this is a station look at the rest of 70 years. delegates that. are. greetings and salutation with millions across the united states facing eviction is over $150000.00 u.s. citizens no longer with us due to the u.s. government's abject failure in responding to the cove of 19 pandemic and weather experts now predicting hurricane season is set to unleash at least 13 brutal hurricanes on the u.s. shores in the coming months i bet with all of that you cannot guess are the priority of the united states congress were focused this week if you guessed funneling more money into the pentagon you my friends are correct you win the new

car yes time magazine is reporting that tucked neatly into the senate republicans latest $1.00 trillion dollar covert 19 response package is a nice $8000000000.00 into pentagon weapons systems built by depends contractors like boeing lockheed martin and general dynamics and what kind of virus and disease fighting weapons will this $8000000000.00 buy us taxpaying citizens well time magazine goes on report that the bill would deposit $2200000000.00 in pentagon ship building accounts it would boost missile defense systems in california and alaska and deliver about $1400000000.00 for the c 130 transport planes and f. 35 fighters manufactured by the good folks at lockheed martin. and as journalists and activists around the us begin to uncover this latest $1000000000.00 defense contractor gift basket they are being labeled as adversaries by the pentagon

politico is now reporting that a new mandatory pentagon training course aimed at preventing leaks refers to protestors and journalists as adversaries in a fictional scenario designed to teach defense department personnel how to better protect sensitive information adversary is the term they use yes those working on the front lines of the 1st amendment to our constitution protesters and journalists are now considered adversaries and pentagon training camps but are we really all that shocked i mean after all we are living in a country where roughly a month ago the united states secretary of defense mark as recently as governors to dominate the battle space battle space when describing efforts to contain and disband black lives matter protests. which is why today we'll be knee deep in the battle space of the 1st amendment as we take on the military industrial complex and their benefactors and start watching the whole. what's going on

a city street you want to. see rises joyce state. great city displays systemic deceptions the late show which. brings up the old. welcome everybody to watching the hawks. and joining us today to discuss the latest domestic military industrial complex news is the former senior security policy analyst from the office of the sector depends the one and only michael malone michael we haven't had john in forever thank you for coming on today . my pleasure thanks for having me so michael bottom line is there any real world military justification for putting billions into the f. 35 an arm spending into a covert 19 recovery bill. oh absolutely not in fact i'm shocked that.

even the senate republicans would even buy into that simply because. they made a very strong point that they want to strictly for stimulus to put people back to work there's no place for this kind of stimulus package for the military at this point in the stimulus package there the the congress passed a $740000000000.00. defense budget already and they and they can always add supplements later but keep it divorced from this this just medis the priorities and it really shows that the trump administration's priorities including the defense department is very very skewed. and we're seeing a lot of our congress people actually shout out what they think is wasteful spending from the pentagon right now and not presley just hash tag yesterday defund the pentagon domestically what could the pentagon be doing in order to actually

help u.s. citizens and others during this pandemic. well they can lie low and not put these kinds of things into stimulus packages or for covert number one but number 2 the rhetoric that you pointed out was very very ill advised and very unfortunate as you pointed out we have a 1st amendment and even though there's a opsec op. policy that has just. it's. they they are looking at the press and in that particular scenario as adversaries and it's wrong you know the press is the only profession that is mentioned in the constitution the united states the only one and yet the pentagon is calling a member sorry i think espers asleep asleep at the switch be should be looking this stuff over and he made one error on that the battlefield where where protesters

were even called them targets so his his his rhetoric is just inflammatory at best and people need to calm down the military as you point out needs to be helpful they are they have a they have a rental. in terms of trying to assist people at a very critical time maybe delivery for example i vaccines when when that becomes available that's going to be a legitimate outreach for them but in terms of dealing with peaceful protesters no that's that's the that's the job of the local governments and the state governments now the president could invoke the $1807.00 insurrection act but he's been counseled that that's just overkill and it's totally on the search and it is what's happening today is totally unlike what happened in 1968 i was around in 1968 and everything was out of control at that time not not like today you know i want to

ask you getting back to what you mentioned about the media in the. spawn's to questions about the use of the term adversaries in reference to journalists and protesters in this training drill pentagon spokesperson lieutenant colonel your royal or will and told the media quote attempting to read more into the use of the term obvious scapes the clear purpose of the training to prevent information from falling into unauthorized hands regardless of its potential use you know michael well i think you kind of mentioned this earlier but should the pentagon whether for training purposes or any other kind of purposes be using terms like adversaries when describing journalists and protesters you know at the very least journalism protestors working on their own shores or even you know journalism protesters in general around the world is adversaries a term that we we you know i think they're kind of saying like well don't it's just a term don't play into it don't read into it but what should we. well it's a it's a very unfortunate use of the term adversary and as i recall that. doctrine was

meant to be that policy was meant to provide a scenario and calling the press the adversaries it was was it was dead wrong and what i think they were getting at was trying to guard classified information to ensure that it's not leaked out to the press and that's that and they got carried away with their rhetoric and the leaking that has occurred. and that's what this the drift of this doctrine was about was to try and prevent leaks but the leak of this document itself was leaked and it was and it was something that was done from the inside and if it was classified then the press has every right and every legitimate right to reproach to report on it and it's just it's the same issue where the russians were recently accused based upon very raw uncorroborated

intelligence of putting bounties on american soldiers in afghanistan and yet even the president had to repudiate that that information and and so did a lot of in the pentagon now the pentagon has got to watch its. terminology it has to respect the 1st amendment it shouldn't be calling. peaceful protesters adversaries because they are exercising their constitutional right it's only when we have violence and what have you but then the states have a responsibility to take over and i think that. esper needs to be more mindful of and be and have a little more oversight of what goes out of of the pentagon i'm just astounded that he hasn't got better control over his own. department. m. ichael switching gears just a little bit congresswoman alexandria kasi

a court is currently pushing to bar funding for military treatment in u.s. public schools and on digital streaming platforms like twitch what are your thoughts on reforming the u.s. military's recruitment practices. well they have a legitimate right to go in and recruit on universities for example i mean i was in there o.t.c. when i was at the university and it was fine i think that. at least they're not bringing back the draft. and i think maybe that might be something with the but. i would say that humorously but at any rate. she's got her own agenda and she wants the military out of everything she wants and she has she has she wants nothing to do with the military and and if and i have a i have a grandson who just got out of high school and he saw that the military actually provides an opportunity for him and he qualified in every field including nuclear

engineering and that's where they're going to put him he's going to have a career in it and he's calm he's capable of it and given the training so i think in some sense it gives people a legitimate. a gateway to better jobs and opportunities to to better themselves and i think that she changes once too i don't personally agree with her on this and i think that the military has a right so the cia goes. and other agencies go out and recruit universities and even in high schools i remember when i was in high school at the state government come around and give us a pitch so it's very legitimate. and as long as it's. you know it's done to offer them opportunities people opportunities. why not you got to remember because you know cortez has also told apple to go fly

a kite and and they want 25000 jobs up in her district so her her ability to call the right shots is questionable at best. why you know i think you're lucky i never of the state department come to my high school and ask me if i want to join the state department or anything like that so you know i member of the group. i guess so yeah i mean i think you make a good point at the same time i do think that there needs to be some rains put on of at what age the military or the cia or anyone can start kind of going after these kids because they should be of an age that they can make that decision without being unduly influenced whether it's through a video game or other such things like that michael i had to i would agree he i think i think in senior high school is an it's is about the right time because kids should be thinking what career path they want to venture into exactly right michael i want to say thank you so much for coming on always a pleasure having you on sir. thanks for having me and as we go to break my friends

remember that you can also star watching the hawks on demand to the brand new portable t.v. app which is available on all platforms remember portable t.v. you can see all these shows and a whole lot more all right next we delve into the workplace horror show that was allegedly the ellen show and then rachel blevins r t america correspondent joins us to discuss the latest news on murder and sexual misconduct coming out of fort hood if you do not want to miss that conversation stay tuned all through the hole.

we go to work so you stay home. and staff and something before the guard. when you see trevor this may want to get thanks in they didn't could say. if you want to overcome that there go straight trans travel restriction 6 on the move this 3 chance then we have to have a go go back see. how can you explain love i've been to 82 countries i did in 12 but i came here and on those 3 days i just filled with hope. and he kept pretty isn't a sick joke. i made my decision ready.

i felt. pretty. good. my one dream is that all my children busy. love cold weather. like everything about it. for me too to allegations of racism sexism and intimidation the lights of hollywood

are filled with stories of many of these stories never even get the coverage they deserve despite hollywood being considered a liberal bastion and that brings us to the ellen degeneres show the popular daytime television show has become the subject of an internal investigation by warner media after numerous accounts of workplace problems emerged the issue that circling the ellen degeneres show our new employees have been speaking out for over a decade but just last month and their voices finally gotten heard executives from show producer telepictures and distributor warner brothers television sent a memo to stoppers that interviews with current and former staffers about their experiences on the set are under way. in april variety released a scathing article where crew members shouted out their disdain for being fired at the height of the coronavirus pandemic only to be replaced by nonunion workers and cheaper labor in july a report of racism and intimidation made the front page of buzz feed news in it 10

former ellen employees that they were fired after taking medical leave or bereavement to attend family funerals one employee walked off the job after growing weary from consistent inappropriate comments on race all employees featured describe the environment on ellen set as toxic 10 hour plus work days are the norm but with a rotating group of contractors production crews and other staffers the montreux remains this is as good as it gets this is ellen you'll never find anything better and considering the competitive dog eat dog nature of hollywood people often take the bait and feel the physically and mentally can no longer handle the abuse former employees want to see ellen held accountable for her positive public brand that just doesn't jive with the behind the scenes experiences of her staffers. but willing to cancel the burdock to still out on that she's a media giant a 32nd national spot during her show cost

a whopping $51570.00 the show raked in over 35000000 for warner brothers each year and more than $50000000.00 for host ellen degeneres movie who are monstrous numbers i don't know if $51000.00 for one i have you know i've worked in hollywood for a long time before i came into this into this business of doing this show in the news business and you know prior to the me too movement a lot of the rumors and everything that you say people are abused people not just sexual and sexist and bigoted but you know they're also physically abuse they're also you know worked 18 hour days that you know it's a it's a brutal industry to work yeah and it seems like the reports were there people were speaking out and they were either getting whacked with it so they just lost their job completely blocked from working on other threats or they were ignored completely and giving harsher hours because what ends up happening is and you

probably know this well it's really easy to find somebody else to sign up a production staff for a major show and yes it is yes i mean the thing in hollywood is always the case of hey there's another bus load there's another training young you know young kids 1821 years old who are ready to sign up and that's both for like people on the camera and off the camera you feel that constant pressure that hey they'll just get someone younger to replace you or they'll just get someone who will put up with the abuse to replace you there's a great great film called swimming with sharks that stars kevin spacey that really documents the abuse that a lot of people both in the office and outside the office in hollywood face which as you pointed out is weird one of the city but that's like a bastion for limit you wouldn't think that working conditions like that would exist in a because a lot of the people who are involved in these things are the same people who will speak out about working conditions outside of hollywood there are people who will lead the campaign. and shout wave signs hashtag tweet mean while ignoring it on their own front door. at the end of the day to let's not forget that you know no

one goes to football games with war criminals like our former president george w. bush you know come on now we've talked about on this show whatever happened it's like optics clearly you know with all the with all these reports coming out we want to wait and see what happens in the best occasions for is just to get the full depth of what what actually went on on the show but the biggest question is what happens going forward what their arguments that it's going to be really hard to cancel ellen burstyn foremost because the advertisers haven't backed up we have seen it year after year these conversations happen and now they're just now getting a lot of attention but not a single advertiser has backed out of the ellen show and we talked about the whopping cost of having an ad buy during that show it's actually the largest ad by cost of any daytime t.v. period while so there's a lot of money associated with this and her high profile guests haven't start stop showing up to the show either so it's hard to tell what's going to happen it truly is i think you brought up some great points there but i think that you're going to see i think once this investigation really reaches its zenith and you hear

a lot more people you know speaking out you really hear what's going on because there's a certain point like we don't know if ellen was directly responsible for it but the end of the day it's her name on the show her pictures on the show whatever happens behind the scenes still ultimately is going to fall on her whether she actively took part in it or you know claim i didn't know it was happening you know which is always kind of the one thing you know if you i didn't know they were being mean to the staff or crew will be ok even to pay attention when you're walking to set. and that's the one thing that a lot of these former staffers are arguing that you know the environment is so toxic that anybody who is there can obviously see this happening it's not happening in a silo or behind closed doors people are extremely abrasive racially insensitive doing some really bad things talked about them you know laying people off at the height of a pandemic but also firing people who've taken off time for bereavement if a family member dies that is. they covered thing like you're not supposed to be let go of your job because you attended a funeral no you absolutely should be and like you said ellen show was not the only

show where these kind of things happen to you i think people would be surprised that this is more the norm limit is the exception than the intention to assist with . 3 months after u.s. army specialist vanessa given was seeing her family and friends came to washington d.c. today to demand justice for her murderer while they continue to call 'd for a congressional investigation lawmakers here in congress have introduced the i am the mess again bill which aims at changing the way sexual assault is handled in the u.s. military are to use rachel blevins joins us now to discuss rachel thank you for coming on thank you for having me so what can we expect from from this bill when her name what is this broker of a goal of this legislation is to create an independent 3rd party where members of the military can report their sexual assault and sexual harassment because right now these soldiers are expected to report it through the ranks of the military they're expected to go to their superiors but what they found is that far too many

times their abusers are their superiors or they are actually reported and nothing is done about it and that's why this story of vanessa again has really resonated with a lot of people who say they've been there they were in that place because her family and friends came out after she was murdered and they revealed that she told them that she was being harassed but she was terrified of telling her superiors because she feared retaliation and we have seen support for getting justice for her for this legislation and we saw president trump meeting with her family today we've seen dozens of lawmakers saying they plan to support this bill but it's all going to come down to oversight because even if this legislation is passed even if this 3rd party is created it's going to be about making sure that the military actually implements it and that these cases are taken seriously and rachel when it comes to those sexual assault cases in the military how rampant. what exactly are the numbers one fortunately we've really seen a rise in these cases in recent years and i want to take a look at the records that were released by the department of defense according to

their numbers they say that there were 20500 instances of unwanted sexual contact tax in 28 seen their reports increase 38 percent from 2016 to 20 teen and that one out of every 16 military women reported being assaulted in that year and we also have to remember those are just the people who actually reported it because we have far too many cases of women and men who are terrified of reporting it and speaking out so the numbers are likely much larger. number 20000 is a ridiculous luling is that we do have to think about the it might be double that of the people who just don't report because they know that like you said earlier either nothing's going to happen or they're reporting directly to somebody who may have been the person who sees them in the 1st place i have to ask what's next. in the future of fort hood because this isn't the only scandal involving murder and things like that that have hit fort hood now in the last year for

a while now her family is calling for a congressional investigation into her death because so far we've learned that she was mordor murdered at the fort hood army military base and not only was she murdered there but then her body was taken away from there by a fellow soldier so there's a lot of questions surrounding how that happened how that was able to be carried out and why we haven't gotten more answers so far and you know when we talk about fort hood i'm fortunately that's actually not the only deaths that we've seen there in recent months we saw vanessa again and her reported mean suspect in her just who reportedly took his own life but we've also seen a number of other deaths that have suspicious circumstances i want to take a look at some of those soldiers now they include may harm or who was found july 17th at the base near in a nearby dam his cause of death was reportedly drowning and now being investigated gregory's. alice was found you 19th and a nearby field 10 months after he went missing his cause of death has not been released but police confirm foul play is suspected brandon scott rosencrantz was

found may 18th his cause of death was a gunshot wound and it is being investigated as murder right even ingo dela cruz jr was found march 14th his cause of death was a gunshot wound and as it was part of a triple homicide rate there for wayne sawyer was about arson bit of a cause of death has not been released but foul play has not been ruled out and then finally shelby tyler jones was found on march 1st and he was killed by a gunshot wisco a number of questions there definitely a number of questions there rachel thank you so much for breaking all that down for us always a pleasure having you on thank you very much thank you all righty everybody that is our show for you today remember everyone in this world we are not told we're not so i tell you all i love you i you know i robot and i'm really surprised keep on watching all those hawks out there and have a great day and night everybody. industry

comes to life in los angeles every night. dozens of women sells abilities on the streets many of them under age. los angeles police reveal a taste of the daily challenge you know if you're going to exploit a child here in los angeles and we're going to come as you see officers going undercover as 6 workers and customers to fight 6 trade. financial fines that it was all about money laundering 1st as it is this is just a different. this is a good start well we have our 3 banks all set up for something and you're something in america something overseas the cayman islands. all these banks are complicit in their. need to do some serious money laundering ok let's see how we did

while we've got a nice watch for max and for stacey oh beautiful jewelry. from that you know what money laundering is highly illegal here for a bunch of guys record. u.s. secretary of state might come théo is on a mission he claims the world must change china are trying to change us so should we interpret this the cold war to be waged against meeting business also implying force regime change china is certainly a major global competitor but is it now more and. done in the end by north it so many people because they call freedom is so important that even such a bad copy sending. i'm not killed me would be

a good. deal to find the next guy. who looked up live on canyoning booting dum dee and felt something good luck she wound up a party at. the click some for the c.e.o. flavor to the deflection board for you to say. that is a god that then i got off the brilliance of. time he and others are going to hear a lot about. that that he can bank on he gets nothing like a. long long while and then he goes along the bottom is a bonus which alone can choke a lot older. than to

a new person and lead to knee move 100 gandhi a new normal gandhi. on the face. to go to you then go to mock you then they will join you. welcome to our viewers from around the world live from central london this is r.t. u.k. . the u.k. prime minister postponed is the further lifting of law down restrictions as it emerges the infection rate is rising. for me while the u.k. government changes restrictions overnight for much of northern england with separate households banned from meeting in private homes and gardens. the world health organization warns the coronavirus pandemic could be one big wave rather than seasonal returns of the virus all be joined by a w.h.o. spokes person. further to get the power to ask those working from home to return to

the office even the most vulnerable have been shielding we'll hear from a psychology expert. and activists call for the u.k. government to allow asylum seekers to work claiming it can raise 100000000 pounds in tax we hear from a human rights lawyer. the u.k. government has rolled back on a planned easing of lockdown restrictions amid a steady rise in new coronavirus infections that as large portions of northern england woke up to stricter measures which came into force overnight without much warning well for more on this and i'm joined by our 2 u.k. shut it was dashed are the sharia so england was supposed to ease restrictions wasn't further on saturday but it's not the case anymore is that absolutely we were

indeed hoping to enter the next phase of easing the lockdown measures tomorrow about boris johnson thought he had simply no other choice but to delay it by up to 2 weeks so that includes indoor activities like bowling alley ways casinos and wedding receptions all of which will not be able to free own. at least for another 2 weeks now as always is policy making and government decisions has always been guided by the science and medical professionals and boris johnson is saying at this point in time the data is still implying we're not out the words just yet with those numbers creeping up our assessment is that we should now squeeze that brake pedal squeeze that brake pedal in order to keep the virus under control on saturday the 1st of august you remember we had hoped to reopen in england a number of the high a risk city that had remained closed and today i'm afraid were spinning those changes for at least

a fortnight the idea that we can open up everything and keep the virus under control is clearly wrong and what we're seeing as is that we are at the outer edge of what we can do and therefore choices we need to be made. well face coverings will also be made mandatory and other indoor spaces like cinemas art galleries museums and places of worship all of which will be enforceable by law on top of this ours johnson is now supporting further localized a lockdown scenario is particularly in northern england you again to arise in cases now about how cock the health secretary he said that the key contributor to all of this is mixing households and not social distancing. we brought them in to target specifically the problems that we've been able to see through the data because we want to keep it control of the spread of this virus we want to do that with a minimal impact on people's lives i predict these decisions do have significant impact on people's lives but we want to do the minimum and the evidence shows the.

biggest risk in terms of the spread of this virus cross this area is how soul transmission when people are going to see job it in there is. in each of these homes when they're not generic so together. well the measures announced late last night affect 4000000 people living in the greater manchester is lancashire and parts of west yorkshire areas people in these areas are not able to meet up with other households in their homes or gardens the measures also apply them to restaurants and outside tables but individual households can go to places like pubs cafes and restaurants but of course it's sparked criticism yet again on this haphazard approach to social distancing the chaotic way in which lock downs are imposed in an almost whack a mole style across the united kingdom the issue of policing of course is up there and also the issue of timing in all of this of course late last night for instance

and imposes measures giving the local authorities just a few hours to prepare of course in the northern region a huge population for the b m e community today does mark the mist and celebration of a huge impact there were households would normally be mixing to celebrate but boris johnson has always maintained he would reverse and you turn on any decisions to ease the local lock down measures if and when the data brady required them to do so if the data said act he said the government would also act so quite a different tone he is now striking from what we've previously heard from boris johnson the prime minister when he 1st said no military by christmas. shadier thank you very much andy well bush johnson has also been trying a new catchphrase to help people to social distance though it seems to lack a little punch hands face space hands face space plus get a test the hands face space get

a test its hands face space. and get a test if you have or if you have symptoms. well the world health organization has warned the coronavirus pandemic could be one big wave rather than 1st and 2nd waves of infection that's as the w h o's chief warns that young people are not invincible and need to be convinced of the real risk to health if you don't so just of the spikes of cases in some countries are being driven in part by younger people letting down their guard during the northern hemisphere summer we have said it before and we will say that again. young people are remote. and i'm now joined by a w.h.o. spokes person that's dr margaret harris dr harris thank you very much for joining us well one big wave does that mean that the virus comes once and then goes away no

it does not all what we mean is that the transmission is still there so the concern was that people saw you know lockdowns over that it was somehow it go away they they had this idea that it might come back later in the year but they had this seemed to be this fixed idea that now is some time to ponty and unfortunately that's not the case what you've got transmission anywhere is potentially everywhere and on fortunately it's making this very clear doing its utmost to ruin everybody's fun well the u.k. prime minister as we've been hearing has paused more easing of the lockdown in the u.k. but if it's one big wave what we delaying the inevitable. you know you know what we mean by one big wave is that it continues to remain but you need to bring it down you need to bring it down so that those who are get most ill and you will have that percentage of people who get most ill can get the treatment they need immediately

in your hospitals are not overwhelmed and your hospitals can do the other things they need to be doing to save the lives of those people who get lots of other illnesses i know we've seen some studies in the u.k. that have suggested people have died of a lot of other things that would normally be treated because the hospitals were so overwhelmed by people with severe coated well late on thursday night as we've been hearing the u.k. impose tougher rules on the north do you know if these localized approaches actually work yes indeed they do and in fact it's a positive thing to see very very localized very targeted approaches because that means you know we have viruses in other words just as my director my my director emergencies my growth and said you know what your spot fires are when you have what hugh. it's much much more difficult to bring it down and that's why you end up with a whole national lockdown but if you just got the spot you can really work out where your transmission is and you can break though that transmission and if you have to do it with lock downs because you're not managing to get people to stay

they keep their distance to not touch their mouth nose and honest to maintain that obsession with environmental hygiene and high and again well that's what you have to do it's been suggested that these local measures are targeting those groups celebrating eat i mean is targeting certain communities the way to go or could it make them feel victimized. i would not say that you would be targeting particular groups and by the way to everybody watching. him know if you target the epidemiology and i'm sure that's what's going on we've actually seeing more of that it's younger age groups going out and have doing what young people normally do it during a lovely summer. and we're seeing this around the world by the way it's not simply in europe we've done an analysis of the days here in the caseload has really shifted into the younger age groups or would it help them to isolate areas as narrowly as possible such as by street or even by household to ensure that the wider record to me doesn't collapse so if you've got your track trace tracking

tracing testing in place and you've got become so good and so targeted that you can do that that's ideal where young people they have been warned as we heard that they're not invincible but it's also true that the risk of death amongst the young is actually much lower isn't it well again that's not clear and the numbers indicate that fewer young people die from this but they don't indicate which young people so in other words you're playing russian roulette so again i have a young daughter i did not want her to get coded because i don't know even though she's got absolutely no underlying illness i don't know whether she will be the one that gets a severe form and. is even if she recovers may end up with heart disease with chronic fatigue with perhaps brain changes in other words her whole life has changed she's lost all her future there's also the wonder and long term implications as you're saying also as well the u.k. government is extending the use of face moms but the dutch government they all want

to vising or advising against wearing them because it says that the science isn't there where does the w.h.o. stand on this so we say if you cannot socially distance especially if you're in a crowded place with pull the intonation so that's where you don't have the fresh air in dispersing the droplets and the aerosols we say that a face covering is a means of preventing the source of the droplets set to you from going into the air and potentially infecting other people and meanwhile the u.k. is also pressing ahead with back to work i mean is it fair to let companies force work. again this has to be a negotiation and again we would emphasize that the companies must insure that they have put in place but the safe provision so in every workspace it must be possible for people to socially distance they need to look at their ventilation can they ensure that the the internal ventilation is appropriate people can open

a window if possible if you're using your conditioning are using have you cleaned the filters how are you providing the right kind of air conditioning there is a lot every business needs to do to ensure the safety of their workers that's what i think dr harris would have been more advisable to lift the lockdown in the u.k. entirely and just shield the most vulnerable. that's. it's difficult to say any community certainly shielding the most vulnerable is a very important technique but it's not the only tactic lockdowns of things taken on advice of the epidemiologists in the local community working out but it should always bunch be done very much in partnership with the community ensuring that the community understands why this is happening and what how long it will last and what the reasons for it are finally done to her shielding in the u.k. still being lifted from some today surely then that does put the most vulnerable at risk. again i'm sure that there's those who are really vulnerable are being given

the right advice of be given the right information and should on and should know how to protect themselves and what they can do if they're not confident that that it's safe for them to go out they should be able to be again their own best risk manager or manager and they should be empowered to be that nobody should a blind people to do something that they don't feel is safe to modernize thank you very much indeed for joining us it's a pleasure. and still to come after the break. firms get the power to tell workers to return to the office even if it's possible to work from home we'll hear from a psychology expert. and a council launches its own testing tray system out of frustrations with the government approach as northern ireland becomes the 1st whole nation to find any knowledge i tracing out.

it's definitely something to talk

a guy to small like surely it's all going to be i want you to travel less may want to get vaccinated and protected. if you want to overcome the global restrictions travel restrictions 6 anime descriptions then we have to have a go over that scene. welcome back the u.k. government is pressing ahead with changes to workplaces from saturday these allow firms to have to squash in on bringing back stuff you've been working from home june 5th 19 demick previously the advice is for everyone to work from home if they can. from the 1st of august we would update our advice on

going to work. instead of government telling people to work from home we're going to give employers more discretion and ask them to make decisions about how their staff can work safely that could mean of course continuing to work from home which is one way of working safely and which has worked for many employers and employees or it could mean making workplaces safe by following qubit secure guidelines. well the changes mean even those who could do their work from home can be asked to return to their offices such a situation will be up to the discretion of the employer the changes also mean that 2200000 of the most vulnerable people who have been shielding since the onset of the pandemic could also be asked to return we still at

a time when distancing measures are important and all of the various distancing measures working from home for many companies remains a perfectly good option because it's easy to do i think a number of companies think it's actually not that many of the productivity and in that situation i've seen no reason i can see to change in. a more on the mental health implications of returning to work i'm now joined by professor of psychology peter ace and peter thank you for talking to us and we do need the economy open don't we it's important that we get our stuff back. well that's obvious 'd we come for ever just sits at home even when people are working at home and we know the economy isn't working strongly enough and day there are lots of people who are . unemployed because of that because of the lockdown arrangement so we did definitely do need you know some transition towards normality yes but did mosques

on public transport and secure workplaces help to convince people that it's actually safe to go back well it's a very complicated. landscape for information particularly since last night. we now have a change in arrangements nationally as well as locally so there's been a perspective months of some of the relaxation measures some businesses that were going to open from august 1st will not be allowed to do so. the pilot sporting events where limited numbers of people were going to be invited to attend and not going to take place with spectators and all of that at the same time when people are being told that you know as from august of this they should be going back to work and they are indeed their employers can require them to do so so it's a very complicated business i mean you can't just use a single dimension of risk in order to understand why the regulations are as they

are shouldn't firms that have some discretion i mean many people can work at home but perhaps bosses feel that simply isn't quite as productive. i think the only way to do this properly is indeed to allow discretion to be implemented of course that has to be done properly you can't just simply allow employers to do whatever they want to win 8 expediently without regard to their health and indeed the broad welfare of their employees. but the way it's being introduced at the moment i mean a sort of late night tweet last night about the local arrangements in the north of england doesn't foster a sense under control which is what people i think need in order to feel that the arrangements being made for them to return to work are indeed coded secure as the phrase goes on the shielding as we now it's coming to an end on saturday i mean surely that most firms will actually take a generous view on this what you would hope so you would hope that you know they'll

be you know sympathetic understanding that unless we're going to hear about you know or could cases which isn't to say that we should judge the the whole process on that basis but we'll have to wait and see how effectively it's implemented i think i can understand why and why the general public might have some concerns because simply because it's very complicated and what we learned from the the lockdown is that when people understand the reasons for being told to do certain things they are very keen to comply but to soon as it becomes unclear why things have to be as they are all indeed people perceive injustice or inconsistency at least in the arrangements you start to get disengagement and of course that's a problem we need to keep the environment secure to keep the virus under control and also psychologically that a balance needs to be struck doesn't have any people do have the right to stay at

home with us but buses also have the right not to pay them that they. well there's also other factors now i mean it will affect different people in different ways but you know i've been reading lots about people who saved a fortune in their commuting costs and indeed you know the psychology of commuting his is not only interesting like it has significant impacts on people's wellbeing people with longer commutes a less happy than people with shorter commute so the fact that nobody's been very few people have been commuting will have been a positive boost to many people of course that's not going to be the whole story for everybody i wouldn't want to generalize that as a consistent thing but many people will not be the team to come back to work because they've learned to adapt so the benefits of working at home day professor peter to many things fearful. now one english council has developed as i uncovered 900 tracing systems amid growing frustrations with a centralized approach the director of public health in sound well named birmingham

lisa mcnally said they were taking a more proactive approach i wouldn't go quite so far as to say we've given up on test and chase but we're not happy with just allowing them to do their job anymore i just don't see the urgency to fix this i really don't see them running around in a panic as soon as the new case comes in now we're not waiting to test and trace to fail to reach them were phoning them the same day well the test and trace system which has cost taxpayers over $10000000000.00 pounds has been hit with numerous issues since its launch it's been criticised for not reaching enough close contacts of those with the virus which in some areas is just 52 percent the app trials on the isle of wight inmate was scrapped after it emerged that it didn't work on i phones and that project was also hit with privacy concerns about the creation of a centralized database unlike other models where data is stored on individual devices the latest app is still to make an appearance.

well it comes as northern ireland launches its own track and trace out ahead of the rest of the u.k. when an infected person gets a positive test they issued a code well this code is then inserted into the app triggering a bluetooth to other phones that have been in close contact the app also works across the whole line and thanks to an agreement where both jurisdiction share data of infected patients. will stay with us r t u k where in the next hour i'll be discussing the system with a technology expert. now report claims that allowing asylum seekers to work would raise around $100000000.00 pounds for the treasury the research suggests if people have the right to work 6 months after making a claim it would lead to increased income tax and national insurance contributions the government would also save money on support payments currently people can apply for the right to work 12 months after their initial claim but are limited to the shortage occupation list which includes skilled professions human rights lawyer schwab and can says this move would also help people to integrate into society.

portland united i don't think it's particularly surprising that something that we did no one should have known obviously there's exact figures and here is the latest research so that's a new thing that we have the exact figures now but not hanging there's nothing surprising when new news about it until i mean obviously you know these are going to think persecution to come to this country trying to resettle trying to and obviously something the government is particularly keen on and i don't remember it's asylum seekers' other people are criticized for is not integrating you to the do community not integrating into this country and so obviously not allowing them to work much and i'm going to develop work relationships not and i'm going to progress a careers how jobs go out to meet people is obviously a huge obstacle and that are so obvious that i'm going to work or not already provide financial benefits to their economic benefits to the country but also help them to get to know their country this country their culture i would also going to

get asians how to go about workplace now often as a sign case is and can take months many years sometimes and to be resolved and so that has been you know for so long sometimes destitute almost homeless and us trying to scramble to live and then many years later suddenly they left without that support but. that it is either not able to work out and there's huge problems there so obviously if we just allow them to work and within a few weeks within a few months of the congress i know at least there will be that continuing to manual not only settle their lives but be beneficial to the country as well well i want his spokesperson said the government is reviewing its policy on restricting asylum seekers rights to work people currently seeking asylum are only allowed to work if they've been waiting for a decision for more than 12 months and only if they not responsible for the delay in decision making them come also said that officially giving asylum seekers permission to work would prevent them from disappearing. and i was out for instance

and the signs don't crites is less than 6 hours a day so someone has to rid of the house children as medical needs any other needs and you know i mean obviously 6 days nothing to survive on so many of them then might try to look over. cash and no other understood what without permission and so on that's the exploited us they don't pay and that's why it is the system he said there is actually how to you know that there are only companies here or there working you know from the jump into the when. they're paying taxes it's much less now. and finally scotland's 1st minister nicola sturgeon has been named the world's 5th most eloquent politician new zealand's just under arden tops the rankings but the scottish leader was praised for being clear calm and compassionate the team compiled their rankings after analysing over 100 hours of footage from

public addresses majoring 2020 but the group criticize prime minister boris johnson for what they called a tendency to deliver confusing messages in the form of washer ring a kind of waffling. yes face coverings i think people should be wearing in shops but in terms of how we. can do that we will build build build build back better build back breena build back cost of finding a balance between giving people. good search of the truth because people say they need to i'm happy to point out to the. tree. but you know you on the point about what should people do in the message of british room employees and all our workforce in the country it's it's it's it's what you know you know i have discussed before. now about more news out the top of the hour

say that. one almost shows seem wrong. but old quotes just don't call. me to get to shape out these days to come out ahead and in again tread because the trail . when so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground. u.s. secretary of state might come théo is on a mission he claims the world must change china trying to change just how should we interpret this the cold war to be waged against meeting business also implying change china is certainly

a major global competitor but he said no more and. if there was competition or free market competition in drugs in america the price would be low that's the beauty of free market capitalism the fact that you don't have free market capitalism for drug prices in america shows you have been trying to. bully and they doubt its price gouging and he's right to try to dismantle that but without that kind of premium for these drugs for these companies that however i don't see how they're going to command the multiples they do on the stock market so he's he's got a. saying he's either going to take a 50 percent hit on the stock market cory's going to lose a lot of people i mean the drought.

continues. to grow virus condemning continues to he. travels i hope but on the opposite. because this is even more to the station. this with my biology. knowledge is working on a colleague 90. miles from my alice's head of our society college i'm working on a code 19 vaccine that so many questions for your doctor can take hiking. welcome to our show thank you very much for inviting me and a pleasure to talk to you why is it your lab is using east cells to grow and to chance an activity in response to carnivorous will in our bodies if i understand it correctly what i am.