after dose after dose after dose and really became his drug dealer so who's to blame patients doctors manufacturers the government. is you'll be dia a reflection of reality. in a world transformed. what will make you feel safe. tyson a shill for community. are you going the right way or are you being led so. direct. what is truly wants is faith. in a world corrupted you need to descend. to join us in the depths. aura made in the shallowness.

in europe people are taking to the streets to protest the lack of transparency in treaty negotiations such as the t.t. ip treaty with the us and the seat a treaty with canada. the use of arbitration tribunals a central and totally opaque part of these treaties is a serious threat to the future of democracies. may. be very. limited us another is it possible to. tiny little block the signing of the free

trade agreement with canada thanks to paul men yet it's minister president. 3.5000000 loons blocked a treaty concerning 500000000 europeans. european entity defies the great liberal euro it's truly david against goliath. all of us face that. full well big diff. is good about fair hope there's one is what we do believe that if you're genius or not if you don't. give us big. because previous. don't want to sign it just. says on those i'm going to join it is only. this sort of distrust for me as it examines this you know not that exam i was the 1st going is unfair i see it all chris i don't fix it it's all there are

just. a hope in. to attract foreign investors you're a promise canada that it would integrate the international arbitration system called dns into the treaty. the cornerstone of the system is the deterrent effect for states when a complaint is made. when a state nationalized is a business it seizes property and the state then compensates for this expropriation . but if the state raises the minimum wage or passes an empty g.m. along or prohibits endocrine disruptors it can affect a company's gains. this is an indirect expose creation. since it's a loss of earnings. sufficient ground for suing

a state before a private international arbitration tribunals. that becker screwed up in the process did not the strongest on my demands for a plus. plus one targeted at that are dependent on the high commanders on the myth that having the problems going for before are. not just as mocking up. a real scandal. this interact expose creation written into the c. to and other treaties opens up a real pandora's box. complaints against government measures that bother investors are likely to increase. arbitration tribunals are a massive deterrent to the state. in his article it's also it is that. zax in there let me get his mickey spillane again is the

glue that is assume you do time to this we don't seem to get is because i didn't get you know the gong in your. skivvies the specific i think us positive did because of the lack of acidic on the other back in the top. part of. new news i want to take him on this one on the hope that is doing the gift. by example . as rescission up again that is to simply deal with it. do you mean was that the give us again you. don't look enough. to guess you don't even have one and if it destroys you to hate you more this will be given the. no token so matter of one.

do some stronger don't move on from this is you give up on the film and i saw most of us to be thrown to the bridge just in our desire to to be safe i mean does it. make its move for jack a visit to see me. there on the brink of a massive expansion of the role of the rest of us. so what happens when we introduce a couple of new traders like santa and the other big one is the trans-pacific partnership promoters advised yes have long like to say well we already have 2 or 3000 of these trainees what's a couple more teams that combined with a c p takes us from still having a minority role in the world to be calming and establishments of the institution why the foreign investors have their most powerful rights at the international level of any private charter in the world most people think about trade they think

about goods and services being a strange between countries and the investment component the investment chomped or of a trade agreement is about something very different it's about establishing a special system of international protection for foreign. p. diddy's you see that is the. it could be a new leak over who needs even the thoughts that if you know is he going to use them he still missing c 98 xenia do you see 20 you know he can see and if you don't. think you will be false could well. we exist to commit that we would have all the moves. on the level of people. own juices a simple quote. don't predict said. but the level was well security it's time i've

got to live where i was you know and i think that they're into all that they live or last saw something for break and you know. they also vision our larry going to give you a piece on what you could. say on the. deficit list of new homes in economy. they provide is what i would say only for. goodness of i think you are also not at all. in these arbitration tribunals multinationals impose their will most often in great secrecy. secrecy is not only an obstacle in forming citizens it is the keystone of the whole system allowing for the most shameful arrangements. for this is what happened in germany when the swedish multinational vattenfall

a large energy producer indirectly attacked the city of hamburg in 2009. plan to get the federal state that remained secret for years and was unveiled thanks to a professor of international law marcus kind of. tradition are secret because no one prevents the parties from the go see it or anything and then in the public hearing they will say whatever they will say that the real negotiations will take place outside i in 2007 vattenfall obtained a building permit for a coal fired power station in the suburbs of hamburg. following the 2000 data elections and to petition the elected green party review the permit. the discharge of hot water into the elbe to cool turbines threatens the quality.

fina vattenfall would have to comply with anti pollution measures. and how did vattenfall react by immediately filing a complaint before an arbitration tribunals demanding 1400000000 euros in compensation under pressure germany secretly negotiated with wagner fall intil 2011 and suddenly one day the case was closed we only know at the end that they reached a settlement i listen this is very important the only publicly available information is that they settled and of the story. again. much scrutinize the tribunals decision. it mentions a mysterious compromise between vattenfall and hamburg signed in a local court. and so that's what i said if they reached

a settlement in front of the rest accord in front of them this is a piece of information that i can request and the federal government refused. but the city of hamburg sent to. the city gave a new permit which is less restrictive than the op that's the 2nd. button flooded one only button 5 wanted a change in the prompt and that's what they call. as unbelievable as it may sound hundreds of green party didn't impose the environmental standards that it considered just. i can just imagine the conversation that took place between the federal government of germany and the city of hamburg so the federal government said look we signed this treaty we are bound by this internationally germany has international obligations and you have to fulfill them we can't you cannot. become

a break international law i mean this is also a powerful argument especially in the more proceedings especially in countries like germany but all over the world. even germany is caught in the trap of its treaties and gives in to blackmail. in total secrecy the state signed an agreement on march 11th 2011. that same day japan suffered the worst earthquake in its history. the fukushima disaster shook the planet and especially germany. pressured by a 50 year old anti nuclear movement and following protests in 450 cities across the

country under the merkel was compounds who act. she moved to abandon nuclear power with majority support. anything ya plans and then i engineered. it to me. in. the name quotation of. easy kinda can in any. bending consequences. and. one thing you know and think that counted in the. thanks.

if. you just have to fly between 2 kinds of low and as fast as you can. do much of it i was watching

the purdue express for the. bushmaster an h.r. person rather. than. the engine restores impersonal suspense of course one rushes in racing is competition in the extreme whoever follows the specified route between the ones with the fastest time williams just beautiful little daughter who's going to church every church. law school should do their community. 6 insularis decision became the 13th amendment of the law on atomic energy when it was voted in 4 months later. the 7 oldest german plants were

immediately closed among them those the bones bottle and which also belong to the swedish month. vattenfall. immediately challenge the legitimacy of the nuclear law at the constitutional court of. the highest court of justice. germany in a private arbitration court. it had already won once it could and would try again in may 2012. in arbitration. the child takes place in washington although it essentially concerns.

the claimants the federal republic of germany respondents. being streamed so that. greets. the arbitrator. of germany compensation claims. as a consequence of the. claim of their production licenses for criminal.

and. they were simply withdraw. to dispute. his right as such. and you rather this dispute concerns the manner in which germany has chosen implementing decision and its failure to prop to protect claimants investments in particular concerns germany's failure to pay any compensation at all . the heart and so most in those protection treaties is to provide protection against expropriation. the difficulty however when we talk about indirect expropriation is to draw the line between expropriation on the one. and legitimate governmental measures on the other. and there is no easy way to draw these lines and make this distinction. so of course one could say that the protection that in the west was enjoy under the treaty is influence how and walked

the state regularly it. doesn't matter if a parliament has adopted in the war in the most democratic way. it can still violate international purgation stuff the state has undertaken in the international treaty. it is for each individual state to decide whether or not they want to sign such treaties germany is trying to do just arbitration is tricks ploy to fukushima disaster. to create a narrative that would excuse its wrongdoing. you can put perfume on it but the bottom line here is that the international and the governed this dispute. germany cannot challenge the ratified treaty. but this giant failed to meet its obligations. it did not prepare its damaged. a great danger for the

population. claimants now compensation for their own. in business failure billions for plants which were not tarrie is for their problems but apparently in that. reality a burning transfer meter is totally normal as are bursting pipes also normal and back and how soon of us are corroded barrels with radioactive waste . to follow shown your promotional video of the crime of power plant in that video none of the events that are listed here on the slide feature and plans but both of them have been standing still. not because of focus shima not because of the moratorium not because of the 13th amendment but because of a multitude of incidents.

brewton i'm doing this to. open the defeat of. heinz little a nuclear physicist from greenpeace called as an expert witness took a close look at all the plans failures. experienced and how this. is actually saying most of the emerge. over these cables if you just feel of. a trade in history on the whole thing could be used in a few of the ships so full kumu. done in this machine transform our doors to those even. the machines from our the how to see on the moon. any begin this is an enormous amount mustn't. talk to it's going to get after going

to bottom of the root on the side so if it's a disparity in seems a large you feel to link. it is possible she only looked on. this clue which. save wouldn't it if this were in some book gold. thus germany is in famine or descriptions of fires quote unquote and pictures over corroded barrels quote unquote country but nothing to the ultimate determination as to whether in 2011 germany has admitted in this over trade that its decision to accelerate to phase out was not based on concerns over safety of the nuclear power . but mariner on an alleged change perception of the general risk that nuclear energy poses to the german population that is all politics. that

involves lawyer is sheltering behind the law behind strict legal language so as not to recognize the multi-nationals responsibility. what is very clear that this group of people or many of them have been educated in a particular way they are all educated in this particular way of looking at both international law as sort of a technical matter and at the same time thinking that giving companies as many rights and privileges will benefit the global economy so lawyers are not trained in thinking about the consequences of their cases lawyers are trained in thinking about other way apply the law. there is only a french for this and the french term is the. this is what this really applies here people think in a very similar way this case is very controversial on has generated much public

debate now why is because it's an arbitration which should never have been. brought under the energy charter treaty and under the exit convention. the reason for it through the amendment. was different. actually and you are correct. that is correct. if that is a public perception. how would you legally. into. the investment protection. if you are sure i make a number of assumptions and i don't ask you to do anything but should not do this would be because it is almost impossible hypothetical because you are. assuming that the public is wrong and has the right wrong some of the perception changes in the public how does that translate into legally introduce you to. and i was

listening to the. opening this morning. claiming that the 13th and was a political decision and i've said it quite often i wonder when political has become such a dirty word. it comes from the greek political us which means relating to the people to the citizens to the state. and democracy is nothing if not political it is government off the people by the people for the people. it has to be political that's a definition and it's certainly not a dirty word. refusing any political or democratic consideration multinationals consider themselves outside politics and above the law . laws still exist.

while vattenfall the trial against germany. is proceeding in washington the federal constitutional court in karlsruhe where the 1st complaint was lived give this judgment. the court declares that abandoning nuclear power conforms to the german constitution and that the companies affected will have to receive a financial compensation. but if i come off to come to your home and. it's great to survive on trade schools there's a cure you should start working on that come in time but also. from here you have to in also song on commision sometimes to be leashed industrially not tradition for them. to get along and give you a wonderful foster mom that's involved. in the scuttles can i mean i was going to

move i just feel even in houston as often push the. same visa unleashing. it on the. country giving the for. the work of. risk here didn't. just must confide in east insureds he says there should be 5 it need this communion and this was stopped so long it can also be humbled to be undone in a key concern in love as opposed to haste and is an extended she's getting hitched just been more 20. years to shop for the woman through. what a 1000005 congressional committees all have but i don't know about any speaks in the most you can be out in the oil.

it is up to the german government to set the amount of compensation to be. dated by the bundestag. in an arbitration case it's very different. the amount of compensation is much higher and is set arbitrarily by business lawyers and with no democratic legitimacy. a considerable portion of legal costs $4.00 to $10000000.00 is to be paid primarily by the state. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy confrontation let it be an arms race off and spearing dramatic development only

i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical time to sit down and talk. there's a war of the 1st multiple little. of the. bullets on the plane. was only as a day to day mr lee and it. is so cheap those of you. to use the book with their skulls just go one of those that would use ok physically. but. of course it.

it's looking. at the whole collapse follow and everything would be. the president of. russian media including up he warns that the country will collapse if. dozens were arrested during rallies in support of the opposition figurehead maria kolesnik over. the news this morning the british government's handling of the pandemic forces many state health service doctors to consider.