i wouldn't be surprised if we were passed that when we put it that way and i don't think that it's going to change unless the people come forward it's not a regulatory body it's not the senate and in some cases not even project veritas because the content is coming from whistleblowers from brave people so as long as more brave people come forward we'll get more answers to these questions that you're asking but only if people have a conscience and step up and we will hear your story out of project veritas just finally do you fear. from mainstream media because of what you put on no no we don't fear any backlash that's why we're working here we're here because we're beyond that point we believe that the american people deserve to know the truth we're truth seekers we're not political we're not looking for gain we don't do this for money we don't do this for fun we don't do this for sport this is for truth so it doesn't matter the backlash we're going to continue we're going to keep going until the full truth is exposed and and then some it's a never ending fight nic thanks for your time and your thoughts very interesting

develop in the last few days as regards and we do hope to see what else you have on earth soon as well nick davis managing editor of the newsroom project or at times thank you stay tuned. well if you'd like to have your say and that's or indeed any of us our stories why not drop us a comment on our social media channels where across the usual just click wherever you do see about r.t.e. local life or know.

we need in your world what industry doesn't want any regulation they just want to put products on the market. we need a regulation so we don't do. crazy things because maybe sometimes we would do crazy

things i don't know but except that we have regulation we want to regulation i was in this. if you don't behave then yes penalties that's fine. obviously the industry makes money of course it does if the industry did not make money how many people would be out of work. or sort of the last concern the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedent corporate interests corporate profits have been getting priority with the regulator so that needs to change and one of the big ways to do that is just to require transparency. as we lost transparency we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed to use if we don't keer there's intellect or property rights but if so we publish

everything's it would just be breaking the law. they prefer intellectual property. to the health of children. if you make money out of selling pesticides how much incentive. does these companies do these companies have to get us off pesticides will they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or will they make sure that we use always more pests. the industry prefers to spend millions of euros in the lobbying to deliver regulations instead of researching substitutes and how to make these things differently.

quite frankly i've been in the industry for a long time i have never seen a brown envelope if that's what you're leading to absolutely never. you know the industry it's in the industry's interests to bring food to. tables that is safe at a high quality. that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good nutritious food every day at a meeting of my. grocery goals risk you are referring to are 2 accidents industrial incidents while serious all people who are injured or people die every time this happens for industry in general it's a defeat. however those incidents also lowers to improve to do it better next time and to progress and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus going from. what is progress

in this progress moving forward whatever and using any technology we are capable of inventing but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful and that it's good for for the people we put some intelligence on what the technology and what progress is i don't think that progress is ruining the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that that can that can create disease and cancer. to someone who's 20 years old that's the worst.

if we were today we. would not have airplanes would not exist because airplanes sometimes they fall down so there is a risk we would not have automobiles because every year in europe $5060000.00 people die with automobiles a. precautionary principle i think is a disaster. and yet we are now more and more advocating. and your place is to overcoach or we are farming in europe substances north

americans or so as americans. you know us needs because we don't use those we don't use technology. i mean it doesn't make sense we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and in europe we have this romantic idea from this that there's this people. they would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something they don't need they're just business people and we should let them do their business.

and we can't expect them to act in any other way except as business. the only way that would say is if there is a root and branch. revolution in the way that we do business and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat food like a global commodity. we have a very big problem. and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder and the highest bidder may not be someone that wants to feed the highest bidder maybe someone wants to feed your car this is entirely the wrong way to look at food food should be sued .

i will be. making money. making profits it's about because. it's an. informative. big uniform lens with one called action. corporate control. and it's mostly also economically it's about international markets imported sport it's all about companies controlling in faraway places lands to export commodities is not about food production it's not about feeding people.

industrial agriculture is a form of mining. and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and the most of the uses go into animal food and textiles fiber fuel whatever you have the rest of it can't be sold more expensive to some other use will go into processed in food processing. so is food and necessity always food a business transaction food is both yes so we all need to eat that's for sure but in europe we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a famine in europe hundreds of years so we have no idea what it means to have the

choice between one tomato and no tomato we have to tend to want doesn't really matter to us if we have a chimo to want or not you and i think we are. unaware of the impact our decisions here have on countries where there is no food no with a. big confusion between. general interest in the interest of industry because the priority is jobs and growth and it's taking growth and jobs already putting people's lives. if the so food industry is successful it will create more jobs it will create more value added it will create more protests so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry but this should be a communal fight. modern

i recall sure relies on sight their eyes relies on precision farming which is a connection between such a digital machinery and all of the tools which are available for farmers unfortunately i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production in agriculture because of overly. conservative restrictive regulation and these trade off between progress and risk is not what i understood and. i think europe is the best potential to be easy leading i would go to all region in

the world we should be the ones with the best jobs and the most invested seeds in hybrid ation genetic space the size chemicals machinery we should be because we have every scene we need to succeed and my fear is that we are not using this potential to its maximum. label off on this to make competitive the best of the trades relations with all these countries the federalists i mean otherwise we stake like a fortress and we don't let anything in that doesn't let something out and you know this is not. the world is not like that everything is connected not everything is global so what we want to see is something very different is the model built on diversity on biological diversity that is you know different crops planted together. like freeze dried water just add water. and then. it's art just art here's

$100000.00 all you need is the art to go with it but you got the joke and just you don't have the artist at heart it's freeze dried are. bought it's freeze dried. it's freeze dried money it's it's sold as if it's something in it. what it is of the says it is. do we get as humanity. to change and reconfigure to get. how we operate on this planet. we will make ourselves obsolete. that's a defining moment and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong they have to be then assistant to golds while many people if i say that would say

yes yes of course makes sense but. not understood that this is not where we are now we are now defining future visions through technology. but i want to turn it around i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be in how we want to design our environment our now food system that operates within the planetary boundary is. in defining where it respects the rules of the planet. and not. we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms.

continuous improvement of existing things because i have the. let's call it the old continent. slowing down a little bit in making progress. if decisions are taking on emotion one day left the other day right this is not the basis of a sustainable farming what progress do we want are we willing to trade. benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world. which is more mortal. so we are pecans to. other parts of the world which do not always play with the same rules. while living in a very strange place today because we have on the one hand challenges of obesity

and overweight and on the other hand we have challenges of under-nutrition now nutrition and starvation. there are geopolitical issues and parts of the world where there is less food and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world either through age or through producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land because we can't use more land we can't use more resources. nor can sing it with a woman don't. disappear the camaro therefore most of those are really. going to

come in to. the move to the. mill is that. the. problem over $1000000000.00 in medical. what do you imagine the number of chronic diseases that are in every family today. it is not due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found. and in all breast cancer friends that's not true so it is due to environment and to croly poisons that outnumber men walk down a chronic always means designed to be toxic initially and spread all over the place. first it's.

going to you're going to do it because his mum i don't know what i'm critical dissident do you try new kid in young enough mama. know what i said in my life. he is credited to beatrice hind you communing with the mama in-flow model you made just as he could. talk among. to understand even. in this if he did best to get a feeling so to doxy of course so look. better not make the most ill or are. you really lame boost your father must stay with.

the lesson that. is listed in the got out of the navy. is not the biggest however. this was stuff just kept within ear there's a bit in them in your. local call me a very speedy baby. wish that bottle of beer is a council more people that are so stuff yes. but a lot of theo and by that. 39 s. . a number of suspect shops. we're lucky. because on the no this thing you know i can put on you leave me demasi moto so you feel to you it will give us a bit under what can only a little be out you know where we are no. no stupidity not get your new little

deceived man i can see though listening to you thomas and instead of into you knew by see it today i would look out their mouth into a little bit in a moment although. creaming. blasting mouth to take. it out of i me into an email to a comedian i see a scene for a while still does he go look at the net but only because he will see the bottle see into getting in the. morning and must be able to do what he had to let me look at and salalah he did the motherly 2 weeks and they must feel today going to get

along. and be fitted into maida. document to know if something. isn't. obvious but can only cut it close for eochaid it s. a limited coverage. he got to see cooking do you want to pursue annoyed got to the media no one here but go to the op or toddle as short as she looked. my daughter she's a little plastic oh my little she though the law only knows how to end their own petard but what i will call not a lawsuit out there on the real model see if you know don't demand media.

so all these chemical compounds are out made out of petroleum petroleum is of course he'll fuel very sticky and it is by our cumulated because it's the 4th side compound which last long. this is why it gives the city the livers and he could means and cancer because it gives of the disease that are the destruction of communication the new cancer of the 1st reason you have cancer is because you're south cannot communicate to each other any more with than the rest of the body. and common all diseases it's the same problem never was diseases like blocking someone's eye in or or even depression it's the same problem also immune disease or

all other malformations in the baby's it's all feels the same problems a cell cannot communicate but this happens on the long term so that when several years several dozens of yours so you cannot see because you drink a glass of wine with pesticides or a piece of bread with base the side you cannot see this effect immediately many of us your born and to modern agriculture have understood that it's it's easy to scare people it's easy to. to use fear as a strong. emotional driver for a general policy and for influencing policy sometimes it's in the interests of the anti industry groups to do that of course because ek it's that network brings in money for them as well so i think we should look at this from both sides we sometimes have visits from them recently they invaded this building and they have

done so before and through when you're threatening letters and stuff but ok that's part of the game i suppose we do not we you know when we fight against when we fight against when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons i sometimes have the feeling that. we have both an arrows and they have atom bombs as soon as there's an engineer or a group of people who are against something maybe maybe the bandits maybe they stop using it in place of importing so in terms of development and trust i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth we know what's in our products for example that if i if i make a product i mean you can go home this evening and make a buy area in your kitchen and you know what's in there and you write it down that is the truth sorry but you know we are an industry we know what we put in our products we can tell you this is the truth this is what we put record in our products when i say we have to truth i'm talking about our not talking about

philosophically the truth i'm talking about what we do we know what we do and we can talk about it. on the. compound recover you don't know demand delivery assume this if it's your last something deep is the seed these are. really hard. if you've read the book listen to the need to forum and those here back to normal. listeners also if you demo on the this evaluate show me and elisa only do cd's and history at. anu for example. based on the hard way downtown in glasgow on out with only van and out with only

rendition of the under the bow see mustn't talk if you reduce you may like opposition group or the. new or not who don't recall doing some on the immunity set cache the question plate of the last unique there is a bit hard to take particularly. in this city before such a mess and the park could you rephrase that say to follow the. grief was a. compositional satirically decided kelly nepali toxic you don't they collaborated on a new phone on a very console look before that in social as he killed one toxic you on the way. done that there are no before that on the make out is off you need listen and he's the sound is an emo. local now i'm puerto rico feed us here it is official a south

a coffee down c.l. paul a community a chance if he. also met 2 more solo. so . they say. this is a central plank support the government's kind of problem right now. talking to. people. like human beings except when it conflicts with the.

point. to protect its own existence. washington will pay the price for harming relations between the $2.00 countries. the expulsion of russian personnel more sanctions. the. french parliament.