was trying to avoid that kind of free inquiry for under a delimited inquiry it was a means of that a pretty when your freedom rather than expanding it. curtailing it and also it preclude me from examining whether the palestinians were in some ways also violating human rights within the territory they administer. and i tried to change that way of thinking about the mandate but there was a strong pushback against that effort because who is the fear that if the men the description was changed the mandate itself might disappear your aunt you were at the time a prominent american scholar and international law and yet as far as i know it was the united states on to the outgoing bush administration that also objected pretty

strongly to your appointment perhaps because of that belief that you would be more biased towards the the palestinians i wonder if the american representatives averages cast balance with you because at least at that time despite all the praise really leanings the united states insisted on presenting itself as a fair broker in. well it insisted in public media connections but in. things that were more or less off camera it was pretty open about its defense of israel and particularly within the un system where it allege that israel was victimized by. hostility toward its sovereign rights. and they

viewed me as a critic of israel and therefore objected to my appointment they were not members i would not have received the appointment if the u.s. had been a member at the time when i was appointed because you have to have the support of all the 49 members of the human rights council the us read later rejoined the human rights council i think partly so they'd have freedom to criticize me but. at the time they were not a member but the u.n. ambassador john bolton a very well known american political figure who's written this book he was national security advisor trump for a while many i guess he said well familiar to the russian audience especially there . and he attacked me. and said that pointing me showed everything that was

wrong about the way the u.n. operated fires and to stand within 9 months of your appointment that the united states got a new administration the obama team came to office with this promise of a new moral vigor and i think it more than just approach to justice if i can put it this week by the way i noticed that there weren't just that justice is very frequently used in the titles. if your book 2nd you have these 5 books read this word and incidentally that was also one of the most favorite words of president obama so my question to you is whether these years starting in 2008 with the coming of a bomb much power changed its own or. brought anymore justice to the palestinian people because he definitely promised something of the sort and he is initial speeches yes he made this very well known speech in cairo

a couple months after his inauguration which promised a new turning a new page toward american policy in the middle east but the page turned out to be rather a blank page and. when there was pushback from a very pro israeli democratic congress he felt i suppose that his priority policy priorities would suffer if he didn't give away israel palestine and so even though his prior privately he was probably more sympathetic with the kind of point of view that i hold the people he appointed to represent the united states and in the human rights council and at the u.n. itself. attacked me personally. throughout the 6

years there was basically a continuity of american patisserie patient in the u.n. so far as israel palestine is concerned. what on other issues but on this issue in fact the u.s. took pride in the fact that it was protecting israel from censure criticism in the law i know that you often make this distinction but then symbolic and substantive policy is and. i think that's a hugely and appreciated fact about here swine policy and how divergent its symbolism. is from real action of going back to trying to i know that you find he's . further support for israel a poor and but isn't there some benefit some ugly truth to him calling a spade a spade and not trying to present us policy as balanced as many of his successors

did before. yes i think i think it is clarifying as to the real nature of the u.s. relationship to israel and to any kind of diplomacy that would bring about a sustainable peace the problem is that he not only. took the disguise away the pretension of balance but he also endorsed a maximalist netanyahu zionist agenda which substantively carried beyond the prove what. israel felt empowered to do and he endorsed for instance israeli sovereignty in the goal of the hives moving the u.s. embassy to jerusalem and. the u.n.

consensus on that point and generally going beyond what other leaders had done substantively as well as being more candid symbolically. now many foreign policy experts would also remember 2020 as the year when. the arab countries earlier resolve of denying israel normalization of relations before a state of palestine is created gave weights you know opened dealmaking paid the u.a.e. back rain saddam is that the same diplomatic ties and. other countries arab countries considering to do the same how much of it is due to trauma and how much of it was inevitable. well it's very hard to assess because these kind of decisions are covered with rationalizations

publicly that are not. instructive if you want to understand the real motivations and there's very speculation that the u.a.e. and bahrain were wanted to do trump a favor in exchange for is support during the presidency and they came you remember these normalization agreements came just before the november elections and it was seen as a way of helping him in that context so it was in part a private pragmatic deal and trample of deals and partly it was a sense that the palestinian cause was going nowhere that their solidarity on

a rhetorical level had no payoff and being. kind of opportunistic governments they felt that they had more to gain i suspect by normalizing relations and seeing where that would lead. then by maintaining this sterile status quo. and it's been the normalization agreements have been somewhat misinterpreted they haven't abandoned the demand for a independent sovereign palestinian state with its capital in jerusalem but they talk to contests and. the beloved that they used to have before. well they dropped the symbolic leverage is questionable whether they ever had geo political leverage it was going and then and from israel's point of view it psychologically liberating should not be as isolated in the region where

their status located so from the next on yahoo israeli point of view this was an achievement they got without giving anything on the palestinian question professor fault we have to take a short break our but we will be back in just a few moments state. financial for a long day with the money laundering 1st to posit this cash in the 3 different. is

a good start well we have our 3 banks all set up for something and you're something in america something overseas in the cayman islands or never will pull these banks are complicit in the kleptocracy to decide if they did look all it's a murder to do some serious money laundering ok let's see how we did while we get a nice luxury watch for max and for stacy own beautiful jewelry and how about. luxury on a bill again from that you know what money laundering is highly illegal. because of course. is your media a reflection of reality. in a world transformed. what will make you feel safe. heis a nation full community. are you going the right way or are you being led.

to direct. what is true what is faith. in the world corrupted you need to descend. to join us in the depths. or unmaidenly shallowness.

join me every thursday on the alex simon show and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then. welcome back to worlds apart but reach earth fock former agent un special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the palestinian territories occupied since 1967 and now a professor follow before the break we were talking about the normalization of ties between israel and some of its arab neighbors and i've heard some russian experts

a jazz that trumpet only to you the crowd in this symbolisms of it but the actual change of heart change of policy bad or negotiations between israelis and that the arabs were spurred by the obama policy in the region particularly he's after it's to reach out to. what it would be fair to suggest that the practical or abandon the end of the palestinian cause by some of the arab states is in the unintended consequence of a bomb is pursuing he's deal with iran. i think you could say that i think that it's. definitely the priority of these. governments including saudi arabia which hasn't yet reached normalization agreement is the containment of iran and the destabilization of iran. may

fail to gain any kind of. diplomatic material support for the pro or to. made it worthwhile to. the seen as a betrayer of the palestinian cause and that betray though which i think is felt by the populations in these kind of arab countries that have not abandoned the palestinian struggle so you do have this kind of tension between these regimes and their people on this issue and they were bent what must have been hit them from doing this openly earlier they were cooperating with israel unscary the regional issues earlier this was. making it explicit now i've heard the same before and one of the reasons the arab

states fear iran so much is because it has become the primary threat to our political everyman's particularly dynastic governance i use actually saying that iran is feared because of its quote unquote democracy. not democracy but it's anti none are minor key views i had this meeting with khomeini back in 1970 known a long time ago where he compared the saudi dynasty to the show. who was his adversary and it was at the time when the red iranian revolution had just succeeded and he made the point that dynasties are of this sort are corrupt and are exploitative of their people and have no place in an islamic country so there was

a very deep sense of the part of iraq that of course doesn't translate into saying that. the islamic republic in iran is 'd committed to a liberal democracy now professor riyadh now on the cusp of yet another changing regard as the white house and the biden administration i think clearly is banned on bringing back some of the moral symbolism of a bombing europe day for ensuring themselves as being. for all the good against all the bad deeds being in practical terms it will result in a little bit more justice but the palestinian people well i think 1st of all it will. see continuity with the obama diplomas.

and i think the iran nuclear remember is very symbolic of what obama's approach to the region was and it was done in defiance of israel not and netanyahu subjects so if that is done it will create a at least temporarily a move or a. positive atmosphere for political accommodation and it could lead to greater stability in the region which i think will be a strong priority for the biden people they will be as produce rarely as earlier american pre-term leaders and they will restore a back disguised as we were talked of previously namely

pretending to seek a balanced outcome based on mutual interests but it professor i think this is removed talked before about unintended consequences and i think psychologically it's easier to understand why they by than a station would want to go back to base if you know it's their way of sort of stroking their collective egos but do you think they could be unintended negative consequences of that and. you know. bringing back i mean if you look at the a rationale of the of that nuclear deal back in 2015 the obama administration seemed to believe that the main goal was to curtail iran's nuclear ambitions as a way of arresting a nuclear arms race in the region the thinking i think was that if iran was scots or have a nuclear weapon then nothing could stop turkey or saudi arabia from acquiring one but we now see that that's produced a whole rift of. new alliances that may have actually reasoned detentions in the

region do you think something like that would happen again when you have led both by simply good motives but you don't think it's through. completely. well i think i think you have to start with the understanding that iran is desperate for normalization and the end of sanctions and they will i believe. try to give very reassuring kind of image to the west and make it appear as if this is a win win outcome now when it will have the repercussions you suggest and the assassination of this nuclear scientist just now is a way of trying to provoke i think raney an act of

retaliation or to put the hardliners in control in iran and. my impression is that iran is too sophisticated and shrewd to fall for a bat kind of. provocation you've written before that israel takes the normalization of arab neighbors very seriously and that it may even see that as a prelude to an escalated tensions with iran do you think israel is genuinely all that threatened by tatiana or is it perhaps a way of redefining its territorial conflict with the palestinians and completing the promised land project on its own terms well i think israel has genuinely and to some extent in a manipulative way. feared any. strong

state in the region. and it has specially if that state isn't. true its government sympathetic with israel's legitimacy and iran in that sense is a psycho political threat more of them than i think a material threat whether it's used to be a material threat is used to manipulate in part the israeli public which is very divided now and they need symbols of unity and one of them is the iran threat and whether that works in the present context i'm not sure now speaking out you mentioned this assassination or. talk iranian their. scientists and

israel is widely believed. to be behind it just as it is believed to have nuclear weapons but it would not comment on any of those issues what do you think i mean putting aside the moral s.-s. meant all of the means of israeli foreign policy what do you think it's abjectness would be and if the few weeks that remains in power. will is it partly depends on the signals they receive from washington there's been a lot of speculation. trump wants to maximize the pressure on iran. during this period and that certainly would be encouraged i think by israel netanyahu and it would serve as a distraction from both countries both for israel and the u.s. but it's very dangerous distraction could be very costly. iran has lots of

weapons non-nuclear sophisticated. missile technology it could if they so decided inflict tremendous damage on israeli city of course they would suffer tremendous retaliate or consequences and so i'm quite sure they don't want that to be the preferred scenario but if things get out of and as they sometimes have is. there is this danger and i think trumps recklessness is being challenged in washington by the more experienced security bureaucracy that wants a calm transition and not a fiery transition but i do understand your correctly that because he is written before that the biden destruction is very unlikely to change course on any of the

trumps. have pro israel policies i mean it's unlikely that you know the embassy back it's unlikely to you be practically against the incorporation of all and hides it may boysen criticism all festival and the expansion but it will change nothing on the ground what would be fair to say that under by then the united states is likely to remain a bouncer for israel with a slightly more cultured face. exactly i think that's a good summary of what it's reasonable to expect when the you know the middle east has been a. ascending where things happen that you don't anticipate started with the arab spring of 201011 i wouldn't be surprised if some disruptive events occur that will alter how

this prospect of continuity plays out and if i may task you very quickly because we're running out of time but is there any real conscientious that position to that in the well because i know that the latest ad and u.n. general assembly yet again passed a resolution affirming the palestinians right to self-determination but it strikes me as one of those all the symbolism is that it makes. do with this didn't just us feel a little bit better about themselves rather than delivers anything practical to you . today actual victim i think you shouldn't forget the global solidarity movement that has been growing in relation to the palestinian struggle and the israelis themselves are very worried about the so-called b.d.s.

campaign boycott divestment and sanctions campaign that has gained a lot of momentum and has led israel to take very strong steps to try to criminalize participation in b.d.s. and do all kinds of things they're worried about losing legitimacy and if you look back at history including the n.t. who o'neill wars the winning side in the end was not the militarily superior. it was the side that can. the morrow and politico just i just hope you're right but it's been there way too long for the palestinians i think i'm bearing along anyway professor we have to leave it there thank you very much for being with us good to be with you and. i think what you hope to see her again next week on the worlds apart.

joe biden they indeed be inaugurated in january of next year whatever well you have a legitimate mandate will the next campaign start when the next president takes office and the new liberal order is headed back to. be near egypt. look. at those i say. look they're on the cheap. and then going through all the countries let's idea is their right to go to his

country he said if you give them everything to do to pass. this country. this is what we don't understand how we are in such a contact. us until 2 months after the same time. noticing. similar. good why do you need one. if. not they got. on the computer with the plane. would come back to the police story you have to see. the. if you move. the.

anger in france runs into a 2nd weekend over a bill that could stop the public from filming the police. insists one. of. the world's most available vaccine russia says it will cost less than $20.00. to un members. and degrading rights group which uses the e.u. of having its own guantanamo hundreds of its citizens held as terrorist suspects in camps in syria.