the french president's party withdraws a bill that would have restricted the filming of police officers after weeks of national protests in europe, song, guantanamo a rights. a report says hundreds of family members with european citizenship are being held and inhumane conditions at kurdish controlled refugee camps in syria. and that u.s. president elect joe biden makes another key appointments. jen psaki will be the white house press secretary, a familiar face from the obama era, and remembered for more than just a few gaffes. there are flows of gas,

natural gas, i should say. they go through from western europe through pain train to russia, and we are, i'm sorry, the other way from russia. crane to western europe or from brazil, from the keys for russia, and see no evidence to prove clean. who are fleeing to russia? sorry, i don't, does it for me at this hour, those are headlines of my colleague mickey and we will be here in just under an hour's time with a full and fresh look at the news. this is our team international. hello and welcome to crossfire all things are considered. the foreign policy team of a potential buy in ministration is being touted by the liberal media. we tell you

why all this should be horrified also there's a lot of talk about a great reset and build back better does looking back or bode well for the future to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guest, patrick headings, an employment he's the editor and founder of the 21st century wire. and here in moscow, we're joined by bob. she's a political analyst and editor, you know smee internet media project. all right, gentlemen crossed up rose in effect, that means you can jump in anytime you want. and i was appreciate it. ok, let's go to patrick 1st. their employment in watching the potential by a cabinet being presented to the public through the liberal media. we heard of phrases like they are like the avengers, it's like they're superheroes or something like that. and then there was

a talking head on p.b.s. saying, these are intensely professional people and they're apolitical. i mean, i almost fell out of my chair. when that was said here, i look at this team and it's a rogues gallery of people that want endless war promote them. we're very much involved in designing wars that are still being fought and they're being but when the liberal media is cheering them as if there is some kind of an enlightenment after darkness. ok, obviously the donald trump is the darkness in their mind. but there's a lot of continuity here, and i think this is what's really terrifying. and we have election cycle after election cycle where the public says they're sick and tired of these wars. but it doesn't seem to have much of an impact on the professional manager, real class that runs what i call the foreign policy block. take it away. patrick.

you're right to point out peter about the continuity. there's a, if you look back in history, there's a tremendous continuity of u.s. foreign policy from the ministration to administration. it's a slow moving elephant. it doesn't change much between administration, but it did change for the last 4 years. this is probably the trump administration, probably the biggest break in terms of continuity of u.s. foreign policy in my lifetime. and the way that i could remember and many others. so there is, there was a break in continuity. and i think that break was born out of the political will, of the american people electing a populist president. and so the, it triggered an auto immune reaction from the establishment in america that the media is well. so with bought with, if biden assumes power, let's assume he's going to take the reins in january. then the democrats are going to have the media on their side for everything. there will be no holding them to account. it will just be kind of a cheering section,

much like it was for 8 years under obama and you, you can see where that led the u.s. and led the world, which was one of the darkest periods, in my opinion. in geo political history, this president started a numerous new wars from yemen, dismembered yemen, dismembered to you crane, dismembered libya, nearly dismembered syria, if not for the help of syria's allies, russia and iran. so, but now they're going to have a chance to resume some of those projects. i mean, but they'll also in terms of continuity, they will look at what true the trunk framework is and we're most likely work with it. trump has allowed the democrats in this sense to be more hawkish, let's say, against iran than the obama administration was. i see that is going to continue their appointment of jake sullivan recently as a national security adviser at the tender age of 43 years old. he's just a child. well and we have to remember,

let me go to deman here. i think celebrated was one of the great cheerleaders of the russia, great conspiracy hoax. so this is the resumes that the liberal media is cheering on here. when we look at anthony blinken, he is one of the architects of the breakup of yugoslavia. a lot of people don't know that he was in the white house when, when, when libya was destroyed and has regrets, they didn't do more to intervene in the international profit war in syria here. so it's much the same for it's kind of like an obama $2.00, but the difference is the main here is that the neo cons have been able to trends migrate into both major parties and most importantly, into the media. it's a closed circle. now go ahead. you are exactly right, you have whatever you call them, ultra liberal snellen ueberroth, you have them inside both or it is unfortunately, you know, what was really bad. on the trumper, there was

a legislative framework created. so whoever is the new secretary of state, where is the new, say, representative in the un, they're going to act in their legislative framework left by the terrible congress. you know, the congress under mr. trump introduced things, right, cuts, which actually a kind of institutionalized us, a kind of hybrid war against russia. just imagine these people obliged their american state to keep track of rich people in russia who have connections to the government, their families, you know, to, to pursue them basically around the world. well, that was basically a legislative declaration or war for many years. so unfortunately, the new demonstration, whoever joins us is going to act inside that framework. but you know, what really struck me was the fact that despite the fact that 74000000 at least 74000000 americans voted for trump,

there is no respect for them. there is no excuse for go by it and you know, some people call hugo bottom. i think it's a very, it's a very good name because basically he didn't say that he would alter a bomb, a sport. it is because 74 young people vote for trump. you know, and that's despite the program saying, you know, these better as it's about nobody has more respect than joe biden, or the what can women of man who get out every day to be old and sustain this country? well, 7th you, for me to know these people voted for someone else. they don't know something, you know, tell them how you're going to be different from obama. but joe biden just said, i'm off in my lifetime, so you're going to lose too. but that's all the excuses he kept. but that's the point is, you know, nothing will fundamentally change that. you know, that is the message or, you know, you know, patrick, one of the things i lament most in this election cycle is that it was,

and i think you and i have been watching politics from a very young age. was completely devoid of policy. so we were doing on this program right now, trying to interpret what the biden foreign policy if he is inaugurated. what of by inform policy would be through people that he's speaking to be in his cabinet because well, joe didn't seem very much during the campaign. other than he didn't like trump's tweets and he wore a mask. was the long and short of it. no, you know, you're right. so the big, what's going to be the big difference in terms of democrats versus republicans, i want to put the trump in this train into a republican basket tradition. but let's just say for argument's sake, is the tool box. the democrats have a certain tool box. they'll shuttle in all the same people, the architects of the samantha power, susan rice, all the responsibilities to protect crowd. that's their tool box, it's human rights. it's emotive narratives. it's refugees, it's,

we need to save the people we need to intervene. and so they will sort of roll this out. the media absolutely has trained for this. c.n.n. is built for that. basically all the ngo frameworks, that's part of their tool box. the language that they'll use, it will be a humanitarian, a kind or gentle or form of, for lack of a better term, imperialism that we saw under obama. and that's how the democrats roll. right, patrick? i think you would agree with me that inside that tool box that i think you describe is to be 2 missing words, international law degree. right? no, it will be international norms. oh ok. it will be it will be the rules based international order. that's their language. that's the same language that you'll see coming out of the g 7. this will be repeated by britain. the democrats tend to work through multilateral organizations, like nato, to do their no prosecute wars, for instance,

because it gives them kano, of, you know, public relations cover or waters down there sort of culpability. obama did this in libya too. great a great skill. and so this, this is what you'll see, the un will become more in the forefront in terms of humanitarian issues and intervention. so you have the liberal internationalist, interventionist, neo liberal, interventionist, which is really a neo conservative growth, really in it. and they will be and they will tell us over and over again that this is the essence of the international community. no, it is really the washington consensus here. ok. you know, the maybe you've kind of hinted at it here. i fully expect that syria could be on the agenda again, russia. they've been kind of opaque in how they want to deal with china, which i think will be very, very interesting. but again,

because we didn't have it during the campaign, we really don't have a clear understanding what potential biden missed ration. what is some of the things that you're looking at as we kind of, you know, read the tea leaves here? well, bottled, it came to us for the defense secretary, special new show, hold noise. she is called a specialist on russia and pentagon's, russia. well i'm, i'm usually someone, i feel i need a certain ministry secretaries in their american administration headed by specialists on these. so that country because usually they're the specialists on destroying that country or at best demonizing that country. i mean, like specialist on syria in the united states, where usually the most outspoken supporter of the regime change there, which actually manned civil war and supporting muslim brotherhood and other extremist organizations,

which in fact started the civil war in syria. but of course they're american media presented it as just, you know, some kind of an old burrow state against peaceful demonstrations by the syrian government. so i'm somewhat uneasy, you know, when i hear that michele flournoy, a specialist on russia, is probably going to have their defense team william burroughs. well, has to do business trip, because i know that during his tenure bass of the in russia he said, man, you're right towards bob. his book is terrible and his articles are all for so. unfortunately, also, you know, the problem with now many barolo or ultra liberal ideology is the same as with other to tell it to anyone your religious people at the top. some of them support it out of conviction. some of them support it out of pure pragmatism. i'm sorry, just you know, to sustain their families and become rich. and sometimes you have a combination, you know,

in order to make your life better and secure. these people kind of absorb the norms over ultra liberal, narrow liberal to tell you terry and ideology that absolves these things into their writings into their thinking. just gone, oh, you know what? i'm much more comfortable. let's finish up with patrick here. here. it's a grift to, i mean, if you look at these a list of people, they are how high positions in the foreign policy realm here. i mean, maybe they're lobbyists or lobbyist working hand in hand with the defense industry and other industries. and it's a huge grif that made a lot of money. now they're on top, your last 10 seconds go to, you know, it is there, they're all going to be in, gainful employment. there's a whole coterie of analysts will be shuttled in to c.n.n. and foreign policy experts, but the main thing, and last thing i'll say is joe biden was self-appointed voice viceroy of the ukraine during the obama strafe. and so, you know, the situation of the donbass,

they're going to want to let that languish for, you know, going to go to a hard break and hard break and continue our discussion on some real estate r.t. . if you're born into a poor family, if you're born into a minority family, if you're born into a family, single parent that really constrains your life chances every day to your needs and the needs of your family.

welcome back to cross up where all things are considered. i'm people about to remind you we're discussing some real news well is go back to patrick is the 2 terms that the great reset and build back better is being bandied around. and i guess, you know, they seem rather innocuous and harmless here, but i find them to be quite sinister because this is a way to change the world again. maybe that's not a bad thing. that things are pretty gloomy right now because of the economic turndown and the endemic. but it seems to me using these terms, is a back door to do what you want without voter consent. and there's going to be no debate. it's just going to be administratively applied and it'll be applied in all

sectors of our lives here again, without our permission, your thoughts knows this is a big, unprecedented situation where, you know, you look at joe biden, for instance, he had build back better as a you know campaign slogan, this is the same exact slogan, it appears behind boris johnson. it appears behind justin trudeau. you can see using this terminology and it's coming out of the world economic forum in davos. so it's the 1st time in international organizations kind of running the platform for mainline u.s. presidential candidate during an election. i mean, this is unheard of. and so you have to step back and without being too conspiratorial, saying there's a bit of harmonization there and coordination there. it's kind of obvious and the main point is, i think what you said, peter, is that voters in britain voters in the united states, they don't, they're not voting on davos. is great reset agenda. they never had a chance. there was never a referendum. this is just being absorbed. so,

and this is all it basically in line with the un's sustainable development goals of 2030. so this is kind of a race to meet all these arbitrary technocratic standards that have been laid out by all these various u.n. committees and all these climate conferences have been going on for 2 decades. and so it's 5 eyes. countries are totally on board with this australia, especially new zealand. and then most of the european countries are already pretty much signed up to it as well. so, but they were really rebuilding a system that they themselves broke. this is really going to prop up the green new deal, which is the objective of this is propping up a system, a financial system that is, you know, absolutely over leveraged and what have they done in the last 9 months. they have over leveraged again with bailouts. and q.e. and stimulus is a system that was already on its hands and knees. so this is really setting up the

green new deal, the rating of pension, felt what it meant to me, but it's me, i grieve with you, but it's be very, very clear with our viewers here. the new green deal is not just about the environment to me again, this is atrocious horse. you change so many things and you know, until it's proven. otherwise, it is just a continued transfer of wealth to the very richest and the world. it's no coincidence that they're doing this. ok, this is an opportunity to keep that financial system and paradigm in place here. but, you know, team at the interesting thing is that with this great recession build back better. and again, these are like and now we get to use dog whistle. ok. these are dog whistles against populism. that's what it is. and there is that because of the failed economic system that we are living with now, and these failed for the vast majority of this, populism is a threat to them. and these, these 2 ideas,

these 2 pillars is to make sure something like trump never happens again, and they're determined to do this. ok, they're very determined and this depend on it and economic turndown is their opportunity to act now and to act in unison. go ahead, you know, absolutely right. it is a moment where the outer liberals kind of strengthened their grip on power, not just in the united states, but around the world. but also, i mean, i just, i was just stunned to what a short memory people have because in their build back better well 1st, i'm terrified by the word recept because we've had a reset with obama in 2010 in russian american relations. and their end of the reset was take a boy, you know, it was, or the civil war in ukraine, basically provoked by the west, provoked by the coup that they supported in kiev. it was the war in syria. and

people have such a short memory because inside that program, what do we read? this is the 2nd time we have seen the 2nd bailout in 12 years for big corporations . and wall street, well, who did the 1st bailout in 20092000 tan. wasn't it mr. obama? by any way, and his vice president joe biden, you know, there's a crisis we remembered started under bush by basically the bailout. you know, there selvedge in all the big banks. of course was all done by obama's team. actually our bomber promised he made 2 promises that he would walk for the what can people and that he would take big money out of politics. well, we remember that in their underwear bomber stream, it was not just big money or courage in full swing in support. or hillary clinton, obama was the 1st president who allowed secret service, as you know, basically special services to get involved. we remember how they got involved in

american politics. and suddenly, with course, we had this new after the intelligence community, you know, something that even the president cannot contradict. you know, the intelligence community has said russia would trump in power and absurdist that may sound where we were. believe it, you know, no, the conspiracy theory about, you know, being supported by, by the been supported by the new swell and chinese money. that is a conspiracy theory. everyone agrees, but their theory of all being supported by russia is equally absurd. and everyone was supposed to believe in it. you know, i quite agree with you on green new deal. well, i think president marker on who usually banks very lengthy and few speeches. he has struck a chord with many report to us. i think about a week ago when in his own interview, he said that, you know, for decades people were encouraged to get homes out. say, see,

just don't take their children to additional costs in their cars and no people out to us. i told you, no cars are bad, you know, everything you have been doing is just ecologically unsustainable. if they go in, they told the working people for years, the changeover to diesel and then actually exactly, and then then but no, now we don't want diesel. i mean, after all of that money was invested, you know, patrick, i disassociate per se way, is that this great reset or build back better and it's nothing to do with working people is better because in spite of working people, i mean, they want to implement these things through a back door and not through the democratic process because they know that they can't get these people to follow ok because they're, if they're either educated or they're ignorant or they're religious people, there's always something wrong with that part of the electorate. and this is a strictly short circuit at the inn, around the go ahead. if you look at the effect of lockdowns,

especially in the west and i'm talking about developed countries in the west. ok,, because there's, it's more pronounced the do the drop in g.d.p., the loss of civil liberties and rights and so forth. all of this stuff. and the unemployment where the developed were the undeveloped world, the 3rd world. it,, if you will, was already struggling. and you know, it doesn't have a great g.d.p., so they haven't really felt and living under despots normally, they haven't felt as big of a change. so what this has done is depressed the western economy and almost leveled it out. so it's closer. so there's slightly more normalization between the 3rd world and the developed world, which is what most says they intend to do. it's what the world economic forum wants to socialize consumption they want to sort of normalize and even out production in except for the very rich i would suppose, right? yeah, it will if you can hear. the comment you made on fuel is important because if you

ban diesel diesel cars and combustion engines, which they've moved that forward to 2030 in the u.k. for instance, that's going to basically not only destroy the, a lot of the car manufacturing, but it's going to drive there are things that do require fuel, like aviation, and maritime, and so it's going do is going to drive the price. it's going to restrict the supply of the available supply, the market shrinking. it's going to drive the price up. so the only people who can afford to fly or to ship some of these things by boat, it's going to be very expensive, is going to drive the prices up. and so the billionaire class have no problem, they'll be able to fly to the mall deaves, they'll be able to go to, you know, the great barrier reef to look at the sharks and what not. all the things that they love doing skiing involved is there no problem, but for the rest of the middle class has been depressed and crushed the working, class forget it. they're on u.b.i., universal basic income in this plan. and the green new deal is being funded by

raiding the pensions of the, of the next generation and the current generation and the last generation and what they call releasing liberating 4 trillion or 10 trillion it to fund greentech. if you remember cylindrica under obama, that $500000000.00 boom doggo there, produced no solar panels multiply that times $10000.00. that's the sort of money you're talking about with the green new deal that they want to do. this is just an opening for the massive amount of corporate fraud. basically do nothing, projects, jobs for my friends. they're talking about sustainable green jobs. you got to believe that if it exists, think the example of the combustible engine. i mean, this is what a lot of working people do their drivers. ok. they their courier's this for many people. and particularly if you look at it in red states in the united states, this is absolute necessity. but that they're driving forward even weeks. i mean,

without any consideration of what they're going to do, i mean, how many, hundreds of thousands or millions of people are involved in that part of the economy. are they just going to be put aside or put them on some kind of low level welfare, just cis assistance they get through through life? i mean, again, nobody is voting on this. ok. and if it was presented to voters, they would swear, isn't english, say no good. where i think that it's true, a lot them being the united states, there is something wrong of all of these green demogorgon. i mean, i'm all for equality. and that whole for leftist need to look, you know, i agree, but you know, some of the, formerly ecological leftist r.d.s. in europe are getting just sinister. i mean, the greens think germany where the symbol of pacifism for many years know they have the biggest enemy, as all russia, they, they believe every lie about russia and about,

and of all about the countries in the east. and i agree with you completely that the most poor people, i depend upon the combustion combustion engine, and i won't go for a country. it's in their wallet. are you know, they, you all baby oil supplies and their gas supplies that they have been provide to reach congress when the green sea in germany. a said, oh, we don't need, we don't need north team to because we're going to have created a new way. you know, well 1st they are, you know, i ain't cheap services to their own people. ok, he may have to jump in, you know, we've run out of time. i want to thank my guests implement in moscow, and i want to thank our viewers for watching us here. r.t.c. an xterm. remember

financialization has its limits. the accounting tricks of stock buybacks in money printing their lives and in saudi arabia. we see a brilliant example of what happens when a country decides to go into financialization, instead of let's say diversifying into actual productive economic activity.

i think one of the worst things as a kid is what you want to do. it's not what you want to do, it's why do you do the things you do?, you could design a life that is focused on your y., being aware of work as a way of expression. people ask me, what motivates me every day, and i look, i'm just being me. i started my company because it was an expression of myself. i am just painting on a canvas. but i think if we can teach them that, think of their work and their life as a place to express themselves and then dream of what they see themselves becoming, having that strategic mistake makes you think more long term rather than the short term. what athletes are told to picture making the shot before they take the shot. and i think that the same thing is true for the rest of us. we have to picture what our goal is, is looking like and not just pick an arbitrary goal. but what do we want our life

to look like and then create a plan to get there. and we can help kids.