i just i am not is that what democrat you know what he was i saying history into the year ok let me go to john here and i think it will answer jeff's concerns with my questions now with look at 30 years later in eastern europe and you have a lot of people in these former communist countries that are not very happy with

neo liberalism you can look in poland you can look at the hungry you can look elsewhere all through the former eastern bloc i'm directing this question to jaf but i want john chancellor it. you know jeff i think you're slightly tilting at windmills because certain other peter ryan also the herald defenders of western liberalism or western liberal fairytales know what i was trying to say earlier is that the collapse of the berlin wall is of course a physical event but what it and what it showed was the liberation of east 1st east berlin as east germans eastern europeans are but it was also the liberation of russians and of soviet citizens from the same communist dictatorship which had by then collapsed or was in the process of collapsing and the revisionism that i was referring to in my earlier answer is the revisionism to say that the communist regime in eastern europe which is how james of course rightly says was imposed through soviet force that that regime was somehow the domination of russians over

czechs and germans and poles and so on it was not that it was an ideology minister ideology over all those people equally and so the liberty if it came came just as much to the russians as it did to the east germans and everyone else liberty which like all the party comes with a price and risk that's what liberty is and of course yes not least because of the abuses of western power the abuses of neo liberalism yes of course plenty of people in particular i would say in hungary actually more so than poland i don't know perhaps you know better than i do of course they're disappointed with it but i don't think that those disappointment should cause us to forget the very real tyranny under which people lived both in the soviet union and in eastern europe as a result of marxism i did oh i agree with that heraldry reflected by now because we do have. some major differences apparently on this program go ahead carol yes.

i mean i think if you just look at the results. you do when you look back over the 30 years you can see really substantial increases in well being. objective indicate. life expectancy. the health of the population life has just simply got better for people in central and eastern europe. dramatic improvement they've got to why direct sr health care. if it's a really very very inquisitive ok moment ok but harold there's something that's happening i think you should there's something more than economic indicators ok so how would you do explain the rise of populism and nationalism in eastern europe i think it is a reject it is a reaction in many ways a rejection of neo liberalism ok because the communist period put a put into deep freeze

a lot of ideas in eastern europe and probably ideas that should have been frozen ok but now with the end of communist rule in eastern europe you're seeing it come up again and and the e.u. and neal liberalism is not answering all those needs. economic indicators isn't enough i mean we live more we need more than just bread ok that was the whole point of the question. we're there but people do need a basic. measure of existence and. that was really problematic if you look in the 1980 s. their life expectancy was very low there were more deaths because of cancer more deaths because of heart attacks more deaths because of violence and that all changed in the 1990 s. so it does seem to me to indicate not just the kind of as you ok well you know but it doesn't really really but it's been proven it doesn't answer my question though why is there why is there the rise of these populist movements nationalist movements and rejection of the neal liberal model imposed upon them from brussels

jeff the u.k. you are a perfect person to answer this one it's absolutely not imposed by brussels. well how will this how but they still have to disagree on the russells as it's about. something completely different what the plan is you know how do you do well and i don't think we'll have to disagree on that ok we have to disagree and jeff jump in but pizza doesn't put the pipe to plan i would like to make is this is the liberal western capitalism is not just been challenged by nationalists and populists it's also been challenge from the left as well now there's actually been a revolt point of socialism and socialist thinking and socialist movements yes so we have what would. this i did with 989 the whole communist socialist project and then that was a history of sullivan and the future was all liberal and complex in the west and that's turned out not not not to be true in the future is very much open at the

moment and you know and wanted to put the possibilities of science very likely but more realistic and that is you know some cause some kind of you know you know every visiting of different forms of socialist such as developing the such as the approaches to the resolution of the economic problems so you know i don't think you know one night i remember all represented the end of so she's ok maybe i'll case i'll say what i say it's certainly what you made certainly it certainly wasn't the end of history we were as we were told last 30 seconds go to you john go ahead. you know i don't think the sense of national identity was put in the deep freeze on the communism in hungary and poland and elsewhere i think on the contrary it was i would say almost reinforced by communism in reaction against it that's where that's how the hunger in the polls to 5 and so when the. communist regime disappeared that's what was left it was without a deep freeze it was probably a fascinating point sail most hell i would run out of time we've ended on

a fascinating note from john but we've run out of time many thanks to my guests in paris washington and in cork and thanks to our viewers for watching us here are c.c.u. next time and remember cross talk deals. we go to work so straight home. the u.s. economy was booming numbers of people were made homeless. you can work 40 hours in

a week and still not have enough to get housing everybody believes america still has the lead up to the reality of it we're not financially equality and a lack of affordable housing for a living minimum wage give many people new choice. that's been a problem with the city knows turn around and told me stay way out a little bit. of concerted effort is no answer because yes that requires resources the most vulnerable are abandoned on the streets to become. cooks. time after time called parisian to repeat the same mantra sustainability it's very important to excel or it transitions to sustainable prize board sustainability stay number man not a more equitable and sustainable well. they claim their production is completely hama's. because.

it didn't design the companies want us to feel good about buying their products while the damage is being done far away this is 2nd eldest doesn't want anyone and i mean look. and you missed me doing the nieminen. understood superman. is your media a reflection of reality. in the world transformed. what will make you feel safe from. the isolation community. are you going the right way or are you being led so. what is true what is faith. in a world corrupted you need to descend. to join us in the

depths. or a maybe in the shallows. i am i staggered this is the kaiser report i guess you know we're going to talk about more and about you know jobs are not really needed in other part of this lockdown people assume that millions and millions of people doing their job would have some immaterial impact on the fortunes of the economy as a whole but no it only affects the service clubs the presidents matter fact it's a great opportunity if you're in the banking elite and he sees.